Q.A doctor is to visit a patient. From the past experience, it is known that the probabilities that he will come by train, bus, scooter or by other means of transport are respectively 103, 51, 101 and 52. The probabilities that he will be late are 41, 31 and 121, if he comes by train, bus and scooter respectively, but if he comes by other means of transport, then he will not be late. When he arrives, he is late. What is the probability that he comes by train?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability (Bayes' Theorem)
We are given the prior probabilities of each mode of transport and the conditional probabilities of being late given each mode. The doctor is late — we need the posterior probability that he came by train.
Step 1: Define events
Let T, B, S, O be the events that he comes by train, bus, scooter, or other means.
P(T)=103,P(B)=51,P(S)=101,P(O)=52.
Let L = event that he is late.
P(L∣T)=41,P(L∣B)=31,P(L∣S)=121,P(L∣O)=0.
Step 2: Compute total probability of being late
P(L)=P(T)P(L∣T)+P(B)P(L∣B)+P(S)P(L∣S)+P(O)P(L∣O)
=103⋅41+51⋅31+101⋅121+52⋅0 …
Using Bayes’ theorem, we update the prior probability that the doctor comes by train (3/10) with the likelihood of being late given each transport mode. The posterior probability that he came by train, given that he is late, is 21.
The problem gives us a classic Bayes’ theorem situation: we know the prior probabilities of which transport the doctor uses, and we know the conditional probabilities of being late given each transport. When we observe that he is late, we want the posterior probability that he came by train.
The key idea: Bayes’ theorem reverses the conditioning. Instead of asking “If he takes the train, how likely is he to be late?” we ask “Given that he is late, how likely is it that he took the train?” The formula is:
P(Train∣Late)=P(Late)P(Late∣Train)⋅P(Train)
The denominator P(Late) is the total probability of being late, summed over all possible transport modes.
Let’s work through it step by step.
-
List the given probabilities clearly.
Let T, B, S, and O denote the events that the doctor comes by train, bus, scooter, or other means, respectively.
- P(T)=103
- P(B)=51=102
- P(S)=101
- P(O)=52=104
Check: 103+102+101+104=1, good.
-
Conditional probabilities of being late.
Let L be the event that the doctor is late.
- P(L∣T)=41
- P(L∣B)=31
- P(L∣S)=121
- P(L∣O)=0 (he will not be late by other means)
-
Compute the total probability of being late, P(L).
By the law of total probability:
P(L)=P(L∣T)P(T)+P(L∣B)P(B)+P(L∣S)P(S)+P(L∣O)P(O)
Substitute:
P(L)=41⋅103+31⋅51+121⋅101+0⋅52
Compute each term:
- 41⋅103=403
- 31⋅51=151
- 121⋅101=1201
Now add them. Find a common denominator — the LCM of 40, 15, and 120 is 120:
- 403=1209
- 151=1208
- 1201=1201
So:
P(L)=1209+1208+1201=12018=203
Notice that the “other means” term contributes zero, so we only sum over the three modes that can cause lateness. This simplifies the calculation. …
Method: Bayes' Theorem (finding the cause from the observed outcome)
Use this when an outcome (being late) can arise through several channels and you want the probability of a particular channel given the outcome. You know the chance of being late given each mode of transport, but want the transport given that lateness occurred.
Steps
Step 1: Set up the partition of possible causes.
List the mutually exclusive, exhaustive hypotheses (here: he came by train, bus, scooter or other means) and write their prior probabilities P(Ei) (these must sum to 1).
Step 2: Write each likelihood.
For each cause, state P(A∣Ei) — the probability of the observed outcome (here: the doctor is late) under that cause.
Step 3: Get the total probability of the outcome (the denominator).
By the law of total probability,
P(A)=∑iP(Ei)P(A∣Ei).
Step 4: Apply Bayes' theorem for the cause you want.
P(Ek∣A)=∑iP(Ei)P(A∣Ei)P(Ek)P(A∣Ek). …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Dropping the "other means" mode from the partition.
Why it's wrong: even though P(late∣other)=0, the mode's prior P(O)=52 is needed for the priors to sum to 1, and forgetting the mode entirely signals a mis-set partition. Correct approach: list all four modes; its late-contribution is simply zero.
Mistake 2: Using P(late∣train)=41 directly as the answer.
Why it's wrong: that is the likelihood, not P(train∣late). Correct approach: apply Bayes' theorem with the full total-probability denominator. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- KCET 2025Set A-11 markMCQQ.Meera visits only one of the two temples A and B in her locality. Probability that she visits temple A is 52. If she visits temple A, 31 is the probability that she meets her friend, whereas it is 72 if she visits temple B. Meera met her friend at one of the two temples. The probability that she met her at temple B is (A) 167 (B) 165 (C) 163 (D) 169
›Reveal solutionSolution
The friend has already been met (the effect); we want the probability of the cause (temple B) — that reversal of conditioning is exactly Bayes' theorem.
