Skip to content

Physics · Ch 7 — Alternating Current

Resonance in a Series LCR Circuit

7.11

Resonance in a Series LCR Circuit

The resonance condition. Section 7.10.1 showed that the impedance of a series LCR circuit is Z=R2+(XL−XC)2Z=\sqrt{R^2+(X_L-X_C)^2}. Since RR is fixed, ZZ is smallest exactly when the term (XL−XC)2(X_L-X_C)^2 is smallest -- which happens when XL=XCX_L=X_C, making that whole term vanish. At this special condition, called resonance, the impedance collapses to its absolute minimum possible value:

Zmin=R(purely resistive, since the L and C contributions exactly cancel)Z_{min} = R \qquad \text{(purely resistive, since the $L$ and $C$ contributions exactly cancel)}

The resonant frequency. Setting XL=XCX_L=X_C explicitly,

ω0L=1ω0C⟹ω02=1LC⟹ω0=1LC\omega_0 L = \frac{1}{\omega_0 C} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \omega_0^2 = \frac{1}{LC} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \boxed{\omega_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}}

with the corresponding ordinary (cyclic) resonant frequency f0=ω0/(2π)=1/(2πLC)f_0=\omega_0/(2\pi)=1/(2\pi\sqrt{LC}). This frequency depends ONLY on LL and CC -- not on RR at all -- so changing RR never shifts WHERE the peak occurs, only how tall and narrow it is (see below).

Why the current is maximum at resonance. Since Irms=Vrms/ZI_{rms}=V_{rms}/Z for a fixed applied rms voltage, and ZZ is at its absolute smallest value RR exactly at ω=ω0\omega=\omega_0, the rms current reaches its own absolute MAXIMUM value at resonance:

Imax=VrmsRI_{max} = \frac{V_{rms}}{R}

Away from ω0\omega_0 in either direction (whether ω<ω0\omega<\omega_0, where the circuit is net capacitive, or ω>ω0\omega>\omega_0, where it is net inductive), (XL−XC)2(X_L-X_C)^2 grows, ZZ increases above RR, and the current falls below this peak -- producing the bell-shaped resonance curve shown in the figure for this section.

Why smaller RR gives a sharper peak. The PEAK height Imax=Vrms/RI_{max}=V_{rms}/R is obviously larger for a smaller RR. But RR also controls how QUICKLY the current falls away as ω\omega moves away from ω0\omega_0: since Z=R2+(XL−XC)2Z=\sqrt{R^2+(X_L-X_C)^2}, a small RR means even a modest mismatch (XL−XC)(X_L-X_C) already dominates R2R^2 inside the square root, so ZZ (and hence II) changes rapidly with frequency near ω0\omega_0 -- giving a tall, NARROW resonance peak. A large RR, by contrast, dominates the sum for a wider range of (XL−XC)(X_L-X_C), so ZZ changes only gradually with frequency, giving a shorter, BROADER peak (both curves are shown together in the figure, sharing the same ω0\omega_0 but with very different shapes). …

Figure 1Resonance curve: rms current versus angular frequency for a series LCR circuit

What this figure shows. A graph is drawn with angular frequency ω\omega along the horizontal axis and rms current IrmsI_{rms} along the vertical axis. TWO curves are plotted on the same axes, both bell-shaped (rising from near zero at low ω\omega, reaching a single sharp peak, then falling back towards zero at high ω\omega), both peaking at the SAME angular frequency ω0\omega_0 (marked with a vertical dashed guideline down to the horizontal axis, labelled ω0\omega_0). One curve, labelled 'small RR', is drawn as a TALL, NARROW, sharply-peaked bell curve; the other curve, labelled 'large RR', is drawn as a SHORTER, WIDER, more gently-rounded bell curve reaching a lower peak current, both curves crossing at the same low-current tails on either side. A short horizontal double-headed arrow is drawn across the small-RR curve at a height of Imax/2I_{max}/\sqrt{2} (marked with a dashed horizontal guideline from the vertical axis), spanning between the two angular frequencies ω1\omega_1 …