Q.O2 molecule consists of two oxygen atoms. In the molecule, nuclear force between the nuclei of the two atoms
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Nuclear Force Range
What is the Range of a Force?
Before we talk about the nuclear force, think about forces you already know. Gravity and electromagnetism have infinite range — a magnet on Earth still feels the pull of a magnet on the Moon, though it's unimaginably weak. The force just gets weaker with distance, but it never truly becomes zero.
Now imagine a force that simply does not exist beyond a certain distance. That's the nuclear force. It's like a rope that only works if you're within arm's length — step back, and the rope goes slack. This is what we mean by finite range.
The Nuclear Force: A Short-Range Glue
The strong nuclear force holds protons and neutrons together inside the nucleus. But here's the puzzle: protons are positively charged and repel each other violently. If the nuclear force had infinite range like electromagnetism, it would either pull everything together or push everything apart — but it doesn't. It only acts when particles are extremely close, about the size of a proton or neutron.
The nuclear force range is roughly 1–2 femtometers (1 fm = 10−15 m). For comparison, a hydrogen atom is about 100,000 fm across. The nuclear force is a microscopic, neighbourhood-only force.
The Precise Statement
The strong nuclear force between two nucleons (protons or neutrons) is negligible when their separation exceeds about 2.5 fm. It becomes strongly attractive at distances around 1–2 fm, and then turns repulsive if they get closer than about 0.5 fm (this prevents the nucleus from collapsing).
Vnuclear(r)≈0for r>2.5 fm
This is why a nucleus is so dense — nucleons must be packed within this tiny range to feel the binding force. It's also why only certain combinations of protons and neutrons are stable: if the nucleus gets too large, protons on opposite sides are too far apart to feel the nuclear attraction, but they still feel the electric repulsion. That's why heavy elements need extra neutrons (which add attraction without repulsion) to stay stable.
Why Does It Have a Range?
The short answer: the nuclear force is mediated by particles called pions (pi mesons), which have mass. Unlike photons (massless, infinite range) or gravitons (massless, infinite range), massive exchange particles produce a force that dies out exponentially beyond a characteristic distance — the Compton wavelength of the pion. …
The key idea is that nuclear forces are extremely short-ranged, acting only over distances of about 10−15 m (a few femtometers). The distance between the two oxygen nuclei in an O2 molecule is roughly 10−10 m — tens of thousands of times larger.
- Nuclear force (strong force) binds nucleons within a nucleus but falls to near zero beyond a few femtometers.
- The separation between nuclei in a molecule is on the order of angstroms (10−10 m), far beyond the range of nuclear force. …
The nuclear force between the two oxygen nuclei in an O₂ molecule is negligible because nuclear forces have an extremely short range (about 1–2 fm), while the nuclei are separated by roughly 120 pm — over 100,000 times farther apart. The correct option is (A).
The key to this question lies in understanding the range of the nuclear force. The nuclear force (also called the strong nuclear force) is what binds protons and neutrons together inside a nucleus. But it has a very short range — it only acts over distances on the order of a few femtometers (1 fm=10−15 m). Beyond about 2–3 fm, it drops to essentially zero.
In contrast, the distance between the two oxygen nuclei in an O₂ molecule is about 1.2×10−10 m (120 pm). That's more than 100,000 times larger than the range of the nuclear force. So the nuclear force simply cannot reach from one nucleus to the other.
Let's walk through the options carefully.
-
Why option (A) is correct
The nuclear force is indeed short-ranged. At the interatomic separation in a molecule, it is completely negligible. The bonding in O₂ is due to electrostatic (Coulomb) interactions between electrons and nuclei — the nuclear force plays no role.
-
Why option (B) is wrong
The electrostatic force between the two positively charged nuclei is repulsive and significant at this distance. But the nuclear force is not "as important" — it is effectively zero. So the statement is false.
-
Why option (C) is wrong
The nuclear force does not cancel the electrostatic repulsion between the nuclei. In fact, the two nuclei stay apart because the attractive forces from the shared electrons (covalent bonding) overcome the nuclear repulsion. The nuclear force is irrelevant here.