Step 1 — Name the events.
Let A = "Meera visits temple A", B = "Meera visits temple B", F = "she meets her friend".
She visits only one of the two temples, so A and B are mutually exclusive and exhaustive:
P(A)=52⟹P(B)=1−52=53.
Given: P(F∣A)=31, P(F∣B)=72.
Step 2 — Why Bayes.
We are told the outcome (F happened) and asked for the probability of a cause (B). Bayes' theorem inverts the conditioning:
P(B∣F)=P(A)P(F∣A)+P(B)P(F∣B)P(B)P(F∣B).
The denominator is P(F) by the law of total probability — the friend can be met on either branch.
Step 3 — Compute the two branch probabilities.
P(A∩F)=52×31=152,P(B∩F)=53×72=356.
Step 4 — Total probability of meeting the friend. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.P and Q are considering to apply for a job. The probability that P applies for the job is 41. The probability that P applies for the job given that Q applies for the job is 21, and the probability that Q applies for the job given that P applies for the job is 31. Then the probability that P does not apply for the job given that Q does not apply for the job is (A) 54 (B) 87 (C) 65 (D) 1211
›Reveal solutionSolution
We are given conditional probabilities and need to find P(P∣Q). Using the definitions of conditional probability and the law of total probability, we compute P(Q) and P(Q), then apply Bayes' theorem to get 54, which corresponds to option (A).
Concept and intuition:
This is a classic problem of working backwards from conditional probabilities to find a joint probability table. We know P(P), P(P∣Q), and P(Q∣P). From these, we can find P(P∩Q) in two ways, which lets us solve for P(Q). Then we can compute the desired conditional probability P(P∣Q) using the complement rule and the definition of conditional probability.
Step-by-step solution:
- Write down what is given. Let P = event that P applies, Q = event that Q applies. We have:
P(P)=41,P(P∣Q)=21,P(Q∣P)=31.
- Use the definition of conditional probability to express P(P∩Q) in two ways. From P(P∣Q)=P(Q)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(P∣Q)⋅P(Q)=21P(Q).
From P(Q∣P)=P(P)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(Q∣P)⋅P(P)=31⋅41=121.
- Equate the two expressions for P(P∩Q) to find P(Q).
21P(Q)=121⇒P(Q)=61.
- Find P(Q) and P(P∩Q).
P(Q)=1−P(Q)=1−61=65.
Also, P(P∩Q)=P(P)−P(P∩Q)=41−121=123−121=122=61.
- Find P(P∩Q). Since P∩Q is the complement of P∪Q, we can use:
P(P∩Q)=1−P(P∪Q).
First, P(P∪Q)=P(P)+P(Q)−P(P∩Q)=41+61−121. …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.Given that A and B are two events such that P(B)=53, P(A/B)=21 and P(A∪B)=54, then P(A)= (A) 103 (B) 21 (C) 51 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
Turn the conditional probability into P(A∩B), then substitute into the addition theorem and solve for P(A).
Step 1 — Extract P(A∩B) from the conditional probability.
By definition,
P(A/B)=P(B)P(A∩B)(P(B)=0).
Rearranging (the multiplication theorem):
P(A∩B)=P(A/B)⋅P(B)=21×53=103.
This is the key move — the conditional probability is not directly usable in the union formula, but P(A∩B) is.
Step 2 — Apply the addition theorem.
P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B)−P(A∩B).
The intersection is subtracted because the elements common to A and B would otherwise be counted twice.
Step 3 — Substitute the known values.
54=P(A)+53−103.
Step 4 — Solve for P(A). …
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.A man speaks truth 2 out of 3 times. He picks one of the natural numbers in the set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} and reports that it is even. The probability that it is actually even is (A) 52 (B) 51 (C) 101 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Bayes' theorem the probability is 53 — option (D).
The set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} has 3 even numbers (2,4,6) and 4 odd numbers, and one number is picked at random.
Let E = "the number is even" and R = "the man reports it as even."
Priors.
P(E)=73,P(Ec)=74.
Likelihoods. He tells the truth with probability 32 and lies with probability 31.
- If the number really is even, a truthful report says "even": P(R∣E)=32.
- If the number is odd, only a lie reports "even": P(R∣Ec)=31.
Bayes' theorem. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Three bags contain a number of red and white balls are as follows. Bag I: 3 red balls Bag II: 2 red balls and 1 white ball Bag III: 3 White balls The probability that bag i will be chosen and a ball is selected from it is 6i,i=1,2,3. If a white ball is selected, what is the probablity that it came from Bag III (A) 119 (B) 112 (C) 0 (D) 111
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem: we are given prior probabilities for choosing each bag and the conditional probabilities of drawing a white ball from each bag; after observing a white ball, we want the posterior probability that it came from Bag III. The answer is 119.
