Q.Two point charges, each equal to −q, are held fixed on a straight line, separated by a distance 2d (so each is a distance d from the mid-point of the line). A third charge +q of mass m is placed at the mid-point and is then displaced by a small distance x (with x≪d) in the direction perpendicular to the line joining the two fixed charges. Show that the charge +q executes simple harmonic motion, and that its time period is T=[q28π3ε0md3]1/2.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Coulomb Force Superposition
Coulomb Force Superposition – From Intuition to Precision
Imagine you're in a room with three friends. Each friend can push or pull you. If two friends push you from the same side, you feel a stronger push — the combined effect. If one pushes from the left and another from the right, you feel the net effect, which might be smaller or even zero if they push equally hard.
This is exactly how electric forces work. When multiple charged particles are present, each one exerts its own force on a given charge. The total force that charge feels is simply the vector sum of all the individual forces — as if each other charge were acting alone, completely ignoring the presence of the rest.
That's the core idea: forces add like arrows, not like numbers.
The Precise Statement
Fnet on q0=∑i=1nFi→0=4πε01∑i=1nri02q0qir^i0
Where:
- q0 is the charge you're calculating the force on
- qi are all other charges (excluding q0 itself)
- ri0 is the distance between qi and q0
- r^i0 is a unit vector pointing from qi to q0 (or away, depending on sign convention — be consistent)
The key point: Each pair of charges interacts independently. The presence of a third charge does not alter the force between the first two. This is what "superposition" means — the forces simply layer on top of each other.
Why This Matters (and a Common Trap)
Never add the magnitudes of forces directly unless all forces are along the same line and in the same direction. Force is a vector — direction matters.
If two forces point in opposite directions, they partially cancel. If they're at right angles, the net force is found using the Pythagorean theorem, not simple addition.
Example: Three charges on a line:
- q1=+2μC at x=0
- q2=−1μC at x=3cm
- q0=+1μC at x=1cm
Step 1: Force from q1 on q0 — both positive, so repulsive. q0 is pushed to the right.
Step 2: Force from q2 on q0 — opposite signs, so attractive. q0 is pulled to the right (toward q2).
Step 3: Both forces point right. Now you add magnitudes: Fnet=F1→0+F2→0.
If q2 were also positive, the force from q2 would push q0 left, and you'd subtract.
The Deeper Reason
Coulomb's law is a linear law — the force is proportional to each charge individually. If you double q1, the force from q1 doubles, but the force from q2 stays the same. This linearity is what makes superposition possible. It's not a coincidence — it's a fundamental property of electromagnetic interactions at the classical level.
Superposition works because electric forces obey a linear inverse-square law. If the force depended on products of three charges (like q0q1q2), superposition would fail. It doesn't — and that's why we can break down any multi-charge problem into a series of two-charge calculations.
--- …
Why this formula?
Coulomb Force Superposition — Why the Formula Holds
The principle of superposition for Coulomb forces states that the net electrostatic force on a given charge due to a collection of other charges is the vector sum of the individual forces from each charge, as if the others were absent.
The Key Formula
If we have a charge q0 at position r0, and N other point charges q1,q2,…,qN at positions r1,r2,…,rN, the net force on q0 is:
Fnet=4πε01∑i=1N∣r0−ri∣2q0qir^0i
where r^0i is the unit vector pointing from qi to q0.
Why This Works — The Physical Reasoning
1. Coulomb's Law is a Two-Body Interaction
Coulomb's law describes the force between exactly two point charges. It depends only on:
- The product of their charges (q0qi)
- The inverse square of the distance between them
- The direction along the line joining them
Crucially, the force between q0 and qi does not depend on the presence of any other charges qj.
2. Forces Add as Vectors (Newton's Third Law + Linearity)
Electrostatic forces are real physical forces — they obey Newton's laws. If multiple forces act on the same charge, the net effect is the vector sum of each individual force. This is a fundamental property of forces in classical mechanics.
