Q.How old is the interview as a form, and how common has it become in journalism? (Answer in 30–40 words.)
Concept understanding — Right To Privacy
The Right to Privacy: From Everyday Intuition to Constitutional Right
Think about the last time you closed your bedroom door, or turned away from someone while typing a password, or felt uneasy when a stranger read the message on your phone screen over your shoulder. That feeling — the sense that some parts of your life are yours alone — is the seed of the right to privacy. It is the claim that you, as an individual, have a zone of life where the state, your neighbours, or even your family cannot intrude without a very good reason.
What the Right to Privacy Actually Means
Legally, the right to privacy is not about hiding something wrong. It is about personal autonomy — the power to make decisions about your own body, mind, and information without being watched, recorded, or controlled by others. The NCERT Political Science textbook (Class XI, Indian Constitution at Work) explains that privacy is a fundamental right implied by Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark 2017 Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India case, declared that privacy is an intrinsic part of life and liberty — it is not a gift from the government, but a natural right of every person.
The right to privacy is not absolute. It can be restricted by law, but only if the law is reasonable, serves a legitimate state aim (like national security or public health), and is proportionate — meaning the intrusion is no greater than necessary.
Why It Matters for a Commerce/Humanities Student
You might think privacy is only about hiding secrets, but it touches every part of modern life:
- Personal autonomy: Your choice of whom to marry, what to eat, what religion to follow, or whether to have children — these are private decisions. Without privacy, the state or society could pressure you into choices you do not want.
- Dignity and identity: Privacy protects your reputation and your sense of self. Constant surveillance — whether by the government, a company, or social media — chips away at your ability to be yourself.
- Data protection: In a digital economy, your personal data (bank details, shopping habits, location, health records) is valuable. The right to privacy means companies cannot collect, sell, or misuse your data without your informed consent. This is directly relevant to commerce students who will work with customer data.
- Freedom of expression and association: If you know every word you say or every group you join is being recorded, you will censor yourself. Privacy is the shield that allows dissent, criticism, and unpopular opinions to exist.
Key Dimensions of Privacy (as Recognised by Indian Courts)
The Supreme Court in the Puttaswamy judgment identified three overlapping aspects:
- Decisional privacy: The freedom to make intimate personal choices — whom to love, what to believe, how to live.
- Informational privacy: The right to control who knows what about you — your medical records, financial transactions, private conversations.
- Bodily privacy: The right to protect your body from unwanted intrusion — medical tests without consent, forced searches, or surveillance of your physical movements.
The NCERT textbook emphasises that privacy is not a Western or modern concept. Indian traditions have long recognised the importance of grihastha (householder life) and the sanctity of personal space. The Constitution's framers did not explicitly list privacy, but the courts have read it into Article 21 because it is essential for a life of dignity.
Common Misunderstandings to Avoid
- "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." This is false. Privacy is not about hiding wrongdoing; it is about having a private life at all. Even law-abiding citizens do not want their every move tracked, their every conversation recorded, or their personal data sold.
- "Privacy means secrecy." No. Privacy is about control over information, not total secrecy. You may willingly share your location with a friend but not with a stranger — that is your choice.
- "The right to privacy is only for individuals, not for groups." Actually, privacy also protects group identities — for example, the privacy of a religious community's internal practices or a political party's membership list.
A Final Thought for Your Exams
When you write about the right to privacy in an answer, remember this structure:
- Root it in Article 21 — it is part of the right to life and personal liberty.
- Cite the Puttaswamy case (2017) as the landmark judgment that made it a fundamental right.
- Explain the three dimensions — decisional, informational, bodily.
- Acknowledge the limits — it is not absolute; reasonable restrictions by law are allowed.
- Connect it to real life — data protection, personal autonomy, dignity.
The right to privacy is not a luxury for the secretive. It is the foundation of a free and dignified life — and that is why it matters to every citizen, including you.
Silvester notes the interview is little more than 130 years old — a fairly recent invention. Yet it has quickly become a commonplace of journalism, read at some point by almost everyone who is literate, with several thousand celebrities interviewed over the years.
The interview is little over 130 years old, but it has become a commonplace of journalism that almost every literate person has read at some point.
The interview is little more than 130 years old, yet it has become a commonplace of journalism that almost every literate reader encounters.
Silvester opens Part I of this CBSE Class 12 English NCERT lesson by pointing out that the interview is a fairly recent invention — it has existed for a little over 130 years. Despite its youth as a form, it has become a commonplace of journalism. Today, almost everybody who is literate will have read an interview at some point in their lives, while from the other side, several thousand celebrities have been interviewed over the years, some of them repeatedly. So the form is both young and, by now, everywhere.
The interview is little over 130 years old — a recent invention — yet it has become a commonplace of journalism, read at some point by almost everyone who is literate.
- CBSE 2023Set 1/3/11 markMCQQ.Kipling considered an interview a crime because it is(a) illegal.(b) an offence against his person.(c) an act of espionage.(d) a waste of time. (The Interview)
›Reveal solutionSolution
Rudyard Kipling considered an interview a profound violation of his personal space and dignity, likening it to an assault.
The chapter "The Interview" delves into the varied perceptions of interviews, a common feature of journalism. While some prominent figures have embraced interviews as a means to communicate their ideas or present their true selves, others have viewed them with deep suspicion or outright hostility. Rudyard Kipling, the celebrated author of The Jungle Book and Kim, belonged firmly to the latter camp.
Kipling was famously averse to interviews throughout his life. His strong feelings on the matter are explicitly documented in the text, where he is quoted using exceptionally harsh language to describe the act. He did not merely find them inconvenient or time-consuming; his objections ran much deeper, touching upon fundamental issues of personal autonomy and integrity.
ImportantKipling's exact words, as quoted in the chapter, are crucial: he referred to an interview as "immoral, a crime, an assault, it is cowardly and vile."
Let us break down why these words point to an "offence against his person":
- "Immoral" and "Vile": These terms suggest a strong ethical condemnation. Kipling believed there was something fundamentally wrong and contemptible about the practice of interviewing, implying it transgressed moral boundaries.
- "A Crime": While not suggesting a legally punishable offence in the conventional sense, likening it to a crime conveys the severity of the transgression in his eyes. It implies a serious violation of rights or norms.
- "An Assault": This is the most direct and powerful descriptor. An assault is an attack, either physical or verbal, that infringes upon an individual's personal space, safety, or dignity. For Kipling, being subjected to an interview felt like a direct intrusion, an unwelcome probing into his private thoughts and life, akin to a personal attack. He felt his inner self was being invaded without consent.
- "Cowardly": This might refer to the interviewer's approach, perhaps seen as preying on individuals or extracting information under the guise of conversation.
Taken together, Kipling's choice of words clearly indicates that he perceived interviews not just as a nuisance, but as a profound violation of his personal being. It was an act that he felt intruded upon his privacy, dignity, and sense of self, making it a direct offence against his person.
✓Final answerKipling considered an interview an offence against his person because he viewed it as an "immoral, a crime, an assault," a profound and unwelcome intrusion into his private self and dignity.
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.