Q.Probability that A speaks truth is 54. A coin is tossed. A reports that a head appears. The probability that actually there was head is (A) 54 (B) 21 (C) 51 (D) 52
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability (Bayes' Theorem)
We need P(Head∣A reports head).
Let H = head occurs, T = tail occurs, R = A reports head.
Given: P(H)=21, P(T)=21, P(R∣H)=54 (truth), P(R∣T)=51 (lie).
By Bayes' theorem: …
We use Bayes’ theorem to reverse the conditional: given that A reports a head, the probability that the coin actually showed a head is 54.
Why Bayes’ theorem?
The problem gives us the probability that A speaks the truth (54), and we know the coin is fair. But the question asks: given that A reports a head, what is the chance the coin actually showed a head? That’s a classic “inverse probability” situation — we need to update our belief about the coin toss using the report we heard. Bayes’ theorem is the tool for exactly this.
Let’s define the events clearly:
- H: the coin shows a head.
- T: the coin shows a tail.
- RH: A reports that a head appears.
We know:
- P(H)=P(T)=21 (fair coin).
- P(A speaks truth)=54. So if the coin is head, A reports head with probability 54; if the coin is tail, A reports tail with probability 54.
- If A lies (probability 51), then when the coin is head, A reports tail; when the coin is tail, A reports head.
We want P(H∣RH).
-
Identify the probabilities of reporting a head in each case.
- If the coin is head (H): A tells truth → reports head: probability 54. A lies → reports tail: probability 51. So P(RH∣H)=54.
- If the coin is tail (T): A tells truth → reports tail: probability 54. A lies → reports head: probability 51. So P(RH∣T)=51.
-
Apply Bayes’ theorem.
P(H∣RH)=P(RH∣H)⋅P(H)+P(RH∣T)⋅P(T)P(RH∣H)⋅P(H)
- Plug in the numbers. …
Method: Bayes' theorem for a reliability / witness problem
Use this when a source of known reliability reports an outcome and you must find the probability the outcome truly occurred, given the report.
Steps
Step 1: Fix the prior and the reliability.
Write the prior probabilities of the true states (a fair coin gives P(H)=P(T)=21) and the reliability p that the source reports truthfully; it lies with probability 1−p.
Step 2: Turn reliability into likelihoods of the report. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Answering 21 because the coin is fair.
Why it's wrong: A's report is extra information; since A tells the truth more often than not, a reported head genuinely raises the chance the coin was a head. Correct approach: update with Bayes' theorem, which gives 54.
Mistake 2: Setting P(reports head∣tail) to 0. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.A person is known to speak false once out of 4 times. If that person picks a card at random from a pack of 52 cards and reports that it is a king, then the probability that it is actually a king is (A) 371 (B) 51 (C) 3712 (D) 3725
›Reveal solutionSolution
Classic Bayes'-theorem problem: weigh the prior probability of drawing a king against the person's truth-telling reliability. Answer: 1/5.
Concept and Intuition
The report 'it is a king' can arise two ways: the card really is a king and the person tells the truth, or the card is NOT a king and the person lies (falsely claims king). Bayes' theorem combines these into the posterior probability that it's actually a king.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior: P(K)=4/52=1/13 (king drawn), P(Kˉ)=12/13 (not a king).
- Truth-telling: P(truth)=3/4, P(lie)=1/4.
- P(reports king∣K)=P(truth)=3/4 (truthfully reports the actual king).
- P(reports king∣Kˉ)=P(lie)=1/4 (lies about a non-king, falsely calling it a king). …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.A person is known to speak the truth in 3 out of 4 occasions. If he throws a die and reports that it is six, then the probability that it is actually six is (A) 83 (B) 72 (C) 91 (D) 54
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem problem: combine the prior P(six)=1/6 with the witness's reliability 3/4 to get the posterior probability it's actually six, given he reports six. The answer is 3/8.
Concept and Intuition
Before he speaks, the die has P(six)=1/6. His report is evidence, but he isn't perfectly reliable (truthful 3/4 of the time). Bayes' theorem updates the prior probability using how likely the report "six" is under each of the two possibilities (six actually occurred vs. it didn't).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let E1 = the die actually shows six, E2 = it doesn't. P(E1)=61, P(E2)=65.
- Let A = he reports "six". If E1 occurred, he reports six truthfully with probability 43: P(A∣E1)=43.
- If E2 occurred, he reports "six" only if he lies, with probability 41: P(A∣E2)=41.
- By Bayes' theorem:
P(E1∣A)=P(A∣E1)P(E1)+P(A∣E2)P(E2)P(A∣E1)P(E1).
- Numerator: 43⋅61=243=81.
- Denominator's second term: 41⋅65=245.
- Sum =243+245=248=31. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-FN1 markMCQQ.Let A and B be two events with P(A)=71, P(A/B)=52 and P(B)=72. Then the value P(B/A) is (A) 51 (B) 495 (C) 54 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
Chain the conditional-probability definition twice: first get P(A∩B) from P(A/B), then get P(B/A) from that.
