Skip to content
Exercises · 6.12

Q.(a) A child stands at the centre of a turntable with his two arms outstretched. The turntable is set rotating with an angular speed of 40 rev/min. How much is the angular speed of the child if he folds his hands back and thereby reduces his moment of inertia to 2/52/5 times the initial value? Assume that the turntable rotates without friction.

(b) Show that the child's new kinetic energy of rotation is more than the initial kinetic energy of rotation. How do you account for this increase in kinetic energy?
Sikkim CbseNCERTSubjective· 3mImportance★★★★★est
42% · 24/57 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Using conservation of angular momentum (Iω=constantI\omega = \text{constant}) because no external torque acts on the system, the new angular speed becomes 100100 rev/min. The kinetic energy increases because the child does internal muscular work while folding his arms.


Why conservation of angular momentum works here

The child and turntable together form a system that rotates without friction. When the child folds his arms, no external torque acts on the system — the only forces are internal (the child's muscles). For any system with zero net external torque, angular momentum is conserved:

L=Iω=constantL = I\omega = \text{constant}

This is the rotational analogue of conservation of linear momentum. The moment of inertia II changes because the child redistributes mass closer to the axis; angular speed ω\omega must adjust to keep LL unchanged.


(a) Finding the new angular speed

1. Let the initial moment of inertia be I1I_1 and the initial angular speed be ω1=40\omega_1 = 40 rev/min.

2. When the child folds his arms, the moment of inertia becomes:

I2=25I1I_2 = \frac{2}{5} I_1

3. Conservation of angular momentum gives:

I1ω1=I2ω2I_1 \omega_1 = I_2 \omega_2

Substitute I2I_2:

I1×40=25I1×ω2I_1 \times 40 = \frac{2}{5} I_1 \times \omega_2

4. Cancel I1I_1 (non-zero) and solve:

40=25ω2⇒ω2=40×52=100 rev/min40 = \frac{2}{5} \omega_2 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \omega_2 = 40 \times \frac{5}{2} = 100 \text{ rev/min}

Watch out

A common mistake is to forget that ω\omega must be in consistent units. Here both speeds are in rev/min, so the ratio is valid. If you convert to rad/s, the ratio remains the same — the factor 52\frac{5}{2} is dimensionless.

Tip

Notice that reducing II to 25\frac{2}{5} multiplies ω\omega by 52\frac{5}{2}. This inverse proportionality is the hallmark of angular momentum conservation: smaller II means faster spin.


(b) Comparing kinetic energies

1. Rotational kinetic energy is:

K=12Iω2K = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2

Initial kinetic energy:

K1=12I1ω12K_1 = \frac{1}{2} I_1 \omega_1^2

Final kinetic energy:

K2=12I2ω22=12(25I1)(100)2K_2 = \frac{1}{2} I_2 \omega_2^2 = \frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{2}{5} I_1\right) (100)^2

2. Express K2K_2 in terms of K1K_1:

K2=12⋅25I1⋅1002=12I1⋅25⋅10000K_2 = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{2}{5} I_1 \cdot 100^2 = \frac{1}{2} I_1 \cdot \frac{2}{5} \cdot 10000

But K1=12I1⋅402=12I1⋅1600K_1 = \frac{1}{2} I_1 \cdot 40^2 = \frac{1}{2} I_1 \cdot 1600. So:

K2K1=25⋅100001600=40001600=2.5\frac{K_2}{K_1} = \frac{\frac{2}{5} \cdot 10000}{1600} = \frac{4000}{1600} = 2.5

Thus K2=2.5 K1K_2 = 2.5\, K_1 — the kinetic energy increases by a factor of 2.52.5. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.