Q.Using the properties of determinants, evaluate: 0x2yx2zxy20zy2xz2yz20
Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2:
det1002−303−61=1×(−3)×1=−3.
No cofactor was ever expanded — we just slid rows around.
Aim your zeros at a row or column that already contains a 1 to keep the arithmetic clean. And remember operation 3 needs a different row: adding a multiple of a row to itself rescales it and changes the value.
Evaluating determinants using row and column operations rather than direct expansion is a core skill in the CBSE Class 12 Determinants chapter, and "properties of determinants class 12 with examples" is one of the most searched topics for board exam revision. This technique of reducing a determinant to triangular form is also a favourite approach in JEE Main and JEE Advanced problems involving higher-order determinants.
Key idea: every entry carries factors of x,y,z in a pattern; pull them out of the columns and then the rows, leaving a plain numerical determinant.
Step 1 — factor x from C1, y from C2, z from C3:
Δ=xyz0xyxzxy0yzxzyz0.
Step 2 — factor x from R1, y from R2, z from R3:
Δ=x2y2z20xxy0yzz0.
Step 3 — expand along the first row:
0xxy0yzz0=−y(0−zx)+z(xy−0)=xyz+xyz=2xyz.
So Δ=x2y2z2⋅2xyz=2x3y3z3.
2x3y3z3
Pulling x,y,z from the three columns and then from the three rows leaves a small determinant equal to 2xyz, so the value is 2x3y3z3.
Intuition
Each entry is a single monomial in x,y,z, so instead of a brute expansion we strip the common factors out of every column and every row. Each strip multiplies out front, and the leftover determinant is tiny.
Setting up
Δ=0x2yx2zxy20zy2xz2yz20.
Working the steps
1. Factor the columns. Column 1 has common factor x, column 2 has y, column 3 has z:
Δ=xyz0xyxzxy0yzxzyz0.
2. Factor the rows. Now row 1 has common factor x, row 2 has y, row 3 has z:
Δ=xyz⋅xyz0xxy0yzz0=x2y2z20xxy0yzz0.
3. Expand the small determinant along the first row:
0xxy0yzz0=0−y(0⋅0−z⋅x)+z(x⋅y−0⋅x)=−y(−zx)+z(xy)=2xyz.
4. Multiply back:
Δ=x2y2z2⋅2xyz=2x3y3z3.
Check with x=1, y=2, z=3: the original determinant is 02340129180=432, and 2⋅13⋅23⋅33=432. ✓
2x3y3z3
Method: Factoring Common Variables Out of Rows and Columns Before Expanding
This method applies to determinants whose entries are monomials sharing common variable factors across rows and/or columns — instead of expanding a messy 3×3 directly, you strip out every shared factor first, leaving a tiny, easy determinant.
Steps
Step 1: Factor a common term out of each column
Scan each column for a variable common to every entry in it (treating a 0 entry as compatible with any factor) and pull it out in front of the determinant, dividing every entry in that column by the factor as you do:
Δ=(column factors)×⋯.
Step 2: Repeat for rows if a further common factor remains
After factoring columns, check whether each row of what's left also shares a common variable. If so, factor that out too — it's legitimate to factor rows and columns in sequence, as long as each factor is multiplied back in outside the determinant.
Step 3: Expand the small remaining determinant
What's left after two rounds of factoring is usually a determinant with simple 0s and single variables — expand this by cofactor expansion along whichever row/column has the most zeros.
Step 4: Multiply every factored term back together
Combine all the factors pulled out in Steps 1–2 with the value of the small determinant from Step 3 to get the final answer, and sanity-check by plugging in small numeric values for the variables into both the original and final expressions.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Attempting a direct cofactor expansion instead of factoring first
Why it's wrong: expanding this 3×3 determinant directly (without first pulling x,y,z out of the columns and rows) means juggling six degree-5 monomial terms at once, which is slow and highly error-prone. Correct approach: always scan for a common monomial factor in each column (and then each row) before expanding — here x,y,z factor cleanly from the three columns, then again from the three rows.
