Q.Ravi works in the packing department of a manufacturing unit. On Monday, his packing supervisor instructs him to pack 200 boxes using method X. An hour later, the production manager, bypassing the supervisor, instructs Ravi to switch to method Y and pack only 150 boxes. Ravi is confused about whose instruction to follow. Which principle of management given by Henri Fayol has been violated in this situation, and why?
This situation is a direct violation of Fayol's principle of Unity of Command, which states that an employee should receive orders from, and be accountable to, only one superior at a time.
Here, Ravi's own packing supervisor gives him one instruction (pack 200 boxes using method X), and shortly afterward the production manager — who is not Ravi's direct superior in this chain — bypasses the supervisor and gives Ravi a conflicting instruction (switch to method Y, pack only 150 boxes). Ravi is left uncertain about which instruction takes precedence, which is precisely the confusion the principle of unity of command is designed to prevent.
Why this matters in practice: when an employee reports to two or more superiors on the same matter, it becomes difficult to fix responsibility if something goes wrong (each superior can blame the other's conflicting order), it undermines the authority and standing of the immediate supervisor in front of the worker, and it wastes time and creates stress for the employee caught in the middle.
What the organisation should do to correct it: the production manager should route any change in instructions through Ravi's supervisor, or through the proper scalar chain of authority, rather than issuing instructions to Ravi directly. If the production manager genuinely needs to change the packing method or target, that change should be communicated to the supervisor first, who then issues a single, clear, updated instruction to Ravi.
Unity of Command has been violated — Ravi has received conflicting orders from two superiors (his supervisor and the production manager) for the same task, which is exactly what this principle exists to prevent.
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.