Q.'Prevention is better than cure.' Justify with regard to TDA abuse.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Preventing tobacco, drug and alcohol (TDA) abuse before it begins is far more effective and humane than trying to treat addiction after it has set in, because the damage caused by long-term abuse is often severe and difficult to reverse.
Justification for 'Prevention is better than cure' with regard to TDA abuse:
-
Addiction develops rapidly and is hard to reverse: Repeated use of tobacco, alcohol, or drugs can quickly lead to tolerance (needing higher doses for the same effect) and physical/psychological dependence. Once dependence sets in, breaking the habit requires prolonged medical and psychological treatment, and relapse rates are high — so avoiding the first use altogether is far more reliable than trying to cure an established addiction.
-
Irreversible health damage: Chronic tobacco use causes cancers, chronic bronchitis, and cardiovascular disease; alcohol abuse damages the liver (cirrhosis) and nervous system; drug abuse can cause organ failure, weakened immunity, and permanent brain changes. Many of these effects cannot be fully cured even after the person stops using the substance.
-
Social and behavioural harm: Abuse impairs judgement and coordination, increasing the risk of accidents, violence, and risky behaviour; it damages relationships, academic/work performance, and can push individuals toward crime to support the habit. Such social costs are difficult to fully repair even after recovery.
-
Difficulty and cost of treatment: Rehabilitation and de-addiction programmes are long, expensive, and success is not guaranteed; many individuals relapse repeatedly.
…
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.