Q.A satellite is to be placed in equatorial geostationary orbit around earth for communication.
(a) Calculate height of such a satellite.
(b) Find out the minimum number of satellites that are needed to cover entire earth so that at least one satellites is visible from any point on the equator. [M=6×1024 kg, R=6400 km, T=24h, G=6.67×10−11 SI units]
Imagine you're watching two planets orbiting the Sun. One is close in — Mercury, zipping around in just 88 days. Another is far out — Saturn, taking nearly 30 years to complete one lap. You'd expect the farther planet to take longer, but here's the surprising part: the relationship isn't just "farther = slower." It's much more precise, and it reveals a deep truth about gravity itself.
The Intuition
Think of a planet as a runner on a circular track. The farther out the track, the longer the lap — that's obvious. But Kepler noticed something subtler: if you double the distance from the Sun, the orbital period doesn't just double. It increases by a factor of about 2.8 (which is 8). Triple the distance, and the period grows by about 5.2 (which is 27).
There's a pattern here. The period seems to grow as the 3/2 power of the distance. Why? Because gravity weakens with distance, so a farther planet feels a weaker pull and moves more slowly — not just because the track is longer, but because it's moving slower along that track.
The Precise Statement
T2∝a3
The square of the orbital period T is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis a of the orbit.
For planets orbiting the Sun, if you measure T in Earth years and a in astronomical units (AU, where 1 AU = Earth's average distance from the Sun), the constant of proportionality is exactly 1:
T2=a3
So for Earth: T=1 year, a=1 AU, and 12=13 — it checks out.
For Mars: a≈1.52 AU, so T2=(1.52)3≈3.51, giving T≈1.87 years. That's about 687 days — exactly right.
Note
This law applies to any body orbiting a much more massive central body: moons around planets, satellites around Earth, binary stars around each other. The constant of proportionality changes depending on the mass of the central body.
Why It Works (The Physics)
Newton later showed that Kepler's Third Law is a direct consequence of his law of gravitation. For a circular orbit (a good approximation for most planets), the centripetal force needed to keep the planet in orbit is provided by gravity:
r2GMm=rmv2
Here M is the Sun's mass, m the planet's mass, r the orbital radius, and v the orbital speed. The speed is related to the period by v=2πr/T. Substituting and simplifying:
r2GM=T24π2r
Rearranging:
T2=GM4π2r3
The quantity 4π2/(GM) is a constant for all planets orbiting the Sun. So T2∝r3 — exactly Kepler's law.
Important
The constant 4π2/(GM) depends only on the mass of the central body. This means: if you know the period and distance of any moon or planet, you can calculate the mass of the body it orbits. This is how astronomers "weigh" stars, black holes, and galaxies.
A 24-hour orbit fixes the satellite's height at about 35,900 km; the visibility geometry (using cosθ=R/r) then shows 3 satellites, spaced 120° apart, are enough to cover the whole equator.
(a) From r3=GMT2/(4π2) with T=86400 s: r≈4.23×107 m =42,300 km, so h=r−R≈35,900 km. …
Matching gravity to the centripetal requirement for a 24-hour orbit gives an orbital radius of about 42,300 km, i.e. a height of about 35,900 km above Earth's surface. Since a satellite is visible only from within a limiting angle set by cosθ=R/r, one satellite covers about 163° of the equator, so a minimum of 3 geostationary satellites, spaced 120° apart, are needed to keep every equatorial point in view of at least one.
Part (a): Height of the geostationary orbit
For a satellite of mass m in a circular orbit of radius r, gravity supplies the centripetal force:
r2GMm=mω2r=m(T2π)2r
Solving for r:
r3=4π2GMT2
With G=6.67×10−11, M=6×1024 kg, and T=24 h=86400 s:
r3=4π2(6.67×10−11)(6×1024)(86400)2≈7.57×1022 m3
r≈4.23×107 m=42,300 km
Height above the surface:
h=r−R=42,300−6,400=35,900 km
Part (b): Minimum number of satellites
A point on the equator can see a satellite only if the satellite is above its horizon. At the extreme visible point P, the line of sight PS (to the satellite S) is tangent to the Earth, so the triangle formed with Earth's centre C has a right angle at P: …
Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.
TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-07-AN1 markMCQ
Q.The escape speed of a body from the surface of the earth is 11.2kms−1. The escape speed of a body from the surface of planet whose mass is 8 times to that of earth and mean density same as that of the earth is
(A) 5.6kms−1
(B) 16.8kms−1
(C) 11.2kms−1
(D) 22.4kms−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
Escape speed depends on mass and radius. Given constant density, radius scales as the cube root of mass, so escape speed scales as M1/3. With mass 8 times Earth’s, escape speed doubles to 22.4kms−1.