3. The Electric Field is Linear
A deeper reason: the electric field E obeys superposition. Since F=q0E, and E from multiple sources adds linearly, the force automatically adds linearly.
The electric field at r0 due to qi is:
Ei(r0)=4πε01∣r0−ri∣2qir^0i
Then:
Fnet=q0∑iEi=∑iFi
The Crucial Assumption (Why It's Not Trivial)
Superposition holds because Maxwell's equations are linear in the electric field. If the equations were nonlinear (e.g., if the field depended on E2), then the force from two charges together would not be the sum of the individual forces.
In electrostatics, the electric field satisfies:
∇⋅E=ε0ρ,∇×E=0
Both equations are linear — if E1 and E2 are solutions, then E1+E2 is also a solution. This linearity is the mathematical reason superposition works.
--- …
When +q is pushed sideways by x, both fixed −q charges attract it back toward the axis. For x≪d the net restoring force is linear in x, so the motion is SHM, and working out the constant gives the stated period. …
Displacing +q perpendicular to the line of the two −q charges makes both of them attract it back toward the axis. The sideways components add while the along-line components cancel. For small x the restoring force is proportional to x, which is the signature of SHM; extracting the spring constant gives the required time period.
Set-up
Place the two fixed charges −q at (±d,0) and the moving charge +q at (0,x), with x≪d. Let k=4πε01.
Force from each fixed charge
The distance from +q to each −q is
r=d2+x2.
Each pair (+q,−q) attracts, so the force on +q from one fixed charge has magnitude
F=r2kq2=d2+x2kq2,
directed from +q toward that fixed charge.
Resolving the forces
By symmetry the components along the line joining the fixed charges cancel. The components perpendicular to that line (along −x, i.e. back toward the axis) add. The perpendicular component of each force is Frx, so the net restoring force is
Fnet=2Frx=d2+x22kq2⋅d2+x2x=(d2+x2)3/22kq2x,
directed toward the axis (restoring).
Small-displacement (linearising)
For x≪d, (d2+x2)3/2≈d3, so
Fnet≈−d32kq2x(negative=restoring). …
Method: Proving SHM by Linearizing a Superposed Restoring Force
This technique applies whenever a charge is displaced slightly from a symmetric equilibrium position between two (or more) fixed charges, and you must show the resulting motion is simple harmonic and find its period.
Steps
Step 1: Set up coordinates around the equilibrium point
Place the fixed source charges at symmetric positions (e.g. (±d,0)) and give the displaced charge a small perpendicular (or along-axis, depending on the problem) displacement x from the equilibrium point, with x≪d. This keeps the geometry simple and makes the symmetry of the source charges do most of the work.
Step 2: Write the Coulomb force from each source charge using superposition
By the superposition principle, each source charge acts independently on the displaced charge — compute the magnitude and direction of the force from each one separately, using the actual (displacement-dependent) separation:
F=4πε01r2q1q2,r=d2+x2 (or whatever the geometry gives)
Step 3: Resolve into components and use symmetry to cancel/add
Because the source charges are placed symmetrically, one set of components (typically along the line joining them) cancels by symmetry, while the other set (perpendicular, i.e. along the displacement direction) adds. This is what turns a 2-source vector problem into a single net 1D restoring force.
Step 4: Linearize for small displacement …
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 on this concept.
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.Two point charges P=+25μC and Q=−16μC are placed 5 cm apart. Find the position of the point at which the resultant electric field is zero: (A) 1 cm from Q and 4 cm from P on the dipole axis (B) 2.5 cm from Q and 2.5 cm from P on the dipole axis (C) 20 cm from Q and 25 cm from P on the dipole axis (D) 25 cm from Q and 20 cm from P on the dipole axis
›Reveal solutionSolution
For two opposite charges, the net electric field is zero outside the smaller charge on the line joining them. Solving EP=EQ gives distances 20 cm from Q and 25 cm from P, so option (C) is correct.
