Q.Evaluate the integral using substitution ∫02x+4−x2dx
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Integration By Completing Square
Integration by Completing the Square
You can integrate x2+11 or x2−a21 on sight. But a quadratic denominator such as x2+4x+5 fits neither standard form directly. The fix is to rewrite the quadratic as a perfect square plus (or minus) a constant, turning it into a form you already know.
The move
For x2+bx+c, add and subtract (2b)2:
x2+bx+c=(x+2b)2+(c−4b2).
After substituting u=x+2b the integral collapses to ∫u2+k2du or ∫u2−k2du.
Case A — leads to inverse tangent
∫x2+4x+5dx.
Complete the square: x2+4x+5=(x+2)2+1. With u=x+2,
∫u2+1du=tan−1u+C=tan−1(x+2)+C.
∫u2+a2du=a1tan−1au+C is the workhorse when the constant left over is positive.
Case B — leads to a logarithm
∫x2−6x+5dx.
Here x2−6x+5=(x−3)2−4. With u=x−3 the denominator u2−4 factors, so use partial fractions:
∫u2−4du=41logu+2u−2+C=41logx−1x−5+C. …
Concept: completing the square, then the standard integral ∫a2−u2du.
Complete the square in the denominator:
x+4−x2=−(x2−x−4)=417−(x−21)2.
With u=x−21 (so du=dx) and a=217, use
∫a2−u2du=2a1loga−ua+u=171log17−2u17+2u.
The limits become u=−21 (at x=0) and u=23 (at x=2): …
Complete the square to reach 417−(x−21)2, apply the standard integral ∫a2−u2du=2a1loga−ua+u, and evaluate between the limits. Final value: 171log(5−175+17).
Step 1 — Complete the square
Factor out the −1 on the x2 term and complete the square:
x+4−x2=−(x2−x−4).
Now x2−x−4=(x−21)2−41−4=(x−21)2−417, so
x+4−x2=417−(x−21)2.
This is a2−u2 with
u=x−21,a2=417 ⇒ a=217,du=dx.
Step 2 — Standard integral
The CBSE standard result is
∫a2−u2du=2a1loga−ua+u+C.
Here 2a=17, and multiplying numerator and denominator of a−ua+u by 2 gives
∫417−u2du=171log17−2u17+2u+C.
Step 3 — Change the limits
As x goes from 0 to 2, u=x−21 goes from −21 to 23. On [0,2] the denominator x+4−x2 stays positive, so the integrand is continuous and the substitution is valid.
Step 4 — Evaluate
At u=23: 17−2(3/2)17+2(3/2)=17−317+3. …
Method: Complete the square, then match a standard denominator form
For ∫quadraticdx with no derivative-of-denominator in sight, complete the square to reach a2−u2 or u2+a2, then apply the matching standard integral.
Steps
Step 1: Complete the square in the denominator.
Rewrite ±x2+bx+c as ±[(x+h)2∓a2]; a negative x2 coefficient gives the form a2−u2.
Step 2: Substitute u=x+h (so du=dx) and change the limits.
Step 3: Apply the correct standard result.
For a difference of squares, …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Completing the square without handling the negative x2 coefficient.
Why it's wrong: x+4−x2=−(x2−x−4); forgetting to factor out the −1 flips the form from a2−u2 to something wrong. Correct approach: rewrite as 417−(x−21)2.
Mistake 2: Using the arctan formula for an a2−u2 denominator. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 on this concept.
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.∫3sin2x−2cos2x+sin4xdx= (A) 2713sin2x−2(6sin2x+17)+c (B) 27(6sin2x+17)3sin2x−2+c (C) 3sin2x−227(6sin2x+17)+c (D) 273sin2x−2(6sin2x+17)+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The integral simplifies by rewriting the numerator in terms of sin2x and using a substitution t=sin2x, leading to a rational function in t that integrates to 2713sin2x−2(6sin2x+17)+c, which matches option (A).
The key insight here is that the denominator 3sin2x−2 suggests a substitution u=3sin2x−2, but the numerator contains cos2x and sin4x. Notice that sin4x=2sin2xcos2x, so the whole numerator factors as cos2x(1+2sin2x). That cos2x is exactly the derivative of sin2x up to a constant factor, which makes a substitution in terms of sin2x natural. Once we express everything in t=sin2x, the integral becomes a straightforward rational function integration.
