Amongst the given set of reactants, the most appropriate for preparing 2° amine is __. (i) 2° R-Br + NH₃ (ii)

NCERT Exemplar · Q9

Q. Amongst the given set of reactants, the most appropriate for preparing 2° amine is ____.

(i) 2°

R{-}Br + NH_3

(ii) 2°

R{-}Br + NaCN

followed by

H_2

/Pt

(iii) 1°

R{-}NH_2 + RCHO

followed by

H_2

/Pt

(iv) 1°

R{-}Br

(2 mol) + potassium phthalimide followed by

H_3O^+

/heat

Telangana TsbieMCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★

34% · 37/108 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions

Nucleophilic Addition – From Intuition to Precision

Imagine you have a molecule with a carbon–oxygen double bond — a carbonyl group ( $\ce{C=O}$ ). That oxygen is greedy for electrons; it pulls them away from carbon, leaving the carbon slightly positive ( $\delta^+$ ) and the oxygen slightly negative ( $\delta^-$ ). Now, if you bring a species that is rich in electrons (a nucleophile, meaning "nucleus-loving"), it will naturally be attracted to that electron-deficient carbon. The nucleophile attacks the carbon, the $\pi$ bond breaks, and the oxygen picks up a proton (or some other electrophile) to become stable. That, in a nutshell, is nucleophilic addition.

Note

The key idea: a nucleophile adds across a polar multiple bond (usually $\ce{C=O}$ or $\ce{C≡N}$ ), breaking the $\pi$ bond and forming two new sigma bonds.

The Precise Statement

Nucleophilic addition is a reaction in which a nucleophile (an electron-rich species) forms a sigma bond with an electrophilic carbon atom of a polar multiple bond (typically a carbonyl group, $\ce{C=O}$ , or a nitrile, $\ce{C≡N}$ ), while the $\pi$ bond breaks. The resulting intermediate then captures a proton (or another electrophile) to give a neutral product.

In general form:

\ce{R2C=O + Nu^- ->[H^+] R2C(OH)Nu}

The nucleophile ( $\ce{Nu^-}$ ) attacks the carbonyl carbon; the oxygen becomes negatively charged; then a proton ( $\ce{H^+}$ ) from the medium attaches to the oxygen, yielding an alcohol.

Why It Happens – The Driving Force

The carbonyl carbon is electrophilic because:

Oxygen is more electronegative than carbon, so the $\ce{C=O}$ bond is polarised: $\ce{C^{\delta+}=O^{\delta-}}$ .
The $\pi$ bond is weaker than a $\sigma$ bond, so it can break relatively easily.

A nucleophile (like $\ce{OH^-}$ , $\ce{CN^-}$ , or $\ce{NH3}$ ) has a lone pair or a negative charge. It seeks positive centres. The attack forms a new $\sigma$ bond, and the $\pi$ electrons move entirely to oxygen, creating an alkoxide ion ( $\ce{R2C-O^-}$ ). This intermediate is then quenched by a proton.

Watch out

A common mistake: thinking the nucleophile attacks the oxygen. No — oxygen is already electron-rich; the nucleophile goes to the carbon because it is electron-deficient.

A Concrete Example – Addition of HCN to a Ketone

Take acetone ( $\ce{CH3COCH3}$ ) and hydrogen cyanide ( $\ce{HCN}$ ). In the presence of a base, $\ce{CN^-}$ (the nucleophile) attacks the carbonyl carbon:

\ce{CH3COCH3 + CN^- -> CH3C(O^-)(CN)CH3}

The alkoxide intermediate then picks up a proton from $\ce{HCN}$ (or from water) to give a cyanohydrin:

\ce{CH3C(O^-)(CN)CH3 + H^+ -> CH3C(OH)(CN)CH3}

The product is acetone cyanohydrin. Notice: two new sigma bonds formed ( $\ce{C-CN}$ and $\ce{O-H}$ ), and the $\pi$ bond is gone.

What Makes a Good Nucleophile?

