Q.There are three coins. One is a two headed coin (having head on both faces), another is a biased coin that comes up heads 75% of the time and third is an unbiased coin. One of the three coins is chosen at random and tossed, it shows heads, what is the probability that it was the two headed coin ?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
The key idea is Conditional Probability — we update the probability of each coin being chosen given that the toss resulted in heads.
Step 1: Define events and prior probabilities.
Let C1 = two-headed coin, C2 = biased coin (heads 75%), C3 = unbiased coin.
Each coin is equally likely to be chosen:
P(C1)=P(C2)=P(C3)=31.
Step 2: Likelihood of heads given each coin.
P(H∣C1)=1,P(H∣C2)=0.75=43,P(H∣C3)=0.5=21.
Step 3: Apply Bayes' Theorem.
Total probability of heads: …
This is a classic Bayes' theorem problem. We update the prior probability (1/3 for each coin) using the likelihood of observing heads under each coin. The final probability that the coin was the two-headed one, given that heads appeared, is 94.
Why Bayes' theorem works here
We are given three coins with different head-probabilities:
- Coin A (two-headed): P(H)=1
- Coin B (biased): P(H)=0.75=43
- Coin C (unbiased): P(H)=21
One coin is chosen at random, so each has prior probability 31. Then we toss it and see heads. The question is: given that outcome, what is the chance it was Coin A?
This is a textbook case of inverse probability — we know the effect (heads) and want the cause (which coin). Bayes' theorem reverses the conditional probability:
P(Coin A∣H)=P(H)P(H∣Coin A)⋅P(Coin A)
The denominator P(H) is the total probability of heads, found by summing over all three coins (law of total probability).
Step-by-step solution
1. Write down the prior probabilities.
Each coin is equally likely to be chosen:
P(A)=P(B)=P(C)=31
2. Write down the likelihoods — probability of heads given each coin.
- For the two-headed coin: P(H∣A)=1
- For the biased coin (75% heads): P(H∣B)=43
- For the unbiased coin: P(H∣C)=21
3. Compute the total probability of heads, P(H).
Using the law of total probability:
P(H)=P(H∣A)P(A)+P(H∣B)P(B)+P(H∣C)P(C)
Substitute:
P(H)=(1)(31)+(43)(31)+(21)(31)
Factor 31:
P(H)=31(1+43+21)
Add the fractions inside: 1=44, 43, 21=42. Sum = 44+3+2=49.
Thus: …
Method: Bayes' Theorem with several equally likely causes
Use this when one of three (or more) objects is chosen at random and you observe an outcome, then must judge which object it was.
Steps
Step 1: List every candidate and its prior.
With n objects picked at random, each hypothesis Hi has prior P(Hi)=n1.
Step 2: Write each object's likelihood of the observed outcome.
P(E∣Hi) is the chance of the outcome (heads) for that particular object — 1 for a two-headed coin, its bias for a biased coin, 21 for a fair coin.
Step 3: Total probability of the outcome. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Using P(heads∣two-headed)=21.
Why it's wrong: a coin with heads on both faces always shows heads, so this likelihood is 1. Correct approach: set P(H∣C1)=1, P(H∣C2)=43, P(H∣C3)=21.
Mistake 2: Forgetting to divide by P(H).
Why it's wrong: the likelihoods alone are not posteriors; they must be normalised by the total chance of heads. Correct approach: P(H)=31(1+43+21)=43, then divide. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.A coin is tossed until a head appears or until the coin has been tossed three times. Given that 'head' does not appear on the first toss, what is the probability that the coin is tossed thrice? (A) 21 (B) 83 (C) 81 (D) 41
›Reveal solutionSolution
Given the first toss is a tail, the coin is tossed a third time only if the second toss is also a tail — probability 21.
The coin stops the moment a head appears, or after three tosses. We are told the first toss is a tail (no head on toss 1).
Now the second toss decides:
- Head on toss 2 ⇒ stop after 2 tosses.
- Tail on toss 2 ⇒ a third toss is made. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.A bag contains (n+1) coins. It is known that one of these coins has a head on both sides, whereas the other coins are fair. One of these coins is selected at random and tossed. If the probability that the toss results in heads is 127, then the value of n is : (A) 5 (B) 3 (C) 2 (D) 4
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to treat the coin selection as a two‑case partition (two‑headed coin vs. fair coins) and apply the law of total probability. Solving the resulting equation gives n=5, so the correct option is (A).
