Explain the solubility rule 'like dissolves like' in terms of intermolecular forces that exist in solutions.

NCERT Exemplar · Q38

Q. Explain the solubility rule 'like dissolves like' in terms of intermolecular forces that exist in solutions.

Karnataka PUCShort· 3mImportance★★★★★

79% · 104/131 Questions

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Biochemical Bonds

Biochemical Bonds: The Glue That Holds Life Together

Imagine you're building with LEGO bricks. Some bricks click together tightly and never come apart unless you really yank them. Others snap together lightly and can be pulled apart with a gentle tug. Some bricks don't even click — they just stick because of static cling or magnetism.

Biochemical bonds are exactly like that. They are the forces that hold atoms together inside the molecules of your body — your DNA, proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. Without these bonds, you'd literally fall apart into a pile of individual atoms.

The Core Idea

Atoms bond because being bonded is more stable (lower energy) than being alone. Think of it like this: a single atom is like a person standing alone in a cold room. Bonding is like huddling together for warmth — you lose some freedom of movement, but you gain stability.

In biochemistry, we care about four main types of bonds. They differ in strength, how they form, and what they do in living systems.

1. Covalent Bonds — The Strong, Permanent LEGO Clicks

This is the strongest bond in biology. Two atoms share electrons — like two people holding the same umbrella. Each atom contributes one or more electrons, and they both "own" the pair.

Key properties:

Very strong (100–400 kJ/mol)
Forms the backbone of all biomolecules
Takes a lot of energy (or enzymes) to break

Where you find it:

The carbon-carbon bonds in your DNA's sugar-phosphate backbone
The peptide bonds linking amino acids into proteins
The bonds within a glucose molecule

Note

A single covalent bond shares 2 electrons. A double bond shares 4. Triple bonds are rare in biology but exist (e.g., in cyanide).

2. Ionic Bonds — The Static Cling of Opposites

Some atoms steal electrons from others. When that happens, one atom becomes positively charged (lost an electron) and the other becomes negatively charged (gained one). Opposite charges attract — that's an ionic bond.

Key properties:

Moderate strength (5–100 kJ/mol in dry conditions)
Very weak in water (because water molecules get in between)
Easily broken by changes in pH or salt concentration

Where you find it:

In salt bridges that help proteins fold into their correct shape
Between the phosphate groups of DNA and positively charged proteins (histones)

Watch out

Ionic bonds are often called "bonds" but in water they behave more like attractions. Don't confuse them with covalent bonds — they're much weaker in biological fluids.

3. Hydrogen Bonds — The Gentle, Reversible Magnets

This is the most important weak bond in biology. A hydrogen atom that's already covalently bonded to an electronegative atom (like oxygen or nitrogen) gets a slight positive charge. It then gets attracted to another electronegative atom nearby.

Think of it like a weak magnet — it holds things together but can be easily undone.

Key properties:

Weak individually (5–30 kJ/mol)
But many together can be very strong
Easily broken by heat or changes in pH
Directional — they only work when atoms are properly aligned

Where you find it:

Between the two strands of DNA (this is what holds the double helix together)
In protein folding (between amino acids in the backbone)
Between water molecules (giving water its unique properties)

Important

Hydrogen bonds are the reason DNA can unzip for replication. If DNA used covalent bonds between strands, it would be impossible to separate without destroying the molecule.

4. Van der Waals Interactions — The Fleeting, Accidental Touches

Even neutral atoms have temporary, uneven distributions of electrons. These create tiny, momentary charges that attract nearby atoms. It's like two people accidentally brushing shoulders in a crowd — brief, weak, but real.

