Q.If a+b+c=0 and abcbcacab=0, then prove that a=b=c.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Determinant Evaluation Using Identities
Expanding a 4×4 or 5×5 determinant term by term is painful and error-prone. The smarter route is to transform the determinant into an easy form using properties (the "identities") that change its value in a known, controlled way — then read the answer off a triangular matrix.
The geometric intuition
A determinant measures the signed "volume" of the box spanned by the rows in n-dimensional space. Sliding one row parallel to another doesn't change that volume; swapping two rows flips its sign; scaling a row scales the volume. The algebraic identities are just these facts translated into rules.
The three row (or column) operations
- Swap two rows: det→−det (sign flips).
- Scale a row by k: det→kdet (the factor comes out).
- Add a multiple of one row to a different row (Ri→Ri+λRj, i=j): det unchanged.
The identical rules hold for columns. There is also row-wise linearity: if a row is a sum Ri=Ri′+Ri′′, the determinant splits into the sum of two determinants with all other rows fixed.
Row-wise linearity is not det(A+B)=detA+detB — that is false. The splitting works one row at a time.
The strategy
- Use operation 3 to create zeros in a row or column (value unchanged).
- Factor out common factors with operation 2.
- Swap rows if needed to reach upper-triangular form (track the sign change).
- The determinant is then the product of the diagonal entries.
Worked example
det1472583610.
Apply R2→R2−4R1 and R3→R3−7R1 (no change), then R3→R3−2R2: …
Concept: Determinant Evaluation Using Identities (Row/Column Operations and Factorisation)
Step 1: Apply C1→C1+C2+C3 to the given determinant:
abcbcacab=a+b+ca+b+ca+b+cbcacab
Step 2: Factor (a+b+c) from C1 (since a+b+c=0, this factor is non-zero):
=(a+b+c)111bcacab
Step 3: Subtract R1 from R2 and R3:
=(a+b+c)100bc−ba−bca−cb−c
Step 4: Expand along C1:
=(a+b+c)[(c−b)(b−c)−(a−c)(a−b)]
Simplify: (c−b)(b−c)=−(b−c)2 and (a−c)(a−b)=a2−a(b+c)+bc. …
Adding all rows to the first row extracts a factor (a+b+c); since a+b+c=0, the remaining determinant must vanish, which reduces to (a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−a)2=0 and forces a=b=c.
We are given a+b+c=0 and
Δ=abcbcacab=0.
Step 1 — Create a common factor. Apply C1→C1+C2+C3. Every entry of the first column becomes a+b+c:
Δ=a+b+ca+b+ca+b+cbcacab=(a+b+c)111bcacab.
Because a+b+c=0, the condition Δ=0 forces
111bcacab=0.
Step 2 — Reduce. Apply R2→R2−R1 and R3→R3−R1, then expand along the first column: …
Method: Creating a Common Factor via a Row/Column Sum, Then Reducing
Use this method whenever a determinant's rows (or columns) are cyclic rearrangements of the same three quantities, you're given that the determinant equals 0, and asked to derive an algebraic consequence (such as three quantities being equal).
Steps
Step 1: Add all rows (or columns) into one
Apply an operation like C1→C1+C2+C3 (or the row equivalent). When the rows/columns are cyclic permutations of the same three quantities, this sum collapses to the same expression in every entry of that column — typically the sum of the three quantities.
Step 2: Factor the common expression out
Since every entry in that column is now identical, factor it out as a scalar multiplying a simpler determinant (with a column of 1's standing where the common expression used to be).
Step 3: Use the given nonzero condition to cancel that factor
If you're told the extracted factor (e.g. a+b+c) is nonzero, and the original determinant equals 0, then the remaining determinant — after the factor is pulled out — must itself be 0: a nonzero number times something equal to zero forces that something to be zero. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Sign error applying C1→C1+C2+C3
Why it's wrong: this operation must add all three columns into column 1 (not subtract, and not add only two of them); getting it wrong means the entries of column 1 won't come out as the clean, uniform a+b+c, and the whole "factor it out" strategy collapses.