-
Why option (D) is wrong …
Method: The Range-vs-Distance Comparison Method
Whenever a question asks "is force X important at distance Y," you don't need detailed dynamics -- you only need to compare the CHARACTERISTIC RANGE of the force to the ACTUAL SEPARATION in the scenario. This generalises well beyond this one nuclear-force question.
Steps
Step 1: Identify the force's characteristic range
Every fundamental force other than gravity and electromagnetism has a distance beyond which it becomes negligible. Recall that scale -- for the strong nuclear force it is of order 1-3 femtometres (10−15 m).
Step 2: Identify the actual separation in the scenario
Determine the real distance between the two objects in question, in the same units. For two nuclei bonded in a molecule, the separation is the interatomic/bond distance, set by electron-cloud sizes -- of order 10−10 m (angstroms), not nuclear sizes.
Step 3: Compare the two length scales directly …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-FN1 markMCQQ.The average energy of a neutron produced in the fission of 92235U is (A) 160×10−13 J (B) 320×10−15 J (C) 320×10−13 J (D) 160×10−15 J
›Reveal solutionSolution
The average energy of a fission neutron is about 2 MeV, which converts to 3.2×10−13 J. Among the options, that matches 320×10−15 J, so the correct choice is (B).
The key idea here is that fission neutrons are born with energies around 1–2 MeV (million electron volts). The problem gives answers in joules, so we need to recall the conversion factor: 1 eV=1.6×10−19 J. A quick mental check: 1 MeV = 1.6×10−13 J, so 2 MeV = 3.2×10−13 J. Now we just match that to the options.
Let’s walk through it step by step:
-
Recall the typical energy of a fission neutron.
When 235U fissions, it releases about 200 MeV total energy, most of which appears as kinetic energy of the fission fragments. The neutrons emitted (typically 2–3 per fission) have an average kinetic energy around 2 MeV. This is a standard fact from nuclear physics — the neutron spectrum peaks near 0.7 MeV but averages about 2 MeV.
-
Convert MeV to joules.
The conversion factor is:
1 eV=1.602×10−19 J
Therefore:
1 MeV=106×1.602×10−19 J=1.602×10−13 J
For 2 MeV:
2×1.602×10−13 J≈3.2×10−13 J
- Match with the given options.
The options are:
- (A) 160×10−13 J = 1.6×10−11 J (too large — that’s 100 MeV)
- (B) 320×10−15 J = 3.2×10−13 J (exactly our value) …
-
- TG EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-02-FN1 markMCQQ.If 96.875% of a radioactive substance decays in 10 days, then the half life of the substance is (in days) (A) 10 (B) 5 (C) 4 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that exponential decay follows N=N0e−λt, and the fraction remaining after 10 days is 3.125%=321. Since 321=(21)5, this means 5 half‑lives have passed in 10 days, so the half‑life is 10/5=2 days. The correct option is (D).
Concept & Intuition
Radioactive decay is exponential: in each half‑life, exactly half of the remaining atoms decay. So if you know what fraction remains after a given time, you can count how many half‑lives have elapsed. Here, 96.875% has decayed, meaning only 100%−96.875%=3.125% remains. That tiny fraction is a power of 21: 3.125%=321=(21)5. Five half‑lives have passed in 10 days, so one half‑life is 10÷5=2 days.
Step‑by‑Step Reasoning
- Write the decay law The amount remaining after time t is
N(t)=N0e−λt,
where λ is the decay constant and N0 is the initial amount.
- Find the fraction remaining If 96.875% has decayed, then the fraction remaining is
1−0.96875=0.03125=321.
So
N0N(10)=321.
- Relate fraction to half‑life The half‑life T1/2 satisfies N(T1/2)=21N0. After n half‑lives, the fraction is (21)n. Here,
(21)n=321=(21)5⇒n=5.
- Find the half‑life Those 5 half‑lives occur in 10 days, so …
- TG EAPCET 2025Set ap-2025-04-30-FN1 markMCQQ.If the half life of an element is 10 minutes, then the time taken (in minutes) for the element to decay from 20% to 80% is (A) 20 (B) 10 (C) 5 (D) 15
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that radioactive decay follows exponential decay, and the time to go from 20% to 80% of the original amount depends only on the half-life, not on the starting amount. The time taken is 20 minutes.
