History · Ch 6 — Bhakti–Sufi Traditions — Changes in Religious Beliefs and Devotional Texts
Faiths of rulers and subjects
Faiths of rulers and subjects
The Rulers and Their Faiths
One common way historians study the spread of religious traditions is by looking at the faith of the ruling elite. In the Indian subcontinent, this approach is particularly useful because from the eighth century onwards, several ruling dynasties professed Islam.
The first major event was the conquest of Sind in 711 CE by the Arab general Muhammad Qasim. Sind then became part of the Caliph's domain. Later, around the thirteenth century, the Turks and Afghans established the Delhi Sultanate. This was followed by the formation of Sultanates in the Deccan and other regions. In all these areas, Islam was the acknowledged religion of the rulers. This pattern continued with the Mughal Empire in the sixteenth century and with many regional states that emerged in the eighteenth century.
The Shari‘a and the Ulama
In theory, Muslim rulers were expected to be guided by the ulama (scholars of Islamic law). The ulama were supposed to ensure that the ruler governed according to the shari‘a.
The shari‘a is the law governing the Muslim community. It is based on four sources:
- The Qur’an
- The hadis (traditions of the Prophet, including a record of his remembered words and deeds)
- Qiyas (reasoning by analogy)
- Ijma (consensus of the community)
As Islamic rule expanded outside Arabia into areas with different customs, qiyas and ijma were recognised as additional sources of legislation. Thus, the shari‘a evolved from all four sources.
The Zimmi and the Jizya
The situation in the Indian subcontinent was complicated because large populations did not subscribe to Islam. To deal with this, the category of the zimmi (meaning "protected", from the Arabic word zimma for protection) was developed. This status was originally for people who followed revealed scriptures, such as Jews and Christians, living under Muslim rule. They paid a tax called the jizya and, in return, gained the right to be protected by the Muslim state.
In India, this status of zimmi was extended to Hindus as well.
Flexible Policies of Rulers
Despite the theoretical framework of the shari‘a, rulers in practice often adopted a flexible policy towards their subjects. Many Mughal emperors, including Akbar and Aurangzeb, came to regard themselves as emperors of all peoples, not just Muslims.
This flexibility is visible in several ways:
- Land endowments and tax exemptions: Several rulers gave land grants and tax exemptions to Hindu, Jaina, Zoroastrian, Christian, and Jewish religious institutions.
- Respect for non-Muslim leaders: Rulers often expressed respect and devotion towards non-Muslim religious leaders.
Two sources from the textbook illustrate this clearly.
Source 5: A church in Khambat
This is an excerpt from a farman (imperial order) issued by Akbar in 1598:
Whereas it reached our eminent and holy notice that the padris (fathers) of the Holy Society of Jesus wish to build a house of prayer (church) in the city of Kambayat (Khambat, in Gujarat); therefore an exalted mandate … is being issued, … that the dignitaries of the city of Kambayat should in no case stand in their way but should allow them to build a church so that they may engage themselves in their own worship. It is necessary that the order of the Emperor should be obeyed in every way.
Source 6: Reverence for the Jogi
This is an excerpt from a letter written by Aurangzeb to a Jogi in 1661-62: …
Source 5 — A church in Khambat. An excerpt from a farman (imperial order) issued by the Mughal emperor Akbar in 1598:
Whereas it reached our eminent and holy notice that the padris (fathers) of the Holy Society of Jesus wish to build a house of prayer (church) in the city of Kambayat (Khambat, in Gujarat); therefore an exalted mandate … is being issued … that the dignitaries of the city of Kambayat should in no case stand in their way but should allow them to build a church so that they may engage themselves in their own worship. It is necessary that the order of the Emperor should be obeyed in every way. …
Source 6 — Reverence for the Jogi. An excerpt from a letter written by the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb to a Jogi in 1661–62:
The possessor of the sublime station, Shiv Murat, Guru Anand Nath Jio! May your Reverence remain in peace and happiness ever under the protection of Sri Shiv Jio! … A piece of cloth for the cloak and a sum of twenty-five rupees which have been sent as an offering will reach (Your Reverence) … Your Reverence may write to us whenever there is any service which can be rendered by us. …
Shari‘a. The shari‘a is the law governing the Muslim community. It is based on the Qur’an and the hadis — traditions of the Prophet, including a record of his remembered words and deeds. With the expansion of Islamic rule outside Arabia, in areas where customs and traditions were different, qiyas (reasoning by analogy) and ijma (consensus of the community) were recognised as two other sources of legi …
A Mughal miniature from the early 17th century shows Emperor Jahangir seated on a low throne, facing a Hindu Jogi (an ascetic follower of the Nath tradition). The emperor is dressed in fine Mughal court attire, while the Jogi wears a simple loincloth and carries a staff. Between them, there is no barrier or formal distance — they are shown in direct, face-to-face conversation. The Jogi’s posture and the emperor’s attentive lean suggest a respectful exchange, not a command or a petition.
The painting is not a neutral portrait. It is a deliberate statement about the Mughal court’s relationship with non-Muslim religious figures. Jahangir, like his father Akbar, often patronised and sought blessings from Hindu ascetics, especially Nath Jogis, who were believed to possess spiritual power and longevity. The Jogi’s presence in the imperial painting signals that the emperor valued such connections — not as a ruler tolerating a subject, but as a seeker engaging with a revered teacher. …