Mistake 2: Cancelling the factor (a+b+c) without stating why it's legal
Why it's wrong: dividing an equation like (a+b+c)⋅X=0 down to X=0 is only valid because the question explicitly gives a+b+c=0. Skipping this justification (or worse, cancelling when a+b+c could be 0) is a logical gap examiners specifically look for in "prove that" questions. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.a+b+2cccab+c+2aabbc+a+2b= (A) (a+b+c)3 (B) 2(a+b+c)3 (C) 3(a+b+c)3 (D) (a+b+c)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Writing each diagonal entry as s+(off-diagonal-like term) where s=a+b+c reveals the matrix as sI plus a rank-1 correction, whose determinant works out cleanly to 2(a+b+c)3 using the determinant lemma (or row operations).
Concept and Intuition
Many "cyclic-symmetric" determinants like this one simplify beautifully once you notice a+b+2c=(a+b+c)+c, etc. — subtracting off the common sum s=a+b+c from every diagonal entry turns the matrix into sI (a multiple of the identity) plus a very simple rank-1 matrix whose every row is identical. Determinants of sI+rank-1 matrices have a clean closed form.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let s=a+b+c. Rewrite diagonal entries: a+b+2c=s+c, b+c+2a=s+a, c+a+2b=s+b.
- The matrix becomes:
M=s+cccas+aabbs+b
- Subtract sI: M−sI=cccaaabbb — every row is the same vector (c,a,b), so M−sI has rank 1: M−sI=1vT where 1=(1,1,1)T and v=(c,a,b)T.
- So M=sI+1vT. The determinant lemma (matrix determinant lemma) gives: det(sI+1vT)=s3+s2(vT1) …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-20-FN1 markMCQQ.What is the value of aa−bb+cbb−cc+acc−aa+b=? (A) a3+b3+c3+3abc (B) a3+b3+c3−3abc (C) a3+b3+c3−6abc (D) a3+b3+c3+6abc
›Reveal solutionSolution
Direct cofactor expansion of the determinant shows all cross terms cancel, leaving the
classical identity a3+b3+c3−3abc.
Concept and Intuition
This is a disguised version of the well-known factorisation
a3+b3+c3−3abc=(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca), packaged as a determinant. Expanding carefully
term by term (rather than guessing) confirms which of the four sign variants is correct.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand along the first row: D=a[(b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)]−b[(a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)]+c[(a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)].
- Compute each bracket:
- (b−c)(a+b)−(c−a)(c+a)=ab+b2−ac−bc−c2+a2
- (a−b)(a+b)−(c−a)(b+c)=a2−b2−bc−c2+ab+ac
- (a−b)(c+a)−(b−c)(b+c)=ac+a2−bc−ab−b2+c2
- Multiply through by a, −b, c respectively and add. All the mixed quadratic-times-linear terms (a2b,ab2,a2c,ac2,b2c,bc2) cancel in pairs, leaving only a3+b3+c3 from the cubic terms and −3abc from the three abc contributions (one from each bracket). …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-19-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of b+cbcac+acaba+b is (A) abc (B) (a+b)(b+c)(c+a) (C) 4abc (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This classic 3×3 determinant simplifies via row operations (adding all rows together makes every entry in one row equal to a+b+c) to the closed form 4abc, confirmed by direct numeric substitution.
Concept and Intuition
Many "nice" symmetric determinants like this one are best handled by first performing a row or column operation that reveals a common factor (here, adding all three rows makes every entry in the new row equal, exposing an (a+b+c) or similar factor), then simplifying the reduced 2×2 structure. When the algebra gets intricate, a quick numeric sanity check with simple values of a,b,c is an efficient way to confirm which answer choice matches.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The determinant is b+cbcac+acaba+b.