- Rewrite the numerator Use sin4x=2sin2xcos2x:
cos2x+sin4x=cos2x+2sin2xcos2x=cos2x(1+2sin2x).
The integral becomes
∫3sin2x−2cos2x(1+2sin2x)dx.
- Substitute t=sin2x Then dt=2cos2xdx, so cos2xdx=2dt. The integral transforms to
∫3t−2(1+2t)⋅2dt=21∫3t−21+2tdt.
- Simplify the integrand Let u=3t−2, so t=3u+2 and dt=3du. Then 1+2t=1+2⋅3u+2=1+32u+4=33+2u+4=32u+7. The integral becomes
21∫u32u+7⋅3du=21⋅31⋅31∫u2u+7du=181∫(2u1/2+7u−1/2)du.
- Integrate term by term
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-FN1 markMCQQ.If 2∫33logx+log(125−75x+15x2−x3)3logxdx=k, then 4k2+2k+1= (A) 9 (B) 3 (C) 25 (D) \dfrac{9}{4}$
›Reveal solutionSolution
This problem is solved by recognizing a specific algebraic identity within the logarithm and then applying the King's Rule for definite integrals. The integral simplifies to 1/2, leading to a final value of 3.
The core concept here is a powerful property of definite integrals, often called King's Rule or the property of symmetric limits. This rule is particularly useful when the integrand has a structure that transforms nicely when x is replaced by (a+b−x).
If f(x) is a continuous function on [a,b], then a∫bf(x)dx=a∫bf(a+b−x)dx.
The intuition behind this rule is that integrating from a to b is the same as integrating from b to a if we reflect the function about the midpoint of the interval. When we apply this rule, we often get a new integral that, when added to the original integral, simplifies significantly, usually to a constant or a much simpler function.
In this problem, the limits of integration are a=2 and b=3. So, we will replace x with (a+b−x)=(2+3−x)=(5−x). The key is to observe how the argument of the logarithm in the denominator transforms under this substitution.
- Identify the integral and simplify the denominator's argument: Let the given integral be I.
I=2∫33logx+log(125−75x+15x2−x3)3logxdx
First, let's simplify the expression inside the second logarithm in the denominator: $125 - 75x + 15x^2 - x^3$. This expression is a cubic polynomial. We can recognize it as the expansion of $(5-x)^3$:(5−x)3=53−3(52)x+3(5)x2−x3=125−75x+15x2−x3
So, the integral can be rewritten as:I=2∫33logx+log((5−x)3)3logxdx
Using the logarithm property $\log(A^B) = B \log A$:I=2∫33logx+3log(5−x)3logxdx
We can factor out $3$ from the denominator:I=2∫33(logx+log(5−x))3logxdx
I=2∫3logx+log(5−x)logxdx(Equation 1)
- Apply King's Rule: Now, we apply the property a∫bf(x)dx=a∫bf(a+b−x)dx. Here a=2 and b=3, so a+b−x=2+3−x=5−x. Replace x with (5−x) in Equation 1: I=2∫3log(5−x)+log(5−(5−x))log(5−x)dx …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-AN1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] ∫cos6x+sin4xcos2x+cos4xsin2x+sin6xsin2xtanxdx=
(A) log(sin4x+cos4x)+c (B) 41log(sin4x+cos4x)+c (C) 41log(1+tan4x)+c (D) log(1+tan4x)+c›Reveal solutionSolution
The integrand simplifies dramatically by factoring the denominator as a sum of two squares, leading to a clean substitution that yields 41log(sin4x+cos4x)+c, which matches option (B).
The key insight is that the denominator looks messy but is actually a disguised sum of two perfect squares. Once we see that, the numerator also cooperates, and a simple substitution finishes the job.
Why this works:
The denominator has terms cos6x, sin6x, and mixed terms sin4xcos2x, cos4xsin2x. This suggests grouping as (cos6x+sin6x)+sin2xcos2x(sin2x+cos2x). Since sin2x+cos2x=1, the denominator becomes cos6x+sin6x+sin2xcos2x. And cos6x+sin6x itself factors as (cos2x+sin2x)(cos4x−sin2xcos2x+sin4x)=cos4x−sin2xcos2x+sin4x. Adding the extra sin2xcos2x gives exactly cos4x+sin4x. That’s the clean core.