Strong nucleophiles are usually negatively charged or have lone pairs:

$\ce{OH^-}$ , $\ce{CN^-}$ , $\ce{NH2^-}$ , $\ce{CH3O^-}$ , $\ce{H^-}$ (from hydride reagents like $\ce{NaBH4}$ or $\ce{LiAlH4}$ )
Neutral but polarisable: $\ce{NH3}$ , $\ce{H2O}$ (weaker, but can add under acidic conditions) …

Why this formula?

Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions: Why the Key Formulas Hold

Nucleophilic substitution reactions are a cornerstone of organic chemistry. Instead of just memorizing the rate laws, let's understand why they arise from the molecular events.

1. The Two Main Mechanisms: A Tale of Timing

The key formulas (rate laws) for nucleophilic substitution come directly from how many molecules are involved in the rate-determining step (RDS) — the slowest step that controls the overall reaction speed.

SN1: Unimolecular — The Leaving Group Goes First

The Rate Law:

\text{Rate} = k[\text{RX}]

Why?

The reaction happens in two steps:

Slow step (RDS): The C–X bond breaks spontaneously, forming a carbocation intermediate. Only the substrate ( $\text{RX}$ ) is involved.

\text{RX} \xrightarrow{\text{slow}} \text{R}^+ + \text{X}^-

Fast step: The nucleophile ( $\text{Nu}^-$ ) attacks the carbocation.

\text{R}^+ + \text{Nu}^- \xrightarrow{\text{fast}} \text{RNu}

Since the slow step depends only on the concentration of $\text{RX}$ , the rate law has no dependence on $[\text{Nu}^-]$ . The nucleophile arrives after the carbocation is formed — it cannot affect the speed of the first step.

Key insight: The rate is determined by how easily the leaving group leaves, not by how fast the nucleophile attacks.

SN2: Bimolecular — Simultaneous Attack and Departure

The Rate Law:

\text{Rate} = k[\text{RX}][\text{Nu}^-]

Why?

The reaction occurs in one concerted step:

The nucleophile attacks the carbon from one side at the same time as the leaving group departs from the opposite side.
Both $\text{RX}$ and $\text{Nu}^-$ must collide with the correct orientation and sufficient energy.

The rate depends on the frequency of productive collisions between the two molecules. This is directly proportional to the product of their concentrations:

\text{Rate} \propto [\text{RX}] \times [\text{Nu}^-]

Key insight: Both partners are involved in the transition state simultaneously — if either is missing, the reaction cannot proceed.

2. The Transition State: Why the Formulas Are Not Just "Given"

For SN2, the transition state has a pentavalent carbon (five bonds partially formed/broken). The energy barrier depends on steric hindrance — bulkier groups around carbon make it harder for the nucleophile to approach, which is why SN2 is favored at primary carbons. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The key idea is that reductive amination of an aldehyde with a primary amine selectively gives a secondary amine without over-alkylation. The correct option is (C).

To prepare a secondary amine cleanly, you need a method that avoids mixtures of primary, secondary, and tertiary products. Let's see why each option works or fails.

Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions — the core concept here — involve a nucleophile attacking an electrophilic carbon. When you use an alkyl halide with ammonia, the product (a primary amine) is itself a better nucleophile than ammonia. So it immediately attacks another alkyl halide molecule, giving a cascade of over-alkylation. That's the fundamental problem with direct alkylation.

Let's examine each option:

Option (A): 2° R–Br + NH₃

Ammonia attacks the secondary alkyl bromide to give a primary amine salt. But the free primary amine formed is more nucleophilic than ammonia, so it reacts with another molecule of R–Br to give a secondary amine, then a tertiary amine, and finally a quaternary ammonium salt. You end up with a mixture — not a clean route to a secondary amine.
Option (B): 2° R–Br + NaCN followed by H₂/Pt

This gives a nitrile (R–CN) which on reduction yields a primary amine (R–CH₂–NH₂). The carbon skeleton gains one extra carbon, and the product is a primary amine, not secondary. So this is outright wrong for preparing a secondary amine.
Option (C): 1° R–NH₂ + RCHO followed by H₂/Pt

This is reductive amination. The aldehyde and primary amine first form an imine (Schiff base) by condensation. Catalytic hydrogenation then reduces the C=N bond to a C–N single bond, giving a secondary amine.

