Q.In answering a question on a multiple choice test, a student either knows the answer or guesses. Let 43 be the probability that he knows the answer and 41 be the probability that he guesses. Assuming that a student who guesses at the answer will be correct with probability 41. What is the probability that the student knows the answer given that he answered it correctly?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability (Bayes' Theorem)
Let K = event that the student knows the answer, G = event that he guesses, and C = event that he answers correctly.
We are given:
- P(K)=43, P(G)=41
- P(C∣G)=41, and if he knows, he is certainly correct: P(C∣K)=1
We want P(K∣C).
Step 1: Find P(C) using the law of total probability:
P(C)=P(K)⋅P(C∣K)+P(G)⋅P(C∣G)=43⋅1+41⋅41=43+161=1612+161=1613 …
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem. The probability that the student knows the answer, given that they answered correctly, is 1312.
The key here is conditional probability: we want P(knows∣correct). The event “answered correctly” can happen in two mutually exclusive ways — either the student knows the answer (and is therefore always correct), or they guess (and are correct only with probability 41).
Bayes’ theorem lets us reverse the conditional: we know P(correct∣knows)=1 and P(correct∣guesses)=41, and we know the prior probabilities 43 and 41 respectively. The theorem combines these to give the “updated” probability after seeing the correct answer.
Bayes’ theorem (two-event form):
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)⋅P(A)
where P(B)=P(B∣A)P(A)+P(B∣Ac)P(Ac).
- Define the events clearly Let K = “student knows the answer”, and C = “student answers correctly”. We are given:
P(K)=43,P(Kc)=41
P(C∣K)=1(if they know, they are certainly correct)
P(C∣Kc)=41(if they guess, correct with probability 41)
- Find the total probability of answering correctly By the law of total probability:
P(C)=P(C∣K)P(K)+P(C∣Kc)P(Kc)
=(1)(43)+(41)(41)=43+161=1612+161=1613
- Apply Bayes’ theorem …
Method: Bayes' Theorem when one branch is a certainty
This is the standard "given the observed outcome, find which route produced it" pattern, with one twist that appears often: one of the routes guarantees the outcome.
Steps
Step 1: List the routes and their priors.
Identify the exhaustive ways the situation could have started — "knows" vs "guesses" — with priors P(Hi).
Step 2: Assign each route's likelihood — and spot the certain one.
Write P(E∣Hi). When a route makes the outcome inevitable (a student who knows is certainly correct), that likelihood is exactly 1, not some value less than 1. Getting this branch right is the crux of the problem. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Using P(correct∣knows)<1.
Why it's wrong: a student who knows the answer is certain to be correct, so this likelihood is exactly 1. Correct approach: set P(C∣K)=1; only the guessing branch carries 41.
Mistake 2: Dropping the guessing branch from P(C).
Why it's wrong: a correct answer can also come from a lucky guess, so P(C) must include it. Correct approach: P(C)=43⋅1+41⋅41=1613. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.In a test a student either guesses or copies or knows the answer to answer a multiple choice question with four choices. The probability that he makes a guess is 1/3 and the probability that he copies the answer is 1/6. The probability that his answer is correct, given that he copied it is 1/8. The probability that he knew the answer to the question, given that he answered it correctly is (A) 2429 (B) 2922 (C) 2924 (D) 2923
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem problem with three mutually exclusive causes (guess/copy/know) for a correct answer. Answer: 24/29.
Concept and Intuition
This is a textbook application of Bayes' theorem: we're given the prior probabilities of three exhaustive, mutually exclusive ways of answering (guessing, copying, knowing) along with the conditional probability of being correct under each, and asked to reverse the conditioning — find the probability the student knew the answer, GIVEN that they got it right.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The three ways of answering are exhaustive: P(know)=1−P(guess)−P(copy)=1−31−61=1−21=21.
- Conditional correctness probabilities: P(C∣guess)=41 (one of four choices), P(C∣copy)=81 (given), P(C∣know)=1.
