Q.A manufacturer has three machine operators A, B and C. The first operator A produces 1% defective items, where as the other two operators B and C produce 5% and 7% defective items respectively. A is on the job for 50% of the time, B is on the job for 30% of the time and C is on the job for 20% of the time. A defective item is produced, what is the probability that it was produced by A?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability (Bayes' Theorem)
We want P(A∣D), the probability that operator A produced the item given it is defective.
Step 1 – Prior probabilities
P(A)=0.50, P(B)=0.30, P(C)=0.20.
Step 2 – Likelihoods (defect rates)
P(D∣A)=0.01, P(D∣B)=0.05, P(D∣C)=0.07.
Step 3 – Total probability of a defect
P(D)=P(A)P(D∣A)+P(B)P(D∣B)+P(C)P(D∣C) …
By Bayes' theorem, P(A∣defective)=345≈0.147.
Let A,B,C be the events that an item was made by operator A, B, C, and D that it is defective.
P(A)=0.5, P(B)=0.3, P(C)=0.2,P(D∣A)=0.01, P(D∣B)=0.05, P(D∣C)=0.07.
Total probability of a defective item:
P(D)=(0.5)(0.01)+(0.3)(0.05)+(0.2)(0.07)=0.005+0.015+0.014=0.034.
Bayes' theorem: …
Method: Bayes' theorem with a several-part partition
Use this for "which source produced it?" problems: an item comes from one of several sources with known proportions, each source has a known defect (or success) rate, and you must find the probability a defective item came from a specific source.
Steps
Step 1: Set up the partition and its prior probabilities.
The sources (operators, machines, bags) must be mutually exclusive and exhaustive. Their proportions of the workload are the priors P(A),P(B),P(C),… and should sum to 1.
Step 2: Write each conditional likelihood.
For every source, note P(D∣source) — here the defect rate for that source. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Forgetting to weight each defect rate by the operator's share of time.
Why it's wrong: operator A runs the machine 50% of the time, so their contribution to defects is 0.50×0.01, not just 0.01. Correct approach: multiply each defect rate by its prior before comparing or summing.
Mistake 2: Dividing by only A's contribution instead of the total defect probability. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.A car manufacturing factory has two plants X and Y. Plant X manufactures 70% of cars and plant Y manufactures 30% of cars. 80% of cars at plant X and 90% of cars at plant Y are rated as standard quality. A car is chosen at random and is found to be of standard quality. The probability that it has come from plant X is (A) 7356 (B) 8456 (C) 8356 (D) 7956
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a reverse-probability question (effect → cause), so use Bayes' theorem with the total probability of a standard-quality car in the denominator.
Step 1 — Define the events.
- X: the car came from plant X — P(X)=0.70
- Y: the car came from plant Y — P(Y)=0.30
- S: the car is of standard quality
The conditional (likelihood) data given:
P(S∣X)=0.80,P(S∣Y)=0.90
Note X and Y are mutually exclusive and exhaustive (0.7+0.3=1), which is exactly what Bayes' theorem needs.
Step 2 — Why Bayes and not simple conditioning.
We are told the effect (the chosen car is standard) and asked for the probability of the cause (it came from X). That inversion — P(X∣S) from P(S∣X) — is precisely Bayes' theorem:
P(X∣S)=P(X)P(S∣X)+P(Y)P(S∣Y)P(X)P(S∣X)
Step 3 — Compute the numerator.
P(X)P(S∣X)=0.70×0.80=0.56
Step 4 — Compute the denominator (total probability of a standard car).
P(S)=0.70×0.80+0.30×0.90=0.56+0.27=0.83
Step 5 — Divide. …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Advika chooses one of three scarves every morning: Red, Blue, or Green. The probability she chooses Red is 20%. The probability she chooses Blue is twice the probability of choosing Red. On the remaining days she wears a Green scarf. Once a scarf is chosen, she decides whether to wear a Hat (H) and Sunglasses (S). These choices are independent of each other but depend on the scarf colour: Scarf colour Red Blue Green P(H)0.50.40.1P(S)0.80.50.5 Advika is spotted outdoors wearing both a Hat and Sunglasses. What is the probability that she is wearing the Red scarf? (A) 31313 (B) 218 (C) 94 (D) 138
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem on scarf colour given that both a hat and sunglasses are worn. Priors P(R)=0.2, P(B)=0.4, P(G)=0.4; likelihoods P(H∩S∣colour)=P(H)P(S). The posterior P(R∣H∩S)=94 — option (C).
