Skip to content

Chemistry · Ch 5 — Electrochemistry

Electrochemical series (Electromotive series)

5.12

Electrochemical series (Electromotive series)

The standard potentials of a number of electrodes have been determined using the standard hydrogen electrode. These electrodes, with their half reactions, are arranged according to their decreasing standard potentials, as shown in Table 5.1. This arrangement is called the electrochemical series.

Key points of electrochemical series

i. The half reactions are written as reductions. The oxidizing agents and electrons appear on the left side of the half reactions, while the reducing agents are shown on the right side of the half reactions.

ii. Below the hydrogen electrode the negative standard potential increases, and above the hydrogen electrode the positive standard potential increases.

iii. E0E^0 values apply to the reduction half reactions that occur in the forward direction as written.

iv. A higher (more positive) E0E^0 value for a half reaction indicates its greater tendency to occur in the forward direction, and in turn a greater tendency for the substance to reduce. Conversely, a low (more negative) E0E^0 value of a half reaction corresponds to its greater tendency to occur in the reverse direction, or for the substance to oxidise. The half reactions are listed in order of their decreasing tendency in the forward direction.

Applications of electrochemical series

i. Relative strength of oxidising agents : The species on the left side of the half reactions are oxidizing agents. The E0E^0 value is a measure of the tendency of the species to accept electrons and get reduced — in other words, the E0E^0 value measures the strength of a substance as an oxidising agent. The larger the E0E^0 value, the greater is the oxidising strength. The species in the top left side of the half reactions are strong oxidising agents; as we move down the table, the E0E^0 value and the strength of the oxidising agents decrease from top to bottom.

Remember

Remember...

The left side of a half reaction has cations of metals or non-metallic molecules (oxidants). There are free metals or anions of non-metals on the right side (reductants).

ii. Relative strength of reducing agents : The species on the right side of the half reactions are reducing agents. The half reactions at the bottom of the table, with large negative E0E^0 values, have little or no tendency to occur in the forward direction as written; they tend to favour the reverse direction. It follows that the species appearing at the bottom right side of the half reactions, associated with large negative E0E^0 values, are effective electron donors — they serve as strong reducing agents. The strength of the reducing agents increases from top to bottom as the E0E^0 values decrease.

iii. Spontaneity of redox reactions : A redox reaction in a galvanic cell is spontaneous only if the species with the higher E0E^0 value is reduced (accepts electrons) and that with the lower E0E^0 value is oxidised (donates electrons). The standard cell potential must be positive for a cell reaction to be spontaneous under standard conditions. A noteworthy application of the electromotive series is predicting the spontaneity of redox reactions from the knowledge of standard potentials.

Suppose we ask a question : at standard conditions, would Ag+\mathrm{Ag^+} ions oxidise metallic magnesium ? To answer this question, first we write the oxidation of Mg by Ag+\mathrm{Ag^+}:

Mg (s)⟶Mg2+ (aq)+2 e−(oxidation)\mathrm{Mg\,(s) \longrightarrow Mg^{2+}\,(aq) + 2\,e^-} \quad \text{(oxidation)}

2Ag+ (aq)+2 e−⟶2Ag (s)(reduction)\mathrm{2Ag^{+}\,(aq) + 2\,e^- \longrightarrow 2Ag\,(s)} \quad \text{(reduction)}

Mg (s)+2Ag+ (aq)⟶Mg2+ (aq)+2Ag (s)(overall reaction)\mathrm{Mg\,(s) + 2Ag^{+}\,(aq) \longrightarrow Mg^{2+}\,(aq) + 2Ag\,(s)} \quad \text{(overall reaction)}

Note

The book prints the silver ion in the reduction and overall lines as "2Ag²⊕" — silver is monovalent, and the book's own working below uses the Ag+ ∣ Ag\mathrm{Ag^{+}\,\vert\,Ag} couple; the corrected 2Ag+\mathrm{2Ag^{+}} is shown above.

From Table 5.1 of the electrochemical series we have EMg0=−2.37E^0_{Mg} = -2.37 V and EAg0=0.8E^0_{Ag} = 0.8 V. For the cell having Mg as anode and Ag as cathode,

ECell0=EAg0−EMg0=0.8 V−(−2.37 V)=3.17 VE^0_{Cell} = E^0_{Ag} - E^0_{Mg} = 0.8\,\mathrm{V} - (-2.37\,\mathrm{V}) = 3.17\ \mathrm{V}

The EMF being positive, the cell reaction is spontaneous: Ag+\mathrm{Ag^+} ions oxidise metallic Mg.

General rules

i. An oxidizing agent can oxidize any reducing agent that appears below it, and cannot oxidize the reducing agent appearing above it in the electrochemical series.

ii. A reducing agent can reduce the oxidising agent located above it in the electrochemical series.