Mistake 2: Mixing up which factor belongs to which row or column
Why it's wrong: factoring happens in two separate passes (columns, then rows), and assigning the wrong variable to the wrong row/column in the second pass gives a wrong overall power of x, y, or z in the final answer. Correct approach: track each factoring step explicitly — column factors give xyz, and the row factors on the new matrix independently give another xyz, for a combined x2y2z2.
Mistake 3: Sign error in the small 3×3 expansion
Why it's wrong: expanding 0xxy0yzz0 along the first row involves a double-negative in the middle cofactor (−y(0⋅0−z⋅x)=−y(−zx)=+xyz), and dropping one of the two negative signs gives −2xyz or 0 instead of 2xyz. Correct approach: write out 0⋅0−z⋅x explicitly before applying the cofactor's minus sign, rather than combining the signs mentally.
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.−a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2= (A) a2b2c2 (B) 2a2b2c2 (C) 3a2b2c2 (D) 4a2b2c2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Factoring a, b, c out of the three rows reduces the determinant to a simpler ±1-coefficient determinant that evaluates to 4abc, giving a total of 4a2b2c2. Answer: (D).
Concept and Intuition
Each row of the given determinant has a common factor: row 1 is a⋅(−a,b,c), row 2 is b⋅(a,−b,c), row 3 is c⋅(a,b,−c). Pulling a common factor out of a row simply multiplies the determinant by that factor (a standard determinant property), so we can simplify before directly expanding the messier original 3×3 determinant.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original determinant: −a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2.
- Factor a from row 1, b from row 2, c from row 3:
=abc−aaab−bbcc−c
- Expand this reduced determinant along the first row:
−a−bbc−c−baac−c+caa−bb
- Compute each 2×2 minor: −bbc−c=(−b)(−c)−c(b)=bc−bc=0; aac−c=a(−c)−c(a)=−2ac; aa−bb=ab−(−b)(a)=2ab.
- Substitute: −a(0)−b(−2ac)+c(2ab)=0+2abc+2abc=4abc.
- So the reduced determinant equals 4abc, and the original determinant is abc×4abc=4a2b2c2.
Common Mistakes
- Sign errors when expanding the 2×2 minors of the reduced matrix (the −,+,− cofactor pattern is easy to mis-apply).
- Forgetting to multiply the reduced determinant's value back by the abc factored out earlier.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 4a2b2c2.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.1a2a31b2b31c2c3= (A) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(a+b+c) (B) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a) (C) (a−b)(b−c)(a−c)(ab+bc+ca) (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This determinant is a known generalised-Vandermonde identity that factors as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) — verified numerically, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Determinants with rows 1,x,x2 (Vandermonde) factor neatly as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a). When the exponent pattern is not consecutive (here 0,2,3 instead of 0,1,2), the determinant still factors into the Vandermonde piece times an extra symmetric-polynomial factor — here that extra factor turns out to be e2=ab+bc+ca (the second elementary symmetric polynomial), since the exponent set {0,2,3} is the base set {0,1,2} shifted up by the partition (0,1,1), whose associated Schur polynomial is exactly e2.
Rather than rely purely on this identity from memory, verifying with actual numbers is the safest exam technique.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand the determinant along the first row (all entries 1): D=(b2c3−b3c2)−(a2c3−a3c2)+(a2b3−a3b2) =b2c2(c−b)+a2c2(a−c)+a2b2(b−a).
- Rather than fully factor symbolically, test with concrete numbers: let a=1,b=2,c=3.
- Direct determinant: rows (1,1,1), (1,4,9), (1,8,27). D=1(4⋅27−9⋅8)−1(1⋅27−9⋅1)+1(1⋅8−4⋅1)=1(108−72)−1(27−9)+1(8−4)=36−18+4=22.
- Test option (D): (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) with these values: (1−2)(2−3)(3−1)=(−1)(−1)(2)=2; ab+bc+ca=2+6+3=11; product =2×11=22. Matches D=22.
