Q.Given three identical boxes I, II and III, each containing two coins. In box I, both coins are gold coins, in box II, both are silver coins and in the box III, there is one gold and one silver coin. A person chooses a box at random and takes out a coin. If the coin is of gold, what is the probability that the other coin in the box is also of gold?
Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A).
- If P(A∣B)=P(A), then knowing B tells you nothing about A — the events are independent. That is a special case, not the general rule.
Conditional probability is the foundation of the multiplication theorem, independence, and Bayes' theorem — every "given that" question in this chapter rests on it.
Conditional Probability opens the CBSE Class 12 Probability chapter and is foundational for everything that follows in that unit, including Bayes' theorem and the multiplication rule — making "conditional probability formula class 12 with examples" one of the most searched topics in Class 12 Mathematics. It is equally important for JEE Main and CUET, where conditional probability questions are set almost every year.
Concept: Conditional Probability — we need P(other coin gold∣first coin gold).
Step 1: Define events.
Let B1, B2, B3 be the events of choosing box I, II, III respectively. Each box is equally likely: P(B1)=P(B2)=P(B3)=31.
Step 2: Probability of drawing a gold coin from each box:
- Box I: both gold → P(gold∣B1)=1
- Box II: no gold → P(gold∣B2)=0
- Box III: one gold → P(gold∣B3)=21
Step 3: By Bayes' theorem,
P(B1∣gold)=P(gold)P(gold∣B1)P(B1)
where P(gold)=1⋅31+0⋅31+21⋅31=31+61=21.
Thus P(B1∣gold)=211⋅31=32.
If the first coin is gold, the other coin is also gold only if the box is Box I. So the required probability is 32.
The probability that the other coin is also gold is 32.
This is a classic conditional probability problem (Bertrand’s box paradox). The key is that the gold coin you drew could have come from any of the three gold coins in the boxes, but only two of those three gold coins are in the all-gold box. So the probability that the other coin is also gold is 32.
Why conditional probability is the right tool
The question asks: Given that the drawn coin is gold, what is the probability that the other coin in the same box is also gold? This is a textbook conditional probability problem — we are restricting our universe to only those outcomes where the first coin is gold, and then asking what fraction of those outcomes also satisfy the condition “the other coin is gold.”
A common mistake is to think that since you picked a gold coin, you must be in either box I or box III, and since those are two boxes, the answer is 21. That reasoning is wrong because the two boxes are not equally likely after you see the gold coin. Box I has two gold coins, so it is twice as likely to produce a gold coin as box III, which has only one. Conditional probability corrects for this imbalance.
Do not fall for the “two boxes, so 1/2” trap. The boxes are not equally likely given the gold coin — box I is twice as likely as box III.
Step-by-step solution
1. Define the events clearly
Let:
- B1 = event that box I (two gold coins) is chosen
- B2 = event that box II (two silver coins) is chosen
- B3 = event that box III (one gold, one silver) is chosen
- G = event that the drawn coin is gold
We want P(other coin is gold∣G). But “other coin is gold” is exactly the same event as “the chosen box is B1” — because only in box I are both coins gold. So we want P(B1∣G).
2. Write down the prior probabilities
Since the box is chosen at random:
P(B1)=P(B2)=P(B3)=31
3. Write down the likelihoods — the probability of drawing a gold coin from each box
- From box I: both coins are gold, so P(G∣B1)=1
- From box II: both coins are silver, so P(G∣B2)=0
- From box III: exactly one gold coin out of two, so P(G∣B3)=21
4. Apply Bayes’ theorem
Bayes’ theorem says:
P(B1∣G)=P(G)P(G∣B1)⋅P(B1)
We already have the numerator: 1⋅31=31.