Concept and Intuition
Conditional probability is defined as P(E/F)=P(F)P(E∩F). Given one conditional probability, we can back out the joint probability P(A∩B), and then use it (with the definition again, but conditioning the other way) to find the other conditional probability.
Step-by-Step Solution
- P(A/B)=P(B)P(A∩B)⇒P(A∩B)=P(A/B)⋅P(B)=52×72=354.
- Now use P(B/A)=P(A)P(A∩B)=1/74/35. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.On every evening, a student either watches TV or reads a book. The probability of watching TV is 54. If he watches TV, the probability that he will fall asleep is 43 and it is 41 when he reads a book. If the student is found to be asleep on an evening, the probability that he watched the TV is (A) 1311 (B) 1312 (C) 132 (D) 134
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Bayes' theorem: finding the probability of a cause (watched TV) given an observed effect (fell asleep). The answer is 1312.
Concept and Intuition
When asked "given the observed outcome, what's the probability of a particular cause," that's a Bayes'-theorem setup: compute the joint probability of that cause with the outcome, and divide by the total probability of the outcome (summed over all causes).
Step-by-Step Solution
- P(TV)=54, P(book)=51.
- P(asleep∣TV)=43, P(asleep∣book)=41.
- Total probability of falling asleep: P(asleep)=P(TV)P(asleep∣TV)+P(book)P(asleep∣book)=54⋅43+51⋅41=53+201=2012+201=2013. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQQ.A family consists of 8 persons. If 4 persons are chosen at random and they are found to be 2 men and 2 women, then the probability that there are equal number of men and women in that family is (A) 51 (B) 73 (C) 52 (D) 72
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a Bayes'-theorem problem: given the observed sample (2 men, 2 women out of 4 drawn), find the posterior probability that the family itself is evenly split (4 men, 4 women), by weighting each possible family composition's likelihood of producing that sample.
Concept and Intuition
Before drawing, we don't know how many of the 8 family members are men — call it k (k can range from 0 to 8, but only k=2,3,4,5,6 can possibly yield a sample of 2 men and 2 women out of 4 drawn, since we need at least 2 men and at least 2 women in the family). Treating each feasible value of k as equally likely a priori, Bayes' theorem says: P(k=4∣observed 2M,2W)=∑kP(observed∣k)P(observed∣k=4), since the priors cancel when they're equal.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For a family with k men and 8−k women, the probability of drawing exactly 2 men and 2 women in a sample of 4 (hypergeometric) is proportional to (2k)(28−k) (the (48) denominator is common to all k and cancels in the ratio).
- Only k=2,3,4,5,6 give a nonzero value (need k≥2 and 8−k≥2).
- Compute L(k)=(2k)(28−k) for each:
- k=2: (22)(26)=1×15=15
- k=3: (23)(25)=3×10=30
- k=4: (24)(24)=6×6=36
- k=5: (25)(23)=10×3=30
- k=6: (26)(22)=15×1=15
- Sum of likelihoods =15+30+36+30+15=126. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-FN1 markMCQQ.Two persons P and Q are considering to apply for a job. The probability that P applies for the job is 1/4, the probability that P applies for the job given that Q applies for the job is 1/2, and the probability that Q applies for the job given that P applies for the job is 1/3. Then the probability that P does not apply for the job given that Q does not apply for the job is (A) 4/5 (B) 5/6 (C) 7/8 (D) 11/12
›Reveal solutionSolution
Chain the given conditional probabilities to find P(Q) and P(P∩Q), then use the complement rule — the answer is (A) 4/5.
Concept and Intuition
Conditional probability definitions let us cross-multiply to recover the joint probability P(P∩Q) from either conditional. Once P(P),P(Q),P(P∩Q) are all known, De Morgan's law converts "neither event" into the complement of the union.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Given: P(P)=41, P(P∣Q)=21, P(Q∣P)=31.
- P(P∩Q)=P(Q∣P)⋅P(P)=31×41=121.
- Also P(P∩Q)=P(P∣Q)⋅P(Q)⇒121=21⋅P(Q)⇒P(Q)=61.
- P(P∪Q)=P(P)+P(Q)−P(P∩Q)=41+61−121=123+122−121=124=31.
- By De Morgan's law, "neither P nor Q applies" is the complement of P∪Q: P(P∩Q)=1−31=32.
- P(Q)=1−P(Q)=1−61=65. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-FN1 markMCQQ.A pair of dice is thrown. Then the probability that either of the dice shows 2 when their sum is 6 is (A) 21 (B) 51 (C) 52 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a conditional probability: restrict the sample space to pairs summing to 6, then count how many of those have a 2 on either die.
Concept and Intuition
"Given that the sum is 6" restricts attention to only those (die1, die2) pairs whose total is 6. Within that restricted, equally-likely set, we simply count the favourable outcomes.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Pairs (d1,d2) with d1+d2=6: (1,5),(2,4),(3,3),(4,2),(5,1) — 5 outcomes, each equally likely given the sum is 6.
- Favourable outcomes (either die shows 2): (2,4) and (4,2) — 2 outcomes.