The concept here is exponential decay. When a radioactive element decays, the amount remaining after time t is given by N=N0e−λt, where λ is the decay constant. The half-life T1/2 is the time for half the sample to decay, so N=N0/2 when t=T1/2. This gives λ=T1/2ln2.
The problem asks for the time taken for the element to decay from 20% to 80%. Wait — that phrasing is tricky. "Decay from 20% to 80%" means the amount of the element remaining changes from 20% of the original to 80% of the original? That would be an increase, which is impossible in decay. The intended meaning is: the element decays such that its remaining amount goes from 80% of the original down to 20% of the original. So we want the time interval between when 80% is left and when 20% is left.
Let’s work it step by step.
-
Set up the decay equation.
Let N0 be the initial amount. At any time t, the fraction remaining is N0N=e−λt.
The half-life is T1/2=10 minutes, so λ=10ln2.
-
Find the time when 80% remains.
We want N0N=0.8. So:
0.8=e−λt1
Taking natural logs:
ln(0.8)=−λt1⇒t1=−λln(0.8)
Since ln(0.8)=ln(8/10)=ln8−ln10=3ln2−ln10, but we can keep it as is for now.
- Find the time when 20% remains. Similarly, for N0N=0.2:
0.2=e−λt2⇒t2=−λln(0.2)
- The time interval is the difference. The time taken to go from 80% to 20% is: Δt=t2−t1=−λln(0.2)+λln(0.8)=λln(0.8)−ln(0.2) …
-
- TG EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-09-AN1 markMCQQ.The energy released by the fission of one uranium nucleus is 200 MeV. The number of fissions per second required to produce 128 W power is (A) 6×1012 (B) 8×1012 (C) 2×1012 (D) 4×1012
›Reveal solutionSolution
Power is energy per second; each fission releases 200 MeV. Converting MeV to joules and dividing the target power (128 W) by the energy per fission gives the number of fissions per second. The result is 4×1012 fissions/s, so option (D) is correct.
Concept & Intuition
Power (in watts) is simply energy per second (1 W = 1 J/s). If each fission event releases a fixed amount of energy, then the number of fissions per second needed to produce a given power is just that power divided by the energy released per fission. The only catch is that the energy per fission is given in electronvolts (MeV), while power is in joules per second. So we must convert MeV to joules using the fundamental conversion 1 eV=1.602×10−19 J.
Step-by-step solution
-
Identify the given quantities
- Energy released per fission: Efission=200 MeV.
- Desired power output: P=128 W=128 J/s.
- We need the number of fissions per second, call it n.
-
Convert MeV to joules
1 MeV=106 eV=106×1.602×10−19 J=1.602×10−13 J.
Therefore,
Efission=200×1.602×10−13 J=3.204×10−11 J.
- Relate power to number of fissions per second Power is energy per second:
P=n×Efission.
So
n=EfissionP=3.204×10−11128.
- Calculate n n=3.204128×1011≈39.95×1011=3.995×1012. …
-
- TG EAPCET 2024Set ap-2024-05-07-AN1 markMCQQ.Reactor used to produce fissile material is (A) batch reactor (B) breeder reactor (C) chemical reactor (D) pipe reactor
›Reveal solutionSolution
A breeder reactor is specifically designed to produce new fissile material from fertile material, making it the correct answer. The correct option is (B).
Concept and Intuition
Nuclear reactors are devices that initiate and control a sustained nuclear chain reaction. The core idea behind a reactor that produces fissile material is to convert naturally abundant, non-fissile (but "fertile") isotopes into fissile ones.
- Fissile materials are isotopes that can undergo fission when struck by a neutron, releasing energy and more neutrons, thus sustaining a chain reaction. Examples include Uranium-235 (235U) and Plutonium-239 (239Pu).
- Fertile materials are isotopes that are not fissile themselves but can be converted into fissile materials by absorbing a neutron and then undergoing radioactive decay. Examples include Uranium-238 (238U) and Thorium-232 (232Th).
The goal of producing fissile material is to extend the supply of nuclear fuel, as naturally occurring fissile Uranium-235 is relatively scarce, while fertile Uranium-238 and Thorium-232 are much more abundant. A reactor designed for this purpose effectively "breeds" new fuel.
