Q.“Democracy is an accepted norm in the entire region of South Asia.” Explain the statement.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Democratic consolidation in South Asia is uneven, but democracy has become the universally accepted standard of political legitimacy across the region, even where it is imperfectly practiced.
The statement that "democracy is an accepted norm in the entire region of South Asia" does not mean that every country in the region is a fully functioning democracy. What it means is something more fundamental: no government in South Asia today openly rejects democracy as a system of governance. Even military rulers and authoritarian regimes feel compelled to hold elections, maintain parliaments, and claim democratic legitimacy. This is a remarkable shift from the decades after independence, when several countries experimented with one-party rule, military dictatorship, or absolute monarchy.
Consider the evidence. India has remained a democracy since independence, with regular elections, a free press, and an independent judiciary — though it has faced challenges like the Emergency of 1975-77. Pakistan has alternated between military and civilian rule, but even General Zia-ul-Haq and General Pervez Musharraf held referendums and elections to legitimise their power. Bangladesh began with parliamentary democracy, then saw military coups, but since the 1990s has restored multi-party elections. Sri Lanka, despite a long civil war, has never abandoned its democratic framework. Nepal abolished its monarchy in 2008 and became a federal democratic republic. Bhutan transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy with elected governments. The Maldives adopted a multi-party constitution in 2008.
The exception that proves the rule is Afghanistan under the Taliban, which rejected democracy outright. But even there, the internationally recognised government before 2021 was a democratic republic, and the Taliban's rule is not accepted as legitimate by the broader international community or by most South Asian states.
What unites these diverse experiences is that democracy has become the only acceptable language of political legitimacy. No leader in South Asia today says "I am against democracy." Instead, they claim to be bringing "true democracy" or "guided democracy" or "Islamic democracy." Even when elections are rigged, constitutions are suspended, or courts are packed, the pretence of democracy is maintained. This is the hallmark of a norm: people feel obliged to pay lip service to it even when they violate it. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.