Skip to content
Question

Q.Rahul, the Managing Director of 'HariHar Ltd.' and Sahil, the finance manager were discussing about avenues of investing the idle funds of the company. Rahul was of the opinion that money should be invested in the capital market whereas Sahil felt that it would be better if the investment was made in the money market. Explain with the help of any two points, giving reasons, why Sahil felt that investment in the money market is better.

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2025Subjective· 4mImportance★★★★★est
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Sahil, as finance manager, preferred the money market for idle funds because it offers high liquidity (funds can be retrieved quickly when needed) and lower risk (short-term instruments are safer), both critical for managing a company's working capital efficiently.

When a company finds itself with idle funds—cash sitting in the bank account that isn't immediately required for operations—the finance manager faces a classic dilemma: where to park this money so it earns a return but remains accessible when business needs arise. This is precisely the situation Rahul and Sahil are debating. Rahul's instinct to look at the capital market makes sense if the company has surplus funds it won't need for years, but Sahil's preference for the money market reflects a deeper understanding of what "idle funds" typically mean in corporate finance: temporary surpluses that must remain flexible.

The money market deals in short-term debt instruments—treasury bills, commercial paper, certificates of deposit—with maturities ranging from overnight to one year. The capital market, by contrast, handles long-term securities like shares and debentures. This fundamental difference in time horizon shapes everything else about these two markets, and it's why Sahil's reasoning is sound for a company managing its day-to-day liquidity.

Two compelling reasons support Sahil's view:

High Liquidity and Quick Conversion

Money market instruments are designed for rapid conversion back into cash. If HariHar Ltd. suddenly needs funds to pay suppliers, meet a payroll obligation, or seize an unexpected business opportunity, investments in treasury bills or commercial paper can be sold almost immediately without significant loss. The short maturity periods mean that even if the company doesn't sell early, the funds will return within weeks or months. Capital market investments, particularly equity shares, can take time to sell at a fair price, and the company might be forced to exit at a loss if the market is down when cash is urgently needed. For a finance manager responsible for ensuring the company never faces a liquidity crunch, this flexibility is non-negotiable.

Lower Risk Profile

Money market instruments carry substantially less risk than capital market securities. Treasury bills are backed by the government, making them virtually risk-free. Commercial paper issued by highly-rated corporations also carries minimal default risk given the short time frame. Share prices in the capital market, however, can swing wildly based on market sentiment, economic conditions, or company-specific news. A company that invests idle funds in equities might find its "surplus" has shrunk by 15% when it actually needs the money. Sahil, tasked with preserving the company's capital while earning modest returns, would naturally gravitate toward instruments where the principal amount is secure. The finance manager's job isn't to maximize returns at all costs—it's to balance return with safety and availability. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.