Concept. Hat and sunglasses are independent given the scarf, so P(H∩S∣colour)=P(H∣colour)⋅P(S∣colour). Bayes' theorem then reverses the conditioning to give the probability of the scarf colour from the observed accessories.
Step 1 — Priors.
P(R)=20%=0.2,P(B)=2P(R)=0.4,P(G)=1−0.2−0.4=0.4.
Step 2 — Likelihood of wearing both accessories for each colour.
P(H∩S∣R)=0.5×0.8=0.40,
P(H∩S∣B)=0.4×0.5=0.20,
P(H∩S∣G)=0.1×0.5=0.05. …
- KCET 2025Set A-11 markMCQQ.Meera visits only one of the two temples A and B in her locality. Probability that she visits temple A is 52. If she visits temple A, 31 is the probability that she meets her friend, whereas it is 72 if she visits temple B. Meera met her friend at one of the two temples. The probability that she met her at temple B is (A) 167 (B) 165 (C) 163 (D) 169
›Reveal solutionSolution
The friend has already been met (the effect); we want the probability of the cause (temple B) — that reversal of conditioning is exactly Bayes' theorem.
Step 1 — Name the events.
Let A = "Meera visits temple A", B = "Meera visits temple B", F = "she meets her friend".
She visits only one of the two temples, so A and B are mutually exclusive and exhaustive:
P(A)=52⟹P(B)=1−52=53.
Given: P(F∣A)=31, P(F∣B)=72.
Step 2 — Why Bayes.
We are told the outcome (F happened) and asked for the probability of a cause (B). Bayes' theorem inverts the conditioning:
P(B∣F)=P(A)P(F∣A)+P(B)P(F∣B)P(B)P(F∣B).
The denominator is P(F) by the law of total probability — the friend can be met on either branch.
Step 3 — Compute the two branch probabilities.
P(A∩F)=52×31=152,P(B∩F)=53×72=356.
Step 4 — Total probability of meeting the friend. …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.The probability of solving a problem by three persons A, B and C independently is 21, 41 and 31 respectively. Then the probability of the problem is solved by any two of them is (A) 121 (B) 41 (C) 241 (D) 81
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for the probability that exactly two of the three persons solve it. We compute the sum of probabilities for each pair solving while the third fails, giving 81.
The key idea: "solved by any two of them" means exactly two solve it, not at least two. The third person must fail. Since A, B, and C work independently, we multiply their individual probabilities for each specific outcome and then add the three possible cases.
A common mistake is to include the case where all three solve it. That would be "at least two", not "any two". The phrase "any two" in probability problems almost always means exactly two.
Let’s denote:
- P(A)=21, so P(A fails)=1−21=21
- P(B)=41, so P(B fails)=1−41=43
- P(C)=31, so P(C fails)=1−31=32
We want exactly two successes. There are three mutually exclusive ways this happens:
-
A and B solve, C fails
Probability = P(A)×P(B)×P(C fails)
=21×41×32=242=121
-
A and C solve, B fails
Probability = P(A)×P(C)×P(B fails)
=21×31×43=243=81
-
B and C solve, A fails
Probability = P(B)×P(C)×P(A fails) …
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.At a certain university 4% of male students are over 6 feet tall and 1% of female students are over 6 feet tall. The total student population is divided in the ratio 3 : 2, in favor of female students. If a student is selected at random from amongst all those over 6 feet tall, what is the probability that the student is a female? (A) 1/3 (B) 2/5 (C) 3/11 (D) 3/5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem gives P(female∣>6ft)=0.0220.006=113.
Population split 3:2 in favour of females ⇒ P(F)=53=0.6, P(M)=52=0.4.
Tall fractions: P(T∣F)=0.01, P(T∣M)=0.04.
By Bayes' theorem: …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.In an entrance test, there are multiple choice questions. There are four possible answers to each question of which only one is correct. The probability that a student knows the answer to a question is 90%. If he gets the correct answer to a question, then the probability that he was guessing is (A) 3736 (B) 91 (C) 371 (D) 4037
›Reveal solutionSolution
We use Bayes’ theorem to reverse the conditional probability: given that the student answered correctly, we want the probability that he was guessing. The answer is 371, so the correct option is (C).
