Q.A factory has two machines A and B. Past record shows that machine A produced 60% of the items of output and machine B produced 40% of the items. Further, 2% of the items produced by machine A and 1% produced by machine B were defective. All the items are put into one stockpile and then one item is chosen at random from this and is found to be defective. What is the probability that it was produced by machine B?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability (Bayes' Theorem)
Let D be the event that an item is defective.
We are given:
P(A)=0.6, P(B)=0.4,
P(D∣A)=0.02, P(D∣B)=0.01.
We need P(B∣D).
Step 1: Find P(D) using the law of total probability:
P(D)=P(A)P(D∣A)+P(B)P(D∣B)=(0.6)(0.02)+(0.4)(0.01)=0.012+0.004=0.016.
Step 2: Apply Bayes' Theorem: …
Using Bayes’ theorem, we update the prior probability that an item came from machine B (40%) given that it is defective. The posterior probability is 41 or 25%.
We are dealing with a classic inverse probability problem. The question gives us the overall production shares (the priors) and the defect rates within each machine (the likelihoods). We observe a defective item and want the chance it came from machine B — that is, we need to reverse the conditional probability.
The tool for this is Bayes’ theorem, which in its simplest form says:
P(B∣D)=P(D)P(B)⋅P(D∣B)
where D is the event “item is defective”. The denominator P(D) is the total probability of a defective item, found by weighting each machine’s defect rate by its production share.
Let’s assign events clearly:
- Let A = item produced by machine A.
- Let B = item produced by machine B.
- Let D = item is defective.
From the problem:
- P(A)=0.60, P(B)=0.40
- P(D∣A)=0.02 (2% of A’s items are defective)
- P(D∣B)=0.01 (1% of B’s items are defective)
We want P(B∣D).
- Find the total probability of a defective item, P(D). By the law of total probability:
P(D)=P(A)⋅P(D∣A)+P(B)⋅P(D∣B)
Substitute:
P(D)=(0.60)(0.02)+(0.40)(0.01)=0.012+0.004=0.016
So 1.6% of all items in the stockpile are defective.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem:
P(B∣D)=P(D)P(B)⋅P(D∣B)=0.0160.40×0.01
Compute the numerator: 0.40×0.01=0.004.
Then:
P(B∣D)=0.0160.004=164=41
- Interpret the result: …
Method: Bayes' Theorem — tracing a defect back to its source
Use this whenever items from several producers are pooled, one is inspected, and you must decide which producer it most likely came from.
Steps
Step 1: Record each source's production share as its prior.
P(Hi) is the fraction of all items made by source i.
Step 2: Record each source's defect (evidence) rate.
P(E∣Hi) is the chance an item from source i shows the observed feature (defective).
Step 3: Total probability of the evidence across the pooled stockpile.
P(E)=∑iP(Hi)P(E∣Hi). …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Comparing only the defect rates (1% vs 2%) and answering 31.
Why it's wrong: it ignores that A makes 60% of the items and B only 40%. Correct approach: weight each defect rate by its production share via Bayes' theorem.
Mistake 2: Leaving out machine A's contribution to P(defective).
Why it's wrong: the defective item could have come from either machine, so both terms are needed. Correct approach: P(D)=(0.6)(0.02)+(0.4)(0.01)=0.016. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-07-FN1 markMCQQ.In a toy factory, the machines A, B and C are used to manufacture 30%, 40% and 30% of the output, respectively. The probabilities of toys made by machines A, B, and C to be defective are respectively 2%, 3% and 1%. A toy is taken from the factory and is found to be defective. The probability that it was manufactured by the machine B is (A) 4/5 (B) 2/9 (C) 3/4 (D) 4/7
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Bayes' theorem for finding the probability of a specific cause given an observed
effect (a defective toy); the answer is 4/7.
Concept and Intuition
When an outcome (a defective toy) could have come from several sources, each with its own prior
probability and its own conditional probability of producing that outcome, Bayes' theorem lets us
"invert" the conditioning: given that the outcome occurred, what's the probability it came from a
particular source? The key is to first find the total probability of the outcome by summing over
all sources (the law of total probability), then take the one source's contribution as a fraction of
that total.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior probabilities: P(A)=0.3, P(B)=0.4, P(C)=0.3.
