Q.Choose the correct answer: ∫ex+e−xdx is equal to (A) tan−1(ex)+C (B) tan−1(e−x)+C (C) log(ex−e−x)+C (D) log(ex+e−x)+C
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Hyperbolic Integration
Hyperbolic Integration — A First Look
You already integrate sinx and cosx. Hyperbolic integration is the same idea with a different family: sinhx, coshx, tanhx, and their reciprocals.
The name comes from geometry: just as cost,sint trace a circle (x2+y2=1), cosht,sinht trace a hyperbola (x2−y2=1). The integration rules are almost identical to the trigonometric ones, with a few sign changes.
The core definitions
In terms of exponentials:
sinhx=2ex−e−x,coshx=2ex+e−x,tanhx=coshxsinhx
From these come the derivatives:
dxdsinhx=coshx,dxdcoshx=sinhx,dxdtanhx=sech2x
Notice the derivative of coshx is +sinhx (not −sinhx as in trigonometry). That plus sign is the only real difference from the circular case.
The integration formulas
Reversing the derivatives:
∫sinhxdx=coshx+C
∫coshxdx=sinhx+C
∫sech2xdx=tanhx+C
∫csch2xdx=−cothx+C
∫sechxtanhxdx=−sechx+C
∫cschxcothxdx=−cschx+C
Why the sign difference matters
Don't treat ∫sinhxdx like ∫sinxdx. ∫sinxdx=−cosx+C, but ∫sinhxdx=+coshx+C — the minus sign is gone.
Check it: differentiate coshx and you get sinhx, not −sinhx, so the integral must be positive.
A worked example
Find ∫(3sinhx−2coshx)dx.
=3∫sinhxdx−2∫coshxdx=3coshx−2sinhx+C
When you use it in exams
- Direct integration — apply the standard formulas above.
- Substitution — a messy integral like ∫x2+a2dx becomes clean with x=asinht or x=acosht. That's a separate technique, but it relies on these basic integrals. …
The key idea is to rewrite the denominator in terms of a hyperbolic function and then use a standard inverse tangent integral.
Step 1: Recognize that ex+e−x=2coshx. The integral becomes
∫ex+e−xdx=∫2coshxdx.
Step 2: A more direct approach: multiply numerator and denominator by ex:
∫e2x+1exdx.
Step 3: Let u=ex, so du=exdx. The integral transforms to …
The integral ∫ex+e−xdx simplifies by rewriting the denominator as 2coshx, then substituting t=ex to get a standard arctangent form. The correct answer is tan−1(ex)+C, which is option (A).
The key insight here is that the integrand ex+e−x1 looks like a hyperbolic secant function — because ex+e−x=2coshx, so the integrand is 21sech x. But the direct hyperbolic route isn't the simplest. Instead, notice that the denominator is symmetric in ex and e−x, which suggests a substitution that "breaks" this symmetry: let t=ex. This turns the integral into a rational function of t, which is a standard technique for integrals involving exponentials.
- Rewrite the integrand Multiply numerator and denominator by ex to clear the negative exponent:
∫ex+e−xdx=∫e2x+1exdx.
This step is crucial — it transforms the denominator into a simple quadratic in ex.
- Substitute t=ex Then dt=exdx, so the numerator exdx becomes exactly dt. The integral becomes:
∫t2+1dt.
This is the classic arctangent integral.
- Integrate
∫t2+1dt=tan−1(t)+C.
- Back-substitute Replace t with ex: …
Method: Multiply by ex to convert ex±e−x into a rational form
Use this for integrands with ex and e−x together: multiplying top and bottom by ex clears the negative exponent and sets up t=ex.
Steps
Step 1: Multiply numerator and denominator by ex.
ex+e−x1=e2x+1ex.
Step 2: Substitute t=ex.
dt=exdx, so the integral becomes ∫t2+1dt. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Guessing log(ex+e−x) by the ff′ pattern.
