Q.If the determinant x+ay+bz+cp+uq+vr+wl+fm+gn+h splits into exactly K determinants of order 3, each element of which contains only one term, then the value of K is 8.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2: …
Concept: Determinant Evaluation Using Identities — specifically, the linearity property: a determinant is linear in each row (or column). Here, every element is a sum of two terms, so each row is a sum of two row-vectors.
Step 1: Write the determinant as
(x,p,l)+(a,u,f)(y,q,m)+(b,v,g)(z,r,n)+(c,w,h) …
The determinant of a sum of two column vectors can be split into a sum of 2 determinants per column. With three columns each being a sum of two terms, the total number of determinants when fully expanded is 2×2×2=8. Hence K=8.
The key idea here is linearity of the determinant in each column. A determinant is a multilinear function — it behaves linearly when you add two vectors in a single column, keeping the other columns fixed. This property lets us break a complicated-looking determinant into a sum of simpler ones.
Let’s see why this works. If you have a determinant where one column is the sum of two vectors, say c1+d1c2c3, it equals c1c2c3+d1c2c3. The same holds for any column. This is not a trick — it follows directly from the definition of determinant as an alternating multilinear form.
Now apply this to your problem. Each column of the given determinant is itself a sum of two vectors:
- Column 1: (x+a,y+b,z+c)T = (x,y,z)T+(a,b,c)T
- Column 2: (p+u,q+v,r+w)T = (p,q,r)T+(u,v,w)T
- Column 3: (l+f,m+g,n+h)T = (l,m,n)T+(f,g,h)T
So we have three columns, each a sum of two terms. When we expand using linearity, we do it one column at a time.
- Start with the first column. Split it into two determinants:
x+ay+bz+cp+uq+vr+wl+fm+gn+h=xyzp+uq+vr+wl+fm+gn+h+abcp+uq+vr+wl+fm+gn+h
- Now each of these two determinants has its second column as a sum. Split each one again:
xyzp+uq+vr+wl+fm+gn+h=xyzpqrl+fm+gn+h+xyzuvwl+fm+gn+h
abcp+uq+vr+wl+fm+gn+h=abcpqrl+fm+gn+h+abcuvwl+fm+gn+h
So far we have 2×2=4 determinants.
- Each of these four determinants still has its third column as a sum. Split each one one more time. For example: …
Method: Counting the Split-Off Determinants Using Multilinearity
Use this whenever a question asks "into how many determinants does this split" when several columns (or rows) are each written as a sum of terms.
Steps
Step 1: Recall determinant linearity in each column separately
If one column of a determinant is c=c′+c′′, then
det[…,c,…]=det[…,c′,…]+det[…,c′′,…],
with every other column unchanged. This is a per-column rule, not a whole-matrix rule.
Step 2: Apply it independently, column by column
If column 1 splits into m1 pieces, splitting it produces m1 determinants. Now split column 2 in EACH of those m1 determinants, producing m1×m2 determinants, and so on for every splitting column.
Step 3: Multiply the counts to get the total …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Confusing column-wise splitting with the false rule det(A+B)=detA+detB
Why it's wrong: a determinant is linear in each column separately, not linear as a function of the whole matrix — splitting works one column at a time, giving 2n (or more generally ∏mi) terms, not just 2. Correct approach: split one column at a time, and multiply the counts across all splitting columns.
Mistake 2: Forgetting that a repeated-column term would vanish in a related "evaluate" version of this question …
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-AN1 markMCQQ.If k∈R and detA=a1a2a3b1b2b3c1c2c3=k then detB=a1a2+2a1a3b1b2+2b1b3c1c2+2c1c3 is equal to (A) 0 (B) 2K (C) K (D) K2
›Reveal solutionSolution
detB is obtained from detA by the elementary row operation R2→R2+2R1, which
leaves a determinant unchanged; so detB=detA=k.
Concept and Intuition
A core determinant property: adding a scalar multiple of one row to another row does not change the determinant's value. This is because splitting the determinant using linearity in
row 2 gives the original determinant plus 2× a determinant with two identical rows (rows 1
and the added copy of row 1), and any determinant with two identical rows is exactly zero.
Step-by-Step Solution
- detB=a1a2+2a1a3b1b2+2b1b3c1c2+2c1c3.
