Skip to content
Question

Q.Identify the system of succession that was emphasised by ruling dynasties from the sixth century BCE onwards and reinforced in the Mahabharata. (A) Electoral succession (B) Fraternal succession (C) Patriliny succession (D) Matriliny succession

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2026MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

From the sixth century BCE onward, ruling dynasties in the Indian subcontinent emphasised patrilineal succession — the inheritance of throne and property through the male line — a principle that the Mahabharata later reinforced through its central conflict over the Kuru throne.

The question asks you to identify the system of succession that ruling dynasties from the sixth century BCE onwards emphasised, and which the Mahabharata reinforced. The correct answer is patriliny succession (option C). Let me explain why this matters and how the evidence fits together.

In the centuries after 600 BCE, the Indian subcontinent saw the rise of powerful kingdoms — the mahajanapadas — and later the Mauryan and post-Mauryan empires. For these ruling families, the most stable way to transfer power was through the male line: from father to son, or, if no direct son existed, to a close male relative like a brother or nephew. This system, called patrilineal succession, ensured that the kingdom remained within the same lineage (kula) and that property, titles, and authority stayed concentrated in the hands of a single family. It was not just a political convenience; it was deeply tied to ideas of purity, legitimacy, and the continuity of the royal house.

The Mahabharata, which took its final shape over several centuries (roughly 400 BCE to 400 CE), reflects and reinforces this very principle. The entire epic revolves around a succession dispute: who should rule the Kuru kingdom after King Shantanu? The conflict between the Kauravas and the Pandavas is fundamentally a fight over patrilineal inheritance. Dhritarashtra, though the elder, is blind and therefore deemed unfit to rule, so the throne passes to his younger brother Pandu. When Pandu dies, the claim of his sons (the Pandavas) is challenged by Dhritarashtra’s sons (the Kauravas). The epic’s resolution — the Pandavas’ victory — upholds the idea that the throne belongs to the direct male descendants of the founder.

Note

The Mahabharata does not invent patriliny; it takes it for granted as the natural order. The epic’s moral weight is used to justify why the Pandavas, as the sons of Pandu, have a stronger claim than their cousins, the sons of Dhritarashtra. This is a classic example of a text reinforcing an existing social and political norm.

Now, let us briefly consider why the other options are incorrect in this context:

  • Electoral succession (option A) — where a ruler is chosen by a council or assembly — was known in some early republics (ganas or sanghas), but it was not the norm for the large monarchical dynasties that dominated from the sixth century BCE onward. The Mahabharata does not depict a king being elected; it shows a hereditary struggle. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.