- Total probability of being correct: P(C)=31⋅41+61⋅81+21⋅1=121+481+21. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-27-FN1 markMCQQ.On every evening, a student either watches TV or reads a book. The probability of watching TV is 54. If he watches TV, the probability that he will fall asleep is 43 and it is 41 when he reads a book. If the student is found to be asleep on an evening, the probability that he watched the TV is (A) 1311 (B) 1312 (C) 132 (D) 134
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Bayes' theorem: finding the probability of a cause (watched TV) given an observed effect (fell asleep). The answer is 1312.
Concept and Intuition
When asked "given the observed outcome, what's the probability of a particular cause," that's a Bayes'-theorem setup: compute the joint probability of that cause with the outcome, and divide by the total probability of the outcome (summed over all causes).
Step-by-Step Solution
- P(TV)=54, P(book)=51.
- P(asleep∣TV)=43, P(asleep∣book)=41.
- Total probability of falling asleep: P(asleep)=P(TV)P(asleep∣TV)+P(book)P(asleep∣book)=54⋅43+51⋅41=53+201=2012+201=2013. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.It is given that in a random experiment events A and B are such that P(A)=41, P(A∣B)=21 and P(B∣A)=32 then P(B)= (A) 31 (B) 32 (C) 21 (D) 61
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using P(B∣A) to find P(A∩B), then dividing by P(A∣B), gives P(B)=31.
Concept and Intuition
The conditional probability definitions P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B) and P(B∣A)=P(A)P(A∩B) share the common quantity P(A∩B) — computing it from one equation lets us solve the other for the unknown probability.
Step-by-Step Solution
- From P(B∣A)=P(A)P(A∩B)=32, and P(A)=41: P(A∩B)=32×41=61.
- From P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B)=21: P(B)=P(A∣B)P(A∩B)=1/21/6=31.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.A person is known to speak the truth in 3 out of 4 occasions. If he throws a die and reports that it is six, then the probability that it is actually six is (A) 83 (B) 72 (C) 91 (D) 54
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem problem: combine the prior P(six)=1/6 with the witness's reliability 3/4 to get the posterior probability it's actually six, given he reports six. The answer is 3/8.
Concept and Intuition
Before he speaks, the die has P(six)=1/6. His report is evidence, but he isn't perfectly reliable (truthful 3/4 of the time). Bayes' theorem updates the prior probability using how likely the report "six" is under each of the two possibilities (six actually occurred vs. it didn't).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let E1 = the die actually shows six, E2 = it doesn't. P(E1)=61, P(E2)=65.
- Let A = he reports "six". If E1 occurred, he reports six truthfully with probability 43: P(A∣E1)=43.
- If E2 occurred, he reports "six" only if he lies, with probability 41: P(A∣E2)=41.
- By Bayes' theorem:
P(E1∣A)=P(A∣E1)P(E1)+P(A∣E2)P(E2)P(A∣E1)P(E1).
- Numerator: 43⋅61=243=81.
- Denominator's second term: 41⋅65=245.
- Sum =243+245=248=31. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If it is known that a woman has two children and she has at least one girl child, the probability that the woman has both girl children is (A) 41 (B) 31 (C) 32 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic conditional-probability trap: conditioning on "at least one girl" (not "the elder/first child is a girl") leaves 3 equally likely outcomes, of which 1 is both-girls, giving 31.
Concept and Intuition
With two children, birth order matters for counting equally likely outcomes: BB,BG,GB,GG, each with probability 1/4. The event "at least one girl" is a set of outcomes, not a statement about a specific (e.g. first) child, so it correctly removes only BB and keeps three outcomes, not two. This distinguishes it from the simpler (and different) question "given the elder child is a girl," which would leave only {GB,GG} and give probability 1/2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Sample space (ordered by birth, say elder-younger): {BB,BG,GB,GG}, each with probability 41.