The beauty: no free alkyl halide is present to cause over-alkylation. The imine intermediate is less nucleophilic than the starting amine, so further reaction is suppressed. This is the most controlled, high-yield method.
Option (D): 1° R–Br (2 mol) + potassium phthalimide followed by H₃O⁺/heat …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Here are the common mistakes students make on this question, along with how to avoid each.

Mistake 1: Confusing the product of the Hoffmann Ammonolysis (Option A)

The Mistake: Students see $2^\circ R{-}Br + NH_3$ and think it directly gives a pure $2^\circ$ amine. They forget that $NH_3$ is a nucleophile and the product ( $1^\circ$ amine) is also a nucleophile.
Why it's wrong: The reaction doesn't stop. The $1^\circ$ amine product reacts with more alkyl halide to give a $2^\circ$ amine, then a $3^\circ$ amine, and finally a quaternary ammonium salt. You get a mixture.
How to avoid: Remember the Hoffmann Ammonolysis rule: Alkylation of ammonia always gives a mixture of $1^\circ$ , $2^\circ$ , $3^\circ$ amines, and quaternary salt. It is never a clean method for preparing a specific $2^\circ$ amine.

Mistake 2: Misidentifying the product of the Nitrile Route (Option B)

The Mistake: Students think $2^\circ R{-}Br + NaCN$ followed by reduction gives a $2^\circ$ amine.
Why it's wrong: The $2^\circ$ alkyl halide undergoes $S_N2$ with $CN^-$ to give a nitrile ( $R{-}CN$ ). Reduction of a nitrile ( $H_2$ /Pt) gives a $1^\circ$ amine ( $R{-}CH_2{-}NH_2$ ). The carbon skeleton increases by one, but the amine is still primary.
How to avoid: Trace the carbon chain. The $CN^-$ adds a carbon, but the $NH_2$ group ends up on that new carbon. The product is always $R{-}CH_2{-}NH_2$ — a $1^\circ$ amine, regardless of the starting halide's degree.

Mistake 3: Forgetting the Reductive Amination Mechanism (Option C)

The Mistake: Students see $1^\circ R{-}NH_2 + RCHO$ and think it forms a $2^\circ$ amine directly, or they confuse it with simple imine formation.
Why it's correct (and why students miss it): The $1^\circ$ amine reacts with the aldehyde to form an imine ( $R{-}N{=}CH{-}R'$ ). The $H_2$ /Pt then reduces the $C{=}N$ bond to a $C{-}N$ bond, giving a $2^\circ$ amine ( $R{-}NH{-}CH_2{-}R'$ ). This is reductive amination — the most reliable method.
How to avoid: Memorize the two-step logic:
1. Condensation: $1^\circ$ amine + aldehyde/ketone → imine.
2. Reduction: Imine + $H_2$ /catalyst → $2^\circ$ amine. This avoids over-alkylation (unlike option A).

Mistake 4: Misapplying the Gabriel Phthalimide Synthesis (Option D)

The Mistake: Students think using 2 moles of $1^\circ R{-}Br$ with potassium phthalimide gives a $2^\circ$ amine. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-FN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{C_6H_5N(CH_3)_2}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The pair is a tertiary amine and a secondary amine. Only Hinsberg's reagent, $\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2Cl}$ (option A), separates them: the secondary amine gives an alkali-insoluble sulphonamide, the tertiary amine does not react.

The concept first

Before choosing a reagent, classify the two compounds:

$\mathrm{C_6H_5N(CH_3)_2}$ ( $N,N$ -dimethylaniline): the nitrogen carries three carbon groups → tertiary amine, no N–H.

$\mathrm{(C_2H_5)_2NH}$ (diethylamine): the nitrogen carries two carbon groups and one H → secondary amine, one N–H.

So you need a test that distinguishes $2^\circ$ from $3^\circ$ — i.e. a test that keys off the presence of an N–H bond, not off basicity.