- Test option (A): (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(a+b+c)=2×6=12=22 — rejected.
- Test option (C): (a−b)(b−c)(a−c)(ab+bc+ca): note (a−c)=1−3=−2 (opposite sign convention to (c−a)=2), giving (−1)(−1)(−2)(11)=−22=22 — rejected (sign mismatch).
- Option (D) is confirmed as the correct general factorisation.
Common Mistakes
- Sign confusion between (c−a) and (a−c) when comparing to option (C) — a single sign flip changes the whole product's sign.
- Trying to factor the expression fully symbolically under time pressure instead of the much faster numeric-substitution check.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca).
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.a+b+2cccab+c+2aabbc+a+2b= (A) (a+b+c)3 (B) 2(a+b+c)3 (C) 3(a+b+c)3 (D) (a+b+c)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing each diagonal entry as s+(off-diagonal-like term) where s=a+b+c reveals the matrix as sI plus a rank-1 correction, whose determinant works out cleanly to 2(a+b+c)3 using the determinant lemma (or row operations).
Concept and Intuition
Many "cyclic-symmetric" determinants like this one simplify beautifully once you notice a+b+2c=(a+b+c)+c, etc. — subtracting off the common sum s=a+b+c from every diagonal entry turns the matrix into sI (a multiple of the identity) plus a very simple rank-1 matrix whose every row is identical. Determinants of sI+rank-1 matrices have a clean closed form.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let s=a+b+c. Rewrite diagonal entries: a+b+2c=s+c, b+c+2a=s+a, c+a+2b=s+b.
- The matrix becomes:
M=s+cccas+aabbs+b
- Subtract sI: M−sI=cccaaabbb — every row is the same vector (c,a,b), so M−sI has rank 1: M−sI=1vT where 1=(1,1,1)T and v=(c,a,b)T.
- So M=sI+1vT. The determinant lemma (matrix determinant lemma) gives:
det(sI+1vT)=s3+s2(vT1)
(since det(sI)=s3 and adj(sI)=s2I for a 3×3 matrix).
5. vT1=c+a+b=s. So det(M)=s3+s2⋅s=2s3.
6. Substituting back s=a+b+c: det=2(a+b+c)3.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to expand the 3×3 determinant directly by cofactors without the s-substitution — it's algebraically messy and error-prone; the "subtract the common sum" trick is much cleaner and standard for this whole family of problems.
- Forgetting the factor of s2 multiplying (vT1) and just adding s3+vT1.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 2(a+b+c)3.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-FN1 markMCQQ.What is the value of aa−bb+cbb−cc+acc−aa+b=? (A) a3+b3+c3+3abc (B) a3+b3+c3−3abc (C) a3+b3+c3−6abc (D) a3+b3+c3+6abc
›Reveal solutionSolution
Direct cofactor expansion of the determinant shows all cross terms cancel, leaving the
classical identity a3+b3+c3−3abc.
Concept and Intuition
This is a disguised version of the well-known factorisation
a3+b3+c3−3abc=(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca), packaged as a determinant. Expanding carefully
term by term (rather than guessing) confirms which of the four sign variants is correct.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand along the first row: D=a[(b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)]−b[(a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)]+c[(a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)].
- Compute each bracket:
- (b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)=ab+b2−ac−bc−c2+a2
- (a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)=a2−b2−bc−c2+ab+ac
- (a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)=ac+a2−bc−ab−b2+c2
- Multiply through by a, −b, c respectively and add. All the mixed quadratic-times-linear terms (a2b,ab2,a2c,ac2,b2c,bc2) cancel in pairs, leaving only a3+b3+c3 from the cubic terms and −3abc from the three abc contributions (one from each bracket).
- Verify with a quick numeric check (a=1,b=0,c=0): the matrix becomes 1100010−11, whose determinant is 1; and 13+0+0−0=1 — matches.
- So D=a3+b3+c3−3abc.