- Event E = "at least one girl" = {BG,GB,GG}, so P(E)=43. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-20-AN1 markMCQQ.A person is known to speak false once out of 4 times. If that person picks a card at random from a pack of 52 cards and reports that it is a king, then the probability that it is actually a king is (A) 371 (B) 51 (C) 3712 (D) 3725
›Reveal solutionSolution
Classic Bayes'-theorem problem: weigh the prior probability of drawing a king against the person's truth-telling reliability. Answer: 1/5.
Concept and Intuition
The report 'it is a king' can arise two ways: the card really is a king and the person tells the truth, or the card is NOT a king and the person lies (falsely claims king). Bayes' theorem combines these into the posterior probability that it's actually a king.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior: P(K)=4/52=1/13 (king drawn), P(Kˉ)=12/13 (not a king).
- Truth-telling: P(truth)=3/4, P(lie)=1/4.
- P(reports king∣K)=P(truth)=3/4 (truthfully reports the actual king).
- P(reports king∣Kˉ)=P(lie)=1/4 (lies about a non-king, falsely calling it a king). …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-06-FN1 markMCQQ.Two persons P and Q are considering to apply for a job. The probability that P applies for the job is 1/4, the probability that P applies for the job given that Q applies for the job is 1/2, and the probability that Q applies for the job given that P applies for the job is 1/3. Then the probability that P does not apply for the job given that Q does not apply for the job is (A) 4/5 (B) 5/6 (C) 7/8 (D) 11/12
›Reveal solutionSolution
Chain the given conditional probabilities to find P(Q) and P(P∩Q), then use the complement rule — the answer is (A) 4/5.
Concept and Intuition
Conditional probability definitions let us cross-multiply to recover the joint probability P(P∩Q) from either conditional. Once P(P),P(Q),P(P∩Q) are all known, De Morgan's law converts "neither event" into the complement of the union.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Given: P(P)=41, P(P∣Q)=21, P(Q∣P)=31.
- P(P∩Q)=P(Q∣P)⋅P(P)=31×41=121.
- Also P(P∩Q)=P(P∣Q)⋅P(Q)⇒121=21⋅P(Q)⇒P(Q)=61.
- P(P∪Q)=P(P)+P(Q)−P(P∩Q)=41+61−121=123+122−121=124=31.
- By De Morgan's law, "neither P nor Q applies" is the complement of P∪Q: P(P∩Q)=1−31=32.
- P(Q)=1−P(Q)=1−61=65. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.An item is tested on a device for its defectiveness. The probability that such an item is defective is 0.3. The device gives accurate result in 8 out of 10 such tests. If the device reports that an item tested is not defective, then the probability that it is actually defective is (A) 152 (B) 293 (C) 313 (D) 514
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct Bayes'-theorem inversion problem; the item is actually defective with probability 313 given a "not defective" report — option (C).
Concept and Intuition
The device's report can be wrong. To find the true state given an observed (possibly wrong) report, we must weigh both ways the report could have arisen: a genuinely non-defective item correctly reported as such, or a genuinely defective item incorrectly reported as non-defective. Bayes' theorem combines these.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let D: item defective, P(D)=0.3; D′: item not defective, P(D′)=0.7.
- Device accuracy =0.8, so it errs with probability 0.2.
- "Reports not defective" while the item is defective means the device made an error: P(report ND∣D)=0.2.
- "Reports not defective" while the item is not defective means the device was accurate: P(report ND∣D′)=0.8. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.The probability that a person goes to college by car is 51; by bus 52 and by train is 53 respectively. The probabilities that he reaches the college late if he takes car, bus, train are 72,74 and 71 respectively. If he reaches the college in time, the probability that he travelled by car is (A) 296 (B) 2924 (C) 295 (D) 2923
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem: weight each mode's "on-time" probability by its usage probability, then take the car-share of the total.