Why it's wrong: dxd(ex+e−x)=ex−e−x, not 1, so the numerator is not the denominator's derivative — the log form is wrong (that is option D, a distractor). Correct approach: multiply by ex and substitute t=ex.
Mistake 2: Not clearing the negative exponent. …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.If ∫(tanx+1)2x2(sec2x+tanx)dx=xtanx+1−x2+f(x)+c, then f(x)= (A) log∣xsinx+cosx∣+c (B) log∣xcosx+sinx∣+c (C) 2log∣xsinx+cosx∣+c (D) 2log∣xcosx+sinx∣+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The integral simplifies by rewriting the denominator and recognizing a derivative pattern; after integration by parts, the missing term f(x) is 2log∣xsinx+cosx∣+c, so the correct option is (C).
We are given:
∫(tanx+1)2x2(sec2x+tanx)dx=xtanx+1−x2+f(x)+c
and need to identify f(x) from the options.
Concept and intuition:
The denominator (tanx+1)2 and numerator containing sec2x+tanx hint at a derivative of something like tanx or xtanx. The given form of the answer suggests integration by parts was used, where one part became xtanx+1−x2 and the leftover integral is f(x). Our job is to reconstruct that leftover integral by differentiating the given result.
Step-by-step reasoning:
- Differentiate both sides Let F(x)=xtanx+1−x2+f(x)+c. Then F′(x) must equal the integrand:
(tanx+1)2x2(sec2x+tanx).
-
Differentiate the known part
Let g(x)=xtanx+1−x2.
Use quotient rule: g(x)=u−x2 where u=xtanx+1.
Then g′(x)=u2(−2x)u−(−x2)u′.
Compute u′:
u=xtanx+1⟹u′=tanx+xsec2x.
So:
g′(x)=(xtanx+1)2−2x(xtanx+1)+x2(tanx+xsec2x).
- Simplify the numerator of g′(x) Expand:
−2x2tanx−2x+x2tanx+x3sec2x=−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x.
So:
g′(x)=(xtanx+1)2−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x.
- Relate to the integrand The integrand is:
(tanx+1)2x2(sec2x+tanx).
Notice the denominator here is (tanx+1)2, not (xtanx+1)2. This is a mismatch — unless we rewrite the integrand cleverly.
Actually, the given answer’s denominator is xtanx+1, so the integration by parts likely used x as one factor. Let’s instead directly differentiate the whole right-hand side and match.
- Set up the equation Since F′(x)=integrand, we have:
g′(x)+f′(x)=(tanx+1)2x2(sec2x+tanx).
So:
f′(x)=(tanx+1)2x2(sec2x+tanx)−g′(x).
-
Find a common denominator
Write g′(x) with denominator (tanx+1)2? But g′(x) has denominator (xtanx+1)2. This suggests the two denominators are different — unless we suspect a typo? Let’s check the given answer form: xtanx+1−x2 appears. That denominator is xtanx+1, not tanx+1. So the integration by parts likely used u=x2, dv=(tanx+1)2sec2x+tanxdx.
Let’s try that approach.
-
Integrate by parts
Let u=x2, dv=(tanx+1)2sec2x+tanxdx.
Find v: Notice that dxd(tanx+1)=sec2x, so:
(tanx+1)2sec2x+tanx=(tanx+1)2sec2x+(tanx+1)2tanx.
The first term is −dxd(tanx+11) because derivative of (tanx+1)−1 is −(tanx+1)−2sec2x.
The second term: (tanx+1)2tanx can be written as (tanx+1)2(tanx+1)−1=tanx+11−(tanx+1)21.
So:
dv=[−dxd(tanx+11)+tanx+11−(tanx+1)21]dx.
This is messy. Instead, note a simpler trick:
Observe that:
dxd(tanx+1x)=(tanx+1)2(tanx+1)−xsec2x.
Not quite our numerator.