Key properties:

Extremely weak (0.5–5 kJ/mol per interaction)
Only work when atoms are very close (within 0.3–0.4 nm)
Add up significantly when many atoms are packed together

Where you find it:

In the hydrophobic core of proteins (where oily amino acids pack tightly)
Between lipid tails in cell membranes
In enzyme-substrate binding (helps "grip" the substrate)

Putting It All Together: A Biological Example

Consider a protein in your body. It's a long chain of amino acids held together by covalent peptide bonds. That chain then folds into a specific shape. The folding is guided by:

Hydrogen bonds between backbone atoms (forming alpha helices and beta sheets)
Ionic bonds between charged side chains …

Why this formula?

Biochemical Bonds: Why the Key Formulas Hold

Biochemical bonds are the forces that hold atoms together in biomolecules. The key formulas come from electrostatics and quantum mechanics — not from biology itself. Let's break down the why behind the most important ones.

1. Ionic Bond Energy: Coulomb's Law

Formula:

E = \frac{k \cdot q_1 \cdot q_2}{r}

Why it holds:

Opposite charges attract — this is a fundamental law of physics (Coulomb's law).
In a biochemical context, consider a sodium ion ( $\text{Na}^+$ ) and a chloride ion ( $\text{Cl}^-$ ). The energy released when they come together is directly proportional to the product of their charges ( $q_1 q_2$ ) and inversely proportional to the distance ( $r$ ) between them.
The constant $k$ accounts for the medium (water vs. vacuum). In water, the effective force is weaker because water molecules partially shield the charges — this is why ionic bonds in biology are often weaker in aqueous environments.

Key insight: The formula is not arbitrary — it's derived from the inverse-square law of electrostatics, integrated over the distance the charges move toward each other.

2. Covalent Bond Energy: The Morse Potential (Approximation)

Formula (simplified):

E = D_e \left(1 - e^{-a(r - r_0)}\right)^2

Why it holds:

Covalent bonds arise from shared electrons between atoms. The energy is not a simple inverse-square law because electrons are delocalized.
The Morse potential is an empirical formula that captures two key observations:
1. At equilibrium distance ( $r_0$ ): Energy is minimum ( $E = 0$ in this form).
2. If atoms are pulled apart ( $r \to \infty$ ): Energy approaches $D_e$ (the bond dissociation energy).
3. If atoms are pushed too close ( $r \to 0$ ): Energy skyrockets due to Pauli repulsion (electrons can't occupy the same space).
The exponential term $e^{-a(r - r_0)}$ models the rapid drop in attractive force as distance increases — this comes from quantum mechanical overlap of electron clouds.

Key insight: The formula is a curve fit to quantum mechanical calculations, not a first-principles derivation. But it works because it respects the physics: attraction at long range, repulsion at short range, and a stable minimum.

3. Hydrogen Bond Energy: Dipole-Dipole Interaction

Formula (approximate):

E \approx -\frac{2 \mu_1 \mu_2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^3} \cdot \cos\theta

Why it holds:

A hydrogen bond (e.g., between water molecules) is not a true bond — it's a strong dipole-dipole interaction.
The dipole moment ( $\mu$ ) arises because oxygen is more electronegative than hydrogen, creating partial charges ( $\delta^+$ and $\delta^-$ ).
The energy depends on:
- Strength of dipoles ( $\mu_1 \mu_2$ )
- Distance ( $r$ ) — falls off as $1/r^3$ , much faster than ionic bonds ( $1/r$ )
- Orientation ( $\cos\theta$ ) — strongest when dipoles are aligned head-to-tail

Key insight: The $1/r^3$ dependence comes from the derivative of the dipole field. Unlike point charges, dipoles have a field that decays faster — this is why hydrogen bonds are directional and weaker than covalent bonds.

4. Van der Waals Interaction: Lennard-Jones Potential

Formula:

E = 4\epsilon \left[ \left(\frac{\sigma}{r}\right)^{12} - \left(\frac{\sigma}{r}\right)^6 \right]

Why it holds:

Van der Waals forces arise from temporary fluctuations in electron distribution — even nonpolar molecules have instantaneous dipoles. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The 'like dissolves like' rule states that substances with similar intermolecular forces (IMFs) tend to dissolve in each other because the energy required to break existing solute-solute and solvent-solvent IMFs is compensated by the energy released from forming new, comparable solute-solvent IMFs.