Common Mistakes
- Sign error on the 3abc term (getting +3abc instead of −3abc, or ±6abc) from mis-tracking how many times the abc term appears across the three bracket expansions.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — a3+b3+c3−3abc.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of b+cbcac+acaba+b is (A) abc (B) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a) (C) 4abc (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This classic 3×3 determinant simplifies via row operations (adding all rows together makes every entry in one row equal to a+b+c) to the closed form 4abc, confirmed by direct numeric substitution.
Concept and Intuition
Many "nice" symmetric determinants like this one are best handled by first performing a row or column operation that reveals a common factor (here, adding all three rows makes every entry in the new row equal, exposing an (a+b+c) or similar factor), then simplifying the reduced 2×2 structure. When the algebra gets intricate, a quick numeric sanity check with simple values of a,b,c is an efficient way to confirm which answer choice matches.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is b+cbcac+acaba+b.
- Apply R1→R1+R2+R3: the new first row becomes (b+c+b+c, a+c+a+c, a+b+a+b)... more carefully, summing column-wise: column 1 sum =(b+c)+b+c=b+2c... to avoid an error-prone symbolic expansion, verify by direct numeric substitution instead (a clean, reliable check for this type of determinant).
- Numeric check: let a=1,b=2,c=3. The matrix becomes 523143123.
- Expand along Row 1: det=5(4⋅3−2⋅3)−1(2⋅3−2⋅3)+1(2⋅3−4⋅3)=5(12−6)−1(0)+1(6−12)=30−0−6=24.
- Compare with each option at a=1,b=2,c=3: (A) abc=6 — no. (B) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a)=3⋅5⋅4=60 — no. (C) 4abc=4⋅6=24 — matches. (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)=(−1)(−1)(2)=2 — no.
- Only option (C), 4abc, matches the computed value.
Common Mistakes
- Attempting a fully symbolic cofactor expansion without organising the algebra carefully, leading to sign errors — a numeric check with simple distinct values is a fast, robust way to identify the correct closed form among given options.
- Forgetting that this determinant is NOT antisymmetric in a,b,c (ruling out option D, which vanishes whenever any two variables are equal — but the original determinant does not vanish when, say, a=b).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 4abc.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If f,g,h are differentiable functions of x, then f(xf)′f′g(xg)′g′h(xh)′h′= (A) fg′−gh′ (B) gh′+xf′ (C) 0 (D) x(f′+g′+h′)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The determinant simplifies to zero because the second row is a linear combination of the first and third rows, making the rows linearly dependent.
We are asked to evaluate
Δ=f(xf)′f′g(xg)′g′h(xh)′h′
where f,g,h are differentiable functions of x.
Concept and Intuition
The key idea is to use row operations that do not change the value of a determinant, or to notice linear dependence among rows.
Here, the second row contains derivatives of products xf,xg,xh. Using the product rule,
(xf)′=f+xf′,(xg)′=g+xg′,(xh)′=h+xh′.
So the second row is actually:
(f+xf′g+xg′h+xh′).
Notice that this is exactly Row 1 plus x times Row 3:
Row 2=Row 1+x⋅Row 3.
When one row is a linear combination of the others, the determinant is zero.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Expand the second row entries using the product rule:
(xf)′=f+xf′,(xg)′=g+xg′,(xh)′=h+xh′.
- Rewrite the determinant with this expanded form:
Δ=ff+xf′f′gg+xg′g′hh+xh′h′.
- Perform a row operation that does not change the determinant: subtract Row 1 from Row 2.
New Row 2=Row 2−Row 1=(xf′xg′xh′).
So
Δ=fxf′f′gxg′g′hxh′h′.
- Factor x from Row 2:
Δ=xff′f′gg′g′hh′h′.
- Observe that Row 2 and Row 3 are now identical. A determinant with two equal rows is zero. Hence
Δ=x⋅0=0.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that the product rule gives (xf)′=f+xf′, not just xf′. If you miss the f term, you won't see the linear dependence.
TipWhenever you see derivatives of products inside a determinant, expand them first. Often the structure reveals that rows are linear combinations, making the determinant vanish.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C).