Note

Do you know?

The fuel cells for power electric vehicles incorporate the proton conducting plastic membrane. These are proton exchange membranes (PEM) fuel cells.

Table 5.1 : The standard aqueous electrode potentials at 298 K (Electrochemical series)

In the printed table, the oxidising agents on the left grow stronger from bottom to top (strongest at the F2\mathrm{F_2} row) and the reducing agents on the right grow stronger from top to bottom (strongest at the Li row).

ElectrodeHalf reactionE0E^0 V
F− ∣ F2 ∣ Pt\mathrm{F^-\,\vert\,F_2\,\vert\,Pt}F2+2 e−⟶F−\mathrm{F_2 + 2\,e^- \longrightarrow F^-}+2.870
Au+ ∣ Au\mathrm{Au^+\,\vert\,Au}Au++e−⟶Au\mathrm{Au^+ + e^- \longrightarrow Au}+1.680
Ce4+, Ce3+ ∣ Pt\mathrm{Ce^{4+},\,Ce^{3+}\,\vert\,Pt}Ce4++e−⟶Ce3+\mathrm{Ce^{4+} + e^- \longrightarrow Ce^{3+}}+1.610
Au3+ ∣ Au\mathrm{Au^{3+}\,\vert\,Au}Au3++3e−⟶Au\mathrm{Au^{3+} + 3e^- \longrightarrow Au}+1.500
Cl− ∣ Cl2 ∣ Pt\mathrm{Cl^-\,\vert\,Cl_2\,\vert\,Pt}Cl2+2e−⟶2Cl−\mathrm{Cl_2 + 2e^- \longrightarrow 2Cl^-}+1.360
Pt2+ ∣ Pt\mathrm{Pt^{2+}\,\vert\,Pt}Pt2++2e−⟶Pt\mathrm{Pt^{2+} + 2e^- \longrightarrow Pt}+1.200
Br− ∣ Br2 ∣ Pt\mathrm{Br^-\,\vert\,Br_2\,\vert\,Pt}Br2+2e−⟶2Br−\mathrm{Br_2 + 2e^- \longrightarrow 2Br^-}+1.080
Hg2+ ∣ Hg\mathrm{Hg^{2+}\,\vert\,Hg}Hg2++2e−⟶Hg\mathrm{Hg^{2+} + 2e^- \longrightarrow Hg}+0.854
Ag+ ∣ Ag\mathrm{Ag^+\,\vert\,Ag}Ag++e−⟶Ag\mathrm{Ag^+ + e^- \longrightarrow Ag}+0.799
Hg22+ ∣ Hg\mathrm{Hg_2^{2+}\,\vert\,Hg}Hg22++2e−⟶2Hg\mathrm{Hg_2^{2+} + 2e^- \longrightarrow 2Hg}+0.79
Fe3+,Fe2+ ∣ Pt\mathrm{Fe^{3+},Fe^{2+}\,\vert\,Pt}Fe3++e−⟶Fe2+\mathrm{Fe^{3+} + e^- \longrightarrow Fe^{2+}}+0.771
I− ∣ I2(s) ∣ Pt\mathrm{I^-\,\vert\,I_2(s)\,\vert\,Pt}I2+2e−⟶2I−\mathrm{I_2 + 2e^- \longrightarrow 2I^-}+0.535
Cu2+ ∣ Cu\mathrm{Cu^{2+}\,\vert\,Cu}Cu2++2e−⟶Cu\mathrm{Cu^{2+} + 2e^- \longrightarrow Cu}+0.337
Ag ∣ AgCl(s) ∣ Cl−\mathrm{Ag\,\vert\,AgCl(s)\,\vert\,Cl^-}AgCl (s)+e−⟶Ag+Cl−\mathrm{AgCl\,(s) + e^- \longrightarrow Ag + Cl^-}+0.222
Cu2+,Cu+ ∣ Pt\mathrm{Cu^{2+},Cu^+\,\vert\,Pt}Cu2++e−⟶Cu+\mathrm{Cu^{2+} + e^- \longrightarrow Cu^+}+0.153
Sn4+, Sn2+ ∣ Pt\mathrm{Sn^{4+},\,Sn^{2+}\,\vert\,Pt}Sn4++2e−⟶Sn2+\mathrm{Sn^{4+} + 2e^- \longrightarrow Sn^{2+}}+0.15
H+ ∣ H2 ∣ Pt\mathrm{H^+\,\vert\,H_2\,\vert\,Pt}2H++2e−⟶H2\mathrm{2H^+ + 2e^- \longrightarrow H_2}0.00
Pb2+ ∣ Pb\mathrm{Pb^{2+}\,\vert\,Pb}Pb2++2e−⟶Pb\mathrm{Pb^{2+} + 2e^- \longrightarrow Pb}-0.126