Skip to content
Case Problems · Q14

Q.A Pune-based manufacturer of glass showpieces has received a large, urgent export order from a customer in another country who needs the fragile, high-value goods delivered within three days. Road and rail options would take over two weeks and involve multiple handling points that risk breakage. Which mode of transport should the manufacturer choose, and what factors support this choice?

Maharashtra MsbshseTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★
23% · 14/62 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The case highlights three deciding factors: urgency (only three days available), fragility (breakage risk from multiple handling points), and high value of the goods (glass showpieces for an export order).

Road transport, while flexible for local delivery, is too slow for an international delivery within three days and was already ruled out by the manufacturer's own estimate. Rail transport, suited to heavy bulky goods over land, is similarly too slow for this timeframe and does not reach overseas customers directly. Water transport is the cheapest way to move bulky export cargo internationally, but it is by far the slowest mode and cannot meet a three-day deadline. Pipeline transport is irrelevant here since it only carries liquids and gases, not glass showpieces. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.