Skip to content
Example · Example 14

Q.Use VSEPR theory to predict the shape of phosphorus pentachloride, PCl5\text{PCl}_5, and explain why the axial and equatorial P–Cl bonds are not equivalent.

West Bengal WbchseTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★
42% · 14/33 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Phosphorus in PCl5\text{PCl}_5 forms five single bonds, one to each chlorine, with no lone pairs on phosphorus. With 5 electron pairs, all bonding, VSEPR theory places them in a trigonal bipyramidal arrangement: three chlorines lie in an equatorial plane at 120∘120^{\circ} to one another, and the remaining two chlorines lie axially, at 90∘90^{\circ} to the equatorial plane and 180∘180^{\circ} to each other. Unlike the fully symmetric tetrahedral or octahedral geometries, these five positions are genuinely not all equivalent: each axial position is at 90∘90^{\circ} to all three equatorial positions (three close-range 90∘90^{\circ} repulsions), whereas each equatorial position is at 90∘90^{\circ} to only the two axial positions (two close-range 90∘90^{\circ} repulsions) and at a less-repulsive 120∘120^{\circ} to the other two equatorial positions. Because axial bonding pairs experie …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.