- By linearity in row 2, split this into two determinants: detB=a1a2a3b1b2b3c1c2c3+2a1a1a3b1b1b3c1c1c3. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.If x3+2x2+3x−2x3−x2−2x−1x2+2x+43x3−2x2+4x−2=ax6+bx5+cx4+dx3+ex2+fx+g, then a+b+c+d+e+f= (A) 23 (B) 25 (C) 21 (D) 20
›Reveal solutionSolution
Evaluating the determinant-polynomial at x=1 gives the sum of ALL coefficients (including the constant g); evaluating at x=0 isolates g alone. Subtracting removes g, leaving a+b+c+d+e+f=25.
Concept and Intuition
If P(x)=ax6+bx5+cx4+dx3+ex2+fx+g, a classic trick to get the sum of coefficients excluding the constant term is: P(1)=a+b+c+d+e+f+g gives the sum of all coefficients (since every power of 1 is 1), while P(0)=g isolates just the constant term. So P(1)−P(0)=a+b+c+d+e+f. Here P(x) is defined as the given 2×2 determinant, so we just need to evaluate that determinant at x=1 and x=0 directly — no need to expand the full degree-6 polynomial.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is x3+2x2+3x−2x3−x2−2x−1x2+2x+43x3−2x2+4x−2.
- At x=1: top-left =1+2+3−2=4; top-right =1+2+4=7; bottom-left =1−1−2−1=−3; bottom-right =3−2+4−2=3. Determinant =4(3)−7(−3)=12+21=33=P(1)=a+b+c+d+e+f+g. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-FN1 markMCQQ.What is the value of aa−bb+cbb−cc+acc−aa+b=? (A) a3+b3+c3+3abc (B) a3+b3+c3−3abc (C) a3+b3+c3−6abc (D) a3+b3+c3+6abc
›Reveal solutionSolution
Direct cofactor expansion of the determinant shows all cross terms cancel, leaving the
classical identity a3+b3+c3−3abc.
Concept and Intuition
This is a disguised version of the well-known factorisation
a3+b3+c3−3abc=(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca), packaged as a determinant. Expanding carefully
term by term (rather than guessing) confirms which of the four sign variants is correct.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand along the first row: D=a[(b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)]−b[(a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)]+c[(a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)].
- Compute each bracket:
- (b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)=ab+b2−ac−bc−c2+a2
- (a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)=a2−b2−bc−c2+ab+ac
- (a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)=ac+a2−bc−ab−b2+c2
- Multiply through by a, −b, c respectively and add. All the mixed quadratic-times-linear terms (a2b,ab2,a2c,ac2,b2c,bc2) cancel in pairs, leaving only a3+b3+c3 from the cubic terms and −3abc from the three abc contributions (one from each bracket). …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.a+b+2cccab+c+2aabbc+a+2b= (A) (a+b+c)3 (B) 2(a+b+c)3 (C) 3(a+b+c)3 (D) (a+b+c)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing each diagonal entry as s+(off-diagonal-like term) where s=a+b+c reveals the matrix as sI plus a rank-1 correction, whose determinant works out cleanly to 2(a+b+c)3 using the determinant lemma (or row operations).
Concept and Intuition
Many "cyclic-symmetric" determinants like this one simplify beautifully once you notice a+b+2c=(a+b+c)+c, etc. — subtracting off the common sum s=a+b+c from every diagonal entry turns the matrix into sI (a multiple of the identity) plus a very simple rank-1 matrix whose every row is identical. Determinants of sI+rank-1 matrices have a clean closed form.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let s=a+b+c. Rewrite diagonal entries: a+b+2c=s+c, b+c+2a=s+a, c+a+2b=s+b.
- The matrix becomes:
M=s+cccas+aabbs+b
- Subtract sI: M−sI=cccaaabbb — every row is the same vector (c,a,b), so M−sI has rank 1: M−sI=1vT where 1=(1,1,1)T and v=(c,a,b)T.
- So M=sI+1vT. The determinant lemma (matrix determinant lemma) gives: det(sI+1vT)=s3+s2(vT1) …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.If the determinant of a 3rd order matrix A is K, then the sum of the determinants of the matrices (AAT) and (A−AT) is (A) 2K (B) 0 (C) K2 (D) K
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests two standard determinant facts: det(AAT)=(detA)2, and any odd-order skew-symmetric matrix (such as A−AT for a 3×3 matrix A) has determinant zero — giving the sum K2+0=K2.