- Required probability =52.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.A die is thrown twice. Let A be the event of getting a prime number when the die is thrown first time and B be the event of getting an even number when the die is thrown second time. Then P(A/Bˉ)= (A) 21 (B) 32 (C) 51 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
Since A and B (hence Bˉ) come from two independent throws of the die, conditioning on Bˉ does not change P(A); the answer is 1/2.
Concept and Intuition
When two events are determined by physically independent trials (first throw vs second throw of a die), any conditional probability between them collapses to the unconditional probability — conditioning on an independent event changes nothing.
Step-by-Step Solution
- A: prime number on the first throw, i.e. outcome in {2,3,5}, so P(A)=63=21.
- B: even number on the second throw, i.e. outcome in {2,4,6}, so P(B)=21, and P(Bˉ)=21 (odd on the second throw). …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-16-AN1 markMCQQ.Two dice are rolled. If A denote the event that the same number shows on each die and B denote the event that the sum of the numbers on both dice is greater than 7, then P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) respectively are (A) 52,41 (B) 51,21 (C) 51,41 (D) 21,53
›Reveal solutionSolution
Counting the 36 equally likely dice outcomes directly gives P(A∣B)=51 and P(B∣A)=21.
Concept and Intuition
With two fair dice there are 36 equally likely outcomes, so every probability here reduces to simple counting: enumerate the outcomes in A, in B, and in A∩B, then apply the conditional probability formula P(X∣Y)=P(Y)P(X∩Y) directly as a ratio of counts.
Step-by-Step Solution
- A = "same number on each die": outcomes (1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(4,4),(5,5),(6,6) — 6 outcomes, so P(A)=366.
- B = "sum >7", i.e. sum ∈{8,9,10,11,12}. Counting pairs per sum: sum 8 has 5 pairs, 9 has 4, 10 has 3, 11 has 2, 12 has 1 — total 5+4+3+2+1=15 outcomes, so P(B)=3615.
- A∩B: doubles with sum >7 — check each double: (4,4) sum 8 ✓, (5,5) sum 10 ✓, (6,6) sum 12 ✓; (1,1),(2,2),(3,3) have sums 2,4,6, all ≤7 — excluded. So A∩B has 3 outcomes, P(A∩B)=363. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-AN1 markMCQQ.An unbiased coin is tossed 3 times. If the third toss gets head, then the probability of getting at least one more head is (A) 3/4 (B) 1/4 (C) 1/2 (D) 1/3
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests recognizing conditional independence: given the third toss's outcome, the first two tosses remain independent unbiased flips, so their probability is unaffected by the condition. Answer: 3/4.
Concept and Intuition
Since coin tosses are independent events, knowing the outcome of the third toss (head) gives us no information about the first two tosses. So the question really just asks: what's the probability of getting at least one head in two independent fair coin tosses? This is most easily computed via the complement (no heads at all in two tosses).
Step-by-Step Solution
- The condition 'the third toss gets head' is independent of the outcomes of the first two tosses (each coin toss is independent of the others).
- So conditioning on the third toss being heads doesn't change the probabilities for the first two tosses — they remain two independent fair coin flips.
- We want P(at least one head among the first two tosses).
- Use the complement: P(no heads in first two tosses)=P(both tails)=21×21=41.
- So P(at least one head)=1−41=43.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.Bag A contains 2 white and 3 red balls and bag B contains 4 white and 5 red balls. If one ball is drawn at random from one of the bags and is found to be red, then the probability that it was drawn from the bag B is (A) 5423 (B) 5125 (C) 5225 (D) 5527
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem problem: given the ball drawn is red, the probability it came from bag B is 5225.
Concept and Intuition
This is Bayes' theorem: we're given the outcome (red ball drawn) and want to find the probability of which "cause" (bag A or B) produced it, using the prior probability of choosing each bag (each 21) and each bag's own probability of yielding red.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Bag A: 2 white, 3 red (5 total) ⇒P(red∣A)=53.
- Bag B: 4 white, 5 red (9 total) ⇒P(red∣B)=95.
- P(A)=P(B)=21 (bag chosen at random).
- Total probability of red: P(red)=P(A)P(red∣A)+P(B)P(red∣B)=21⋅53+21⋅95=103+185.
- Common denominator 90: 103=9027, 185=9025, sum =9052=4526.
- Bayes: P(B∣red)=P(red)P(B)P(red∣B)=26/45(1/2)(5/9)=26/455/18. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-AN1 markMCQQ.A man is known to speak truth 7 out of 10 times. After throwing a die with 100 faces marked 1,2,3,…,100 on its faces, the man reports that he got a prime number on the die. What is the probability that it is actually a prime? (A) 165 (B) 167 (C) 1611 (D) 1610
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem "truth-telling" problem: combining the base rate of primes among 1–100 with the man's truthfulness gives P(actually prime∣reports prime)=167.
Concept and Intuition
Even though the man is more likely to tell the truth than lie, the base rate of the event matters. Since primes are a minority (25 out of 100), a "prime" report is diluted by false reports from the much larger non-prime set.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Number of primes from 1 to 100 is 25 (2, 3, 5, ..., 97), so P(prime)=10025=41, and P(not prime)=43.
- He speaks truth with probability 107: P(reports prime∣prime)=107, and (lying) P(reports prime∣not prime)=103. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.