- Apply R1→R1+R2+R3: the new first row becomes (b+c+b+c, a+c+a+c, a+b+a+b)... more carefully, summing column-wise: column 1 sum =(b+c)+b+c=b+2c... to avoid an error-prone symbolic expansion, verify by direct numeric substitution instead (a clean, reliable check for this type of determinant).
- Numeric check: let a=1,b=2,c=3. The matrix becomes 523143123.
- Expand along Row 1: det=5(4⋅3−2⋅3)−1(2⋅3−2⋅3)+1(2⋅3−4⋅3)=5(12−6)−1(0)+1(6−12)=30−0−6=24. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.1a2a31b2b31c2c3= (A) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(a+b+c) (B) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a) (C) (a−b)(b−c)(a−c)(ab+bc+ca) (D) (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca)
›Reveal solutionSolution
This determinant is a known generalised-Vandermonde identity that factors as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) — verified numerically, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Determinants with rows 1,x,x2 (Vandermonde) factor neatly as (a−b)(b−c)(c−a). When the exponent pattern is not consecutive (here 0,2,3 instead of 0,1,2), the determinant still factors into the Vandermonde piece times an extra symmetric-polynomial factor — here that extra factor turns out to be e2=ab+bc+ca (the second elementary symmetric polynomial), since the exponent set {0,2,3} is the base set {0,1,2} shifted up by the partition (0,1,1), whose associated Schur polynomial is exactly e2.
Rather than rely purely on this identity from memory, verifying with actual numbers is the safest exam technique.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Expand the determinant along the first row (all entries 1): D=(b2c3−b3c2)−(a2c3−a3c2)+(a2b3−a3b2) =b2c2(c−b)+a2c2(a−c)+a2b2(b−a).
- Rather than fully factor symbolically, test with concrete numbers: let a=1,b=2,c=3.
- Direct determinant: rows (1,1,1), (1,4,9), (1,8,27). D=1(4⋅27−9⋅8)−1(1⋅27−9⋅1)+1(1⋅8−4⋅1)=1(108−72)−1(27−9)+1(8−4)=36−18+4=22.
- Test option (D): (a−b)(b−c)(c−a)(ab+bc+ca) with these values: (1−2)(2−3)(3−1)=(−1)(−1)(2)=2; ab+bc+ca=2+6+3=11; product =2×11=22. Matches D=22. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-05-AN1 markMCQQ.If b and c are non zero real numbers, A=1bcb23c34 and B=0−b−cb0−2c20, then det(A+B)= (A) 3 (B) 1 (C) -1 (D) 0
›Reveal solutionSolution
Adding the symmetric A and skew-symmetric B entrywise cancels the off-diagonal b,c terms below the diagonal, leaving a matrix whose determinant is a fixed number independent of b,c: 3.
Concept and Intuition
A is symmetric and B is skew-symmetric (its transpose is its negative, with zero diagonal). Adding them entrywise, the upper-triangular parts of A+B pick up b+b=2b and c+c=2c, while the lower-triangular parts get b+(−b)=0 and c+(−c)=0 — so A+B becomes upper triangular in its first column, letting the determinant be computed by a clean cofactor expansion that never involves b or c.
Step-by-Step Solution
- A=1bcb23c34, B=0−b−cb0−2c20.
- Add entrywise: (A+B)11=1, (A+B)12=2b, (A+B)13=2c; (A+B)21=b−b=0, (A+B)22=2, (A+B)23=3+2=5; (A+B)31=c−c=0, (A+B)32=3−2=1, (A+B)33=4.
- So A+B=1002b212c54. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-AN1 markMCQQ.−a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2= (A) a2b2c2 (B) 2a2b2c2 (C) 3a2b2c2 (D) 4a2b2c2
›Reveal solutionSolution
Factoring a, b, c out of the three rows reduces the determinant to a simpler ±1-coefficient determinant that evaluates to 4abc, giving a total of 4a2b2c2. Answer: (D).