Now the numerator sin2xtanx=sin2x⋅cosxsinx=cosxsin3x. So the whole integrand becomes cosx(sin4x+cos4x)sin3x. A substitution t=sin4x+cos4x will work because its derivative involves sin3xcosx — almost what we have, except we have cosxsin3x. A small adjustment with cos2x fixes it.
Let’s go step by step.
- Simplify the denominator
D=cos6x+sin4xcos2x+cos4xsin2x+sin6x
Group as (cos6x+sin6x)+sin2xcos2x(sin2x+cos2x).
Since sin2x+cos2x=1, we have
D=cos6x+sin6x+sin2xcos2x.
Now use the identity a3+b3=(a+b)(a2−ab+b2) with a=cos2x, b=sin2x:
cos6x+sin6x=(cos2x+sin2x)(cos4x−sin2xcos2x+sin4x)=cos4x−sin2xcos2x+sin4x.
Adding the leftover sin2xcos2x cancels the middle term:
D=cos4x+sin4x.
So the denominator is simply sin4x+cos4x.
- Rewrite the integrand The numerator is sin2xtanx=sin2x⋅cosxsinx=cosxsin3x. Hence the integral becomes
I=∫cosx(sin4x+cos4x)sin3xdx.
- Choose a substitution Let u=sin4x+cos4x. Then
du=(4sin3xcosx−4cos3xsinx)dx=4sinxcosx(sin2x−cos2x)dx.
That’s not directly our numerator. Instead, try t=sin4x+cos4x but multiply numerator and denominator by cosx to get sin3xcosx in the numerator.
Actually, a better approach: multiply numerator and denominator by cosx:
I=∫cos2x(sin4x+cos4x)sin3xcosxdx=∫(1−sin2x)(sin4x+cos4x)sin3xcosxdx.
That’s messy. Instead, note that sin4x+cos4x=1−2sin2xcos2x, but that doesn’t help directly.
A cleaner substitution: let t=sin4x+cos4x. Compute dt differently:
dxd(sin4x+cos4x)=4sin3xcosx−4cos3xsinx=4sinxcosx(sin2x−cos2x).
Not matching. But we can also write
sin4x+cos4x=(sin2x+cos2x)2−2sin2xcos2x=1−21sin22x.
Still not helpful.
The real trick: rewrite the integrand as
cosx(sin4x+cos4x)sin3x=cos2x(sin4x+cos4x)sin3xcosx=(1−sin2x)(sin4x+cos4x)sin3xcosx.
That’s not simpler. Instead, try u=sin2x? Then du=2sinxcosxdx, and sin3xdx=sinx⋅sin2xdx=sinx⋅udx, but we have cosxsin3xdx=cosxsinx⋅sin2xdx=cosxsinx⋅udx. Not a clean match.
Let’s step back. Multiply numerator and denominator by cosx:
I=∫cos2x(sin4x+cos4x)sin3xcosxdx.
Now note cos2x=1−sin2x, but better: write sin3xcosx=41⋅4sin3xcosx. Observe that
dxd(sin4x)=4sin3xcosx.
So sin3xcosxdx=41d(sin4x). Also cos2x=1−sin2x, but we still have sin4x+cos4x in denominator. Write cos4x=(1−sin2x)2=1−2sin2x+sin4x. Then
sin4x+cos4x=sin4x+1−2sin2x+sin4x=2sin4x−2sin2x+1.
That’s quadratic in sin2x. Let u=sin2x, then du=2sinxcosxdx, and sin3xcosxdx=sin2x⋅sinxcosxdx=u⋅2du. Also cos2x=1−u. So
I=∫(1−u)(2u2−2u+1)u⋅2du=21∫(1−u)(2u2−2u+1)udu.
This is doable but messy. There must be a simpler way.
- The elegant substitution Notice that dxd(sin4x+cos4x)=4sin3xcosx−4cos3xsinx=4sinxcosx(sin2x−cos2x). Our numerator is cosxsin3xdx. Multiply numerator and denominator by cosx to get cos2xsin3xcosxdx. But we want 4sin3xcosx for the derivative. So write
I=∫cosx(sin4x+cos4x)sin3xdx=∫4cos2x(sin4x+cos4x)4sin3xcosxdx.
Now 4sin3xcosxdx=d(sin4x). But we have cos2x in denominator. Write cos2x=1−sin2x. Not great.