Now find P(G), the total probability of drawing a gold coin. By the law of total probability:
P(G)=P(G∣B1)P(B1)+P(G∣B2)P(B2)+P(G∣B3)P(B3)
P(G)=1⋅31+0⋅31+21⋅31=31+0+61=21
So:
P(B1∣G)=2131=31×12=32
A faster way: there are 3 gold coins total (two in box I, one in box III). All are equally likely to be drawn. Two of those three gold coins come from box I. So the probability is 32 — no fractions needed.
5. Interpret the result
Given that you drew a gold coin, there is a 32 chance that you are in box I, meaning the other coin is also gold. Only 31 of the time are you in box III, where the other coin is silver.
The required probability is 32.
Method: Bayes' Theorem (finding the cause from the observed outcome)
Use this whenever you observe an outcome and are asked for the probability of the underlying cause — the conditioning is reversed (you know the chance of a gold coin given each box, but want the chance of a particular box given that a gold coin appeared).
Steps
Step 1: Set up the partition of possible causes.
List the mutually exclusive, exhaustive hypotheses (here: the coin came from box I, II or III) and write their prior probabilities P(Ei) (these must sum to 1).
Step 2: Write each likelihood.
For each cause, state P(A∣Ei) — the probability of the observed outcome (here: drawing a gold coin) under that cause.
Step 3: Get the total probability of the outcome (the denominator).
By the law of total probability,
P(A)=∑iP(Ei)P(A∣Ei).
Step 4: Apply Bayes' theorem for the cause you want.
P(Ek∣A)=∑iP(Ei)P(A∣Ei)P(Ek)P(A∣Ek).
The numerator is just the one term of the denominator that belongs to the cause you are asked about — so the answer is that cause's share of the total chance of the outcome.
Key subtlety: the causes are not equally likely after the observation. A box holding more gold is more likely to have produced the gold coin, so weight each cause by both its prior and its likelihood — never assume the surviving boxes are 50–50.
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: "The gold coin is in box I or box III, so the answer is 21."
Why it's wrong: after seeing a gold coin the two boxes are not equally likely — box I (two gold coins) is twice as likely to have produced a gold coin as box III (one gold coin). Correct approach: weight by the likelihoods, giving 32.
Mistake 2: Setting P(gold∣box III)=1.
Why it's wrong: box III has one gold and one silver, so the chance of drawing its gold coin is 21. Correct approach: use P(gold∣box III)=21.
Mistake 3: Answering the prior P(box I)=31 instead of the posterior.
Why it's wrong: the question conditions on having drawn a gold coin. Correct approach: compute P(box I∣gold) via Bayes' theorem.
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-AN1 markMCQQ.A box contains n coins, m of which are fair and the rest are biased. When a biased coin is tossed, the probability of getting a head is twice as likely as tail. A coin is drawn from the box at random and is tossed twice. It is found that first time it shows head and the second time it shows tail. Then the probability that the coin drawn is fair is (A) 8n+m7m (B) 8n+m9m (C) 8m+n7m (D) 8m+n9m
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a Bayes'-theorem problem; computing the likelihoods for fair vs. biased coins and combining with the prior m/n gives 8n+m9m.
Concept and Intuition
Bayes' theorem updates our belief about which "type" of coin was drawn, given the observed outcome (head then tail), by weighing each type's prior probability by how likely it was to produce that exact outcome.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Fair coin: P(H)=P(T)=21, so P(HT∣fair)=21⋅21=41.
- Biased coin: head is twice as likely as tail, so P(H)=32,P(T)=31; P(HT∣biased)=32⋅31=92.
- Priors: P(fair)=nm, P(biased)=nn−m.
- Bayes: P(fair∣HT)=nm⋅41+nn−m⋅92nm⋅41.
- Multiply numerator and denominator by 36n: numerator =9m; denominator =9m+8(n−m)=m+8n.
- So P(fair∣HT)=8n+m9m.
Common Mistakes
- Using P(H)=P(T)=21 for the biased coin too, or mixing up which outcome (HT vs. TH) is asked.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 8n+m9m.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If it is known that a woman has two children and she has at least one girl child, the probability that the woman has both girl children is (A) 41 (B) 31 (C) 32 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic conditional-probability trap: conditioning on "at least one girl" (not "the elder/first child is a girl") leaves 3 equally likely outcomes, of which 1 is both-girls, giving 31.
