Skip to content
Question

Q.Why can the bangle-makers not organise themselves into a cooperative? (Lost Spring)

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2023Subjective· 2mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The bangle-makers of Firozabad remain trapped in a vicious cycle of caste exploitation, debt bondage, police-middleman-politician nexus, and generations of fear that crushes any attempt at collective resistance or cooperative organisation.

The question cuts to the heart of why poverty persists even when solutions seem obvious. A cooperative would allow the bangle-makers to pool resources, eliminate middlemen, bargain for better prices, and escape the stranglehold of the sahukars (moneylenders). Yet Mukesh's family and thousands like them remain locked in the same dark, airless hovels, their eyes ruined by furnace glare, their children inheriting the same fate. The answer lies not in economics alone but in the interlocking systems of caste and class oppression that Anees Jung exposes in Lost Spring.

The bangle industry in Firozabad rests on a foundation of caste hierarchy. The families blowing glass, welding bangles, and polishing them belong to communities that have done this work for generations—not by choice but by birth. Caste has assigned them this identity, and Indian society has ensured they cannot escape it. When Savita sits alongside her mother, soldering glass pieces in a dark room, she is not learning a trade; she is fulfilling a destiny written centuries ago. The stigma and social exclusion attached to their caste mean that even if they wanted to organise, the dominant castes and power structures would view any assertion of rights as a threat to the established order.

Debt is the second chain. Almost every family is caught in a web of loans from the sahukars, who are often also the middlemen controlling the bangle trade. These moneylenders advance small sums at exorbitant interest, ensuring that the workers can never repay the principal. The debt passes from father to son, a hereditary bondage that makes the idea of breaking free almost unthinkable. To form a cooperative, the workers would need capital, legal knowledge, and the ability to withstand the immediate loss of income that would follow any confrontation with the sahukars. When survival is a daily struggle and every meal depends on the next day's wages, long-term collective action becomes a luxury they cannot afford.

Then there is the nexus of power—the unholy alliance of police, middlemen, bureaucrats, and politicians that Jung describes with quiet fury. The text makes clear that this network actively suppresses any attempt at organisation. The police, instead of protecting the exploited, work hand-in-glove with the exploiters. If a bangle-maker dares to speak of fair wages or better conditions, he risks arrest on false charges, a beating, or worse. The middlemen control access to raw materials and markets; defying them means starvation. Politicians, who might be expected to champion the poor, are complicit in the system because it serves their interests—vote banks are managed through patronage and fear, not empowerment.

Important

The bangle-makers are caught in what the text calls a "vicious circle"—a self-reinforcing trap where poverty, ignorance, caste stigma, and political-economic exploitation feed into one another, making escape nearly impossible without external intervention. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.