The chain rule differentiates composite functions: the derivative of sin(x2) is cos(x2)⋅2x — differentiate the outer function, then multiply by the derivative of the inside. Integration asks the reverse: given cos(x2)⋅2x, find the original function. That's what u substitution does — it reverses the chain rule.
The Core Intuition
When an integral looks like "a function times the derivative of its inside," substitute the inside with u and the derivative of the inside with du. Consider:
∫2xcos(x2)dx
Here 2x is the derivative of x2, and x2 is the inside of cos(x2). Let u=x2, so du=2xdx:
∫cos(u)du=sin(u)+C=sin(x2)+C
Check: the derivative of sin(x2) is cos(x2)⋅2x.
The Precise Statement
∫f(g(x))⋅g′(x)dx=∫f(u)duwhere u=g(x),du=g′(x)dx
Valid provided g is differentiable and the resulting integral in u is simpler.
The Step-by-Step Method
Identify a function g(x) whose derivative g′(x) also appears (possibly up to a constant factor).
Setu=g(x), compute du=g′(x)dx.
Rewrite the entire integral in u and du — every x and dx must be replaced.
Integrate with respect to u.
Substitute backu=g(x).
Watch out
You cannot mix variables. If any x remains after substitution, you chose the wrong u (or must solve for x in terms of u — rare).
A Second Example (with a constant factor)
Evaluate ∫xx2+1dx. Let u=x2+1, so xdx=21du:
∫u⋅21du=21⋅32u3/2+C=31(x2+1)3/2+C
When Does It Work?
When the integrand is something times the derivative of something inside. Common patterns:
Split 1−x4x2=21(1−x21−1+x21) and integrate each part: the result is 41log1−x1+x−21tan−1x+C.
Setting up. The suggested move x2=t replaces x2 by t but leaves an x in dx=2xdt, so it does not fully rationalise the integral. The clean route uses the same factorisation it points to — 1−x4=(1−x2)(1+x2) — to split the fraction directly.
1. Split the integrand
Write the numerator as a difference of the two factors of the denominator:
Why it's wrong: leaving it whole hides the split into 1−x21 and 1+x21. Correct approach: factor as (1−x2)(1+x2) first.
Mistake 2: Wrong sign in the split.
Why it's wrong: (1−x2)(1+x2)x2=21(1−x21−1+x21); a sign slip swaps the log and arctan contributions. Correct approach: verify the split by recombining over a common denominator. …