Concept & Intuition
The electric field due to a point charge is E=k∣q∣/r2, directed away from a positive charge and toward a negative charge. Here we have +25μC and −16μC. Because the charges are opposite, the fields point in opposite directions between the charges, but they can never cancel there because the magnitudes are different and the directions are opposite — the net field is nonzero.
The only place where the fields can cancel is outside the smaller charge (the −16μC), because there the fields from both charges point in opposite directions (away from the positive, toward the negative) and the distances can be adjusted to make magnitudes equal.
We set up the condition ∣EP∣=∣EQ∣ and solve for the distances.
Step-by-step solution
-
Define the geometry
Let the charges be on the x‑axis: P at x=0 with +25μC, Q at x=5 cm with −16μC.
Let the zero‑field point be at distance x from P (so x cm from P).
If the point is to the right of Q, then distance from P is x and from Q is x−5 (both in cm).
-
Write the field magnitudes
EP=(x)2k⋅25,EQ=(x−5)2k⋅16
(We drop the sign because we only care about magnitude; direction is handled by the geometry.)
- Set magnitudes equal for cancellation
x225=(x−5)216
Take square roots (positive distances):
x5=x−54
- Solve for x Cross‑multiply:
5(x−5)=4x⇒5x−25=4x⇒x=25 cm
So the point is 25 cm from P. …
-
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Two identical charged spheres are suspended by strings of equal lengths. The strings make an angle of 45∘ with each other. When the system is immersed in a liquid of relative density 0.8 , the angle between the strings remains unchanged. If the density of the material of the sphere is 2.4gcm−3, what is the dielectric constant of the liquid? (A) 1.6 (B) 1.5 (C) 0.5 (D) 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that the angle remains the same because the electric force is reduced by the dielectric constant exactly as much as the effective weight is reduced by buoyancy. Solving the equilibrium condition gives the dielectric constant as 1.5.
We have two identical charged spheres hanging from strings of equal length, making an angle of 45∘ with each other. That means each string makes an angle of 22.5∘ with the vertical. When immersed in a liquid, the angle stays the same. This tells us that the ratio of the electric repulsion to the effective weight (weight minus buoyancy) must be the same in air and in the liquid.
Concept and intuition:
In air, the spheres repel each other with a force Fe=r2kq2 (where k=1/(4πε0)). In the liquid, the electric force is reduced by the dielectric constant κ: Fe′=κr2kq2. Meanwhile, the weight of each sphere is mg, but in the liquid there is an upward buoyant force Fb=ρliquidVg. The effective weight becomes mg−Fb=(ρsphere−ρliquid)Vg. Since the angle doesn’t change, the ratio of electric force to effective weight must be the same in both cases. That gives us an equation to solve for κ.
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Set up the equilibrium in air. Each sphere has mass m=ρsV, where ρs=2.4g/cm3 and V is its volume. The tension in the string has vertical component Tcosθ=mg and horizontal component Tsinθ=Fe, where θ=22.5∘ (half the angle between the strings). Dividing:
tanθ=mgFe.
- Set up the equilibrium in the liquid. The effective weight is mg−Fb=(ρs−ρl)Vg, with ρl=0.8g/cm3 (relative density 0.8 means density 0.8 g/cm³). The electric force is now Fe′=κFe because the medium reduces the Coulomb force by the dielectric constant. The angle is the same, so:
tanθ=(ρs−ρl)VgFe′.
- Equate the two expressions for tanθ. From air: tanθ=ρsVgFe. From liquid: tanθ=(ρs−ρl)VgFe/κ. …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Point charge 2C,2C, and −2C are placed at the three vertices of a right-angled triangle in air. [as shown in the figure below] What is the electric field at a point P on the hypotenuse that is equidistant from all three charges. Given distances XP=YP=ZP=0.5 m (A) 0⋅72×1010NC−1 along YP (B) 7.2×1010NC−1 along PY (C) 0.72×109NC−1 along YP (D) 7.2×109NC−1 along PY
›Reveal solutionSolution
The two equal 2C charges sit at the ends of the hypotenuse, collinear through the midpoint P; their fields cancel there. Only the −2C charge remains, giving 7.2×1010N C−1.