We start by noting that the problem gives us three bags with different compositions, and a rule for choosing a bag: the probability of picking bag i is 6i. Then, from that bag, we pick a ball uniformly at random. We are told that a white ball was selected, and we need the probability that it came from Bag III. This is a textbook case for Bayes’ theorem, which lets us “reverse” conditional probabilities: we know P(white∣bag i), and we want P(bag i∣white).
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Define events and write down given probabilities. Let Bi be the event that bag i is chosen (i=1,2,3). We are told:
P(B1)=61,P(B2)=62,P(B3)=63.
Let W be the event that a white ball is drawn.
From the bag compositions:
- Bag I: 3 red, 0 white → P(W∣B1)=0.
- Bag II: 2 red, 1 white → P(W∣B2)=31.
- Bag III: 0 red, 3 white → P(W∣B3)=1.
- Compute the total probability of drawing a white ball. By the law of total probability:
P(W)=P(B1)P(W∣B1)+P(B2)P(W∣B2)+P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Substitute:
P(W)=61⋅0+62⋅31+63⋅1=0+182+63=91+21.
Get a common denominator (18):
P(W)=182+189=1811.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem to find P(B3∣W). Bayes’ theorem says:
P(B3∣W)=P(W)P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Plug in the numbers:
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.In an entrance test, there are multiple choice questions. There are four possible answers to each question of which only one is correct. The probability that a student knows the answer to a question is 90%. If he gets the correct answer to a question, then the probability that he was guessing is (A) 3736 (B) 91 (C) 371 (D) 4037
›Reveal solutionSolution
We use Bayes’ theorem to reverse the conditional probability: given that the student answered correctly, we want the probability that he was guessing. The answer is 371, so the correct option is (C).
Concept and intuition
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem. We have two ways a student can get a correct answer: either he knows the answer (and thus answers correctly for sure), or he guesses (and has a 1 in 4 chance of being correct). We are told the prior probability that he knows the answer is 90%. The question asks: given that he got it right, what’s the chance he was actually guessing? Bayes’ theorem lets us “flip” the conditional probability, using the known likelihoods.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Define events clearly Let K = “student knows the answer”, and G = “student guesses” (so G is the complement of K). Let C = “student gives the correct answer”. We are given:
P(K)=0.9,P(G)=0.1.
-
Conditional probabilities for answering correctly
- If the student knows the answer, he is certain to be correct: P(C∣K)=1.
- If he guesses, he picks randomly among 4 options, so P(C∣G)=41.
-
Find the total probability of a correct answer
By the law of total probability:
P(C)=P(C∣K)P(K)+P(C∣G)P(G)=(1)(0.9)+(41)(0.1)=0.9+0.025=0.925.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem We want P(G∣C), the probability that he was guessing given that he answered correctly:
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.At a certain university 4% of male students are over 6 feet tall and 1% of female students are over 6 feet tall. The total student population is divided in the ratio 3 : 2, in favor of female students. If a student is selected at random from amongst all those over 6 feet tall, what is the probability that the student is a female? (A) 1/3 (B) 2/5 (C) 3/11 (D) 3/5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem gives P(female∣>6ft)=0.0220.006=113.
Population split 3:2 in favour of females ⇒ P(F)=53=0.6, P(M)=52=0.4.
Tall fractions: P(T∣F)=0.01, P(T∣M)=0.04.
By Bayes' theorem: …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.If for two events A and B,P(A−B)=51 and P(A)=53 then P(B/A)= (A) 32 (B) 21 (C) 53 (D) 52
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to interpret P(A−B) as P(A∩Bc) and use the definition of conditional probability. The result is P(B/A)=32, so option (A) is correct.
We are asked for P(B/A), the probability of B given A. The definition is
P(B/A)=P(A)P(A∩B).
We know P(A)=53, so we need P(A∩B). The given P(A−B)=51 is the key: A−B means “A and not B,” i.e., A∩Bc.
- Relate P(A−B) to P(A∩B) Since A is the union of the disjoint parts “A and B” and “A and not B,” we have
P(A)=P(A∩B)+P(A∩Bc).
Here P(A∩Bc)=P(A−B)=51 and P(A)=53.
- Solve for P(A∩B)
53=P(A∩B)+51⇒P(A∩B)=53−51=52.
- Apply the conditional probability formula P(B/A)=P(A)P(A∩B)=3/52/5=32. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Bag A contains 3 white and 2 red balls. Bag B contains only 1 white ball. A fair coin is tossed. If head appears then 1 ball is drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. However if tail appears then 2 balls are drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. Now one ball is drawn at random from bag B. Given that the drawn ball from B is white, the probability that head appeared on the coin is (A) 3023 (B) 2312 (C) 2311 (D) 3019
›Reveal solutionSolution
Computing P(white drawn∣H)=54 and P(white∣T)=1511, Bayes' theorem gives P(H∣white)=2312.
