Q.If w(x,y,z)=x2+y2+z2, x=et, y=etsint and z=etcost, find dtdw.
Concept understanding — Total Differential and Chain Rule for Partial Derivatives
When the two variables x,y of a function W(x,y) are themselves both functions of a single parameter t, the composite W(x(t),y(t)) depends ultimately only on t, and its ordinary derivative dtdW can be found without first eliminating x,y in favour of t.
Theorem 8.2 (Function of Function / Chain Rule, one parameter). If W(x,y) has partial derivatives ∂x∂W,∂y∂W, and x=x(t),y=y(t) are both differentiable, then W is a differentiable function of t and
dtdW=∂x∂Wdtdx+∂y∂Wdtdy.
The tree diagram is the standard memory aid: W branches to x and y (via ∂W/∂x, ∂W/∂y), and each of x,y branches down to t (via dx/dt, dy/dt); multiply along each branch and add over the two paths.
Theorem 8.3 (Chain Rule, two parameters). If W(x,y) has partial derivatives, and x=x(s,t),y=y(s,t) both have partial derivatives with respect to s and t, then
∂s∂W=∂x∂W∂s∂x+∂y∂W∂s∂y,∂t∂W=∂x∂W∂t∂x+∂y∂W∂t∂y.
This is the tool that converts a function between coordinate systems — e.g. Cartesian (x,y) to polar (r,θ) via x=rcosθ,y=rsinθ — without re-deriving from scratch, and it generalizes to any number of intermediate and parameter variables (three-variable W(x,y,z) with x,y,z each functions of s,t, and so on).
Two equally valid strategies for a chain-rule problem: (1) compute ∂x∂W,∂y∂W (and ∂W/∂z if present) symbolically, multiply by the corresponding dx/dt,dy/dt (or ∂x/∂s etc.), add, and only THEN substitute the given formulas for x,y in terms of t (or s,t); or (2) substitute x(t),y(t) into W FIRST to get a genuine one-variable function of t, then differentiate directly. Both must agree (this is exactly what Example 8.18 verifies) — computing both ways is a strong self-check, and one route is often algebraically much shorter than the other (e.g. when W=x2+y2+z2 and x2+y2+z2 simplifies dramatically after substitution, as with x=et,y=etsint,z=etcost collapsing to 2e2t).
When one of the intermediate variables (say x) depends on only ONE of the two parameters (e.g. x=x(t) alone, not on s), its partial derivative with respect to the OTHER parameter is 0 — that branch of the tree diagram simply drops out of the corresponding sum (∂x/∂s=0), it does not become an error or an omission.
Substitute first: w=x2+y2+z2=e2t+e2tsin2t+e2tcos2t=e2t(1+sin2t+cos2t)=2e2t.
w=2e2t⇒dtdw=4e2t
It is shortest here to substitute x,y,z into w FIRST — the trigonometric terms collapse via sin2t+cos2t=1 — reducing w to a simple exponential of t before differentiating.
Step 1. Substitute x=et,y=etsint,z=etcost into w=x2+y2+z2.
w=e2t+e2tsin2t+e2tcos2t=e2t(1+sin2t+cos2t)=e2t(1+1)=2e2t,
using the Pythagorean identity sin2t+cos2t=1.
Step 2. Differentiate the simplified w=2e2t directly.
dtdw=2⋅2e2t=4e2t.
Check via the chain rule (16), for confirmation. wx=2x,wy=2y,wz=2z; dx/dt=et,dy/dt=et(sint+cost),dz/dt=et(cost−sint).
dtdw=2x⋅et+2y⋅et(sint+cost)+2z⋅et(cost−sint)=2e2t[1+sint(sint+cost)+cost(cost−sint)]
=2e2t[1+sin2t+sintcost+cos2t−sintcost]=2e2t[1+1]=4e2t,
matching Step 2 exactly.
dtdw=4e2t
Direct substitution first (Pythagorean identity collapses the expression), cross-checked with the chain rule
- Attempting the full chain-rule route without noticing sin2t+cos2t=1 simplifies everything dramatically — algebraically valid but far more work
- Losing a factor of et when differentiating z=etcost (forgetting the product rule)
- CBSE 2017Set ANNUAL1 markMCQQ.If u=f(x,y) is a differentiable function of x and y; where x and y are differentiable functions of 't' then :(a) dtdu=∂x∂f⋅∂t∂x+∂y∂f⋅∂t∂y(b) dtdu=∂x∂f⋅dtdx+∂y∂f⋅dtdy(c) dtdu=∂x∂f⋅dtdx+∂y∂f⋅dtdy(d) ∂t∂u=∂x∂f⋅∂t∂x+∂y∂f⋅∂t∂y
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since x and y are each functions of the single variable t, the total derivative chain rule uses ordinary derivatives dx/dt and dy/dt (not partial derivatives ∂x/∂t), matching option (b)/(c).
- u=f(x,y) is a differentiable function of two variables x,y, and both x=x(t), y=y(t) are differentiable functions of the single independent variable t.
- Because x and y each depend on t alone (not on t together with any other independent variable), the rate of change of x and y with respect to t is an ordinary derivative, written dtdx and dtdy — not a partial derivative ∂t∂x, which would only be meaningful if x depended on t and some other independent variable simultaneously.
- The chain rule for the total derivative of the composite u=f(x(t),y(t)) is therefore: dtdu=∂x∂f⋅dtdx+∂y∂f⋅dtdy
- Options (a) and (d) incorrectly use ∂t∂x and ∂t∂y in place of the ordinary derivatives, and (d) also incorrectly writes ∂t∂u on the left (there is no such partial derivative here, since u's only route of dependence on t is through x and y) — both are wrong.
- Options (b) and (c) both correctly state dtdu=∂x∂f⋅dtdx+∂y∂f⋅dtdy.
- Source-transcription note: in the original question paper's transcription used here, options (b) and (c) are printed as literally identical text — this is a duplication artifact in the source, not a genuine second correct-looking alternative to weigh against (a)/(d). The mathematics is unambiguous; either letter (b) or (c) represents the one correct formula.
✓Final answerdtdu=∂x∂f⋅dtdx+∂y∂f⋅dtdy (stated identically in options (b) and (c) due to a source transcription duplicate).
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.