Q.Which one of the following selection method takes longer time in bringing about desired variation ?
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Natural selection is the slowest of the listed selection methods because it is a gradual, undirected evolutionary process.
In plant breeding, methods such as mass selection (bulk selection of superior-looking individuals from a mixed population), pure line selection (isolating and propagating a single genetically uniform line from a self-pollinated population), and clonal selection (selecting and vegetatively propagating superior individual clones) are all consciously directed by the breeder toward a specific desired trait, allowing measurable improvement within just a few generations. Natural selection, in contrast, is not guided by any human intent -- it depends purely on the environment favouring the survival and reproduction of individuals that happen to possess advantageous variations, a process that unfolds over very long evolutionary timescales, often spanning …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.