Skip to content
Choose the Best Answer · Q9

Q.Assertion: bond dissociation energy of fluorine is greater than chlorine gas
Reason: chlorine has more electronic repulsion than fluorine

(a) Both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.
(b) Both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion.
(c) Assertion is true but reason is false.
(d) Both assertion and reason are false.
Puducherry TnboardTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★
29% · 17/58 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Step 1. Check the assertion against known bond dissociation enthalpies.

Experimentally, the F-F bond dissociation enthalpy (~159 kJ/mol) is actually LOWER than the Cl-Cl bond dissociation enthalpy (~242 kJ/mol) — chlorine's bond is the stronger of the two, the opposite of what the assertion claims. So the assertion is false.

Step 2. Check the reason.

The anomalously low F-F bond energy is explained by fluorine's very small atomic size, which forces the three non-bonding lone pairs on each fluorine atom unusually close together across the short F-F bond, causing significant lone-pair-lone-pair electronic repulsion that weakens the bond. Chlorine, being a larger atom, has a longer Cl-Cl bond and correspondingly much less lone-pair repulsion. So it is fluorine, not chlorine, that has the greater electronic repulsion — the reason as stated is also false. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.