Better: Recognize that:
dxd(tanx+11)=−(tanx+1)2sec2x.
And also:
dxd(tanx+1tanx)=(tanx+1)2sec2x(tanx+1)−tanxsec2x=(tanx+1)2sec2x.
So the sum (tanx+1)2sec2x+tanx is actually the derivative of something like tanx+1tanx−tanx+11+⋯? Let’s check:
dxd(tanx+1tanx−1)=(tanx+1)2sec2x(tanx+1)−(tanx−1)sec2x=(tanx+1)22sec2x.
That gives 2sec2x, not our numerator.
Let’s try a direct approach:
Let t=tanx+1, then dt=sec2xdx, but the x2 outside makes substitution hard.
-
A better insight: Differentiate the given answer form
Since the problem gives the result of integration, we can differentiate the RHS and compare. Let’s assume the given form is correct and find f(x) by differentiating.
Let H(x)=xtanx+1−x2+f(x). Then H′(x) equals the integrand.
Compute derivative of xtanx+1−x2 as before:
dxd(xtanx+1−x2)=(xtanx+1)2−2x(xtanx+1)+x2(tanx+xsec2x).
Simplify numerator:
−2x2tanx−2x+x2tanx+x3sec2x=−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x.
So:
H′(x)=(xtanx+1)2−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x+f′(x).
Set equal to integrand:
(tanx+1)2x2(sec2x+tanx)=(xtanx+1)2−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x+f′(x).
- Solve for f′(x)
f′(x)=(tanx+1)2x2sec2x+x2tanx−(xtanx+1)2−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x.
This looks messy, but notice that the denominators are different. Perhaps the intended answer has xtanx+1 in denominator? Let’s check the options: they involve log∣xsinx+cosx∣ or log∣xcosx+sinx∣. Differentiate those:
- dxdlog∣xsinx+cosx∣=xsinx+cosxsinx+xcosx−sinx=xsinx+cosxxcosx.
- dxdlog∣xcosx+sinx∣=xcosx+sinxcosx−xsinx+cosx=xcosx+sinx2cosx−xsinx.
None of these match a simple rational form with (tanx+1)2. So maybe the integration by parts yields a different structure.
- Try integration by parts directly Let u=x2, dv=(tanx+1)2sec2x+tanxdx. Find v: Write:
(tanx+1)2sec2x+tanx=(tanx+1)2sec2x+(tanx+1)2tanx.
Note that:dxd(tanx+1−1)=(tanx+1)2sec2x.
And:(tanx+1)2tanx=(tanx+1)2(tanx+1)−1=tanx+11−(tanx+1)21.
So:dv=[dxd(tanx+1−1)+tanx+11−(tanx+1)21]dx.
Integrate:v=tanx+1−1+∫tanx+1dx−∫(tanx+1)2dx.
This is getting complicated. There must be a simpler pattern.11. Spot the pattern: derivative of tanx+1x
Compute:
dxd(tanx+1x)=(tanx+1)2(tanx+1)−xsec2x.
Our numerator is $x^2(\sec^2 x + \tan x)$. If we factor $x$, we get $x \cdot x(\sec^2 x + \tan x)$. Not matching. Try derivative of $\frac{x^2}{\tan x + 1}$:dxd(tanx+1x2)=(tanx+1)22x(tanx+1)−x2sec2x.
That gives $2x \tan x + 2x - x^2 \sec^2 x$ over denominator. Our numerator is $x^2 \sec^2 x + x^2 \tan x$. So if we add something like $\frac{x^2 \tan x}{(\tan x + 1)^2}$? Not.12. Consider the given answer’s denominator xtanx+1
That suggests the integration by parts used u=x, dv=(tanx+1)2x(sec2x+tanx)dx perhaps. Let’s try:
Let u=x, dv=(tanx+1)2x(sec2x+tanx)dx.
Then du=dx, and we need v. Notice:
dxd(tanx+1x)=(tanx+1)2tanx+1−xsec2x.