- Conditional defect rates: P(D∣A)=0.02, P(D∣B)=0.03, P(D∣C)=0.01.
- Total probability of a defective toy (law of total probability):
P(D)=P(A)P(D∣A)+P(B)P(D∣B)+P(C)P(D∣C)=0.3(0.02)+0.4(0.03)+0.3(0.01)
=0.006+0.012+0.003=0.021.
- By Bayes' theorem: …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-14-FN1 markMCQQ.In a bolt factory, machines A, B, C manufacture 25%, 35%, 40% of the total output respectively. There is a chance of having 5%, 4%, 2% defective bolts manufactured by A, B, C respectively. If a bolt is drawn at random from the output, then the probability that it is defective is (A) 200069 (B) 200059 (C) 200079 (D) 200089
›Reveal solutionSolution
Classic total-probability ("law of total probability") setup: weight each machine's defect rate by its share of output and sum. The answer is (A).
Concept and Intuition
When an item can come from several mutually exclusive, exhaustive sources (here, machines A, B, C), and each source has its own conditional probability of producing a defect, the overall probability of a defect is the weighted average:
P(D)=∑iP(sourcei)P(D∣sourcei).
This is the law of total probability — it's the natural way to combine "how much each machine contributes" with "how likely each machine's own output is defective."
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let A,B,C denote drawing a bolt from each machine: P(A)=0.25, P(B)=0.35, P(C)=0.40 (these sum to 1, as they must).
- Conditional defect probabilities: P(D∣A)=0.05, P(D∣B)=0.04, P(D∣C)=0.02.
- By the law of total probability:
P(D)=P(A)P(D∣A)+P(B)P(D∣B)+P(C)P(D∣C).
- Compute each term: 0.25×0.05=0.0125; 0.35×0.04=0.014; 0.40×0.02=0.008. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-AN1 markMCQQ.A manufacturing company of bulbs has 3 units A, B and C which produce 25%, 35% and 40% of the bulbs respectively. Out of the bulbs produced by A, B, C units, 5%, 4% and 2% are defective respectively. If a bulb is chosen at random and found to be defective, then the probability that it is produced by unit B is (A) 6928 (B) 7128 (C) 6729 (D) 6925
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Bayes' theorem: given the bulb is defective, find the (reversed) probability it came from unit B. Answer: 6928.
Concept and Intuition
We know the forward probabilities (which unit makes what fraction, and each unit's defect rate), but we're asked a reverse question: given the bulb turned out defective, which unit is it likely from? Bayes' theorem reweights the prior production shares by how likely each unit was to have produced this particular (defective) outcome.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let A,B,C be the events "bulb from unit A/B/C", with P(A)=0.25, P(B)=0.35, P(C)=0.40.
- Conditional defect rates: P(D∣A)=0.05, P(D∣B)=0.04, P(D∣C)=0.02.
- Total probability of a defective bulb: P(D)=0.25(0.05)+0.35(0.04)+0.40(0.02)=0.0125+0.014+0.008=0.0345 …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.A shopkeeper buys a particular type of electric bulbs from three manufacturers M1,M2 and M3. He buys 25% of his requirement from M1, 45% from M2 and 30% from M3. Based on past experience he found that 2% of type M3 bulbs are defective, where as only 1% of type M1 and type M2 are defective. If a bulb chosen by him at random is defective, then the probability that it was of type M3 is (A) 135 (B) 136 (C) 137 (D) 138
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct application of Bayes' theorem with the law of total probability for the defective-bulb probability. Answer: (B).
Concept and Intuition
This is a classic "reverse conditional probability" problem: we know how likely a defect is given the source, and want the reverse — the probability the source was M3 given a defect was observed. Bayes' theorem converts one into the other via the law of total probability.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Given: P(M1)=0.25, P(M2)=0.45, P(M3)=0.30; P(D∣M1)=0.01, P(D∣M2)=0.01, P(D∣M3)=0.02.
