Explain any four environmental concerns that have become important for global politics.

Question

Q. Explain any four environmental concerns that have become important for global politics.

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2025Subjective· 4mImportance★★★★★

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Concept understanding — Environmental Degradation

Environmental Degradation – A First Look

Imagine a glass of clean water. Now drop a spoonful of mud into it. The water is still there, but it's no longer usable for drinking. That's a tiny, simple example of what environmental degradation means on a large scale.

The core idea is simple: the environment around us — air, water, soil, forests — gets damaged or spoiled, often because of human activities. It loses its original quality and its ability to support life (including ours).

The Intuition: What does "degradation" mean?

The word "degrade" means to lower in quality, value, or dignity. When we say the environment is degraded, we mean:

The air becomes polluted (smog, toxic gases).
Rivers and lakes become contaminated (industrial waste, sewage).
Soil loses its fertility (overuse of chemicals, erosion).
Forests shrink (deforestation).
Species of plants and animals disappear (loss of biodiversity).

Think of it as the environment "falling sick" because of the way we use it. The sickness can be slow (like soil slowly losing nutrients) or sudden (like an oil spill killing marine life).

The Precise Statement

Important

Environmental degradation is the deterioration of the environment through depletion of resources (air, water, soil), destruction of ecosystems, and the extinction of wildlife. It is caused primarily by human activities — such as industrialization, urbanization, deforestation, and pollution — and is marked by the reduced ability of the environment to sustain life and meet human needs.

In simpler terms: we take too much from nature, and we put too much waste back into it. The environment can no longer clean itself or regenerate fast enough.

Why does it happen? (The main causes)

Cause	What it looks like
Pollution	Factories releasing smoke, vehicles emitting exhaust, plastic waste choking rivers
Deforestation	Cutting down forests for timber, agriculture, or urban expansion
Overexploitation	Overfishing, excessive mining, pumping groundwater faster than it can recharge
Land degradation	Overgrazing, improper farming practices that turn fertile land into desert
Climate change	Rising temperatures, melting glaciers, erratic rainfall — often a result of the above

A concrete example: The Ganga River

The Ganga is not just a river — it's a living ecosystem. For decades, untreated sewage, industrial chemicals, and religious waste have been dumped into it. The result:

The water became unfit for drinking or bathing in many stretches.
Fish populations declined. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Four critical environmental concerns shaping global politics are climate change, biodiversity loss, deforestation, and water scarcity — each transcending borders and demanding international cooperation while exposing tensions between development and sustainability.

Environmental degradation has emerged as one of the defining challenges of contemporary international relations. Unlike traditional security threats confined within national boundaries, environmental problems respect no borders. Pollution in one country drifts across continents, greenhouse gases accumulate in a shared atmosphere, and the depletion of ocean resources affects coastal nations worldwide. This inherently global character forces states to negotiate, cooperate, and sometimes clash over how to manage shared ecological systems while pursuing their own economic and political interests.

Climate Change and Global Warming

The warming of Earth's atmosphere due to greenhouse gas emissions stands as perhaps the most politically charged environmental issue of our time. Industrialized nations built their prosperity on fossil fuels over two centuries, releasing enormous quantities of carbon dioxide. Now, as developing countries pursue their own growth, questions of responsibility and fairness dominate international climate negotiations.

The politics here cut deep. Wealthy nations argue that all countries must reduce emissions to prevent catastrophic warming. Developing nations counter that they cannot be asked to sacrifice their development for a problem they did not create — that the industrialized world enjoyed cheap energy for generations and now wants to deny the same path to others. This North-South divide has shaped every major climate summit, from Kyoto to Paris, with debates over binding targets, financial assistance, and technology transfer revealing fundamental disagreements about equity and historical responsibility.

Rising sea levels threaten to submerge island nations entirely, creating the prospect of climate refugees and stateless populations. Extreme weather events — hurricanes, droughts, floods — strain national budgets and can destabilize fragile governments. Climate change thus becomes a security issue, not merely an environmental one, forcing military planners and diplomats to consider scenarios once confined to environmental advocacy groups.