That’s not our $dv$. But:dxd(tanx+1−x)=(tanx+1)2−tanx−1+xsec2x.
Still not. Try:dxd(xtanx+11)=(xtanx+1)2−tanx−xsec2x.
That’s close to our integrand’s numerator but with $x$ factor.13. Direct differentiation of the given RHS
Let’s assume the given equation is correct and differentiate both sides to find f(x) by matching.
Differentiate RHS:
dxd(xtanx+1−x2)=(xtanx+1)2−2x(xtanx+1)+x2(tanx+xsec2x).
Simplify numerator:−2x2tanx−2x+x2tanx+x3sec2x=−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x.
So:dxd(RHS)=(xtanx+1)2−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x+f′(x).
Set equal to integrand:(tanx+1)2x2sec2x+x2tanx=(xtanx+1)2−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x+f′(x).
Solve for $f'(x)$:f′(x)=(tanx+1)2x2sec2x+x2tanx−(xtanx+1)2−x2tanx−2x+x3sec2x.
This seems too messy. Perhaps the problem has a misprint? But the options are simple logs, so $f'(x)$ must simplify to something like $\frac{2x \cos x}{x \sin x + \cos x}$ or similar.14. Try to guess f(x) from options
Differentiate option (C): f(x)=2log∣xsinx+cosx∣
Then:
f′(x)=2⋅xsinx+cosxxcosx+sinx−sinx=xsinx+cosx2xcosx.
Option (D): $f(x) = 2\log|x\cos x + \sin x|$ Then:f′(x)=2⋅xcosx+sinx−xsinx+cosx+cosx=xcosx+sinx2(2cosx−xsinx).
Which one could appear from integration by parts? Notice that $\frac{d}{dx}(x\sin x + \cos x) = x\cos x$, so $f'(x)$ from (C) is $2 \cdot \frac{x\cos x}{x\sin x + \cos x}$. That is a neat derivative.15. Check if the integrand can be expressed as derivative of xtanx+1−x2 plus that
Compute derivative of xtanx+1−x2 in a different form. Write tanx=cosxsinx, then:
xtanx+1=cosxxsinx+cosx.
So:xtanx+1−x2=xsinx+cosx−x2cosx.
Differentiate this:dxd(xsinx+cosx−x2cosx)=quotient rule.
Numerator derivative: $(-2x\cos x + x^2 \sin x)(x\sin x + \cos x) - (-x^2 \cos x)(\sin x + x\cos x - \sin x)$ over denominator squared. … - TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.8092π∫π1+(2023)(2023x)sec(2023x)dx= (A) 202321+c (B) 2023log(2+1)+c (C) 4046log2+c (D) 20232+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
The factor 1+20232023x1 is the standard even-interval halving trick: the integral reduces to 20231∫0π/4secudu=2023log(2+1).
For an even function h, ∫−kk1+ag(x)h(x)dx=∫0kh(x)dx, because adding the substitution x→−x makes the two a-factors sum to 1. Here h(x)=sec(2023x) is even and g(x)=2023x with a=2023, over the symmetric interval [−8092π,8092π] (note 8092=4⋅2023): …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-14-AN1 markMCQQ.∫sec2x(1+sec6x)3tanxdx= (A) −21(1+sec6x)31+c (B) 2(1+sec6x)34+c (C) −21(1+cos6x)31+c (D) 2(1+cos6x)31+c
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rewriting the secants as cosines turns the integrand into sinxcos5x(1+cos6x)−2/3, which the substitution u=1+cos6x integrates instantly to −21(1+cos6x)1/3+c — option (C).
The concept first: hunt for the u whose derivative is already sitting there
Every successful substitution rests on the same observation: the integrand secretly contains du. So the productive question is not "what looks messy?" but "what could u be, such that du is also present?"