Step-by-step Explanation
-
Understanding the Requirement: The question asks for the type of reactor used to produce fissile material. This implies a process where a non-fissile material is transformed into a fissile one.
-
Analyzing Option (A) Batch Reactor:
- A batch reactor is a type of chemical reactor where reactants are loaded into the reactor, allowed to react for a specific time, and then the products are removed. The process is discontinuous.
- This term is primarily used in chemical engineering for processes like polymerization, fermentation, or synthesis of fine chemicals. It is not associated with the production of nuclear fissile material.
-
Analyzing Option (B) Breeder Reactor:
- A breeder reactor is a nuclear reactor that generates more fissile material than it consumes. It achieves this by converting fertile material into fissile material.
- The most common breeding process involves Uranium-238 (238U) absorbing a neutron to become Uranium-239 (239U), which then undergoes two beta decays to become Plutonium-239 (239Pu). Plutonium-239 is a fissile material.
238U+n→239Uβ−239Npβ−239Pu
* Another breeding cycle involves Thorium-232 ($^{232}\text{Th}$) absorbing a neutron to become Thorium-233 ($^{233}\text{Th}$), which then decays to Uranium-233 ($^{233}\text{U}$), another fissile material. … - TG EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-14-AN1 markMCQQ.Half-life of a radioactive substance A is two times the half-life of another radioactive substance B. Initially the number of nuclei of A and B are NA and NB respectively. After three half-lives of A, the number of nuclei of both are equal. Then NBNA is (A) 31 (B) 41 (C) 61 (D) 81
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to relate the half-lives and then use the exponential decay formula after three half-lives of A. The ratio is NBNA=81, so option (D) is correct.
Concept & Intuition
Radioactive decay follows an exponential law: after n half-lives, the number of remaining nuclei is the initial number divided by 2n. The trick here is that the half-lives of A and B are different, so “three half-lives of A” is a different time interval than “three half-lives of B.” We must first find how many half-lives of B have passed in that same time, then set the remaining numbers equal.
-
Define the half-lives
Let the half-life of B be T. Then the half-life of A is 2T (given: “half-life of A is two times the half-life of B”).
-
Time elapsed
After three half-lives of A, the time elapsed is
t=3×(2T)=6T.
- Number of half-lives of B in that time In time t=6T, the number of half-lives of B is
nB=T6T=6.
- Remaining nuclei after decay For A: after 3 half-lives,
NA′=23NA=8NA.
For B: after 6 half-lives,
NB′=26NB=64NB.
- Set them equal The problem states that after three half-lives of A, the numbers are equal:
8NA=64NB.
- Solve for the ratio …
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-FN1 markMCQQ.The radius and mass number of nucleus ‘1’ is R1 and A1 respectively. The radius and mass number of nucleus ‘2’ is R2 and A2 respectively. If A2 is larger than A1 by 2%, then R2 is larger than R1 by (A) 32% (B) 1% (C) 8% (D) 23%
›Reveal solutionSolution
The nuclear radius scales as R∝A1/3, so a 2% increase in A gives a 32% increase in R.
The key idea here is the empirical nuclear radius formula: for a nucleus with mass number A, the radius is given by R=R0A1/3, where R0 is a constant (roughly 1.2×10−15 m). This means radius depends on the cube root of the mass number, not linearly. So when A changes by a small percentage, R changes by one-third of that percentage — a direct consequence of the power law.
Let’s work it through step by step.
- Write the relation for each nucleus:
R1=R0A11/3,R2=R0A21/3
- The problem says A2 is larger than A1 by 2%. That means:
A2=A1(1+1002)=1.02A1
- Now find R2 in terms of R1:
R2=R0(1.02A1)1/3=R0A11/3⋅(1.02)1/3=R1⋅(1.02)1/3
- For small percentage changes, we use the approximation (1+x)n≈1+nx when x≪1. Here x=0.02 and n=31: (1.02)1/3≈1+31(0.02)=1+30.02=1+3002=1+32% …
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-19-FN1 markMCQQ.The range of frequency bands used for standard AM broadcast is (A) 540−1600 KHz (B) 88−108 MHz (C) 800−900 MHz (D) 3.7−4.2 GHz
›Reveal solutionSolution
Standard AM broadcast uses the Medium Wave (MW) band, which spans from 540 kHz to 1600 kHz. The correct option is (A).