Depletion of Biodiversity

The accelerating extinction of plant and animal species represents an irreversible loss of Earth's biological heritage. Habitat destruction, pollution, overexploitation of resources, and climate change combine to push species toward extinction at rates far exceeding natural background levels. Tropical rainforests, coral reefs, and wetlands — ecosystems rich in biodiversity — face particular pressure from logging, agriculture, and urban expansion.

This becomes a political issue when conservation efforts collide with economic development. A country rich in biodiversity may view its forests as resources to be harvested for timber or cleared for farmland, essential for lifting its population out of poverty. International environmental groups and foreign governments may demand protection of these ecosystems, arguing that biodiversity is a global commons benefiting all humanity. The resulting tension pits sovereignty against global stewardship.

Note

The Convention on Biological Diversity attempts to balance these competing claims by recognizing both national sovereignty over biological resources and the common interest in their conservation, though enforcement remains weak and implementation uneven.

Pharmaceutical companies seek genetic resources in biodiverse regions, hoping to develop new medicines. Who owns these resources? Who profits from them? Indigenous communities living in these areas for centuries assert their own claims, adding another layer to an already complex political landscape.

Deforestation

Forests regulate climate, prevent soil erosion, maintain water cycles, and harbor much of the world's terrestrial biodiversity. Yet they continue to disappear at alarming rates, cleared for agriculture, cattle ranching, logging, and infrastructure development. The Amazon rainforest, often called the "lungs of the Earth," has become a flashpoint in global environmental politics.

When a nation clears its forests, the consequences ripple outward. Carbon stored in trees returns to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide, accelerating climate change. Regional rainfall patterns shift, affecting agriculture in neighboring countries. Rivers that originate in forested highlands may run dry or flood unpredictably when vegetation no longer regulates water flow. …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

CBSE 2026Set 59/3/11 markMCQ
$Q. The major objective of ‘Kyoto Protocol’ was : (A) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (B) to reduce pollution by increasing forest cover. (C) to provide grant-in-aid to the developing nations to control environmental pollution. (D) to promote sustainable development.$
›Reveal solutionSolution

The Kyoto Protocol’s primary objective was to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through legally binding targets for developed nations.

The Kyoto Protocol emerged from a growing global recognition in the 1990s that climate change was not a distant threat but an unfolding crisis. Scientists had already established that rising concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and other greenhouse gases were trapping heat in the atmosphere, driving up average global temperatures. The question was no longer whether action was needed, but how to design an international framework that could actually compel countries to cut their emissions.

Adopted in 1997 at the third Conference of the Parties (COP3) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Kyoto Protocol was the first treaty to set legally binding emission reduction targets. Its core mechanism was straightforward: developed countries — listed in Annex I of the convention — were required to reduce their collective greenhouse gas emissions by about 5% below 1990 levels during the first commitment period (2008–2012). This was not a voluntary pledge or a vague aspiration; it was a treaty obligation with compliance procedures.

Note

The protocol differentiated between developed and developing nations. Developing countries, including India and China, were not given binding reduction targets in the first commitment period — a principle known as “common but differentiated responsibilities.” …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2025Set 59/6/11 markMCQ
$Q. Which one of the following has hosted the world's largest number of displaced people ? (A) Middle East and North Africa (B) Africa (C) Europe (D) Asia and Pacific$
›Reveal solutionSolution
Africa hosts the world's largest number of displaced people, primarily due to ongoing conflicts, political instability, and the severe impacts of climate change.

The phenomenon of displacement, where individuals or communities are forced to leave their homes, is a significant global humanitarian challenge. People become displaced for a variety of reasons, including armed conflict, widespread violence, persecution, human rights violations, and natural disasters, often exacerbated by climate change. These displaced individuals can be either internally displaced persons (IDPs), who remain within their own country, or refugees, who cross international borders seeking safety.

Africa consistently hosts the largest number of displaced people globally. This is a consequence of several complex and often interconnected factors:

Protracted Conflicts and Violence: Many regions across Africa have experienced long-standing armed conflicts, civil wars, and insurgencies. Countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, South Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia, and those in the Sahel region (such as Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger) have seen millions uprooted due to ongoing violence, ethnic tensions, and the activities of armed groups.