Alternatively, use the identity sin4x+cos4x=21(1+cos22x)? Actually sin4x+cos4x=1−21sin22x=43+41cos4x. That might lead to a tangent substitution.
Let’s try dividing numerator and denominator by cos4x:
sin4x+cos4xsin2xtanx=cos4x(tan4x+1)sin2x⋅cosxsinx=cos5xsin3x⋅1+tan4x1.
But cos5xsin3x=tan3x⋅sec2x. And sec2xdx=d(tanx). So
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-11-AN1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] ∫x81−2x7+7x14x7−1dx=
(A) 7x71−2x7+7x14+c (B) log(1−2x7+7x14)+c (C) x81−x151+c (D) x81−x72+x147+c›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to rewrite the integrand by factoring out x−8 and noticing that the expression under the square root becomes a perfect square in terms of x−7. The integral simplifies to a standard form, yielding 7x71−2x7+7x14+c, which matches option (A).
The problem looks messy at first glance — a rational function times a complicated square root. But the structure hints at a substitution: the numerator x7−1 and the denominator x8 suggest that factoring x−8 might align with the derivative of something like x−7. The expression under the square root, 1−2x7+7x14, is quadratic in x7, so rewriting it in terms of x−7 could reveal a perfect square. This is a classic trick: when you see a polynomial in xn inside a square root, try substituting t=x−n or t=xn to simplify.
- Factor out x−8 from the integrand Write the integral as
∫x81−2x7+7x14x7−1dx=∫x8x7−1⋅1−2x7+7x141dx.
Notice that x8x7−1=x−1−x−8. But more usefully, factor x14 out of the square root:
1−2x7+7x14=x14(7−2x−7+x−14)=x77−2x−7+x−14.
Then the integrand becomes
x8⋅x77−2x−7+x−14x7−1=x157−2x−7+x−14x7−1.
This still looks messy, but the presence of x−7 terms suggests a substitution.
- Substitute t=x−7 Let t=x−7. Then dt=−7x−8dx, so dx=−7x8dt. Also x7=1/t. Rewrite the integrand in terms of t. First, the numerator: x7−1=t1−1=t1−t. The denominator: x8 times the square root. We have
1−2x7+7x14=1−t2+t27=t2t2−2t+7=∣t∣t2−2t+7.
Since x>0 (typical for such integrals), t>0, so ∣t∣=t.
The whole integrand becomes
x81−2x7+7x14x7−1dx=x8⋅tt2−2t+7t1−t⋅(−7x8dt)=t1−t⋅t2−2t+7t⋅(−71)dt=−7t2−2t+71−tdt.
So the integral simplifies to
∫−7t2−2t+71−tdt.
- Recognize the derivative of the square root Notice that the derivative of t2−2t+7 is 2t−2=2(t−1). The numerator 1−t is exactly −(t−1). So −7t2−2t+71−t=7t2−2t+7t−1. …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-FN1 markMCQQ.α,β are the roots of the equation sin2x+bsinx+c=0. If α+β=2π then b2−1= (A) c (B) 2c (C) c2 (D) 4c2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to use the sum-of-roots relation from the quadratic in sinx, then apply the condition α+β=π/2 to relate sinα and sinβ via complementary angles, leading to b2−1=2c. The correct option is (B).
We are told that α and β are roots of
sin2x+bsinx+c=0.
That means if we treat t=sinx, then t satisfies t2+bt+c=0. So sinα and sinβ are the two roots of this quadratic.
Concept & Intuition:
The problem gives a condition on the angles α and β themselves (α+β=π/2), not directly on their sines. This suggests using the complementary angle identity: if α+β=π/2, then β=π/2−α, so sinβ=cosα. That lets us rewrite the sum and product of the roots in terms of sinα and cosα, and then compare with the quadratic’s coefficients.
Step-by-step solution:
- Set up the quadratic in sinx Since α and β satisfy sin2x+bsinx+c=0, we have
sinαandsinβ
as the roots of t2+bt+c=0.
By Vieta’s formulas:
sinα+sinβ=−b,sinα⋅sinβ=c.
- Use the angle condition α+β=π/2 This implies β=π/2−α, so
sinβ=sin(2π−α)=cosα.
- Rewrite the sum and product
sinα+cosα=−b,sinαcosα=c.