Concept and intuition
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem. We have two ways a student can get a correct answer: either he knows the answer (and thus answers correctly for sure), or he guesses (and has a 1 in 4 chance of being correct). We are told the prior probability that he knows the answer is 90%. The question asks: given that he got it right, what’s the chance he was actually guessing? Bayes’ theorem lets us “flip” the conditional probability, using the known likelihoods.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Define events clearly Let K = “student knows the answer”, and G = “student guesses” (so G is the complement of K). Let C = “student gives the correct answer”. We are given:
P(K)=0.9,P(G)=0.1.
-
Conditional probabilities for answering correctly
- If the student knows the answer, he is certain to be correct: P(C∣K)=1.
- If he guesses, he picks randomly among 4 options, so P(C∣G)=41.
-
Find the total probability of a correct answer
By the law of total probability:
P(C)=P(C∣K)P(K)+P(C∣G)P(G)=(1)(0.9)+(41)(0.1)=0.9+0.025=0.925.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem We want P(G∣C), the probability that he was guessing given that he answered correctly:
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.Events E1 and E2 form a partition of the sample space S. A is any event such that P(E1)=P(E2)=21, P(E2/A)=21 and P(A/E2)=32, then P(E1/A) is (A) 21 (B) 32 (C) 1 (D) 41
›Reveal solutionSolution
A partition's posterior probabilities must add to 1, so P(E1∣A)=1−P(E2∣A)=1−21=21.
Step 1 — What "partition of the sample space" means.
E1 and E2 form a partition of S if they are mutually exclusive (E1∩E2=∅) and exhaustive (E1∪E2=S), with non-zero probabilities. So exactly one of them must occur.
Step 2 — Conditioning preserves the partition.
Conditioning on an event A (with P(A)>0) just renormalises probabilities inside A; it does not destroy the partition. Formally,
A=(A∩E1)∪(A∩E2),(A∩E1)∩(A∩E2)=∅
Dividing by P(A):
P(A)P(A∩E1)+P(A)P(A∩E2)=P(A)P(A)=1
which is precisely
P(E1∣A)+P(E2∣A)=1
The posterior probabilities of a partition must still sum to 1 — a fact worth remembering, since it turns many Bayes questions into a one-line subtraction.
Step 3 — Substitute the given value.
P(E1∣A)=1−P(E2∣A)=1−21=21 …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Three bags contain a number of red and white balls are as follows. Bag I: 3 red balls Bag II: 2 red balls and 1 white ball Bag III: 3 White balls The probability that bag i will be chosen and a ball is selected from it is 6i,i=1,2,3. If a white ball is selected, what is the probablity that it came from Bag III (A) 119 (B) 112 (C) 0 (D) 111
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem: we are given prior probabilities for choosing each bag and the conditional probabilities of drawing a white ball from each bag; after observing a white ball, we want the posterior probability that it came from Bag III. The answer is 119.
We start by noting that the problem gives us three bags with different compositions, and a rule for choosing a bag: the probability of picking bag i is 6i. Then, from that bag, we pick a ball uniformly at random. We are told that a white ball was selected, and we need the probability that it came from Bag III. This is a textbook case for Bayes’ theorem, which lets us “reverse” conditional probabilities: we know P(white∣bag i), and we want P(bag i∣white).
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Define events and write down given probabilities. Let Bi be the event that bag i is chosen (i=1,2,3). We are told:
P(B1)=61,P(B2)=62,P(B3)=63.
Let W be the event that a white ball is drawn.
From the bag compositions:
- Bag I: 3 red, 0 white → P(W∣B1)=0.
- Bag II: 2 red, 1 white → P(W∣B2)=31.
- Bag III: 0 red, 3 white → P(W∣B3)=1.
- Compute the total probability of drawing a white ball. By the law of total probability:
P(W)=P(B1)P(W∣B1)+P(B2)P(W∣B2)+P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Substitute:
P(W)=61⋅0+62⋅31+63⋅1=0+182+63=91+21.
Get a common denominator (18):
P(W)=182+189=1811.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem to find P(B3∣W). Bayes’ theorem says:
P(B3∣W)=P(W)P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Plug in the numbers:
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.If for two events A and B,P(A−B)=51 and P(A)=53 then P(B/A)= (A) 32 (B) 21 (C) 53 (D) 52
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to interpret P(A−B) as P(A∩Bc) and use the definition of conditional probability. The result is P(B/A)=32, so option (A) is correct.