The escape speed from a planet’s surface is the minimum speed needed for an object to leave its gravitational pull forever. The formula is ve=R2GM, where M is the planet’s mass and R its radius. The key insight: if the mean density ρ is the same as Earth’s, then mass and radius are linked through ρ=34πR3M, so R∝M1/3. That lets us find how ve changes when only M changes, without needing numerical values.
Write the escape speed formula.
For Earth: ve=R2GM. For the other planet: ve′=R′2GM′, where M′=8M and ρ′=ρ.
Q.Mass of a planet is 101th of the mass of the earth. If the escape velocity from the surface of the planet is 21 times that from the earth, the radius of that planet in terms of earth’s radius R is
(A) 5R
(B) 5R
(C) 2R
(D) R2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The escape velocity depends on both mass and radius. Equating the given ratios leads to the planet’s radius being 5R.
The escape velocity from a celestial body is the minimum speed needed for an object to break free from its gravitational pull without further propulsion. The formula is derived from energy conservation: kinetic energy at launch equals the work done against gravity to infinity. For a planet of mass M and radius R, the escape velocity is ve=R2GM, where G is the universal gravitational constant.
The key insight: escape velocity scales as the square root of mass over radius. So if we know how mass and escape velocity compare between two planets, we can solve for the unknown radius ratio.
Let’s denote Earth’s mass as Me and radius as Re=R. The planet’s mass is Mp=101Me. Its escape velocity ve,p is given as 21 times Earth’s escape velocity ve,e.
Write the escape velocity for Earth:
ve,e=R2GMe
Write the escape velocity for the planet:
ve,p=Rp2GMp=Rp2G⋅101Me
The problem states:
ve,p=21ve,e
Substitute the expressions:
Rp2G⋅101Me=21R2GMe
Square both sides to remove square roots:
Rp2G⋅101Me=21⋅R2GMe …
Q.If the radius of the earth becomes x times its present value, the new period of rotation in hours is
(A) 6x2
(B) 12x2
(C) 24x2
(D) 48x2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is conservation of angular momentum: if Earth’s radius becomes x times larger, its moment of inertia increases by x2, so its rotation slows by x2, making the new period 24x2 hours.
We start with the concept: Earth’s rotation is determined by its angular momentum, which is conserved if no external torque acts. When the radius changes, the mass distribution changes, altering the moment of inertia. Since angular momentum L=Iω stays constant, the angular speed ω must adjust inversely to I. The period T=2π/ω then changes proportionally to I.
Moment of inertia of a sphere
For a solid sphere of mass M and radius R, the moment of inertia about its axis is I=52MR2. If the radius becomes x times the present value, the new radius is R′=xR, so the new moment of inertia is
I′=52M(xR)2=52MR2⋅x2=I⋅x2.
Conservation of angular momentum
No external torque acts (we assume the change happens internally or gradually), so
L=Iω=I′ω′.
Substituting I′=Ix2 gives
Iω=(Ix2)ω′⇒ω′=x2ω.
Relation between period and angular speed
The period T=2π/ω. The new period is
Q.Which of the following statement is false?
(A) All planets move in elliptical orbits with sun at one of the foci.
(B) The square root of time period of revolution of planet is proportional to the cube of semi major axis of the ellipse.
(C) Line that joins any planet to the sun sweeps equal areas in equal intervals of time.
(D) The measurement of G has refined by Cavendish’s experiment.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Kepler’s three laws describe planetary motion; statement (B) misstates the third law (it says “square root” instead of “square”), making it the false statement.
The question tests your knowledge of Kepler’s laws of planetary motion and a famous experimental result. Kepler’s laws are:
Law of Ellipses – planets move in ellipses with the Sun at one focus.
Law of Equal Areas – a line joining a planet to the Sun sweeps out equal areas in equal times.
Law of Harmonies – the square of the orbital period is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis.
Statement (D) refers to Cavendish’s experiment, which measured the gravitational constant G. That is a true historical fact. So the false statement must be among (A)–(C). Let’s check each carefully.
Statement (A): “All planets move in elliptical orbits with sun at one of the foci.”
This is exactly Kepler’s first law. It is true.
Pitfall: Some might think orbits are perfectly circular, but Kepler showed they are ellipses (circles are a special case of ellipses, but the Sun is at a focus, not the center).
Statement (B): “The square root of time period of revolution of planet is proportional to the cube of semi major axis of the ellipse.”
Kepler’s third law says: T2∝a3, where T is the period and a is the semi-major axis.
Taking square roots: T2=T∝a3/2. That is not “square root of time period proportional to cube of semi-major axis.” The statement says T∝a3, which is false. …