Geometry
P is equidistant from all three vertices of a right-angled triangle, so it is the circumcentre — the midpoint of the hypotenuse — with XP=YP=ZP=0.5m.
Fields of the two positive charges cancel
The two +2C charges lie at opposite ends of the hypotenuse, so P is exactly between them and on the line joining them. Each produces a field of equal magnitude directed away from itself; being back-to-back along the same line, they are equal and opposite at P and cancel:
E2=r2kq=(0.5)29×109×2each, but they sum to zero. …
- KCET 2025Set D-41 markMCQQ.Which of the following statements is not true? (A) Work done to move a charge on an equipotential surface is not zero (B) Equipotential surfaces are the surfaces where the potential is constant (C) Equipotential surfaces for a uniform electric field are parallel and equidistant from each other (D) Electric field is always perpendicular to an equipotential surfaces.
›Reveal solutionSolution
Work on an equipotential surface is W=qΔV=0 by definition, so the statement that it is 'not zero' is the false one.
Step 1 — Definition of an equipotential surface.
An equipotential surface is a surface on which the electrostatic potential V has the same value at every point. This makes statement (B) true — it is simply the definition.
Step 2 — Test statement (A): work done moving a charge on such a surface.
The work done by an external agent in moving a charge q from point A to point B is
W=q(VB−VA)=qΔV
If A and B both lie on the same equipotential surface, then VA=VB, so
ΔV=0⟹W=q×0=0
The work is zero. Statement (A) asserts it is not zero — therefore (A) is FALSE, and since the question asks which statement is not true, (A) is the answer.
Step 3 — Confirm (D) is true (field ⊥ surface).
If E had any component E∥ along the surface, moving a charge a distance dℓ along the surface would do work W=qE∥dℓ=0, which would mean a potential difference between two points of the surface — contradicting its being equipotential. Hence E∥=0, i.e. E is always normal (perpendicular) to the equipotential surface. (D) is true.
Step 4 — Confirm (C) is true (uniform field case). …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.Two identical conducting balls having positive charges q1 and q2 are separated by a distance r. If they are made to touch each other and then separated to the same distance, the force between them will be (A) Same as before (B) zero (C) Less than before (D) More than before
›Reveal solutionSolution
When two identical charged conductors touch, they share charge equally, and the electrostatic force after separation is always greater than or equal to the original force unless one charge was zero. The correct option is (D).
The key idea here is charge redistribution upon contact. When two identical conducting spheres touch, they become a single conductor, and charge flows until both have the same potential. Since they are identical, this means they end up with equal charges. The force between them after separation depends on the product of the new charges compared to the original product.
- Original force The initial electrostatic force between the balls is given by Coulomb’s law:
Finitial=kr2q1q2
where k=4πε01.
- Charge redistribution on contact When the two identical conducting balls touch, the total charge q1+q2 is shared equally because they are identical in size and shape. So each ball ends up with:
q′=2q1+q2
- Force after separation After they are separated back to the same distance r, the new force is:
Fnew=kr2(q′)2=kr2(2q1+q2)2=k4r2(q1+q2)2
- Compare Fnew and Finitial We compare the products:
Initial product: Pi=q1q2
New product: Pn=4(q1+q2)2
The difference is:
Pn−Pi=4(q1+q2)2−q1q2=4q12+2q1q2+q22−4q1q2=4q12−2q1q2+q22=4(q1−q2)2
Since (q1−q2)2≥0, we have Pn≥Pi. Equality only if q1=q2.
- Conclusion for the given problem …
- KCET 2024Set D-21 markMCQQ.The total electric flux through a closed spherical surface of radius ‘r’ enclosing an electric dipole of dipole moment 2aq is (Given ϵ0= permittivity of free space) (A) Zero (B) ϵ0q (C) ϵ02q (D) ϵ08πr2q
›Reveal solutionSolution
Gauss's law counts only the net enclosed charge, and a dipole's net charge is zero.