- Relate b and c Square the sum:
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.∫x4+3x2+2x3dx= (A) log(x2+1x2+2)+c (B) log(x2+2)−2log(x2+1)+c (C) log(x2+1(x2+2)x)+c (D) log(x2+2x2+1)+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to substitute u=x2 to turn the integral into a rational function, then use partial fractions. The final result simplifies to log(x2+1x2+2)+c, which corresponds to option (A).
Concept & Intuition
When you see a polynomial in the denominator with only even powers of x (like x4,x2) and an odd power in the numerator (like x3), the substitution u=x2 is a natural fit. It turns the integral into a rational function of u, which we can handle with partial fractions. The logarithm form emerges because the denominator factors nicely into linear factors in u.
Step-by-step solution
- Substitute u=x2 Let u=x2. Then du=2xdx, so xdx=2du. The numerator x3dx=x2⋅xdx=u⋅2du. The integral becomes:
∫x4+3x2+2x3dx=∫u2+3u+2u⋅2du=21∫(u+1)(u+2)udu.
- Partial fraction decomposition We write:
(u+1)(u+2)u=u+1A+u+2B.
Multiply through by (u+1)(u+2):
u=A(u+2)+B(u+1).
Solve for A and B:
- Set u=−1: −1=A(1)+B(0)⇒A=−1.
- Set u=−2: −2=A(0)+B(−1)⇒B=2. So:
(u+1)(u+2)u=−u+11+u+22.
- Integrate in u The integral becomes:
21∫(−u+11+u+22)du=21(−log∣u+1∣+2log∣u+2∣)+c.
Simplify:
=−21log∣u+1∣+log∣u+2∣+c.
- Back-substitute u=x2 …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.If 1+2i is a root of the equation x4−3x3+8x2−7x+5=0, then sum of the squares of the other roots is (A) 0 (B) 2+i (C) −4−4i (D) 38
›Reveal solutionSolution
The quartic factors as (x2−2x+5)(x2−x+1); the three roots other than 1+2i have squares summing to −4−4i. Option (C).
Because the coefficients are real, the conjugate 1−2i is also a root. Write the four roots as 1+2i, 1−2i, r, s.
By Vieta's formulas:
(1+2i)+(1−2i)+r+s=3⇒r+s=1,
and (1+2i)(1−2i)rs=5 with (1+2i)(1−2i)=5 gives rs=1. So r,s satisfy x2−x+1=0, and the quartic factors as (x2−2x+5)(x2−x+1). …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.If I1=∫e4x+e2x+1exdx, I2=∫e−4x+e−2x+1e−xdx, then I2−I1= (A) 21log(e2x+e−2x−1e2x−e−2x+1)+c (B) 21log(e2x+e−2x+1e2x−e−2x−1)+c (C) 21log(e2x+e−2x−1e2x+e−x+1)+c (D) 21log(ex+e−x+1ex+e−x−1)+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
I2−I1=21log(ex+e−x+1ex+e−x−1)+c — option (D).
First rewrite I2. Multiply the numerator and denominator by e4x:
I2=∫e−4x+e−2x+1e−xdx=∫e4x+e2x+1e3xdx.
Since I1=∫e4x+e2x+1exdx,
I2−I1=∫e4x+e2x+1e3x−exdx.
Divide numerator and denominator by e2x:
I2−I1=∫e2x+e−2x+1ex−e−xdx.
Let u=ex+e−x, so du=(ex−e−x)dx and e2x+e−2x=u2−2. The denominator becomes u2−1: …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-AN1 markMCQQ.∫4x2+4x+53x+2dx=Alog(4x2+4x+5)+Btan−1(22x+1)+c, then A+B= (A) 21 (B) 43 (C) 83 (D) 81
›Reveal solutionSolution
The integral splits into a logarithmic part (from the derivative of the denominator) and an arctangent part (by completing the square). Matching coefficients gives A=83 and B=43, so A+B=89, which is not among the options — but careful: the problem’s given form uses A and B as constants in front of the log and arctan terms, and the sum is 89. However, re-checking the options, the intended answer is 83 for A alone? No — let’s solve properly.
Concept & Intuition
When integrating a rational function where the denominator is a quadratic that doesn’t factor over the reals, the standard strategy is:
- If the numerator is (a constant times) the derivative of the denominator, the integral is a logarithm.
- Otherwise, we split the numerator into a part that is a multiple of the derivative (giving log) plus a constant remainder (giving an arctan after completing the square).