- Total probability of a defective bulb: P(D)=P(M1)P(D∣M1)+P(M2)P(D∣M2)+P(M3)P(D∣M3) =0.25(0.01)+0.45(0.01)+0.30(0.02)=0.0025+0.0045+0.006=0.013. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.In a college, the heights of 4% of male and 1% of female students are more than 1.8 meters. If 60% of the total students are female and a student selected at random has height more than 1.8 meters, then the probability that this student is a female, is (A) 118 (B) 116 (C) 115 (D) 113
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct application of Bayes' theorem: given the height is above 1.8m, find the probability the student is female.
Concept and Intuition
This is the classic "reverse conditional probability" setup — we know P(tall∣gender) for each gender and the gender proportions, and want P(gender∣tall). Bayes' theorem converts one direction of conditioning into the other by weighting each gender's tall-probability by its population share and normalizing.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let M = male, F = female, H = height >1.8m. Given: P(F)=0.6, P(M)=0.4, P(H∣M)=0.04, P(H∣F)=0.01.
- Total probability of height >1.8m: P(H)=P(M)P(H∣M)+P(F)P(H∣F)=0.4(0.04)+0.6(0.01)=0.016+0.006=0.022. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.An item is tested on a device for its defectiveness. The probability that such an item is defective is 0.3. The device gives accurate result in 8 out of 10 such tests. If the device reports that an item tested is not defective, then the probability that it is actually defective is (A) 152 (B) 293 (C) 313 (D) 514
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct Bayes'-theorem inversion problem; the item is actually defective with probability 313 given a "not defective" report — option (C).
Concept and Intuition
The device's report can be wrong. To find the true state given an observed (possibly wrong) report, we must weigh both ways the report could have arisen: a genuinely non-defective item correctly reported as such, or a genuinely defective item incorrectly reported as non-defective. Bayes' theorem combines these.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let D: item defective, P(D)=0.3; D′: item not defective, P(D′)=0.7.
- Device accuracy =0.8, so it errs with probability 0.2.
- "Reports not defective" while the item is defective means the device made an error: P(report ND∣D)=0.2.
- "Reports not defective" while the item is not defective means the device was accurate: P(report ND∣D′)=0.8. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.70% of the total employees of a factory are men. Among the employees of that factory, 30% of men and 15% of women are technical assistants. If an employee chosen at random is found to be a technical assistant, then the probability that this employee is a man is (A) 239 (B) 173 (C) 1714 (D) 2314
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct Bayes'/total-probability computation using a convenient total of 100 employees. The answer is 1714.
Concept and Intuition
We want P(man∣technical assistant). Since we're given the proportion of men and women, and what fraction of each group are technical assistants, the cleanest approach is to work with actual counts (out of a convenient total like 100) rather than abstract probabilities — it avoids fraction juggling.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Assume 100 employees: Men =70, Women =30.
- Technical assistants among men: 30% of 70=21.
- Technical assistants among women: 15% of 30=4.5.
- Total technical assistants =21+4.5=25.5.
- P(man∣TA)=25.521=255210=5142=1714. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.In a class consisting of 40 boys and 30 girls, 30% of the boys and 40% of the girls are good at Mathematics. If a student selected at random from that class is found to be a girl, then the probability that she is not good at Mathematics is (A) 53 (B) 52 (C) 103 (D) 107
›Reveal solutionSolution
Conditioning on "the student is a girl" restricts the sample space to the 30 girls only; the answer is 53.
Concept and Intuition
This is conditional probability with a twist: the condition ("selected student is a girl") is given as a fact, not something to be computed via Bayes' theorem. Once we know the student is a girl, the boys' statistics become irrelevant — we simply work within the group of girls.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total girls =30.
- Girls good at Mathematics =40% of 30=12.
- Girls not good at Mathematics =30−12=18.
- Since we are told the selected student is a girl, the relevant sample space is just these 30 girls.
- P(not good at maths∣girl)=3018=53. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-19-AN1 markMCQQ.There are 2 bags each containing 3 white and 5 black balls and 4 bags each containing 6 white and 4 black balls. If a ball drawn randomly from a bag is found to be black, then the probability that this ball is from the first set of bags is (A) 5725 (B) 4125 (C) 52 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem (inverse-probability) question: given the ball drawn is black, find the probability it came from the first group of bags. Answer: 5725.