Step 1 — State Gauss's law
For any closed surface S,
∮SE⋅dA=ϵ0qenc
The crucial point of this law is that the right-hand side depends only on the algebraic sum of the charges inside — not on their positions, not on the size or shape of the surface, and not on any charges outside.
Step 2 — Find the charge enclosed by the sphere
A dipole of moment p=2aq consists of two point charges +q and −q separated by 2a. Since the whole dipole lies inside the spherical surface, both charges are enclosed:
qenc=(+q)+(−q)=0
Step 3 — Apply Gauss's law
ϕ=ϵ0qenc=ϵ00=0
Step 4 — Why this is not a trick …
- KCET 2024Set D-21 markMCQQ.Under electrostatic condition of a charged conductor, which among the following statements is true? (A) The electric field on the surface of a charged conductor is 2ϵ0σ, where σ is the surface charge density (B) The electric potential inside a charged conductor is always zero (C) Any excess charge resides on the surface of the conductor (D) The net electric field is tangential to the surface of the conductor
›Reveal solutionSolution
Under electrostatic conditions, a conductor’s excess charge sits only on its surface, making option (C) the correct statement.
The key idea is that in electrostatics, charges inside a conductor are free to move until they reach equilibrium. Once equilibrium is reached, the electric field inside the conductor must be zero everywhere. If there were any field, charges would keep moving. This single fact — zero internal field — forces all the other properties: the surface is an equipotential, the field just outside is perpendicular to it, and any extra charge cannot stay inside.
Let’s examine each statement carefully.
-
Option (A): The electric field on the surface of a charged conductor is 2ϵ0σ.
This formula is actually the field due to an infinite sheet of charge. For a conductor, the field just outside the surface is ϵ0σ, not half that. Why? Because the field inside the conductor is zero, so all the flux through a Gaussian pillbox that straddles the surface comes from the outside face. That gives ϵ0σ. The 2ϵ0σ result applies to a thin sheet of charge in free space, where field exists on both sides. Here, the conductor’s interior has no field, so the outside field is double that. So (A) is false.
-
Option (B): The electric potential inside a charged conductor is always zero.
Potential is defined relative to a reference (usually infinity). Inside a conductor in equilibrium, the field is zero, so the potential is constant throughout — but that constant need not be zero. It could be positive or negative depending on the charge and the reference. For example, a positively charged isolated conductor has a positive potential. So (B) is false.
-
Option (C): Any excess charge resides on the surface of the conductor. …
-
- KCET 2024Set D-21 markMCQQ.A cube of side 1 cm contains 100 molecules each having an induced dipole moment of 0.2×10−6C−m in an external electric field of 4NC−1. The electric susceptibility of the material is _____ C2N−1m−2. (A) 50 (B) 5 (C) 0.5 (D) 0.05
›Reveal solutionSolution
Get the polarisation (total dipole moment per unit volume), then divide by the applied field, since the stated unit C2N−1m−2 means χ is defined here by P=χE.
Step 1 — The concept: polarisation
When a dielectric is placed in an external field, each molecule acquires an induced dipole moment. The macroscopic measure of this is the polarisation vector
P=volumenet dipole moment
and for a linear dielectric P is proportional to the field, the constant of proportionality being the electric susceptibility.
Step 2 — Volume of the cube
a=1 cm=10−2 m⇒V=a3=(10−2)3=10−6 m3
Step 3 — Total dipole moment
The 100 molecules each carry p=0.2×10−6 Cm and (being induced by the same field) are aligned, so their moments simply add:
ptotal=Np=100×0.2×10−6=2×10−5 Cm
Step 4 — Polarisation
P=Vptotal=10−62×10−5=20 Cm−2
Step 5 — Susceptibility …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.3 point charges each of −q are placed on the circumference of a circle of diameter 2a at A,B and C respectively as shown in figure. The electric field at O is (A) Zero (B) 2aKq towards OC (C) aKq towards OB (D) aKq towards OA
›Reveal solutionSolution
Two of the three equal charges sit at opposite ends of a diameter and their fields at O cancel; only the third charge (at B) is left, so the net field points towards OB - option (C).