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-AN1 markMCQQ.If the determinant cos2xsin2xcos2xsin2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2x is expanded in powers of cosx, then the constant term in the expansion is (A) 1 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The constant term of a polynomial in cosx is exactly the value obtained by setting cosx=0. Answer: (A).
Concept and Intuition
If a determinant's entries are polynomials in c=cosx, expanding it produces a polynomial in c. Its constant term (the c0 coefficient) equals the value of the whole expression when c=0 — a shortcut that avoids expanding the full polynomial in cosx.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write each entry in terms of c=cosx: cos2x=2c2−1, sin2x=1−c2, cos2x=c2.
- Set c=0: cos2x→−1, sin2x→1, cos2x→0.
- The matrix becomes −11−11−10−10−1.
- Expand: −1[(−1)(−1)−(0)(0)]−1[(1)(−1)−(0)(−1)]+(−1)[(1)(0)−(−1)(−1)] =−1(1)−1(−1)+(−1)(−1)=−1+1+1=1.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to fully expand the determinant symbolically in cosx (needlessly long) instead of using the c=0 substitution shortcut for the constant term.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 1.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of the determinant a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b is ____ (A) a (B) b (C) 0 (D) a+b
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rows of this determinant are in arithmetic progression (each row's entries increase by a constant step, and consecutive rows shift by a constant amount too); row-reducing shows two rows become proportional, forcing the determinant to 0.
Concept and Intuition
A determinant is zero whenever any two rows (or columns) are linearly dependent (e.g. one is a scalar multiple of another, or a linear combination of others). Rows built from an arithmetic-progression pattern (like a+b,a+2b,a+3b then shifting by a constant each row) are a classic setup for this — subtracting consecutive rows collapses the "arithmetic" structure into constant, proportional rows.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original matrix:
a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b
- Perform R2→R2−R1: new R2=(a+2b−(a+b), a+3b−(a+2b), a+4b−(a+3b))=(b, b, b).
- Perform R3→R3−R2(original): new R3=(a+4b−(a+2b), a+5b−(a+3b), a+6b−(a+4b))=(2b, 2b, 2b).
- The matrix now has rows (a+b,a+2b,a+3b), (b,b,b), (2b,2b,2b) — and row 3 is exactly 2× row 2, i.e. the rows are linearly dependent.
- A determinant with two proportional rows is always 0.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to expand the 3×3 determinant directly by cofactors without first noticing the arithmetic-progression row structure — far more error-prone than the row-operation shortcut.
- Forgetting that row operations of the type Ri→Ri−Rj don't change the determinant's value, only simplify it.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 0.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.If A=a2b3c2bc2a3c3ab and det(A)=pa3+qb3+rc3+s(abc), then p+q+r+s= (A) 12 (B) 20 (C) 24 (D) 30
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expanding the determinant gives −6a3−4b3−9c3+31abc, so p+q+r+s=−6−4−9+31=12 — option (A).
det(A)=a2b3c2bc2a3c3ab=a(cb−6a2)−2b(2b2−9ac)+3c(4ab−3c2).
Expand:
=abc−6a3−4b3+18abc+12abc−9c3=−6a3−4b3−9c3+31abc.
Matching det(A)=pa3+qb3+rc3+s(abc):
p=−6,q=−4,r=−9,s=31.
p+q+r+s=−6−4−9+31=12.
✓Final answerp+q+r+s=12 — option (A).
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-FN1 markMCQQ.If a,b,c are real numbers such that a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ac≤0, then (a−b+1)5a11−b11a15−b15b7−c7(b−c+2)3b17−c17c9−a9c13−a13(c−a+3)1= (A) 2abc (B) 0 (C) 24abc (D) 24
›Reveal solutionSolution
The inequality forces a=b=c; substituting collapses the matrix to a simple upper-triangular-looking form whose determinant is just the product of its surviving diagonal terms, 24.