Political Instability and Persecution: Political crises, coups, and governance issues often lead to widespread human rights abuses and persecution, forcing people to flee their homes to escape violence or discrimination.

Climate Change Impacts: Africa is highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change, including severe droughts, floods, and desertification. These environmental disasters destroy livelihoods, create food insecurity, and displace communities, often leading to competition over scarce resources and exacerbating existing conflicts.

Economic Hardship: While not always the primary driver, severe economic hardship and lack of opportunities can also contribute to displacement, especially when combined with other factors like conflict or environmental degradation.

Important

The term "displaced people" encompasses both internally displaced persons (IDPs) who remain within their own country, and refugees who cross international borders. Africa has a high number of both categories. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2019Set 59/4/11 mark
$Q. Why did the New International Economic Order (NIEO) initiative fade away in late 1980s ?$
›Reveal solutionSolution

The NIEO faded because it was a political project of the Global South that lost momentum as developing countries fractured internally, the West refused to negotiate, and the debt crisis of the 1980s shifted the entire agenda from "reform of the global economy" to "survival."

The New International Economic Order was not a single treaty or organisation — it was a declaration and a programme of action adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1974, pushed by the Non-Aligned Movement and the Group of 77. Its core demand was simple: restructure the world economy so that developing countries got fair prices for their raw materials, better access to Western markets, more control over their own resources, and a bigger say in institutions like the IMF and World Bank. For a brief moment in the 1970s, it looked like the Global South had the numbers and the oil-power to force change.

But by the late 1980s, the NIEO was effectively dead. Why?

First, the West never genuinely engaged. The United States and its allies saw the NIEO as a direct challenge to the liberal capitalist order. They blocked every concrete proposal — whether it was a common fund for commodity prices, a code of conduct for multinational corporations, or debt relief. Without the cooperation of the countries that controlled the world's finance, technology, and markets, the NIEO had no mechanism to enforce its demands. It remained a set of resolutions, not a binding reality.

Second, the developing world itself fractured. The NIEO assumed a unified "Third World" with shared interests. But by the 1980s, that unity was gone. Oil-exporting countries like Saudi Arabia and Nigeria had very different interests from oil-importing countries like India or Tanzania. Newly industrialising economies in East Asia were beginning to benefit from the existing system and had less incentive to overturn it. And many African and Latin American countries were sinking into debt — they needed loans from the IMF and World Bank, not confrontation with them. The solidarity that had made the NIEO possible in 1974 could not survive the debt crisis of 1982.

Note

The debt crisis is crucial here. When Mexico defaulted in 1982, the entire developing world lost its bargaining power. Countries that had demanded a "new order" were now begging for rescheduling. The IMF's structural adjustment programmes — which required privatisation, deregulation, and export-led growth — became the new reality. The NIEO's language of sovereignty and collective self-reliance was replaced by the language of "conditionality" and "market reforms."

Third, the intellectual climate shifted. The 1970s had been a time when dependency theory and Third Worldism carried weight in universities and UN agencies. By the late 1980s, the rise of Reaganomics and Thatcherism had made free-market thinking dominant. The very idea that states should intervene to fix prices or control multinationals was now dismissed as outdated or harmful. Developing countries themselves began to abandon import-substitution and adopt export-oriented policies. The NIEO's vision of a planned, regulated global economy no longer matched the direction of policy anywhere. …
Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

Q.Explain any four environmental concerns that have become important for global politics.

Concept understanding — Environmental Degradation

Environmental Degradation – A First Look

The Intuition: What does "degradation" mean?

The Precise Statement

Why does it happen? (The main causes)

A concrete example: The Ganga River

Four Environmental Concerns in Global Politics

Climate Change and Global Warming

Depletion of Biodiversity

Deforestation

Q.Explain any four environmental concerns that have become important for global politics.

Climate Change and Global Warming

Depletion of Biodiversity

Deforestation

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Unlock everything free for 14 days