The solubility rule "like dissolves like" is a fundamental concept in chemistry that helps predict whether a substance will dissolve in another. At its heart, this rule is about the balance of attractive forces between molecules. For one substance to dissolve in another, the new attractions formed between the solute and solvent particles must be strong enough to overcome the existing attractions within the solute and within the solvent. These attractions are known as intermolecular forces (IMFs).

The term "like" in this rule refers to the similarity in the type and strength of these intermolecular forces. Substances with similar IMFs are considered "like" and will generally dissolve in each other.

Here's a detailed breakdown of how intermolecular forces govern the "like dissolves like" rule:

The Process of Dissolution and Energy Changes:

When a solute dissolves in a solvent, three main energetic steps occur:
- Step 1: Solute-solute interactions are overcome. Energy is required to separate the solute particles from each other. This process is endothermic ( $\Delta H_1 > 0$ ).
- Step 2: Solvent-solvent interactions are overcome. Energy is required to create space in the solvent for the solute particles. This process is also endothermic ( $\Delta H_2 > 0$ ).
- Step 3: Solute-solvent interactions are formed. Energy is released as the solute and solvent particles attract each other and form new interactions. This process is exothermic ( $\Delta H_3 < 0$ ).
For dissolution to be favorable, the energy released in Step 3 must be comparable to or greater than the energy absorbed in Steps 1 and 2. That is, the overall enthalpy change of solution ( $\Delta H_{solution} = \Delta H_1 + \Delta H_2 + \Delta H_3$ ) should be small or negative. If the new solute-solvent interactions are significantly weaker than the original interactions, the process will be energetically unfavorable, and dissolution will not occur to a significant extent.
Intermolecular Forces (IMFs): The "Stickiness" Between Molecules:

Intermolecular forces are the attractive forces that exist between molecules. They are generally much weaker than the intramolecular forces (covalent or ionic bonds) that hold atoms together within a molecule. The type and strength of IMFs depend on the polarity and structure of the molecules.
Important
The main types of intermolecular forces, in increasing order of typical strength, are:
- London Dispersion Forces (LDFs): Present in all molecules, but are the only IMFs in nonpolar molecules. They arise from temporary, induced dipoles. Their strength increases with molecular size and surface area.
- Dipole-Dipole Forces: Occur between polar molecules (molecules with a permanent dipole moment). The positive end of one molecule is attracted to the negative end of another.
- Hydrogen Bonding: A special, strong type of dipole-dipole interaction that occurs when hydrogen is directly bonded to a highly electronegative atom (N, O, or F).
- Ion-Dipole Forces: Occur between an ion and a polar molecule. These are particularly strong and are crucial for dissolving ionic compounds in polar solvents like water.
"Like" Dissolves "Like": Polar Solutes in Polar Solvents:

Consider a polar solute (e.g., ethanol, $\text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH}$ ) dissolving in a polar solvent (e.g., water, $\text{H}_2\text{O}$ ).
- Both ethanol and water molecules are polar and can form strong hydrogen bonds with each other.
- When ethanol dissolves in water, the hydrogen bonds between water molecules and between ethanol molecules are broken.
- New, strong hydrogen bonds are formed between ethanol and water molecules.
- Since the strength of the new solute-solvent (ethanol-water) hydrogen bonds is comparable to the strength of the original solute-solute (ethanol-ethanol) and solvent-solvent (water-water) hydrogen bonds, the energy released from forming new bonds largely compensates for the energy required to break the old ones. This makes the dissolution process energetically favorable.
- Similarly, ionic compounds (like $\text{NaCl}$ ) dissolve well in polar solvents like water because strong ion-dipole forces form between the ions and the polar water molecules, which are strong enough to overcome the ionic bonds in the crystal lattice and the hydrogen bonds in water.
"Like" Dissolves "Like": Nonpolar Solutes in Nonpolar Solvents:

Consider a nonpolar solute (e.g., iodine, $\text{I}_2$ ) dissolving in a nonpolar solvent (e.g., hexane, $\text{C}_6\text{H}_{14}$ ).
- Both iodine and hexane molecules are nonpolar and primarily interact through weak London Dispersion Forces (LDFs).
- When iodine dissolves in hexane, the weak LDFs between iodine molecules and between hexane molecules are overcome.
- New, weak LDFs are formed between iodine and hexane molecules. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Common Mistakes: "Like Dissolves Like" & Intermolecular Forces

Students frequently lose marks on this concept. Here are the most common errors and how to avoid each.

Mistake 1: Confusing "Like" with Chemical Similarity

The error:

Students think "like" means same functional group or same compound type (e.g., both are alcohols). They then say "Ethanol dissolves in water because both have an –OH group."

Why it's wrong:

The rule is about intermolecular force type and strength, not just structural similarity. Ethanol dissolves in water because both form hydrogen bonds of comparable strength — not simply because both have an –OH.

How to avoid:

Always translate "like" into intermolecular force language:

Polar solvents (with dipole–dipole or H‑bonding) dissolve polar/ionic solutes.
Nonpolar solvents (only London dispersion forces) dissolve nonpolar solutes.

Correct phrasing: "Like dissolves like" means that a solute will dissolve in a solvent when the types and strengths of intermolecular forces between solute and solvent are similar.

Mistake 2: Forgetting London Dispersion Forces

The error:

Students only mention dipole–dipole or hydrogen bonding, ignoring that all molecules (even nonpolar ones) have London dispersion forces. They say "Nonpolar solutes dissolve in nonpolar solvents because there are no forces."

Why it's wrong:

Nonpolar molecules do have forces — London dispersion forces. Solubility occurs because these forces between solute and solvent are comparable in magnitude.

How to avoid:

Always list all three types of intermolecular forces when comparing:

London dispersion (present in all molecules)
Dipole–dipole (present in polar molecules)
Hydrogen bonding (special case of dipole–dipole)

Example: I₂ dissolves in CCl₄ because both are nonpolar and have similar London dispersion forces — not because "no forces exist."

Mistake 3: Misapplying the Rule to Ionic Compounds

The error:

Students say "NaCl dissolves in water because both are polar." This is incomplete — NaCl is ionic, not polar covalent.

Why it's wrong:

Ionic compounds dissolve via ion–dipole interactions, not dipole–dipole. The "like dissolves like" rule still applies, but the force is different.

How to avoid:

For ionic solutes, explicitly state:

Water molecules (polar) orient their dipoles around the ions.
The ion–dipole attraction overcomes the lattice energy of the ionic crystal.

Correct: "NaCl dissolves in water because the strong ion–dipole forces between Na⁺/Cl⁻ and water molecules are comparable in strength to the H‑bonding among water molecules."

Mistake 4: Ignoring the "Strength" Part of the Rule

The error:

Students say "Both have hydrogen bonding, so they mix." But not all H‑bonding is equal — e.g., water and hexane both have H‑bonding? No — hexane has no H‑bonding.

How to avoid:

Always compare both type and magnitude:

Water (strong H‑bonding) and ethanol (moderate H‑bonding) mix well. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQ

\alpha

›Reveal solution

Only starch's two components — amylose and amylopectin — are built entirely from α-glycosidic links; cellulose is β-linked, and lactose (in option A) is β-linked, so those pairs are disqualified.

Step 1 — The concept: α- vs β-glycosidic linkage

When two monosaccharides join, the anomeric carbon (C1) of one links through an oxygen bridge to a carbon of the next. The stereochemistry at that anomeric carbon decides the label:

α-linkage — the $\ce{-OH}$ at C1 points down (below the ring plane, trans to the C6 group). Produces a helical/coiled polymer. Digestible by human amylase.
β-linkage — the $\ce{-OH}$ at C1 points up (above the ring plane). Produces a long straight chain that packs into rigid fibres. Not digestible by humans.