We are asked for P(B/A), the probability of B given A. The definition is
P(B/A)=P(A)P(A∩B).
We know P(A)=53, so we need P(A∩B). The given P(A−B)=51 is the key: A−B means “A and not B,” i.e., A∩Bc.
- Relate P(A−B) to P(A∩B) Since A is the union of the disjoint parts “A and B” and “A and not B,” we have
P(A)=P(A∩B)+P(A∩Bc).
Here P(A∩Bc)=P(A−B)=51 and P(A)=53.
- Solve for P(A∩B)
53=P(A∩B)+51⇒P(A∩B)=53−51=52.
- Apply the conditional probability formula P(B/A)=P(A)P(A∩B)=3/52/5=32. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Bag A contains 3 white and 2 red balls. Bag B contains only 1 white ball. A fair coin is tossed. If head appears then 1 ball is drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. However if tail appears then 2 balls are drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. Now one ball is drawn at random from bag B. Given that the drawn ball from B is white, the probability that head appeared on the coin is (A) 3023 (B) 2312 (C) 2311 (D) 3019
›Reveal solutionSolution
Computing P(white drawn∣H)=54 and P(white∣T)=1511, Bayes' theorem gives P(H∣white)=2312.
Head (transfer 1 ball from A(3W,2R) to B(1W), then draw from B's 2 balls):
P(white)=53(1)+52(21)=53+51=54.
Tail (transfer 2 balls from A to B(1W), then draw from B's 3 balls):
P(WW)=103⇒P(white)=1,P(WR)=106⇒32,P(RR)=101⇒31. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.If A and B are two events such that P(Aˉ)=0.3,P(B)=0.4,P(A∩Bˉ)=0.5, then find the value of P(B/A∪Bˉ) (A) 0.33 (B) 0.7 (C) 0.8 (D) 0.25
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for a conditional probability P(B∣A∪Bˉ). Using the definition of conditional probability and the given probabilities, we compute P(B∩(A∪Bˉ)) and P(A∪Bˉ), then divide. The final value is 0.25, so the correct option is (D).
We are given:
- P(Aˉ)=0.3, so P(A)=1−0.3=0.7.
- P(B)=0.4.
- P(A∩Bˉ)=0.5.
We need P(B∣A∪Bˉ), which is the probability that B occurs given that A or Bˉ (or both) occurs.
Concept and intuition:
Conditional probability P(X∣Y)=P(Y)P(X∩Y). Here X=B and Y=A∪Bˉ. So we need the probability that both B and (A∪Bˉ) happen, divided by the probability that A∪Bˉ happens. The key is to simplify the intersection B∩(A∪Bˉ) using set algebra — it often collapses to something simpler.
-
Simplify the numerator P(B∩(A∪Bˉ))
Using the distributive law:
B∩(A∪Bˉ)=(B∩A)∪(B∩Bˉ)
But B∩Bˉ=∅, so this is just B∩A.
Hence P(B∩(A∪Bˉ))=P(A∩B).
-
Find P(A∩B)
We know P(A)=0.7 and P(A∩Bˉ)=0.5.
Since A=(A∩B)∪(A∩Bˉ) and these are disjoint,
P(A)=P(A∩B)+P(A∩Bˉ)
⇒0.7=P(A∩B)+0.5
⇒P(A∩B)=0.2.
-
Find the denominator P(A∪Bˉ)
Use the inclusion-exclusion principle: …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.If A and B are two events such that P(A)=31, P(B)=21 and P(A∩B)=61, then P(A′/B) is (A) 32 (B) 31 (C) 21 (D) 121
›Reveal solutionSolution
Use P(A′∣B)=1−P(A∣B) (equivalently P(B)P(B)−P(A∩B)), which gives 32.
Step 1 — The definition of conditional probability.
For P(B)>0,
P(A′∣B)=P(B)P(A′∩B)
Conditioning on B means we restrict the sample space to B and ask what fraction of B lies outside A.
Step 2 — Split B into the part inside A and the part outside A.
The events A∩B and A′∩B are disjoint and their union is exactly B:
P(B)=P(A∩B)+P(A′∩B)
⇒P(A′∩B)=P(B)−P(A∩B)=21−61=63−1=62=31
Step 3 — Divide by P(B).
P(A′∣B)=P(B)P(A′∩B)=2131=31×12=32
Step 4 — Cross-check with the complement rule. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.