Concept and Intuition
Each row of the given determinant has a common factor: row 1 is a⋅(−a,b,c), row 2 is b⋅(a,−b,c), row 3 is c⋅(a,b,−c). Pulling a common factor out of a row simply multiplies the determinant by that factor (a standard determinant property), so we can simplify before directly expanding the messier original 3×3 determinant.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original determinant: −a2abacab−b2bcacbc−c2.
- Factor a from row 1, b from row 2, c from row 3:
=abc−aaab−bbcc−c
- Expand this reduced determinant along the first row: −a−bbc−c−baac−c+caa−bb …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.The value of the determinant a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b is ____ (A) a (B) b (C) 0 (D) a+b
›Reveal solutionSolution
The rows of this determinant are in arithmetic progression (each row's entries increase by a constant step, and consecutive rows shift by a constant amount too); row-reducing shows two rows become proportional, forcing the determinant to 0.
Concept and Intuition
A determinant is zero whenever any two rows (or columns) are linearly dependent (e.g. one is a scalar multiple of another, or a linear combination of others). Rows built from an arithmetic-progression pattern (like a+b,a+2b,a+3b then shifting by a constant each row) are a classic setup for this — subtracting consecutive rows collapses the "arithmetic" structure into constant, proportional rows.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Original matrix:
a+ba+2ba+4ba+2ba+3ba+5ba+3ba+4ba+6b
- Perform R2→R2−R1: new R2=(a+2b−(a+b), a+3b−(a+2b), a+4b−(a+3b))=(b, b, b).
- Perform R3→R3−R2(original): new R3=(a+4b−(a+2b), a+5b−(a+3b), a+6b−(a+4b))=(2b, 2b, 2b). …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-FN1 markMCQQ.For i=1,2,3 and j=1,2,3. If ai2+bi2+ci2=1, aiaj+bibj+cicj=0, ∀i=j and A=a1b1c1a2b2c2a3b3c3 then det(AAT)= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) −1 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The conditions given say the rows of A form an orthonormal set, which is precisely the condition AAT=I; so its determinant is 1. Answer: 1.
Concept and Intuition
For a matrix A with rows R1,R2,R3, the (i,j) entry of AAT is exactly the dot product Ri⋅Rj. The problem states ai2+bi2+ci2=1 (each row is a unit vector) and aiaj+bibj+cicj=0 for i=j (distinct rows are perpendicular). Together these say the rows are orthonormal — which is the defining property of an orthogonal matrix, for which AAT=I.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Write (AAT)ij=Ri⋅Rj=aiaj+bibj+cicj.
- For i=j: (AAT)ii=ai2+bi2+ci2=1 (given).
- For i=j: (AAT)ij=aiaj+bibj+cicj=0 (given).
- So AAT=I3, the 3×3 identity matrix.
- det(AAT)=det(I3)=1.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-FN1 markMCQQ.If a,b,c are real numbers such that a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ac≤0, then (a−b+1)5a11−b11a15−b15b7−c7(b−c+2)3b17−c17c9−a9c13−a13(c−a+3)1= (A) 2abc (B) 0 (C) 24abc (D) 24
›Reveal solutionSolution
The inequality forces a=b=c; substituting collapses the matrix to a simple upper-triangular-looking form whose determinant is just the product of its surviving diagonal terms, 24.
Concept and Intuition
The expression a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca is a sum of squares in disguise: 21[(a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−a)2], which can never be negative. So the given condition "≤0" combined with this built-in "≥0" forces it to be exactly zero, which only happens when a=b=c. That single deduction massively simplifies every entry of the determinant, since almost every entry is a difference of equal powers of a,b,c (which all vanish when a=b=c), leaving only three surviving diagonal-type terms.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Rewrite the condition: a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca=21[(a−b)2+(b−c)2+(c−a)2], which is always ≥0.
- Given this quantity is also ≤0, it must equal exactly 0, forcing (a−b)2=(b−c)2=(c−a)2=0, i.e. a=b=c.