Here the denominator is 4x2+4x+5. Its derivative is 8x+4. Our numerator is 3x+2. We write 3x+2 as 83(8x+4)+constant to match the derivative.
Step-by-step solution
- Find the derivative of the denominator Let D=4x2+4x+5. Then
D′=8x+4.
We want to express 3x+2 in terms of 8x+4.
- Express numerator as a multiple of D′ plus a constant Write
3x+2=α(8x+4)+β.
Comparing coefficients of x: 3=8α⇒α=83.
Comparing constants: 2=4α+β⇒2=4⋅83+β=23+β⇒β=2−23=21.
So
3x+2=83(8x+4)+21.
- Split the integral
∫4x2+4x+53x+2dx=83∫4x2+4x+58x+4dx+21∫4x2+4x+51dx.
The first integral is log∣4x2+4x+5∣ (since denominator is always positive, we drop absolute value).
So first part = 83log(4x2+4x+5).
- Handle the second integral by completing the square
4x2+4x+5=4(x2+x+45)=4[(x+21)2+1].
Because x2+x=(x+1/2)2−1/4, so x2+x+5/4=(x+1/2)2+1.
Thus
21∫4x2+4x+51dx=21∫4[(x+1/2)2+1]1dx=81∫(x+1/2)2+11dx.
- Use the arctan formula
∫u2+11du=tan−1u.
Let u=x+21, then du=dx. So
81∫u2+11du=81tan−1(x+21). …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-04-FN1 markMCQQ.If I1=∫e4x+e2x+1exdx, I2=∫e4x+e2x+1e−xdx, then I2−I1= (A) 21log(e2x+e−2x+1e2x−e−2x−1)+c (B) 21log(ex+e−x+1ex+e−x−1)+c (C) 21log(e2x+e−2x−1e2x+e−x+1)+c (D) 21log(e2x+e−2x−1e2x−e−2x+1)+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to rewrite the integrands in terms of e2x and e−2x so that the difference I2−I1 simplifies to a single integral of a rational function, which integrates to an inverse hyperbolic tangent form. The final result matches option (B).
We are given
I1=∫e4x+e2x+1exdx,I2=∫e4x+e2x+1e−xdx.
We need I2−I1. The direct approach — subtracting the integrands and simplifying — is the natural path. The trick is to notice that the denominator is symmetric in e2x and e−2x, so rewriting everything in terms of e2x and e−2x will reveal a clean substitution.
- Write the difference as a single integral
I2−I1=∫e4x+e2x+1e−x−exdx.
Factor e−x from the numerator:
e−x−ex=e−x(1−e2x)=−e−x(e2x−1).
So
I2−I1=∫e4x+e2x+1−e−x(e2x−1)dx.
-
Rewrite the denominator in terms of e2x
Notice e4x=(e2x)2. Let u=e2x. Then du=2e2xdx=2udx, so dx=2udu. Also e−x=(e2x)−1/2=u−1/2.
But we can avoid square roots by a smarter substitution: multiply numerator and denominator by something to make the integrand a function of e2x only.
Observe:
e4x+e2x+1e−x(e2x−1)=e4x+e2x+1ex−e−x⋅e−2xe−2x?
Better: Write the integrand as
e4x+e2x+1e−x−ex=e4x+e2x+1e−x(1−e2x).
Multiply numerator and denominator by e−2x:
=e2x+1+e−2xe−3x(1−e2x).
That still looks messy. Instead, try the substitution t=ex. Then dt=exdx, so dx=dt/t. Also e−x=1/t, e2x=t2, e4x=t4. Then
I2−I1=∫t4+t2+11/t−t⋅tdt=∫t2(t4+t2+1)1−t2dt.
This is a rational function in t, but the denominator is degree 6 — not the simplest path.
- A more elegant substitution: use u=e2x Let u=e2x. Then x=21logu, dx=2udu. Also ex=u, e−x=1/u. Then
e−x−ex=u1−u=u1−u.
The denominator: e4x+e2x+1=u2+u+1.
So
I2−I1=∫u2+u+1(1−u)/u⋅2udu=21∫u3/2(u2+u+1)1−udu.
Still not nice because of the u3/2.
- The key insight: use v=ex+e−x Notice that
e2x+e−2x=(ex+e−x)2−2.
The denominator e4x+e2x+1 can be factored? Actually,
e4x+e2x+1=(e2x+e−2x)e2x? No.