Concept and Intuition
With two children, birth order matters for counting equally likely outcomes: BB,BG,GB,GG, each with probability 1/4. The event "at least one girl" is a set of outcomes, not a statement about a specific (e.g. first) child, so it correctly removes only BB and keeps three outcomes, not two. This distinguishes it from the simpler (and different) question "given the elder child is a girl," which would leave only {GB,GG} and give probability 1/2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Sample space (ordered by birth, say elder-younger): {BB,BG,GB,GG}, each with probability 41.
- Event E = "at least one girl" = {BG,GB,GG}, so P(E)=43.
- Event F = "both girls" = {GG}, and F⊂E, so P(F∩E)=P(F)=41.
- P(F∣E)=P(E)P(F∩E)=3/41/4=31.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing "at least one girl" with "a specific (e.g. the first) child is a girl," which would wrongly give 21.
- Forgetting that BG and GB are distinct outcomes (birth order matters), undercounting the conditioning event.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) 31.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.A box P contains 3 white and 7 red balls. A bag Q contains 4 green and 5 blue balls. Two balls are randomly drawn from box P. If both are of same color, one ball is drawn from bag Q and if the two balls are of different color, 2 balls are drawn from the bag Q. If it is known that there is exactly one green ball among the ball or balls drawn from bag Q, then the probability that the two balls drawn from box P are of different colors is (A) 6735 (B) 6221 (C) 4320 (D) 6732
›Reveal solutionSolution
A two-stage Bayes' theorem problem; conditioning on "exactly one green ball from Q" gives P(different colors from P)=6735.
Concept and Intuition
This is a compound experiment: the outcome in box P (same-color vs different-color) determines how many balls are drawn from bag Q, and hence changes the probability model for "exactly one green." We must compute, for each P-outcome, the probability of observing exactly one green from Q, then combine via Bayes' theorem using the P-outcome's prior probability.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Box P has 3 white + 7 red = 10 balls. P(same color)=10C23C2+7C2=453+21=4524=158. P(different colors)=1−158=157 (check: 10C23C17C1=4521=157 ✓).
- If same color (S): draw 1 ball from Q (4 green, 5 blue, 9 total). "Exactly one green" among 1 ball drawn just means that ball is green: P(1 green∣S)=94.
- If different colors (D): draw 2 balls from Q. P(exactly one green∣D)=9C24C1⋅5C1=3620=95.
- By Bayes' theorem:
P(D∣one green)=P(S)P(one green∣S)+P(D)P(one green∣D)P(D)P(one green∣D)=158⋅94+157⋅95157⋅95
- Numerator =13535; denominator =13532+13535=13567. So P(D∣one green)=6735.
Common Mistakes
- Using the same probability model for "one green" regardless of whether 1 or 2 balls were drawn from Q — the two cases have genuinely different sample spaces.
- Forgetting to weight each conditional probability by the correct prior P(S) or P(D) before combining.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 6735.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.Three boxes B1, B2 and B3 contain balls with different colors as follows:A die is thrown. Box B1 is chosen if either 1 or 2 turns up. Box B2 is chosen if 3 or 4 turns up and box B3 is chosen if 5 or 6 turns up. Having chosen a box in this way, a ball is drawn at random from that box. If the ball drawn is found to be Red, then the probability that it is drawn from box B2 is (A) 127 (B) 125 (C) 121 (D) 263
White Black Red B1 2 1 2 B2 3 2 4 B3 4 3 2 ›Reveal solutionSolution
A Bayes'-theorem problem: reverse the conditional probability "ball is Red, which box?" using the total-probability formula.