Concept and Intuition
This is a direct application of Bayes' theorem / total probability: to find P(cause∣effect), build the denominator as the weighted sum over every possible cause of reaching the observed effect (here, arriving on time), then take the numerator's share of it.
Step-by-Step Solution
- On-time probabilities per mode: car 1−72=75; bus 1−74=73; train 1−71=76.
- Total on-time probability: P(ontime)=51⋅75+52⋅73+53⋅76=355+356+3518=3529.
- Joint probability of taking the car AND being on time: 51⋅75=355. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-AN1 markMCQQ.A box contains n coins, m of which are fair and the rest are biased. When a biased coin is tossed, the probability of getting a head is twice as likely as tail. A coin is drawn from the box at random and is tossed twice. It is found that first time it shows head and the second time it shows tail. Then the probability that the coin drawn is fair is (A) 8n+m7m (B) 8n+m9m (C) 8m+n7m (D) 8m+n9m
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a Bayes'-theorem problem; computing the likelihoods for fair vs. biased coins and combining with the prior m/n gives 8n+m9m.
Concept and Intuition
Bayes' theorem updates our belief about which "type" of coin was drawn, given the observed outcome (head then tail), by weighing each type's prior probability by how likely it was to produce that exact outcome.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Fair coin: P(H)=P(T)=21, so P(HT∣fair)=21⋅21=41.
- Biased coin: head is twice as likely as tail, so P(H)=32,P(T)=31; P(HT∣biased)=32⋅31=92.
- Priors: P(fair)=nm, P(biased)=nn−m. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-13-FN1 markMCQQ.Bag A contains 3 white and 4 black balls. Bag B contains 4 white and 3 black balls. Bag C contains 2 white and 5 black balls. A bag is randomly selected and then a ball is randomly drawn from that bag. If the ball drawn was found to be white, then the probability that the ball is drawn from bag C is (A) 61 (B) 92 (C) 41 (D) 132
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a direct Bayes'-theorem (inverse probability) question. Answer: 92.
Concept and Intuition
We're given the outcome (a white ball was drawn) and asked for the probability of a particular cause (it came from bag C). This is exactly Bayes' theorem: P(C∣W)=∑iP(bagi)P(W∣bagi)P(C)P(W∣C).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Each bag is chosen with probability 31.
- P(W∣A)=73 (3 white out of 7 total in bag A).
- P(W∣B)=74 (4 white out of 7 in bag B).
- P(W∣C)=72 (2 white out of 7 in bag C).
- Total probability of white: P(W)=31(73+74+72)=31⋅79=219=73. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-07-FN1 markMCQQ.In a toy factory, the machines A, B and C are used to manufacture 30%, 40% and 30% of the output, respectively. The probabilities of toys made by machines A, B, and C to be defective are respectively 2%, 3% and 1%. A toy is taken from the factory and is found to be defective. The probability that it was manufactured by the machine B is (A) 4/5 (B) 2/9 (C) 3/4 (D) 4/7
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Bayes' theorem for finding the probability of a specific cause given an observed
effect (a defective toy); the answer is 4/7.
Concept and Intuition
When an outcome (a defective toy) could have come from several sources, each with its own prior
probability and its own conditional probability of producing that outcome, Bayes' theorem lets us
"invert" the conditioning: given that the outcome occurred, what's the probability it came from a
particular source? The key is to first find the total probability of the outcome by summing over
all sources (the law of total probability), then take the one source's contribution as a fraction of
that total.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior probabilities: P(A)=0.3, P(B)=0.4, P(C)=0.3.
- Conditional defect rates: P(D∣A)=0.02, P(D∣B)=0.03, P(D∣C)=0.01.
- Total probability of a defective toy (law of total probability):
P(D)=P(A)P(D∣A)+P(B)P(D∣B)+P(C)P(D∣C)=0.3(0.02)+0.4(0.03)+0.3(0.01)
=0.006+0.012+0.003=0.021.
- By Bayes' theorem: …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.