Concept and Intuition
Two separate determinant identities combine here:
- For any square matrix A, det(AT)=det(A), so det(AAT)=det(A)⋅det(AT)=(detA)2.
- The matrix A−AT is always skew-symmetric, since (A−AT)T=AT−A=−(A−AT). For a skew-symmetric matrix S of odd order n, we always have detS=0. This is because det(ST)=det(S) always, but also ST=−S gives det(ST)=det(−S)=(−1)ndet(S). For odd n, (−1)n=−1, so det(S)=−det(S), forcing det(S)=0.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Given: A is a 3×3 matrix with det(A)=K.
- Compute det(AAT): using det(AAT)=det(A)det(AT) and det(AT)=det(A)=K, we get det(AAT)=K⋅K=K2.
- Compute det(A−AT): let S=A−AT. Then ST=AT−A=−S, so S is skew-symmetric.
- Since S is a 3×3 (odd-order) skew-symmetric matrix: det(S)=det(ST)=det(−S)=(−1)3det(S)=−det(S). This gives 2det(S)=0⇒det(S)=0. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.If A=a2b3c2bc2a3c3ab and det(A)=pa3+qb3+rc3+s(abc), then p+q+r+s= (A) 12 (B) 20 (C) 24 (D) 30
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expanding the determinant gives −6a3−4b3−9c3+31abc, so p+q+r+s=−6−4−9+31=12 — option (A).
det(A)=a2b3c2bc2a3c3ab=a(cb−6a2)−2b(2b2−9ac)+3c(4ab−3c2).
Expand:
=abc−6a3−4b3+18abc+12abc−9c3=−6a3−4b3−9c3+31abc. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.1a2a31b2b31c2c3= (A) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(a+b+c) (B) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a) (C) (a−b)(b−c)(a−c)(ab+bc+ca) (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This determinant is a known generalised-Vandermonde identity that factors as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) — verified numerically, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Determinants with rows 1,x,x2 (Vandermonde) factor neatly as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a). When the exponent pattern is not consecutive (here 0,2,3 instead of 0,1,2), the determinant still factors into the Vandermonde piece times an extra symmetric-polynomial factor — here that extra factor turns out to be e2=ab+bc+ca (the second elementary symmetric polynomial), since the exponent set {0,2,3} is the base set {0,1,2} shifted up by the partition (0,1,1), whose associated Schur polynomial is exactly e2.
Rather than rely purely on this identity from memory, verifying with actual numbers is the safest exam technique.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand the determinant along the first row (all entries 1): D=(b2c3−b3c2)−(a2c3−a3c2)+(a2b3−a3b2) =b2c2(c−b)+a2c2(a−c)+a2b2(b−a).
- Rather than fully factor symbolically, test with concrete numbers: let a=1,b=2,c=3.
- Direct determinant: rows (1,1,1), (1,4,9), (1,8,27). D=1(4⋅27−9⋅8)−1(1⋅27−9⋅1)+1(1⋅8−4⋅1)=1(108−72)−1(27−9)+1(8−4)=36−18+4=22.
- Test option (D): (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) with these values: (1−2)(2−3)(3−1)=(−1)(−1)(2)=2; ab+bc+ca=2+6+3=11; product =2×11=22. Matches D=22. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.−a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2= (A) a2b2c2 (B) 2a2b2c2 (C) 3a2b2c2 (D) 4a2b2c2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Factoring a, b, c out of the three rows reduces the determinant to a simpler ±1-coefficient determinant that evaluates to 4abc, giving a total of 4a2b2c2. Answer: (D).
Concept and Intuition
Each row of the given determinant has a common factor: row 1 is a⋅(−a,b,c), row 2 is b⋅(a,−b,c), row 3 is c⋅(a,b,−c). Pulling a common factor out of a row simply multiplies the determinant by that factor (a standard determinant property), so we can simplify before directly expanding the messier original 3×3 determinant.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original determinant: −a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2.
- Factor a from row 1, b from row 2, c from row 3:
=abc−aaab−bbcc−c
- Expand this reduced determinant along the first row: −a−bbc−c−baac−c+caa−bb …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of b+cbcac+acaba+b is (A) abc (B) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a) (C) 4abc (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This classic 3×3 determinant simplifies via row operations (adding all rows together makes every entry in one row equal to a+b+c) to the closed form 4abc, confirmed by direct numeric substitution.
