Skip to content
Example · Example 42

Q.Explain, with one worked example, why the diazonium-salt route is described as indispensable for synthesising substituted benzenes bearing −F-\text{F}, −I-\text{I} or −CN-\text{CN} directly on the ring at a position that could not have been installed there by direct electrophilic aromatic substitution.

West Bengal WbchseTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★
75% · 42/56 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Ordinary electrophilic aromatic substitution installs a substituent by generating an electrophilic form of that substituent (e.g. NO2+\text{NO}_2^+ for nitration, Br+\text{Br}^+-equivalent for bromination) and letting the ring attack it -- but no comparably controllable electrophilic 'F+\text{F}^+', useful iodinating electrophile, or electrophilic 'CN+\text{CN}^+' exists for direct use on benzene. The diazonium route sidesteps this entirely: benzene is first nitrated (an electrophilic substitution the ring handles easily) to nitrobenzene, reduced (Sn/HCl\text{Sn}/\text{HCl}) to aniline, diazotized at 00–5∘C5^\circ\text{C} to benzenediazonium chloride, converted to its tetrafluoroborate salt, and thermally decomposed (Balz-Schiemann) to fluorobenzene. Every step of this five-step sequence is a reaction the ring CAN do directly (nitration, reduction, diazotization, salt metathesis, thermal decomposition); it is only by routing through the diazonium in …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.