Concept and Intuition
Bayes' theorem lets us "invert" a conditional probability. We know P(Red∣Bi) for each box and the prior P(Bi) (each 1/3 since the die is fair and each box corresponds to two faces); we want the posterior P(B2∣Red).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Totals in each box: B1: 2+1+2=5; B2: 3+2+4=9; B3: 4+3+2=9.
- P(Red∣B1)=52, P(Red∣B2)=94, P(Red∣B3)=92.
- Each box has prior probability 31 (each box corresponds to two die faces out of six).
- Total probability: P(Red)=31(52+94+92)=31(52+32)=31⋅1516=4516.
- Bayes: P(B2∣Red)=P(Red)P(B2)P(Red∣B2)=451631⋅94=4516274=274×1645=125.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to weight each box's conditional probability by its prior 1/3.
- Arithmetic slip when adding the three fractions with different denominators (5 and 9).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 125.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.There are three families F1,F2,F3. F1 has 2 boys and 1 girl; F2 has 1 boy and 2 girls; F3 has 1 boy and 1 girl. A family is randomly chosen and a child is chosen from that family randomly. If it is known that the child thus selected is a girl, then the probability that she is from F2 is (A) 94 (B) 92 (C) 73 (D) 75
›Reveal solutionSolution
Applying Bayes' theorem across the three equally-likely families gives P(F2∣girl)=94.
Concept and Intuition
This is a textbook application of Bayes' theorem: we're given the reverse conditional probabilities (family → probability of picking a girl) and asked for the forward one (girl picked → probability she's from a specific family).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior: P(F1)=P(F2)=P(F3)=31.
- P(girl∣F1)=31 (1 girl out of 3 children), P(girl∣F2)=32, P(girl∣F3)=21.
- Total probability: P(girl)=31⋅31+31⋅32+31⋅21=31(31+32+21)=31⋅62+4+3=31⋅69=21
- P(F2∩girl)=31⋅32=92.
- Bayes: P(F2∣girl)=P(girl)P(F2∩girl)=1/22/9=94.
Common Mistakes
- Treating the child-selection probability as uniform over all 9 children (2+1+1+2+1+1=9, wrong weighting) instead of first picking a family uniformly, then a child within it — the families have unequal sizes so this changes the answer.
- Arithmetic slip adding 31+32+21 without a common denominator.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 94.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.Box I contains 30 cards numbered 1 to 30 and Box II contains 20 cards numbered 31 to 50. A box is selected at random and a card is drawn from it randomly. If the number on the card is found to be a non-prime number, the probability that the card was drawn from Box I is (A) 174 (B) 178 (C) 52 (D) 32
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem with the counts of non-prime numbers in each box gives P(Box I∣non-prime)=8/17.
Concept and Intuition
This is a classic "which urn/box did it come from" Bayes' problem: we're given the outcome (a non-prime card) and asked to find the probability of the cause (which box). We need P(non-prime∣box) for each box, weighted by the prior P(box)=1/2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Primes from 1 to 30: 2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29 — that's 10 primes, so 30−10=20 non-primes in Box I.
- Primes from 31 to 50: 31,37,41,43,47 — that's 5 primes, so 20−5=15 non-primes in Box II.
- P(non-prime∣Box I)=3020=32, P(non-prime∣Box II)=2015=43.
- P(Box I)=P(Box II)=21.
- P(Box I and non-prime)=21⋅32=31; P(Box II and non-prime)=21⋅43=83.
- P(non-prime)=31+83=248+249=2417.
- P(Box I∣non-prime)=17/241/3=31⋅1724=178.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting that 1 is not prime (it's non-prime), which would miscount Box I's non-primes.
- Skipping the proper Bayes' normalization and just comparing raw counts across boxes of different sizes.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 178.
ANSWER: B
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-AN1 markMCQQ.An unbiased coin is tossed 3 times. If the third toss gets head, then the probability of getting at least one more head is (A) 3/4 (B) 1/4 (C) 1/2 (D) 1/3
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests recognizing conditional independence: given the third toss's outcome, the first two tosses remain independent unbiased flips, so their probability is unaffected by the condition. Answer: 3/4.
