Skip to content
Question

Q.Explain any two political consequences of Globalisation.

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2025Subjective· 2mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Globalisation has weakened the traditional sovereignty of nation-states while simultaneously strengthening international institutions and creating new forms of global governance that operate beyond national borders.

Globalisation has fundamentally reshaped the political landscape of the modern world, altering how power is distributed, how decisions are made, and who holds authority over economic and social life. Two consequences stand out as particularly transformative.

Erosion of State Sovereignty

The first major political consequence is the erosion of the nation-state's absolute sovereignty. For centuries, the state enjoyed supreme authority within its territorial boundaries—it could set its own economic policies, regulate its industries, control its borders, and make decisions without external interference. Globalisation has challenged this autonomy in profound ways.

International trade agreements, membership in organisations like the World Trade Organization, and the need to attract foreign investment have all forced governments to align their domestic policies with global standards. A country cannot simply impose tariffs at will or subsidise industries freely without facing consequences from trading partners or international bodies. Capital is mobile now; if a government raises taxes too high or regulates too strictly, multinational corporations can relocate to more favourable jurisdictions. This creates what some call a "race to the bottom," where states compete by lowering labour standards, environmental protections, or corporate taxes to remain attractive to global capital.

Even cultural and social policies face external pressure. International human rights norms, environmental treaties, and global public opinion can constrain what governments do within their own borders. A state's internal affairs are no longer purely internal when global media, international NGOs, and foreign governments can shine a spotlight on human rights abuses or environmental destruction.

Note

This does not mean states have become powerless—they remain the primary political actors—but their room for independent action has narrowed considerably. They must now navigate a complex web of international obligations and market pressures.

Rise of Supra-National Governance

The second consequence is the emergence and strengthening of supra-national institutions and forms of governance that operate above the level of individual states. Globalisation has created problems—financial crises, climate change, terrorism, pandemics, trade disputes—that no single nation can solve alone. This has led to the proliferation of international organisations with real decision-making power.

The European Union represents the most advanced example, where member states have pooled sovereignty in areas like trade, currency (for Eurozone members), and increasingly in foreign policy. Decisions made in Brussels affect the daily lives of hundreds of millions of Europeans, often overriding national legislation. Similarly, the WTO can adjudicate trade disputes and authorise sanctions against countries that violate trade rules. The International Monetary Fund and World Bank attach conditions to loans that effectively dictate economic policy in borrowing nations. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.