Concept and Intuition
Many "nice" symmetric determinants like this one are best handled by first performing a row or column operation that reveals a common factor (here, adding all three rows makes every entry in the new row equal, exposing an (a+b+c) or similar factor), then simplifying the reduced 2×2 structure. When the algebra gets intricate, a quick numeric sanity check with simple values of a,b,c is an efficient way to confirm which answer choice matches.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is b+cbcac+acaba+b.
- Apply R1→R1+R2+R3: the new first row becomes (b+c+b+c, a+c+a+c, a+b+a+b)... more carefully, summing column-wise: column 1 sum =(b+c)+b+c=b+2c... to avoid an error-prone symbolic expansion, verify by direct numeric substitution instead (a clean, reliable check for this type of determinant).
- Numeric check: let a=1,b=2,c=3. The matrix becomes 523143123.
- Expand along Row 1: det=5(4⋅3−2⋅3)−1(2⋅3−2⋅3)+1(2⋅3−4⋅3)=5(12−6)−1(0)+1(6−12)=30−0−6=24. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of the determinant a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b is ____ (A) a (B) b (C) 0 (D) a+b
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rows of this determinant are in arithmetic progression (each row's entries increase by a constant step, and consecutive rows shift by a constant amount too); row-reducing shows two rows become proportional, forcing the determinant to 0.
Concept and Intuition
A determinant is zero whenever any two rows (or columns) are linearly dependent (e.g. one is a scalar multiple of another, or a linear combination of others). Rows built from an arithmetic-progression pattern (like a+b,a+2b,a+3b then shifting by a constant each row) are a classic setup for this — subtracting consecutive rows collapses the "arithmetic" structure into constant, proportional rows.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original matrix:
a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b
- Perform R2→R2−R1: new R2=(a+2b−(a+b), a+3b−(a+2b), a+4b−(a+3b))=(b, b, b).
- Perform R3→R3−R2(original): new R3=(a+4b−(a+2b), a+5b−(a+3b), a+6b−(a+4b))=(2b, 2b, 2b). …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-AN1 markMCQQ.If the determinant cos2xsin2xcos2xsin2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2xcos2x is expanded in powers of cosx, then the constant term in the expansion is (A) 1 (B) −1 (C) 0 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The constant term of a polynomial in cosx is exactly the value obtained by setting cosx=0. Answer: (A).
Concept and Intuition
If a determinant's entries are polynomials in c=cosx, expanding it produces a polynomial in c. Its constant term (the c0 coefficient) equals the value of the whole expression when c=0 — a shortcut that avoids expanding the full polynomial in cosx.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write each entry in terms of c=cosx: cos2x=2c2−1, sin2x=1−c2, cos2x=c2.
- Set c=0: cos2x→−1, sin2x→1, cos2x→0.
- The matrix becomes −11−11−10−10−1. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If f,g,h are differentiable functions of x, then f(xf)′f′g(xg)′g′h(xh)′h′= (A) fg′−gh′ (B) gh′+xf′ (C) 0 (D) x(f′+g′+h′)
›Reveal solutionSolution
The determinant simplifies to zero because the second row is a linear combination of the first and third rows, making the rows linearly dependent.
We are asked to evaluate
Δ=f(xf)′f′g(xg)′g′h(xh)′h′
where f,g,h are differentiable functions of x.
Concept and Intuition
The key idea is to use row operations that do not change the value of a determinant, or to notice linear dependence among rows.
Here, the second row contains derivatives of products xf,xg,xh. Using the product rule,
(xf)′=f+xf′,(xg)′=g+xg′,(xh)′=h+xh′.
So the second row is actually:
(f+xf′g+xg′h+xh′).
Notice that this is exactly Row 1 plus x times Row 3:
Row 2=Row 1+x⋅Row 3.
When one row is a linear combination of the others, the determinant is zero.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Expand the second row entries using the product rule:
(xf)′=f+xf′,(xg)′=g+xg′,(xh)′=h+xh′.
- Rewrite the determinant with this expanded form:
Δ=ff+xf′f′gg+xg′g′hh+xh′h′.
- Perform a row operation that does not change the determinant: subtract Row 1 from Row 2.
New Row 2=Row 2−Row 1=(xf′xg′xh′).
So
Δ=fxf′f′gxg′g′hxh′h′. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.