Q.Kipling considered an interview a crime because it is
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Rudyard Kipling considered an interview a profound violation of his personal space and dignity, likening it to an assault.
The chapter "The Interview" delves into the varied perceptions of interviews, a common feature of journalism. While some prominent figures have embraced interviews as a means to communicate their ideas or present their true selves, others have viewed them with deep suspicion or outright hostility. Rudyard Kipling, the celebrated author of The Jungle Book and Kim, belonged firmly to the latter camp.
Kipling was famously averse to interviews throughout his life. His strong feelings on the matter are explicitly documented in the text, where he is quoted using exceptionally harsh language to describe the act. He did not merely find them inconvenient or time-consuming; his objections ran much deeper, touching upon fundamental issues of personal autonomy and integrity.
Kipling's exact words, as quoted in the chapter, are crucial: he referred to an interview as "immoral, a crime, an assault, it is cowardly and vile."
Let us break down why these words point to an "offence against his person":
- "Immoral" and "Vile": These terms suggest a strong ethical condemnation. Kipling believed there was something fundamentally wrong and contemptible about the practice of interviewing, implying it transgressed moral boundaries.
- "A Crime": While not suggesting a legally punishable offence in the conventional sense, likening it to a crime conveys the severity of the transgression in his eyes. It implies a serious violation of rights or norms. …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.