💡 Memory hook: α = digestible food store (starch, glycogen); β = indigestible structural fibre (cellulose).

Step 2 — Classify every carbohydrate offered

Carbohydrate	Building blocks	Linkage	α or β?
Amylose	α-D-glucose	α(1→4), unbranched helix	α ✓
Amylopectin	α-D-glucose	α(1→4) chains + α(1→6) branches	α ✓
Maltose	2 × α-D-glucose	α(1→4)	α ✓
Lactose	β-D-galactose + glucose	β(1→4)	β ✗
Cellulose	β-D-glucose	β(1→4), straight chain	β ✗
Glycogen	α-D-glucose	α(1→4) + α(1→6)	α ✓
Glucose	—	monosaccharide, no glycosidic link at all	— ✗
Fructose	—	monosaccharide, no glycosidic link at all	— ✗

Step 3 — Test each option (we need both members to be α)

(A) Maltose and Lactose — Maltose is α(1→4) ✓, but lactose is β(1→4) ✗. Lactose is made of galactose + glucose joined through a β link — that is exactly why lactose-intolerant people lack the β-galactosidase (lactase) needed to break it. Rejected (one member fails).

(B) Amylose and Amylopectin — Both are the components of starch (roughly 20% amylose, 80% amylopectin), and both are polymers of α-D-glucose:

Amylose: a linear chain of $\alpha$ (1→4)-linked glucose units, coiled into a helix. …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

KCET 2023Set D-21 markMCQ
$Q. Dimerisation of solute molecules in low dielectric constant solvent is due to: (A) Hydrogen bond (B) Covalent bond (C) Co-ordinate bond (D) Ionic bond$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Dimerisation in low dielectric constant solvents is driven by intermolecular forces that mimic bonding, and the correct answer is hydrogen bonding — the only option that can form stable, directional associations without requiring a full chemical bond.

The key here is understanding what "dimerisation" means in this context. A dimer is simply two identical molecules held together as a pair. In a solvent with a low dielectric constant (like benzene or hexane), the solvent cannot effectively separate charges or stabilise ions. That rules out any process that relies on full charge separation — like ionic bonding — because such interactions would be extremely weak in a non-polar environment.

So what kind of force can hold two neutral molecules together strongly enough to form a detectable dimer? The answer lies in specific, directional intermolecular attractions — not random van der Waals forces, but something with bond-like character.

Let’s go through the options one by one.

Ionic bond — This requires full positive and negative charges. In a low dielectric constant solvent, ions would not be solvated and would simply precipitate or remain as separate ion pairs, not form dimers of neutral molecules. Ionic bonding is irrelevant here.

Covalent bond — A covalent bond would mean the two molecules actually react to form a new, larger molecule. That’s not dimerisation in the physical chemistry sense (reversible association); it’s a chemical reaction. Dimerisation here refers to reversible association without forming a new covalent bond.

Co-ordinate bond — This is a type of covalent bond where both electrons come from one atom. It still requires a chemical reaction and a specific donor-acceptor pair. While some dimers (like $Al_2Cl_6$ ) do use coordinate bonds, those are exceptions involving electron-deficient species. For typical organic solutes (like carboxylic acids), the dimer forms through hydrogen bonds, not coordinate bonds. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQ
$Q. In nucleic acids, the nucleotides are joined together by (A) Phosphoester linkage (B) Phosphodisulphide linkage (C) Phosphodiester linkage (D) Sulphodiester linkage$
›Reveal solutionSolution

One phosphate bridges two sugars through two ester bonds — di + ester = phosphodiester.

Step 1 — Recall what a nucleotide is.