The field at O is the vector sum of the fields of the three charges. Each charge is −q at a distance equal to the radius a (diameter =2a), and for a negative charge the field at O points toward that charge.
Charges A and C lie at opposite ends of a diameter, so their fields at O are equal in magnitude and exactly opposite in direction:
EA+EC=a2Kqu^OA+a2Kqu^OC=0.
Charge B is then unopposed, so the resultant is its field alone, directed from O toward B:
EO=a2Kq along OB. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Two point charges M and N having charges +q and −q respectively are placed at a distance apart. Force acting between them is F. If 30% of charge of N is transferred to M, then the force between the charges becomes: (A) F (B) 49100F (C) 10049F (D) 169F
›Reveal solutionSolution
Transferring 30% of N's charge leaves both magnitudes at 0.7q, so the force scales by 0.7×0.7=0.49, giving 10049F.
Initial force between +q and −q separated by r:
F=4πε01r2q⋅q.
30% of N's charge is 0.3q, transferred from N to M:
qM=q−0.3q=0.7q,qN=q−0.3q=0.7q (magnitude). …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Three point charges are located on a circular arc at A,B and C as shown in the figure below. The total electric field at the centre of the arc(C) is (A) 15000 NC−1 (B) 10000 NC−1 (C) 20000 NC−1 (D) 5000 NC−1
›Reveal solutionSolution
The two equal positive charges give 10000 N/C net along the axis and the negative charge 5000 N/C the other way; resultant =5000 N/C.
With r=6.0 cm =0.06 m, k=9×109:
E+4=(0.06)2(9×109)(4×10−9)=0.003636=10000 N/C
E−2=(0.06)2(9×109)(2×10−9)=5000 N/C …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.Five charges, 'q' each are placed at the comers of a regular pentagon of side 'a' as shown in figure. First, charge from 'A' is removed with other charges intact, then charge at 'A' is replaced with an equal opposite charge. The ratio of magnitudes of electric fields at O, without charge at A and that with equal and opposite charge at A is (A) 4 : 1 (B) 2 : 1 (C) 1 : 4 (D) 1 : 2
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is that the electric field at the centre of a regular pentagon due to five equal charges is zero by symmetry. Removing one charge leaves a net field equal in magnitude to the field of that missing charge alone. Replacing it with an equal opposite charge doubles that field. The ratio of magnitudes is therefore 1 : 2, corresponding to option (D).
Concept and intuition:
For a regular pentagon, the centre is equidistant from all vertices. If five equal charges are placed at the vertices, the vector sum of the electric fields at the centre is zero — each field is cancelled by the others due to symmetry. This is the same principle that makes the field at the centre of a regular polygon with equal charges zero.
Now, if we remove one charge, the symmetry is broken. The net field at O is exactly the field that the missing charge would have produced (since the remaining four still sum to the negative of that one field). If we instead replace the removed charge with an equal opposite charge, that charge now contributes a field in the same direction as the field from the missing charge (because the sign flips), so the total field becomes twice the field of a single charge. The ratio of the magnitudes (first case : second case) is therefore 1 : 2.
Step-by-step reasoning:
- Original configuration (five equal charges): The centre O is equidistant from all vertices. Let this distance be r (the circumradius). Each charge q produces a field of magnitude E0=r2kq at O, directed radially outward (if q>0). Because the pentagon is regular, the five vectors are equally spaced in direction by 72∘. Their vector sum is zero:
Etotal=0.
- First scenario: charge at A is removed. Now only four charges remain (at B, C, D, E). Their net field at O is no longer zero. However, since the original five fields summed to zero, the sum of the four remaining fields must be exactly the negative of the field that was produced by the charge at A:
Efour=−EA.
The magnitude is therefore ∣Efour∣=E0.
- Second scenario: charge at A is replaced with an equal opposite charge −q. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.