Hinsberg's test does exactly that. Benzenesulphonyl chloride acylates the nitrogen, but only if there is an N–H available:

$1^\circ$ amine → $\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2NHR}$ . The N–H left over is made acidic by the two electron-withdrawing $\mathrm{S{=}O}$ groups → the sulphonamide dissolves in KOH/NaOH.

$2^\circ$ amine → $\mathrm{C_6H_5SO_2NR_2}$ . No N–H remains, so the sulphonamide is a solid that is insoluble in alkali.

$3^\circ$ amine → no reaction (no N–H to substitute); the amine remains as an oily layer, dissolving only on adding acid.

Step-by-step

Test option (D), $\mathrm{CHCl_3}$ + alc. KOH (carbylamine). It gives the foul-smelling isocyanide only with primary amines. Both compounds here are non-primary → both give a negative test → cannot distinguish. ✗

Test option (B), anhy. $\mathrm{ZnCl_2}$ + conc. HCl (Lucas reagent). This is a test for alcohols (distinguishing $1^\circ$ / $2^\circ$ / $3^\circ$ ROH by turbidity). Amines are not alcohols. ✗ …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-08-FN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{C_7H_9N}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The alkali-insoluble benzenesulphonamide tells us Y must be a secondary amine, which fixes $\mathrm{Y}=\mathrm{C_6H_5NHCH_3}$ ; a secondary amine of this shape arises from catalytic reduction of an isocyanide, so $\mathrm{X}=\mathrm{H_2/Ni}$ . Option (D).

The concept: why alkali-solubility identifies the class of amine

When an amine reacts with a sulphonyl chloride (Hinsberg's reagent, here p-toluenesulphonyl chloride):

1° amine $\mathrm{RNH_2}$ gives $\mathrm{RNH{-}SO_2Ar}$ . The N–H left on nitrogen sits between an electron-withdrawing $\mathrm{SO_2}$ group and the ring, so it is acidic — the sulphonamide dissolves in NaOH forming a salt.

2° amine $\mathrm{R_2NH}$ gives $\mathrm{R_2N{-}SO_2Ar}$ . Nitrogen now has no hydrogen at all, nothing to ionise, so the product is insoluble in alkali.

3° amine does not react at all.

So "Z is insoluble in alkali" is a direct statement that Y is a secondary amine.

Step-by-step

Use the Hinsberg clue. Z insoluble in alkali $\Rightarrow$ Y has no N–H after sulphonylation $\Rightarrow$ Y is 2°.

Screen the options. $\mathrm{C_6H_5CH_2NH_2}$ (benzylamine) is a primary amine — its tosylamide $\mathrm{C_6H_5CH_2NH{-}SO_2C_6H_4CH_3}$ still has an acidic N–H and would dissolve in KOH. So options (A) and (C) are out. Y must be $\mathrm{C_6H_5NHCH_3}$ .

Now identify the reduction. A secondary amine bearing an $\mathrm{N{-}CH_3}$ group is the hallmark product of reducing an isocyanide (carbylamine): $\mathrm{C_6H_5{-}NC} + 4[\mathrm{H}] \xrightarrow{\ \mathrm{H_2/Ni}\ } \mathrm{C_6H_5{-}NH{-}CH_3}$ …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-AN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{NH_2OH}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
The question asks which pair of reagent (X) and product (Y) is correctly matched. The correct match is aniline ( $\mathrm{C_6H_5NH_2}$ ) with Schiff base, so option (C) is correct.

Concept & Intuition

This is a classic organic chemistry matching problem about carbonyl derivatives. Each reagent (X) reacts with a carbonyl compound (aldehyde or ketone) to give a specific nitrogen-containing derivative. The key is to recall the functional group of the product formed:

Oximes come from hydroxylamine ( $\mathrm{NH_2OH}$ ).

Hydrazones come from hydrazine ( $\mathrm{NH_2NH_2}$ ).

Semicarbazones come from semicarbazide ( $\mathrm{NH_2NHCONH_2}$ ).

Schiff bases (imines) come from primary amines ( $\mathrm{RNH_2}$ ), especially aromatic ones like aniline.