Here the options themselves are the clue — they are all built on (1+cos6x) or (1+sec6x) raised to a fractional power. That strongly suggests u=1+cos6x, whose derivative is
dxdu=6cos5x(−sinx)=−6sinxcos5x.
So if we can massage the integrand into the shape sinxcos5x×(function of u), we are done. That is exactly what converting sec→cos achieves.
Step-by-step
Step 1 — Express everything in cosines.
tanx=cosxsinx,sec2x1=cos2x,1+sec6x=1+cos6x1=cos6x1+cos6x
Step 2 — Rebuild the integrand. The denominator carries (1+sec6x) to the power 2/3:
(1+sec6x)−2/3=(cos6x1+cos6x)−2/3=(1+cos6x)2/3cos4x
Hence
I=∫cosxsinx⋅cos2x⋅(1+cos6x)2/3cos4xdx=∫(1+cos6x)2/3sinxcos5xdx
Notice the payoff: exactly the sinxcos5x we predicted.
Step 3 — Substitute t=cosx, so dt=−sinxdx:
I=−∫(1+t6)2/3t5dt …
- TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.If ex=y+y2−1, then dxdy= (A) sinhx (B) coshx (C) tanhx (D) −sinhx
›Reveal solutionSolution
Recognise ex=y+y2−1 as x=cosh−1y, so y=coshx and dxdy=sinhx.
Setup. We are given
ex=y+y2−1.
The right-hand side is exactly the closed form of the inverse hyperbolic cosine:
cosh−1y=log(y+y2−1).
Invert. Taking logarithms of the given relation,
x=log(y+y2−1)=cosh−1y,
hence
y=coshx.
Differentiate.
dxdy=dxd(coshx)=sinhx.
Check by implicit differentiation. Differentiating ex=y+y2−1: …
- TG EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-10-FN1 markMCQQ.Coth−12= (A) Sech−1(51) (B) Tanh−1(31) (C) Cosh−1(2) (D) Cosech−1(3)
›Reveal solutionSolution
To evaluate Coth−12, we convert it to its equivalent logarithmic form. We find that Coth−12=21log3. By evaluating each option using their respective logarithmic forms, we find that Cosech−1(3) also equals 21log3.
The problem asks us to find the equivalent expression for Coth−12 among the given options. The most straightforward way to do this is to convert Coth−12 into its logarithmic form and then convert each option into its logarithmic form to find a match. This approach works because inverse hyperbolic functions have well-defined logarithmic equivalents, which are often easier to compare.
Concept: Logarithmic Forms of Inverse Hyperbolic Functions
Inverse hyperbolic functions are defined in terms of the natural logarithm. This conversion is crucial for evaluating and comparing these functions. For example, if y=Coth−1x, it means x=Cothy. By expressing Cothy in terms of exponential functions (ey and e−y) and solving for y, we can derive its logarithmic form.
The logarithmic forms of the inverse hyperbolic functions are:
- Sinh−1x=log(x+x2+1)
- Cosh−1x=log(x+x2−1) for x≥1
- Tanh−1x=21log(1−x1+x) for ∣x∣<1
- Coth−1x=21log(x−1x+1) for ∣x∣>1
- Sech−1x=log(x1+1−x2) for 0<x≤1
- Cosech−1x=log(x1+∣x∣1+x2) for x=0. A simpler form for x>0 is log(x1+1+x2).
Let's proceed step-by-step to find the value of Coth−12 and then check the options.
Step-by-step Derivation
-
Calculate the value of Coth−12:
We use the logarithmic form for Coth−1x.
›Proof
Derivation of Coth−1x
Let y=Coth−1x.
Then, by definition, x=Cothy.
We know that Cothy=sinhycoshy=(ey−e−y)/2(ey+e−y)/2=ey−e−yey+e−y.
