Skip to content
Exercises · 6.45

Q.The first ionization constant of H 2S is 9.1 × 10⁻⁸. Calculate the concentration of HS – ion in its 0.1M solution. How will this concentration be affected if the solution is 0.1M in HCl also? If the second dissociation constant of H 2S is 1.2 × 10⁻¹³, calculate the concentration of S2– under both conditions.

Uttarakhand UbseTextbookSubjective· 3mImportance★★★★★est
47% · 73/155 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

For a weak diprotic acid HX2S\ce{H2S}, the first ionization dominates the HSX−\ce{HS-} concentration in pure water, giving [HSX−]≈9.5×10−5 M[\ce{HS-}] \approx 9.5 \times 10^{-5}~\text{M}. Adding 0.1 M HCl suppresses the first ionization via common-ion effect, so [HSX−]≈9.1×10−8 M[\ce{HS-}] \approx 9.1 \times 10^{-8}~\text{M}. The SX2−\ce{S^{2-}} concentration is then found using the second dissociation constant: [SX2−]≈1.2×10−13 M[\ce{S^{2-}}] \approx 1.2 \times 10^{-13}~\text{M} in pure water, and [SX2−]≈1.2×10−13 M[\ce{S^{2-}}] \approx 1.2 \times 10^{-13}~\text{M} in 0.1 M HCl as well (since the second dissociation is negligible compared to the first).


Concept and Intuition

HX2S\ce{H2S} is a diprotic weak acid. It dissociates in two steps:

  1. HX2S⇌HX++HSX−\ce{H2S <=> H+ + HS-}, Ka1=9.1×10−8K_{a1} = 9.1 \times 10^{-8}
  2. HSX−⇌HX++SX2−\ce{HS- <=> H+ + S^{2-}}, Ka2=1.2×10−13K_{a2} = 1.2 \times 10^{-13}

Because Ka1≫Ka2K_{a1} \gg K_{a2}, the first dissociation is the main source of HX+\ce{H+} and HSX−\ce{HS-} in pure water. The second dissociation is so weak that it hardly affects the HSX−\ce{HS-} concentration. When we add 0.1 M HCl, the common ion HX+\ce{H+} suppresses the first dissociation drastically — this is Le Chatelier's principle in action.

The key insight: for a diprotic acid where Ka1≫Ka2K_{a1} \gg K_{a2}, the concentration of the intermediate ion HSX−\ce{HS-} is essentially determined by the first equilibrium alone, and the concentration of the final ion SX2−\ce{S^{2-}} is given by Ka2K_{a2} times the ratio [HSX−]/[HX+][\ce{HS-}]/[\ce{H+}].


Step-by-step Solution

1. Pure 0.1 M HX2S\ce{H2S} — find [HSX−][\ce{HS-}]

Let the initial concentration of HX2S\ce{H2S} be c=0.1 Mc = 0.1~\text{M}. Let xx be the concentration of HX+\ce{H+} (and HSX−\ce{HS-}) from the first dissociation.

The equilibrium for the first step:

SpeciesInitial (M)Change (M)Equilibrium (M)
HX2S\ce{H2S}0.1−x-x0.1−x0.1 - x
HX+\ce{H+}0+x+xxx
HSX−\ce{HS-}0+x+xxx

The equilibrium expression:

Ka1=[HX+][HSX−][HX2S]=x⋅x0.1−x=9.1×10−8K_{a1} = \frac{[\ce{H+}][\ce{HS-}]}{[\ce{H2S}]} = \frac{x \cdot x}{0.1 - x} = 9.1 \times 10^{-8}

Since Ka1K_{a1} is very small, x≪0.1x \ll 0.1, so we approximate 0.1−x≈0.10.1 - x \approx 0.1:

x20.1=9.1×10−8\frac{x^2}{0.1} = 9.1 \times 10^{-8}

x2=9.1×10−9x^2 = 9.1 \times 10^{-9}

x=9.1×10−9=91×10−10=91×10−5x = \sqrt{9.1 \times 10^{-9}} = \sqrt{91 \times 10^{-10}} = \sqrt{91} \times 10^{-5}

Now 91≈9.539\sqrt{91} \approx 9.539, so:

x≈9.54×10−5 Mx \approx 9.54 \times 10^{-5}~\text{M}

Tip

The approximation 0.1−x≈0.10.1 - x \approx 0.1 is valid because xx is about 0.095% of 0.1 — well under the 5% rule.

Thus, in pure 0.1 M HX2S\ce{H2S}:

[HSX−]≈9.5×10−5 M[\ce{HS-}] \approx 9.5 \times 10^{-5}~\text{M}

2. Effect of adding 0.1 M HCl

Now the solution is 0.1 M in HX2S\ce{H2S} and 0.1 M in HCl. HCl is a strong acid, so it contributes [HX+]=0.1 M[\ce{H+}] = 0.1~\text{M} initially. The first dissociation of HX2S\ce{H2S} will produce an additional tiny amount of HX+\ce{H+}, but that is negligible compared to 0.1 M.

Let yy be the concentration of HSX−\ce{HS-} formed from HX2S\ce{H2S} in the presence of HCl. The equilibrium:

SpeciesInitial (M)Change (M)Equilibrium (M)
HX2S\ce{H2S}0.1−y-y0.1−y0.1 - y
HX+\ce{H+}0.1 (from HCl)+y+y0.1+y0.1 + y
HSX−\ce{HS-}0+y+yyy

The equilibrium expression:

Ka1=[HX+][HSX−][HX2S]=(0.1+y)⋅y0.1−y=9.1×10−8K_{a1} = \frac{[\ce{H+}][\ce{HS-}]}{[\ce{H2S}]} = \frac{(0.1 + y) \cdot y}{0.1 - y} = 9.1 \times 10^{-8}

Since yy will be tiny compared to 0.1, we approximate 0.1+y≈0.10.1 + y \approx 0.1 and 0.1−y≈0.10.1 - y \approx 0.1:

0.1⋅y0.1=y=9.1×10−8\frac{0.1 \cdot y}{0.1} = y = 9.1 \times 10^{-8}

So:

[HSX−]=9.1×10−8 M[\ce{HS-}] = 9.1 \times 10^{-8}~\text{M}

Watch out

A common mistake is to forget that the HX+\ce{H+} from HCl completely dominates. Students sometimes try to solve a quadratic, but the approximation is excellent here — the exact yy differs by less than 10−1210^{-12} M.

3. Concentration of SX2−\ce{S^{2-}} in pure 0.1 M HX2S\ce{H2S}

The second dissociation is:

HSX−⇌HX++SX2−,Ka2=1.2×10−13\ce{HS- <=> H+ + S^{2-}}, \quad K_{a2} = 1.2 \times 10^{-13}

From step 1, in pure water: [HSX−]≈9.5×10−5 M[\ce{HS-}] \approx 9.5 \times 10^{-5}~\text{M} and [HX+]≈9.5×10−5 M[\ce{H+}] \approx 9.5 \times 10^{-5}~\text{M} (from the first dissociation). Let zz be the concentration of SX2−\ce{S^{2-}} formed.

The equilibrium for the second step:

Ka2=[HX+][SX2−][HSX−]K_{a2} = \frac{[\ce{H+}][\ce{S^{2-}}]}{[\ce{HS-}]} …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.