A nucleotide = nitrogenous base + pentose sugar + phosphate group. Within a single nucleotide, the phosphate is attached to the 5′-carbon of the sugar by one ester bond (that is a phosphomonoester).

Step 2 — How two nucleotides are joined.

When a polynucleotide chain is built, the 5′-phosphate of the incoming nucleotide also forms an ester bond with the 3′-OH of the sugar of the preceding nucleotide:
$\text{Sugar}_1\text{-}3'\text{-O}\;-\;\overset{\text{O}^-}{\underset{\text{O}}{\text{P}}}\;-\;\text{O-}5'\text{-Sugar}_2$
So the same phosphorus atom now bears two ester bonds — one to each sugar.

Step 3 — Name it.

Two ("di") ester bonds on one phosphate ⇒ phosphodiester linkage. Repeating it thousands of times gives the alternating sugar–phosphate backbone of DNA/RNA, with the bases projecting inward. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
KCET 2018Set A-11 markMCQ
$Q. Which one of the following is a polyamide polymer? (A) Terylene (B) Nylon-6,6 (C) Buna-S (D) Bakelite$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Identify the repeating linkage in each polymer; the polyamide is the one whose monomers join through $-\mathrm{CONH}-$ (amide) bonds — Nylon-6,6.

Step 1 — What a polyamide is.

A polyamide is a condensation polymer in which the monomer units are held together by the amide linkage:
$-\mathrm{C(=O)}\!-\!\mathrm{NH}-$
formed by a $-\mathrm{COOH}$ group condensing with an $-\mathrm{NH_2}$ group and eliminating water.

Step 2 — Classify each option.

(A) Terylene (Dacron/PET): ethylene glycol + terephthalic acid → linkage is $-\mathrm{COO}-$ , an ester. It is a polyester. ✗

(B) Nylon-6,6: hexamethylenediamine ( $\mathrm{H_2N(CH_2)_6NH_2}$ ) + adipic acid ( $\mathrm{HOOC(CH_2)_4COOH}$ ). The $-\mathrm{NH_2}$ and $-\mathrm{COOH}$ condense to give repeating amide links → a polyamide. ✓

(C) Buna-S: butadiene + styrene, an addition co-polymer (a synthetic rubber). No amide. ✗ …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

←Previous questionQ37 — Explain why on addition of 1 mol of NaCl to 1 litre of water, the boil…→Next questionQ39 — Concentration terms such as mass percentage, ppm, mole fraction and mo…

Q.Explain the solubility rule 'like dissolves like' in terms of intermolecular forces that exist in solutions.

Concept understanding — Biochemical Bonds

Biochemical Bonds: The Glue That Holds Life Together

The Core Idea

1. Covalent Bonds — The Strong, Permanent LEGO Clicks

2. Ionic Bonds — The Static Cling of Opposites

3. Hydrogen Bonds — The Gentle, Reversible Magnets

4. Van der Waals Interactions — The Fleeting, Accidental Touches

Putting It All Together: A Biological Example

Why this formula?

Biochemical Bonds: Why the Key Formulas Hold

1. Ionic Bond Energy: Coulomb's Law

2. Covalent Bond Energy: The Morse Potential (Approximation)

3. Hydrogen Bond Energy: Dipole-Dipole Interaction

4. Van der Waals Interaction: Lennard-Jones Potential

Concept: Solubility and Intermolecular Forces

Method: The IMF Matching Method

Common Mistakes: "Like Dissolves Like" & Intermolecular Forces

Mistake 1: Confusing "Like" with Chemical Similarity

Mistake 2: Forgetting London Dispersion Forces

Mistake 3: Misapplying the Rule to Ionic Compounds

Mistake 4: Ignoring the "Strength" Part of the Rule

Step 1 — The concept: α- vs β-glycosidic linkage

Step 2 — Classify every carbohydrate offered

Step 3 — Test each option (we need both members to be α)

Q.Explain the solubility rule 'like dissolves like' in terms of intermolecular forces that exist in solutions.

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days