Q.Why did Sanchi Stupas survive while the Amaravati did not ? Choose the correct reason from the following options : (A) Sanchi was protected by Emperor Shah Jahan. (B) Asiatic Society of Bengal tried to conserve it. (C) Colin Mackenzie dedicated his volumes on Sanchi. (D) Scholars understood the value of preservation at site after the fall of Amaravati.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Sanchi Stupa survived largely due to the foresight of the Begums of Bhopal and a growing understanding among scholars that ancient sites should be preserved in situ, a lesson painfully learned from the destruction of Amaravati.
The fates of the Sanchi Stupa and the Amaravati Stupa offer a compelling contrast in the history of archaeological preservation in India. While both were magnificent Buddhist monuments, Sanchi stands largely intact today, a testament to early conservation efforts, whereas Amaravati was systematically dismantled, its sculptures scattered across museums. Understanding this divergence requires looking at the specific circumstances surrounding their discovery and the prevailing attitudes towards heritage at the time.
Sanchi, located in Madhya Pradesh, owes its remarkable preservation to the enlightened patronage of the rulers of Bhopal in the 19th century, particularly Shah Jahan Begum and her successor Sultan Jahan Begum. These Begums displayed extraordinary wisdom and foresight. When European scholars and officials, including the French and the British, sought to take away the exquisitely carved gateways (toranas) of Sanchi to display in museums in Paris and London, the Begums firmly resisted. They understood the intrinsic value of the stupa as a complete monument and insisted that the gateways remain at their original location.
Instead of allowing the removal of the originals, the Begums offered to fund the creation of plaster cast replicas for the European museums. This was a crucial decision that ensured the integrity of the site. Furthermore, Sultan Jahan Begum provided money for the preservation of the ancient site itself, including the construction of a museum and a guesthouse. Her efforts were instrumental in maintaining Sanchi as a living monument, allowing it to be studied and appreciated in its original context.
The Begums of Bhopal, Shah Jahan Begum and Sultan Jahan Begum, played a pivotal role in preserving the Sanchi Stupa by resisting requests to remove its gateways and by funding its on-site conservation.
In stark contrast, the Amaravati Stupa, situated in Andhra Pradesh, met a very different end. Discovered by Colin Mackenzie in 1796, the site was initially documented, but its subsequent history is one of systematic removal and destruction. Mackenzie himself took several sculptures to Madras. Later, in the mid-19th century, Walter Elliot, a commissioner of Guntur, removed more sculptures and architectural fragments, sending them to Madras and London. Other officials and even local people also took pieces from the site, often without proper documentation or care.
The problem at Amaravati was a lack of understanding regarding the importance of preserving the entire site. The focus was on individual sculptures, seen as valuable art pieces, rather than the monument as a whole. There was no concerted effort to protect the stupa in situ. Consequently, the Amaravati site was largely plundered, its magnificent carvings dispersed, and the original structure reduced to a mere mound of rubble. Today, the sculptures from Amaravati are scattered across various museums, including the Government Museum in Chennai and the British Museum in London, making it impossible to appreciate the stupa as it once stood.
The contrasting fates of Sanchi and Amaravati served as a powerful lesson for archaeologists and colonial administrators. The destruction of Amaravati highlighted the irreparable loss that occurs when ancient sites are treated merely as quarries for individual artifacts. This experience gradually led to a shift in archaeological practice towards the principle of on-site preservation. Scholars and officials began to understand that the context of an artifact is as important as the artifact itself, and that removing pieces from a site diminishes its historical and cultural value. The successful preservation of Sanchi, partly due to the Begums' enlightened approach and partly due to this evolving understanding, became a model for future conservation efforts. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.