Q.Read the passage given below carefully and answer the following questions : Things changed after independence and partition. Our leaders felt that carving out states on the basis of language might lead to disruption and disintegration. It was also felt that this would draw attention away from other social and economic challenges that the country faced. Therefore, the central leadership decided to postpone matters.......
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — States Reorganisation Commission
The States Reorganisation Commission – A First Look
Imagine you are drawing the map of India. You have to divide the country into states. What principle would you use? The British left India with a patchwork of provinces — some huge, some tiny, some ruled directly by the British, others ruled by princes. After independence in 1947, this was clearly not a map for a modern democracy. People in different regions spoke different languages, had different cultures, and felt that their voice was lost inside a giant, mismatched state.
That is the problem the States Reorganisation Commission (SRC) was created to solve.
The Intuition: Why Language Matters
Think of a classroom. If you put students who speak only Tamil, only Hindi, and only Bengali together, they can still learn — but communication is hard. Now imagine running an entire state government that way. People want to be governed in a language they understand. They want their local culture and history to be respected. They want their region's needs — roads, schools, irrigation — to be heard by a government that is close to them, not lost in a distant capital.
In the 1950s, there was a powerful movement across India: "One language, one state." The idea was that each major linguistic group should have its own state. This would make administration easier, democracy more real, and people feel that their identity was recognised.
But it was not simple. Some regions had mixed populations. Some languages were spoken across huge areas. And there was a fear: would linguistic states break India apart?
The Precise Statement
The States Reorganisation Commission was a high-level committee appointed by the Government of India in 1953 to examine the entire question of redrawing the boundaries of states. It was chaired by Justice Fazal Ali, with members H. N. Kunzru and K. M. Panikkar. The Commission submitted its report in 1955, and its recommendations were implemented through the States Reorganisation Act, 1956.
Core principle: The primary basis for reorganising states should be language, but this must be balanced with administrative convenience, economic viability, and national unity.
The SRC did not simply say "every language gets a state." It proposed a careful, practical map. Here is what it did:
- Abolished the old three-fold classification of Part A, B, C, and D states (which were leftovers from British and princely India).
- Created 14 states and 6 union territories based largely on linguistic boundaries, but with adjustments.
- Rejected some demands — for example, it did not create a separate state for the Marathi-speaking region of Bombay (that came later), and it merged the Telugu-speaking areas of the old Hyderabad state with Andhra (creating Andhra Pradesh).
The SRC was not the first attempt at linguistic reorganisation. Andhra State had already been created in 1953 after a long agitation. The SRC was the comprehensive, nationwide solution.
What the SRC Did Not Do …
Part (a): Partition was the major change; unity-consolidation and administrative complexity were extra reasons to postpone linguistic states; Telugu speakers in Madras Presidency challenged it and won Andhra (1953).
Part (b): Universal Adult Franchise means the vote for all adults; the 1952 elections took six months because of a huge illiterate electorate and India's size; their fair conduct proved democracy could work anywhere.
Passage on postponing linguistic states
- One major change due to independence and partition: The most immediate and painful change was Partition — the country was divided into India and Pakistan, triggering one of the largest migrations in history and widespread communal violence. This trauma made leaders deeply cautious about any further division, including demands for language-based states.
- Two more reasons for postponement (not in the passage):
- The need to consolidate national unity first — after Partition, integrating the princely states, rehabilitating refugees and framing the Constitution demanded a strong, unified centre, so encouraging regional loyalties seemed risky.
- The administrative and logistical complexity of redrawing India's entire map on linguistic lines, which required careful, orderly study — leading later to the States Reorganisation Commission (1953).
(iii) Challenge by local people, with an example: Because language was tied to identity and culture, communities feared neglect without their own states. The postponement was challenged most powerfully in the Telugu-speaking region of the Madras Presidency, where Potti Sreeramulu went on a fast unto death in 1952 demanding a separate Andhra; his death after 58 days sparked mass protests, forcing the creation of Andhra state in 1953 — the first linguistic state.
Concept understanding — Indian Election History
Indian Election History: A First Look
Think of a school election for head girl or head boy. Everyone in the school gets one vote, the candidate with the most votes wins, and the whole school accepts the result because the process was fair. Now imagine doing that for a country of over a billion people, with hundreds of political parties, multiple languages, and a population spread across mountains, deserts, and dense forests. That is the story of Indian elections.