Concept and Intuition
Since coin tosses are independent events, knowing the outcome of the third toss (head) gives us no information about the first two tosses. So the question really just asks: what's the probability of getting at least one head in two independent fair coin tosses? This is most easily computed via the complement (no heads at all in two tosses).
Step-by-Step Solution
- The condition 'the third toss gets head' is independent of the outcomes of the first two tosses (each coin toss is independent of the others).
- So conditioning on the third toss being heads doesn't change the probabilities for the first two tosses — they remain two independent fair coin flips.
- We want P(at least one head among the first two tosses).
- Use the complement: P(no heads in first two tosses)=P(both tails)=21×21=41.
- So P(at least one head)=1−41=43.
Common Mistakes
- Overcomplicating this by trying to build a full conditional probability tree over all three tosses, when the key insight (independence removes any real conditioning effect) simplifies it immediately.
- Misreading 'at least one MORE head' as requiring at least one head among ALL three tosses (which would be different, and trivially true anyway since the third is already head) — the question specifically asks about the first two, i.e., 'one more' beyond the given third-toss head.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 3/4.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.Bag B1 contains 4 white and 2 black balls. Bag B2 contains 3 white and 4 black balls. A bag is chosen at random and a ball is drawn from it at random, then the probability that the ball drawn is white, is (A) 421 (B) 3242 (C) 4233 (D) 4223
›Reveal solutionSolution
Total-probability rule over the two equally likely bags gives P(white)=21⋅64+21⋅73=4223.
Concept and Intuition
The ball drawn depends on which bag was chosen first. Since the bag choice is random with P(B1)=P(B2)=21, and the draw is conditionally independent given the bag, the Law of Total Probability adds the two conditional probabilities weighted by how likely each bag is.
Step-by-Step Solution
- B1: 4 white, 2 black out of 6 ⇒P(white∣B1)=64=32.
- B2: 3 white, 4 black out of 7 ⇒P(white∣B2)=73.
- P(white)=21⋅32+21⋅73=31+143.
- Common denominator 42: 31=4214, 143=429, sum =4223.
Common Mistakes
- Simplifying 64 incorrectly or forgetting to weight by 21 for each bag.
- Adding numerators/denominators directly instead of finding a common denominator (a classic fraction-addition slip).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (D) — 4223.
ANSWER: D
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.It is given that in a random experiment events A and B are such that P(A)=41, P(A∣B)=21 and P(B∣A)=32 then P(B)= (A) 31 (B) 32 (C) 21 (D) 61
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using P(B∣A) to find P(A∩B), then dividing by P(A∣B), gives P(B)=31.
Concept and Intuition
The conditional probability definitions P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B) and P(B∣A)=P(A)P(A∩B) share the common quantity P(A∩B) — computing it from one equation lets us solve the other for the unknown probability.
Step-by-Step Solution
- From P(B∣A)=P(A)P(A∩B)=32, and P(A)=41: P(A∩B)=32×41=61.
- From P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B)=21: P(B)=P(A∣B)P(A∩B)=1/21/6=31.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing which conditional probability to use to find P(A∩B) first (must use the one whose conditioning event's total probability, P(A), is already known).
- Dividing instead of multiplying (or vice versa) when rearranging the conditional probability formula.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (A) — 31.
ANSWER: A
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-22-FN1 markMCQQ.A bag contains 6 balls. If three balls are drawn at a time and all of them are found to be green, then the probability that exactly 5 of the balls in the bag are green is: (A) 354 (B) 355 (C) 72 (D) 71
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a Bayes'-theorem problem: given a uniform prior on the unknown number of green balls in the bag, update the belief after observing 3 green balls drawn. Answer: 2/7.