Let’s check each option step by step.

Option (A): $\mathrm{NH_2OH}$ → Hydrazone

Hydroxylamine ( $\mathrm{NH_2OH}$ ) reacts with a carbonyl to form an oxime (with a $\mathrm{C=NOH}$ group), not a hydrazone. Hydrazones come from hydrazine. So this is incorrect.

Option (B): $\mathrm{NH_2NH_2}$ → Semicarbazone

Hydrazine ( $\mathrm{NH_2NH_2}$ ) gives a hydrazone ( $\mathrm{C=NNH_2}$ ). Semicarbazones require semicarbazide ( $\mathrm{NH_2NHCONH_2}$ ). So this is incorrect.

Option (C): $\mathrm{C_6H_5NH_2}$ → Schiff base …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-AN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{CH_3{-}CO{-}NH_2} \xrightarrow[\mathrm{NaOH\ (aq)}]{\mathrm{Br_2}} \mathrm{X} \xrightarrow[\text{(ii) } \mathrm{H_2O}]{\text{(i) } \mathrm{NaNO_2 + HCl}} \mathrm{Y}$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Acetamide undergoes Hofmann bromamide degradation to methylamine (X); nitrous acid converts this primary aliphatic amine into an unstable diazonium ion that immediately loses $\ce{N2}$ and picks up water, giving methanol — option (C).

The concept first: why aliphatic diazonium salts die instantly

Diazotisation ( $\ce{NaNO2 + HCl}$ ) makes the same $\ce{-N2+}$ group from any primary amine. The difference is stability. In an aryl diazonium salt the $\ce{-N2+}$ is conjugated with the ring, so at 273–278 K it survives long enough to be used in coupling/Sandmeyer reactions. In an alkyl diazonium ion there is no such delocalisation, and $\ce{N2}$ is an outstanding leaving group — so the ion falls apart the moment it forms, giving a carbocation that the solvent (water) captures. That is why primary aliphatic amines simply effervesce and give alcohols with nitrous acid.

Step-by-step

Step 1 — Identify X. Acetamide with bromine in aqueous alkali is the textbook Hofmann bromamide degradation:

$\ce{CH3CONH2 + Br2 + 4NaOH -> CH3NH2 + Na2CO3 + 2NaBr + 2H2O}$ …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-13-AN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{CH_3CH_2CH(NH_2){-}COC_6H_5}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
A sulphonamide that is insoluble in alkali can only come from a secondary amine, so X is $\ce{CH3CH2NHCH3}$ ; benzoyl chloride then acylates its nitrogen to give $\ce{CH3CH2N(CH3)COC6H5}$ — option (D).

The concept first: why alkali-solubility fingerprints the amine class

p-Toluenesulphonyl chloride (a Hinsberg-type reagent) reacts with the amine's lone pair, replacing an $\ce{N-H}$ hydrogen with the bulky $\ce{-SO2Ar}$ group:

Primary amine $\ce{R-NH2}$ → $\ce{R-NH-SO2Ar}$ . One $\ce{N-H}$ remains. That hydrogen is acidic, because the resulting anion is stabilised by the strongly electron-withdrawing sulphonyl group. Hence the product dissolves in KOH/NaOH.

Secondary amine $\ce{R2NH}$ → $\ce{R2N-SO2Ar}$ . No $\ce{N-H}$ is left. There is no acidic proton to remove, so the product is insoluble in alkali. ✓

Tertiary amine $\ce{R3N}$ → no reaction (there is no $\ce{N-H}$ to substitute in the first place), so no product Y at all.

The stem says a product Y forms and is insoluble in alkali. Both facts together force X to be secondary.

Step-by-step

Step 1 — Classify X. Product formed ⇒ not tertiary. Product alkali-insoluble ⇒ not primary. Therefore X is a $2^\circ$ amine.

Step 2 — Benzoylation (Schotten–Baumann). Benzoyl chloride $\ce{C6H5COCl}$ acylates the amine nitrogen:
$\ce{R2NH + C6H5COCl -> R2N-CO-C6H5 + HCl}$
The amide nitrogen ends up carrying both original alkyl groups plus the benzoyl group — i.e. it is a tertiary (N,N-disubstituted) amide with no $\ce{N-H}$ .