The Big Idea
Indian election history is the story of how the world's largest democracy has conducted free and fair elections since independence in 1947. It is not just about who won or lost — it is about how a deeply diverse nation built and sustained a system where ordinary citizens choose their government through the ballot box.
The NCERT textbook for Class 9 (Democratic Politics) introduces this by saying that elections are a mechanism by which people can choose their representatives at regular intervals and change them if they wish. India has done this without interruption for over seven decades, which is remarkable for any democracy, let alone one as large and complex as India.
Why It Matters for a Commerce/Humanities Student
You might wonder: why should a commerce or humanities student care about election history? Here is why:
-
It is the foundation of political stability. Businesses, markets, and economies need predictable governance. Elections provide a peaceful way to transfer power. When investors look at India, they see a country where governments change without violence or chaos. That stability has direct economic consequences.
-
It shapes public policy. Every election changes the priorities of government — tax policy, trade agreements, social welfare schemes, infrastructure spending. Understanding election history helps you anticipate policy shifts.
-
It is a case study in institutional design. India's Election Commission is one of the most respected institutions in the world. How it manages elections — from voter registration to counting votes — is studied globally as a model of administrative excellence.
Key Milestones in Indian Election History
Here are the major phases you should know:
-
1951-52: The First General Election. This was a logistical miracle. India had only 17% literacy, most people had never seen a ballot paper, and the country was still recovering from Partition. The Election Commission used symbols (like a pair of bullocks, a lotus, a hand) so that illiterate voters could identify their preferred party. The Congress party won, and Jawaharlal Nehru became Prime Minister.
-
1967: The First Major Challenge. The Congress party lost power in several states. This showed that Indian democracy was not a one-party show — voters could and did throw out incumbent governments. It was a healthy sign for democracy.
-
1975-77: The Emergency and Its Aftermath. In 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi declared a national Emergency, suspending elections and civil liberties. When elections were finally held in 1977, voters decisively rejected the Congress party. This was the first time a non-Congress government came to power at the centre. It proved that Indian voters would punish authoritarianism.
-
1989-1990s: The Rise of Coalition Politics. No single party won a clear majority. Governments were formed by alliances of multiple parties. This period taught India the art of negotiation and compromise in governance. Coalitions became the new normal.
-
2004: The "India Shining" Upset. The ruling BJP-led coalition campaigned on the slogan "India Shining," highlighting economic growth. But rural voters felt left out, and the Congress-led coalition won. This election showed that economic growth alone does not win votes — inclusive development matters.
-
2014 and 2019: The Modi Wave. The BJP won a clear majority on its own, something no party had done since 1984. These elections were marked by massive use of social media, high voter turnout, and a focus on nationalism and development.
The most important fact to remember: India has held 17 general elections since 1952, and every single one has been conducted on time, without military intervention, and with the results accepted by all major parties. This is a record that very few democracies in the world can match.
How the Election System Works (In Brief)
The NCERT textbook explains the basic structure:
- India is divided into 543 parliamentary constituencies for the Lok Sabha (the lower house of Parliament).
- Each constituency elects one Member of Parliament (MP) through a first-past-the-post system — the candidate with the most votes wins, even if they do not get a majority.
- Elections are conducted by the Election Commission of India, an independent constitutional authority.
- Every citizen aged 18 and above can vote, regardless of caste, religion, gender, or education. …
Part (a): Partition was the major change; unity-consolidation and administrative complexity were extra reasons to postpone linguistic states; Telugu speakers in Madras Presidency challenged it and won Andhra (1953).
Part (b): Universal Adult Franchise means the vote for all adults; the 1952 elections took six months because of a huge illiterate electorate and India's size; their fair conduct proved democracy could work anywhere.
Passage on the 1952 general elections
- Universal Adult Franchise: It means the right to vote is granted to all adult citizens of the country, without any discrimination based on caste, creed, religion, gender, property, wealth or education.
- Two reasons it took about six months:
- The electorate was enormous and largely illiterate — election officials had to prepare voter rolls from scratch, design party symbols so illiterate voters could recognise candidates, and train staff, all of which took time. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.