Concept and Intuition
Before drawing, any number of green balls from 0 to 6 is equally likely (7 equally likely hypotheses). Observing "all 3 drawn balls are green" is much more likely under hypotheses with more green balls, so Bayes' theorem reweights the prior toward higher k. We want the posterior probability that k=5.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior: P(k green balls)=71 for k=0,1,…,6.
- Likelihood of drawing 3 balls, all green, given k green balls out of 6: P(all green∣k)=(36)(3k)=20(3k) (zero for k<3).
- Compute: k=3:(33)=1⇒1/20; k=4:(34)=4⇒4/20; k=5:(35)=10⇒10/20; k=6:(36)=20⇒20/20=1.
- Total probability of observing "all green" (law of total probability, prior cancels as common factor 1/7): proportional to 1/20+4/20+10/20+20/20=35/20.
- Posterior P(k=5∣all green)=35/2010/20=3510=72.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting that k=0,1,2 contribute zero likelihood (can't draw 3 green balls if fewer than 3 exist).
- Confusing this posterior-probability question with a plain hypergeometric-probability question (i.e., computing P(all green∣k=5) instead of P(k=5∣all green)).
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 72.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.In a test a student either guesses or copies or knows the answer to answer a multiple choice question with four choices. The probability that he makes a guess is 1/3 and the probability that he copies the answer is 1/6. The probability that his answer is correct, given that he copied it is 1/8. The probability that he knew the answer to the question, given that he answered it correctly is (A) 2429 (B) 2922 (C) 2924 (D) 2923
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem problem with three mutually exclusive causes (guess/copy/know) for a correct answer. Answer: 24/29.
Concept and Intuition
This is a textbook application of Bayes' theorem: we're given the prior probabilities of three exhaustive, mutually exclusive ways of answering (guessing, copying, knowing) along with the conditional probability of being correct under each, and asked to reverse the conditioning — find the probability the student knew the answer, GIVEN that they got it right.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The three ways of answering are exhaustive: P(know)=1−P(guess)−P(copy)=1−31−61=1−21=21.
- Conditional correctness probabilities: P(C∣guess)=41 (one of four choices), P(C∣copy)=81 (given), P(C∣know)=1.
- Total probability of being correct: P(C)=31⋅41+61⋅81+21⋅1=121+481+21.
- Common denominator 48: 484+481+4824=4829.
- Bayes' theorem: P(know∣C)=P(C)P(know)P(C∣know)=29/4821⋅1=29/4824/48=2924.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to compute P(know) as the complement of guess+copy.
- Arithmetic slip converting to a common denominator when summing the total probability.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (C) — 2924.
ANSWER: C
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.Two balls are drawn at random from a box containing 4 white, 6 black balls one after the other without replacement. If it is known that second ball drawn is black, then the probability that the first ball drawn is also black is (A) 115 (B) 95 (C) 125 (D) 135
›Reveal solutionSolution
Conditional probability with sampling without replacement, solved with Bayes' theorem; answer is 95.
Concept and Intuition
When balls are drawn one after another without replacement, the marginal probability that any particular draw (say the 2nd) is black equals the overall proportion of black balls, 106 — position doesn't matter for the marginal event by symmetry. To find the conditional probability of the first draw given information about the second, we use Bayes' theorem: we need the joint probability of both events and divide by the marginal probability of the conditioning event.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total balls: 4 white (W) + 6 black (B) = 10.
- P(2nd is black)=P(1st B, 2nd B)+P(1st W, 2nd B) =106⋅95+104⋅96=9030+9024=9054=53.
- P(1st black and 2nd black)=106⋅95=9030=31.
- By Bayes' theorem: P(1st black∣2nd black)=P(2nd B)P(1st B, 2nd B)=3/51/3=95.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming P(2nd black)=95 (the conditional probability given 1st was black) instead of computing the correct marginal 53.
- Forgetting to include both cases (1st W/2nd B and 1st B/2nd B) when finding the joint denominator event.
✓Final answerThe correct option is (B) — 95.
ANSWER: B
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.