So, we have the equation:
x=ey−e−yey+e−y
Multiply both sides by (ey−e−y):
x(ey−e−y)=ey+e−y
xey−xe−y=ey+e−y
Rearrange the terms to group ey and e−y:
xey−ey=xe−y+e−y
Factor out ey on the left and e−y on the right:
ey(x−1)=e−y(x+1)
Multiply both sides by ey:
e2y(x−1)=(x+1)
Isolate e2y:
e2y=x−1x+1
Take the natural logarithm of both sides:
2y=log(x−1x+1)
Finally, solve for y:
y=21log(x−1x+1)
This formula is valid for ∣x∣>1.
For Coth−12, we substitute x=2 into the formula:
Coth−12=21log(2−12+1)
=21log(13)
=21log3.
Our target value is 21log3. Now we check each option.
-
Evaluate Option (A): Sech−1(51):
Using the formula Sech−1x=log(x1+1−x2) for 0<x≤1. Here x=51.
Sech−1(51)=log511+1−(51)2
=log(511+1−51)
=log(511+54)
=log(511+52)
=log(5155+2)
=log(5+2).
This does not match 21log3. So, option (A) is incorrect. …
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-10-AN1 markMCQQ.If the tangent drawn at a point P(t) on the hyperbola x2−y2=c2 cuts X-axis at T and the normal drawn at the same point P cuts the Y-axis at N, then the equation of the locus of the midpoint of TN is (A) 4x2c2−c2y2=1 (B) c2x2−4c2y2=1 (C) 4c2x2+c2y2=1 (D) x2+y2=4c2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Tangent meets the X-axis at T=(x1c2,0) and the normal meets the Y-axis at N=(0,2y1); eliminating P from the midpoint gives 4x2c2−c2y2=1, option (A).
Let P=(x1,y1) on x2−y2=c2, so x12−y12=c2.
Tangent at P: xx1−yy1=c2. Setting y=0: x=x1c2, so T=(x1c2,0).
Normal at P: the tangent slope is y′=y1x1, so the normal slope is −x1y1:
y−y1=−x1y1(x−x1).
Setting x=0: y−y1=y1⇒y=2y1, so N=(0,2y1). …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-AN1 markMCQQ.If l is the maximum value of −3x2+4x+1 and m is the minimum value of 3x2+4x+1, then the equation of the hyperbola having foci at (l,0), (7m,0) and eccentricity as 2 is (A) 36x2−12y2=49 (B) 2x2−5y2=1 (C) 49x2−36y2=12 (D) 36x2−12y2=1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Find the maximum of the first quadratic and the minimum of the second to locate the foci; use the eccentricity to determine a, then write the hyperbola equation. The answer is (A) 36x2−12y2=49.
Understanding the problem
A hyperbola is determined by its foci and eccentricity. The foci lie on the transverse axis, and for a horizontal hyperbola centered at the origin, they are at (±c,0). The eccentricity e=ac relates the focal distance to the semi-major axis. Once we know c and e, we can find a, then b from b2=c2−a2, and write the standard form a2x2−b2y2=1.
But first, we need to find where the foci actually are by evaluating l and m.
Finding the maximum value l
For f(x)=−3x2+4x+1, this is a downward-opening parabola (coefficient of x2 is negative), so it has a maximum at its vertex.
The vertex occurs at x=−2ab=−2(−3)4=32.
Substituting back:
l=−3(32)2+4(32)+1=−3⋅94+38+1=−34+38+1=34+1=37
Finding the minimum value m
For g(x)=3x2+4x+1, this is an upward-opening parabola, so it has a minimum at its vertex.
The vertex occurs at x=−2(3)4=−32.
Substituting:
m=3(−32)2+4(−32)+1=3⋅94−38+1=34−38+1=−34+1=−31
Locating the foci
The foci are at (l,0)=(37,0) and (7m,0)=(7⋅(−31),0)=(−37,0).
The center of the hyperbola is the midpoint of the foci:
Center=(237+(−37),0)=(0,0)
The distance from center to each focus is:
c=37
Using the eccentricity …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.