Better: Multiply numerator and denominator of the original difference by e−2x:
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-09-FN1 markMCQQ.∫x8+1x5+xdx= (A) 221tan−1(2x2x4−1)+c (B) log(x5+x2)−log(x3+x)+log(x+1)+c (C) 92x8−94x6+91x4−31x2+c (D) 21tan−1(2x3x5−1)+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to rewrite the integrand by dividing numerator and denominator by x4, then substitute t=x4−x41 to obtain a standard arctangent integral. The result matches option (A).
We are asked to evaluate
∫x8+1x5+xdx.
The denominator x8+1 is a sum of eighth powers, which factors nicely as (x4)2+1, but the numerator is not a simple derivative of x4. However, notice that both numerator and denominator are even in the sense that dividing by x4 might symmetrize things.
Concept and intuition:
When we have a rational function where the denominator is x8+1 and the numerator is a sum of odd powers, a common trick is to divide numerator and denominator by x4 (the “halfway” power). This creates expressions like x4+x41 and x2+x21, which suggest a substitution t=x4−x41 because its derivative involves x3+x31 — and we will see that the numerator after division becomes exactly that.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Divide numerator and denominator by x4 (valid for x=0, but the antiderivative will be continuous anyway):
x8+1x5+x=x8/x4+1/x4x5/x4+x/x4=x4+x41x+x31.
So the integral becomes
∫x4+x41x+x31dx.
- Rewrite the denominator in terms of x2: Notice that
x4+x41=(x2+x21)2−2.
This is a standard algebraic identity: (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2, so with a=x2, b=1/x2, we get x4+2+1/x4, hence x4+1/x4=(x2+1/x2)2−2.
- Now consider the substitution t=x4−x41. Differentiate:
dxdt=4x3+x54=4(x3+x51).
That doesn’t match our numerator x+1/x3 directly. But we can also try u=x2−x21? Let’s check:
dxdu=2x+x32=2(x+x31).
That’s exactly twice our numerator! So the substitution u=x2−x21 is promising.
- Express the denominator in terms of u: We have u=x2−x21. Then
u2=x4−2+x41⇒x4+x41=u2+2.
So the denominator becomes u2+2.
- Rewrite the integral: From step 1, the integral is
∫x4+x41x+x31dx.
With u=x2−x21, we have du=2(x+x31)dx, so x+x31dx=2du.
And x4+x41=u2+2. Hence
∫x4+x41x+x31dx=∫u2+21⋅2du=21∫u2+2du.
- Evaluate the standard integral: …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.∫16−7sin2x1dx= (A) 121tan−1(43tanx)+c (B) 31sin−1(43sinx)+c (C) 121log(4+7sinx4−7sinx)+c (D) 121log(4−7sinx4+7sinx)+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The integral simplifies by dividing numerator and denominator by cos2x, converting it into a standard arctangent form. The correct result is 121tan−1(43tanx)+c, which corresponds to option (A).
We are asked to evaluate
∫16−7sin2x1dx.
The integrand is a rational function of sin2x. A classic trick for integrals involving sin2x (or cos2x) in the denominator is to rewrite everything in terms of tanx, because tanx has a simple derivative and lets us turn the integral into a rational function.
Why this works:
If we divide numerator and denominator by cos2x, we get sec2x in the numerator, which is exactly the derivative of tanx. This substitution t=tanx transforms the integral into a standard form ∫a2+t2dt or ∫a2−t2dt, depending on the sign. Here the denominator becomes 16−7sin2x, and after division by cos2x we get 16sec2x−7tan2x, which simplifies nicely.
Let's work through it step by step.
- Rewrite the integrand using sin2x in terms of tanx. Recall sin2x=1+tan2xtan2x. But a more direct method: multiply numerator and denominator by sec2x:
16−7sin2x1=16sec2x−7tan2xsec2x.
Since sec2x=1+tan2x, the denominator becomes:
16(1+tan2x)−7tan2x=16+16tan2x−7tan2x=16+9tan2x.
So the integral is:
∫16+9tan2xsec2xdx.
- Substitute t=tanx. Then dt=sec2xdx, and the integral becomes:
∫16+9t2dt.
- Factor to match the standard arctangent form. Write 16+9t2=9(916+t2)=9((34)2+t2). So: ∫16+9t2dt=91∫t2+(34)2dt. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.