Concept and Intuition
The expression a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca is a sum of squares in disguise: 21[(a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−a)2], which can never be negative. So the given condition "≤0" combined with this built-in "≥0" forces it to be exactly zero, which only happens when a=b=c. That single deduction massively simplifies every entry of the determinant, since almost every entry is a difference of equal powers of a,b,c (which all vanish when a=b=c), leaving only three surviving diagonal-type terms.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Rewrite the condition: a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca=21[(a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−a)2], which is always ≥0.
- Given this quantity is also ≤0, it must equal exactly 0, forcing (a−b)2=(b−c)2=(c−a)2=0, i.e. a=b=c.
- Substitute a=b=c into the matrix: all terms of the form b7−c7, c9−a9, a11−b11, c13−a13, a15−b15, b17−c17 become 0 (difference of equal quantities).
- The remaining diagonal entries: (a−b+1)5=(0+1)5=1; (b−c+2)3=(0+2)3=8; (c−a+3)1=(0+3)=3.
- The matrix reduces to 100080003, a diagonal matrix, whose determinant is the product of the diagonal entries: 1×8×3=24.
Common Mistakes
- Missing that the inequality is actually an equality in disguise (forcing a=b=c), and instead trying to compute the determinant symbolically for general a,b,c — a much harder path.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 24.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-AN1 markMCQQ.If k∈R and detA=a1a2a3b1b2b3c1c2c3=k then detB=a1a2+2a1a3b1b2+2b1b3c1c2+2c1c3 is equal to (A) 0 (B) 2K (C) K (D) K2
›Reveal solutionSolution
detB is obtained from detA by the elementary row operation R2→R2+2R1, which
leaves a determinant unchanged; so detB=detA=k.
Concept and Intuition
A core determinant property: adding a scalar multiple of one row to another row does not change the determinant's value. This is because splitting the determinant using linearity in
row 2 gives the original determinant plus 2× a determinant with two identical rows (rows 1
and the added copy of row 1), and any determinant with two identical rows is exactly zero.
Step-by-Step Solution
- detB=a1a2+2a1a3b1b2+2b1b3c1c2+2c1c3.
- By linearity in row 2, split this into two determinants: detB=a1a2a3b1b2b3c1c2c3+2a1a1a3b1b1b3c1c1c3.
- The first determinant is exactly detA=k.
- The second determinant has row 1 = row 2 (both a1,b1,c1), so it equals 0.
- Hence detB=k+2(0)=k.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming any row modification scales or shifts the determinant — only scaling a row by a constant scales the determinant; adding a multiple of another row leaves it unchanged.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — K.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-AN1 markMCQQ.If a, b, c are respectively the 5th, 8th, 13th terms of an arithmetic progression, then abc5813111= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) abc (D) 520
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since a,b,c are AP terms whose positions (5, 8, 13) are also linear in the same way, the determinant with columns (term, position, 1) is identically zero.
Concept and Intuition
If a,b,c are terms of an AP at positions p,q,r respectively, then a=A+(p−1)d, b=A+(q−1)d, c=A+(r−1)d — i.e. each term is an affine (linear) function of its position. A determinant of the form termposition1 over three such rows is always zero, because the "term" column is a linear combination of the "position" column and the "1" column (row reduction makes a column of zeros).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let the AP have first term A and common difference d. Then a=A+4d (5th term), b=A+7d (8th term), c=A+12d (13th term).
- Expand the determinant along the first row: Δ=a(8⋅1−1⋅13)−5(b⋅1−1⋅c)+1(b⋅13−8⋅c) =a(−5)−5(b−c)+(13b−8c)=−5a−5b+5c+13b−8c=−5a+8b−3c.
- Substitute: −5a=−5A−20d, 8b=8A+56d, −3c=−3A−36d.
- Sum coefficients of A: −5+8−3=0. Sum coefficients of d: −20+56−36=0.
- So Δ=0⋅A+0⋅d=0.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to compute the determinant assuming a,b,c are arbitrary (unrelated) numbers — one must actually substitute the AP relation to see the cancellation.
- Arithmetic slips while expanding the 3×3 determinant (sign errors in cofactor expansion).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 0.
ANSWER: A
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.