The key to this question is knowing the specific frequency ranges allocated to different types of radio broadcasts. AM (Amplitude Modulation) and FM (Frequency Modulation) are two distinct modulation techniques, and each is assigned a different part of the electromagnetic spectrum by international agreement. The question tests your familiarity with these standard allocations — a factual but essential piece of knowledge for communication systems.
Let’s go through the options one by one.
-
Option (A): 540−1600 KHz
This is the Medium Wave (MW) band, historically used for AM broadcasting. The lower end is around 530–540 kHz, and the upper end is about 1600–1700 kHz (depending on the region). In India and most of the world, standard AM radio stations operate in this range. This matches the given range exactly.
-
Option (B): 88−108 MHz
This is the FM broadcast band. FM radio uses VHF (Very High Frequency) waves, and the standard range is 88 MHz to 108 MHz. This is not AM.
-
Option (C): 800−900 MHz
This range falls in the UHF (Ultra High Frequency) band. It is used for cellular communication (like GSM 900) and some TV broadcasts, but not for standard AM radio.
-
Option (D): 3.7−4.2 GHz …
-
- TG EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-20-FN1 markMCQQ.Estimate the approximate volume of aluminium nucleus (A = 27) Use (R0=1.0×10−15 m) π≈3 (A) 1×10−13(A∘)3 (B) 1×10−10(A∘)3 (C) 1×10−15(A∘)3 (D) 1×10−17(A∘)3
›Reveal solutionSolution
The volume of a nucleus scales with mass number A as V=34πR03A. For aluminium (A=27), using R0=1.0×10−15 m and π≈3, the volume comes out to about 1×10−43 m³, which converts to 1×10−13(A˚)3 — matching option (A).
The key idea is that a nucleus is modelled as a sphere of radius R=R0A1/3, where R0 is a constant. This formula comes from the fact that nuclear density is roughly constant for all nuclei — so volume is proportional to the number of nucleons A. Once you have the radius, the volume is just the sphere volume formula. The trick in this problem is the unit conversion: the answer is asked in cubic angstroms (A˚3), not cubic metres. An angstrom is 10−10 m, so 1 m3=1030 A˚3.
Let’s walk through it.
- Nuclear radius formula The radius of a nucleus with mass number A is
R=R0A1/3
Here R0=1.0×10−15 m and A=27. So
R=(1.0×10−15)×(27)1/3
Since 27=33, we have 271/3=3. Therefore
R=3.0×10−15 m
- Volume in cubic metres The volume of a sphere is V=34πR3. Using π≈3:
V=34×3×(3.0×10−15)3
The 34×3 simplifies to 4. So
V=4×(27×10−45)
because (3.0×10−15)3=27×10−45.
V=108×10−45 m3=1.08×10−43 m3
For an estimate, we round this to 1×10−43 m3.
- Convert to cubic angstroms Recall 1 A˚=10−10 m, so 1 m3=(1010)3 A˚3=1030 A˚3. Therefore …
- TG EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-04-AN1 markMCQQ.Two lenses of power −1.6D and +2.1D respectively are placed in contact. The focal length of the combination is (A) 100 cm (B) 200 cm (C) 160 cm (D) 210 cm
›Reveal solutionSolution
The net power of two lenses in contact is the algebraic sum of their individual powers. The combination has a power of +0.5D, giving a focal length of 200 cm. The correct option is (B).
When two thin lenses are placed in contact, the total power of the combination is simply the sum of their individual powers. This is because the deviation of light produced by each lens adds up directly — think of it as two bends in the ray, one after the other, with no gap between them. Power is measured in diopters (D), and focal length in metres is the reciprocal of power: f=1/P.
A positive power means a converging lens (convex), and a negative power means a diverging lens (concave). Here, one lens is diverging (−1.6D) and the other is converging (+2.1D). The net effect depends on which is stronger.
- Find the net power. The formula for lenses in contact is:
Pnet=P1+P2
Substituting the given values:
Pnet=(−1.6)+(+2.1)=+0.5D
- Convert net power to focal length. Focal length f (in metres) is given by:
f=Pnet1
So:
f=0.51=2 m
- Express the answer in centimetres. Since the options are in cm, convert: …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.