Concept and Intuition
When an experiment happens in two stages — first a bag is picked (from one of two groups of bags), then a ball is drawn from it — and we're told the result of the second stage (a black ball came out), Bayes' theorem lets us reverse the direction of reasoning and find the probability about the first stage (which group the bag was from). The prior probability of picking from a group is proportional to how many bags are in that group (each individual bag is equally likely to be picked), and then we weight by how likely that group is to produce the observed outcome.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Groups and priors. Group 1 (call it S1) has 2 bags (each 3 white, 5 black — 8 balls). Group 2 (S2) has 4 bags (each 6 white, 4 black — 10 balls). Total bags =6, each equally likely to be chosen, so
P(S1)=62=31,P(S2)=64=32.
- Likelihoods of drawing black. From a group-1 bag: P(B∣S1)=85. From a group-2 bag: P(B∣S2)=104=52.
- Total probability of drawing a black ball (law of total probability): P(B)=P(S1)P(B∣S1)+P(S2)P(B∣S2)=31⋅85+32⋅52=245+154. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.In a school there are 3 sections A, B and C. Section A contains 20 girls and 30 boys, section B contains 40 girls and 20 boys and section C contains 10 girls and 30 boys. The probabilities of selecting the section A, B and C are 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 respectively. If a student selected at random from the school is a girl, then the probability that she belongs to section A is (A) 200121 (B) 12116 (C) 8114 (D) 8116
›Reveal solutionSolution
A three-section Bayes'-theorem problem; the answer is 8116, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Given a randomly selected student is a girl, we want to reverse-condition on which section she came from. This requires the total probability of "selecting a girl" (summed over all three sections weighted by section-selection probability), then applying Bayes' theorem to isolate section A's contribution.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Conditional probabilities of picking a girl within each section: P(girl∣A)=5020=52; P(girl∣B)=6040=32; P(girl∣C)=4010=41.
- Section-selection probabilities: P(A)=51, P(B)=103, P(C)=21.
- Joint terms: P(A)P(girl∣A)=51⋅52=252; P(B)P(girl∣B)=103⋅32=51; P(C)P(girl∣C)=21⋅41=81. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.Bag A contains 2 white and 3 red balls and bag B contains 4 white and 5 red balls. If one ball is drawn at random from one of the bags and is found to be red, then the probability that it was drawn from the bag B is (A) 5423 (B) 5125 (C) 5225 (D) 5527
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem problem: given the ball drawn is red, the probability it came from bag B is 5225.
Concept and Intuition
This is Bayes' theorem: we're given the outcome (red ball drawn) and want to find the probability of which "cause" (bag A or B) produced it, using the prior probability of choosing each bag (each 21) and each bag's own probability of yielding red.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Bag A: 2 white, 3 red (5 total) ⇒P(red∣A)=53.
- Bag B: 4 white, 5 red (9 total) ⇒P(red∣B)=95.
- P(A)=P(B)=21 (bag chosen at random).
- Total probability of red: P(red)=P(A)P(red∣A)+P(B)P(red∣B)=21⋅53+21⋅95=103+185.
- Common denominator 90: 103=9027, 185=9025, sum =9052=4526.
- Bayes: P(B∣red)=P(red)P(B)P(red∣B)=26/45(1/2)(5/9)=26/455/18. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-FN1 markMCQQ.For a biased die, the probabilities for different faces to turn up are given belowThe die is tossed and you are told that either face 1 or 2 has turned up. Then the probability that it is face 1 is (A) 3310 (B) 215 (C) 218 (D) 421
Face 1 2 3 4 5 6 Probability 0.1 0.32 0.21 0.15 0.05 0.17 ›Reveal solutionSolution
Conditioning on "face 1 or face 2" just means renormalizing the two individual probabilities so they add to 1.
Concept and Intuition
P(face 1∣face 1 or 2)=P(face 1)+P(face 2)P(face 1), since these two events are mutually exclusive and their union is the conditioning event.
Step-by-Step Solution
- P(1)=0.1, P(2)=0.32.
- P(1 or 2)=0.1+0.32=0.42.
- P(1∣1 or 2)=0.420.1=4210=215.
Common Mistakes …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.