Step 3 — Test each option against "benzoyl on a $2^\circ$ nitrogen".

(A) $\ce{CH3CH2CH(NH2)COC6H5}$ — the benzoyl is on carbon, and a free $\ce{-NH2}$ survives. Wrong on both counts. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-18-FN1 markMCQ
$\mathrm{Li_2O + NO_2}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Lithium nitrate decomposes differently from other alkali metal nitrates because of the small size and high polarising power of Li⁺; it gives $\mathrm{Li_2O}$ , $\mathrm{NO_2}$ , and $\mathrm{O_2}$ , so the correct option is (B).

Concept & Intuition

Most alkali metal nitrates (like NaNO₃, KNO₃) decompose on strong heating to give the nitrite and oxygen:

$\mathrm{2\,MNO_3 \rightarrow 2\,MNO_2 + O_2}$ .

But lithium is an exception. Because Li⁺ is very small, it has a high charge density and strongly polarises the nitrate ion. This destabilises the nitrate, causing it to break down further — lithium nitrite (LiNO₂) itself is unstable at high temperature and decomposes to lithium oxide, nitrogen dioxide, and oxygen. So the final products are not simply nitrite + O₂, but oxide + NO₂ + O₂.

Step-by-step reasoning

General trend for alkali metal nitrates

For Na, K, Rb, Cs:

$\mathrm{2\,MNO_3 \xrightarrow{\Delta} 2\,MNO_2 + O_2}$

The nitrite is stable at the decomposition temperature.

Lithium’s anomaly

Li⁺ is much smaller than other alkali ions. Its high polarising power weakens the N–O bonds in the nitrate ion, so decomposition occurs at a lower temperature and proceeds further.

First step – formation of nitrite

Initially, LiNO₃ does form LiNO₂ and O₂:

$\mathrm{2\,LiNO_3 \rightarrow 2\,LiNO_2 + O_2}$

But LiNO₂ is not stable at the temperature needed for decomposition.

Second step – further decomposition of LiNO₂

Lithium nitrite decomposes to lithium oxide, nitrogen dioxide, and oxygen:

$\mathrm{2\,LiNO_2 \rightarrow Li_2O + NO_2 + NO}$

However, NO reacts immediately with O₂ to give NO₂: …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ8 — The source of nitrogen in Gabriel synthesis of amines is __. (i) Sodiu…→Next questionQ10 — The best reagent for converting 2-phenylpropanamide into 2-phenylpropa…

Q.Amongst the given set of reactants, the most appropriate for preparing 2° amine is ____.

Concept understanding — Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions

Nucleophilic Addition – From Intuition to Precision

The Precise Statement

Why It Happens – The Driving Force

A Concrete Example – Addition of HCN to a Ketone

What Makes a Good Nucleophile?

Why this formula?

Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions: Why the Key Formulas Hold

1. The Two Main Mechanisms: A Tale of Timing

SN1: Unimolecular — The Leaving Group Goes First

SN2: Bimolecular — Simultaneous Attack and Departure

2. The Transition State: Why the Formulas Are Not Just "Given"

Concept: Preparation of Secondary Amines via Reductive Amination

Method Name: Reductive Amination

Steps:

Why other options fail:

Mistake 1: Confusing the product of the Hoffmann Ammonolysis (Option A)

Mistake 2: Misidentifying the product of the Nitrile Route (Option B)

Mistake 3: Forgetting the Reductive Amination Mechanism (Option C)

Mistake 4: Misapplying the Gabriel Phthalimide Synthesis (Option D)

The concept first

Step-by-step

The concept: why alkali-solubility identifies the class of amine

Step-by-step

The concept first: why aliphatic diazonium salts die instantly

Step-by-step

The concept first: why alkali-solubility fingerprints the amine class

Step-by-step

Q.Amongst the given set of reactants, the most appropriate for preparing 2° amine is ____.

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days