Head (transfer 1 ball from A(3W,2R) to B(1W), then draw from B's 2 balls):
P(white)=53(1)+52(21)=53+51=54.
Tail (transfer 2 balls from A to B(1W), then draw from B's 3 balls):
P(WW)=103⇒P(white)=1,P(WR)=106⇒32,P(RR)=101⇒31. …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Advika chooses one of three scarves every morning: Red, Blue, or Green. The probability she chooses Red is 20%. The probability she chooses Blue is twice the probability of choosing Red. On the remaining days she wears a Green scarf. Once a scarf is chosen, she decides whether to wear a Hat (H) and Sunglasses (S). These choices are independent of each other but depend on the scarf colour: Scarf colour Red Blue Green P(H)0.50.40.1P(S)0.80.50.5 Advika is spotted outdoors wearing both a Hat and Sunglasses. What is the probability that she is wearing the Red scarf? (A) 31313 (B) 218 (C) 94 (D) 138
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem on scarf colour given that both a hat and sunglasses are worn. Priors P(R)=0.2, P(B)=0.4, P(G)=0.4; likelihoods P(H∩S∣colour)=P(H)P(S). The posterior P(R∣H∩S)=94 — option (C).
Concept. Hat and sunglasses are independent given the scarf, so P(H∩S∣colour)=P(H∣colour)⋅P(S∣colour). Bayes' theorem then reverses the conditioning to give the probability of the scarf colour from the observed accessories.
Step 1 — Priors.
P(R)=20%=0.2,P(B)=2P(R)=0.4,P(G)=1−0.2−0.4=0.4.
Step 2 — Likelihood of wearing both accessories for each colour.
P(H∩S∣R)=0.5×0.8=0.40,
P(H∩S∣B)=0.4×0.5=0.20,
P(H∩S∣G)=0.1×0.5=0.05. …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.A car manufacturing factory has two plants X and Y. Plant X manufactures 70% of cars and plant Y manufactures 30% of cars. 80% of cars at plant X and 90% of cars at plant Y are rated as standard quality. A car is chosen at random and is found to be of standard quality. The probability that it has come from plant X is (A) 7356 (B) 8456 (C) 8356 (D) 7956
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a reverse-probability question (effect → cause), so use Bayes' theorem with the total probability of a standard-quality car in the denominator.
Step 1 — Define the events.
- X: the car came from plant X — P(X)=0.70
- Y: the car came from plant Y — P(Y)=0.30
- S: the car is of standard quality
The conditional (likelihood) data given:
P(S∣X)=0.80,P(S∣Y)=0.90
Note X and Y are mutually exclusive and exhaustive (0.7+0.3=1), which is exactly what Bayes' theorem needs.
Step 2 — Why Bayes and not simple conditioning.
We are told the effect (the chosen car is standard) and asked for the probability of the cause (it came from X). That inversion — P(X∣S) from P(S∣X) — is precisely Bayes' theorem:
P(X∣S)=P(X)P(S∣X)+P(Y)P(S∣Y)P(X)P(S∣X)
Step 3 — Compute the numerator.
P(X)P(S∣X)=0.70×0.80=0.56
Step 4 — Compute the denominator (total probability of a standard car).
P(S)=0.70×0.80+0.30×0.90=0.56+0.27=0.83
Step 5 — Divide. …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.The probability of solving a problem by three persons A, B and C independently is 21, 41 and 31 respectively. Then the probability of the problem is solved by any two of them is (A) 121 (B) 41 (C) 241 (D) 81
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for the probability that exactly two of the three persons solve it. We compute the sum of probabilities for each pair solving while the third fails, giving 81.
The key idea: "solved by any two of them" means exactly two solve it, not at least two. The third person must fail. Since A, B, and C work independently, we multiply their individual probabilities for each specific outcome and then add the three possible cases.
A common mistake is to include the case where all three solve it. That would be "at least two", not "any two". The phrase "any two" in probability problems almost always means exactly two.
Let’s denote:
- P(A)=21, so P(A fails)=1−21=21
- P(B)=41, so P(B fails)=1−41=43
- P(C)=31, so P(C fails)=1−31=32
We want exactly two successes. There are three mutually exclusive ways this happens:
-
A and B solve, C fails
Probability = P(A)×P(B)×P(C fails)
=21×41×32=242=121
-
A and C solve, B fails
Probability = P(A)×P(C)×P(B fails)
=21×31×43=243=81
-
B and C solve, A fails
Probability = P(B)×P(C)×P(A fails) …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.