- Substitute a=b=c into the matrix: all terms of the form b7−c7, c9−a9, a11−b11, c13−a13, a15−b15, b17−c17 become 0 (difference of equal quantities). …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If the cofactors of the elements 3, 7 and 6 of the matrix 1422−14376 are a,b and c respectively, then [a b c]142+[a b c]376= (A) −1 (B) 1 (C) 0 (D) 3
›Reveal solutionSolution
a,b,c turn out to be the cofactors of the matrix's third column, and the two
vectors being dotted with [a b c] are exactly its first and third columns. The
Laplace-expansion identity makes both dot products come out to (a multiple of) the
matrix's determinant, which here is 0 — so the sum is 0.
Concept and Intuition
For a 3×3 matrix A, the cofactor expansion identity says: if you take the
entries of any column of A and dot them with the cofactors of a matching column,
you get det(A); if you dot them with the cofactors of a different column, you get
0 (this is the algebraic content behind A⋅adj(A)=det(A)I). Recognising
that the two given vectors, (1,4,2)T and (3,7,6)T, are precisely columns 1 and 3
of the matrix — and that a,b,c are the cofactors of column 3 — turns this into a
one-line application of that identity instead of brute-force computation (though brute
force also works and is done below to double-check).
Step-by-Step Solution
- The matrix is M=1422−14376. The entries 3,7,6 sit at positions (1,3),(2,3),(3,3) — all in column 3. So a=C13, b=C23, c=C33.
- Compute C13 (delete row 1, col 3; sign (+1)1+3=+):
C13=+42−14=4(4)−(−1)(2)=16+2=18.
- Compute C23 (delete row 2, col 3; sign (−1)2+3=−):
C23=−1224=−(1⋅4−2⋅2)=−(0)=0.
- Compute C33 (delete row 3, col 3; sign (+1)3+3=+):
C33=+142−1=1(−1)−2(4)=−1−8=−9.
- So [a b c]=[18 0 −9].
- First dot product: [a b c]142=18(1)+0(4)+(−9)(2)=18−18=0. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-AN1 markMCQQ.If A=a2b3c2bc2a3c3ab and det(A)=pa3+qb3+rc3+s(abc), then p+q+r+s= (A) 12 (B) 20 (C) 24 (D) 30
›Reveal solutionSolution
Expanding the determinant gives −6a3−4b3−9c3+31abc, so p+q+r+s=−6−4−9+31=12 — option (A).
det(A)=a2b3c2bc2a3c3ab=a(cb−6a2)−2b(2b2−9ac)+3c(4ab−3c2).
Expand:
=abc−6a3−4b3+18abc+12abc−9c3=−6a3−4b3−9c3+31abc. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-04-AN1 markMCQQ.If a, b, c are respectively the 5th, 8th, 13th terms of an arithmetic progression, then abc5813111= (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) abc (D) 520
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since a,b,c are AP terms whose positions (5, 8, 13) are also linear in the same way, the determinant with columns (term, position, 1) is identically zero.
Concept and Intuition
If a,b,c are terms of an AP at positions p,q,r respectively, then a=A+(p−1)d, b=A+(q−1)d, c=A+(r−1)d — i.e. each term is an affine (linear) function of its position. A determinant of the form termposition1 over three such rows is always zero, because the "term" column is a linear combination of the "position" column and the "1" column (row reduction makes a column of zeros).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let the AP have first term A and common difference d. Then a=A+4d (5th term), b=A+7d (8th term), c=A+12d (13th term).
- Expand the determinant along the first row: Δ=a(8⋅1−1⋅13)−5(b⋅1−1⋅c)+1(b⋅13−8⋅c) =a(−5)−5(b−c)+(13b−8c)=−5a−5b+5c+13b−8c=−5a+8b−3c.
- Substitute: −5a=−5A−20d, 8b=8A+56d, −3c=−3A−36d. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.