Concept and intuition
We have a mixed bag: one trick coin that always lands heads, and n fair coins that land heads with probability 21. When we pick a coin at random and toss it, the overall chance of heads is a weighted average of the two cases. The weight for the trick coin is n+11 (since there are n+1 coins total), and for any fair coin it’s n+1n. The problem gives that overall probability as 127, so we set up an equation and solve for n.
Step‑by‑step solution
- Define the events Let T be the event that the two‑headed coin is selected, and F the event that a fair coin is selected. Since selection is random,
P(T)=n+11,P(F)=n+1n.
- Conditional probabilities for heads If the trick coin is chosen, heads is certain:
P(heads∣T)=1.
If a fair coin is chosen, the chance of heads is 21:
P(heads∣F)=21.
- Apply the law of total probability The overall probability of heads is
P(heads)=P(T)⋅P(heads∣T)+P(F)⋅P(heads∣F).
Substituting the values:
P(heads)=n+11⋅1+n+1n⋅21.
- Simplify the expression
P(heads)=n+11+2(n+1)n=2(n+1)2+n.
- Set equal to the given probability The problem states this equals 127:
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Samhita faces a three-headed dragon. She wins a "Tactical medal" if she manages to defeat exactly one of the three heads. The battle proceeds head-by-head under the following conditions: The probability of defeating the first head is 31. After a win: if she defeats a head, the probability of defeating the next head is 32. After a loss: if she fails to defeat a head, the probability of defeating the next head is 41. What is the probability that Samhita earns the "Tactical medal"? (A) 7223 (B) 365 (C) 7217 (D) 7219
›Reveal solutionSolution
Summing the three disjoint "exactly one win" paths gives 121+181+81=7219 — option (D).
Set up the conditional probabilities. Let Wi mean "defeats head i" and Li mean "fails":
- P(W1)=31, so P(L1)=32.
- After a win: next-head win probability =32, so next-head loss probability =31.
- After a loss: next-head win probability =41, so next-head loss probability =43.
Earning the medal means exactly one of the three heads is defeated. The three disjoint sequences are W1L2L3, L1W2L3, and L1L2W3.
Path 1 — W1L2L3 (win, then loss after a win, then loss after a loss):
P=31⋅31⋅43=363=121
Path 2 — L1W2L3 (loss, then win after a loss, then loss after a win): …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Bag A contains 3 white and 2 red balls. Bag B contains only 1 white ball. A fair coin is tossed. If head appears then 1 ball is drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. However if tail appears then 2 balls are drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. Now one ball is drawn at random from bag B. Given that the drawn ball from B is white, the probability that head appeared on the coin is (A) 3023 (B) 2312 (C) 2311 (D) 3019
›Reveal solutionSolution
Computing P(white drawn∣H)=54 and P(white∣T)=1511, Bayes' theorem gives P(H∣white)=2312.
Head (transfer 1 ball from A(3W,2R) to B(1W), then draw from B's 2 balls):
P(white)=53(1)+52(21)=53+51=54.
Tail (transfer 2 balls from A to B(1W), then draw from B's 3 balls):
P(WW)=103⇒P(white)=1,P(WR)=106⇒32,P(RR)=101⇒31. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Suppose we have three cards identical in form except that both sides of the first card are coloured red, both sides of the second are coloured black, and one side of the third card is coloured red and the other side is coloured black. The three cards are mixed and a card is picked randomly. If the upper side of the chosen card is coloured red, what is the probability that the other side is coloured black. (A) 61 (B) 21 (C) 0 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic conditional probability problem (often called the "three cards" or "Bertrand's box" variant). The key is that seeing a red side updates the probability space to only the red sides, and among those, only one belongs to the mixed card. The answer is 1/3.
We are asked: given that the visible side is red, what is the probability that the other side is black? This is not simply "one of the two remaining cards has a black other side" because the cards are not equally likely once we condition on the observation.
Concept and Intuition
The pitfall is to think: "We see red, so the card is either the all-red or the mixed card. That's two possibilities, so the chance is 1/2." But this ignores that the all-red card has two red sides, while the mixed card has only one red side. When we pick a card at random and then look at a random side, each of the six sides is equally likely to be the one we see. Seeing red eliminates the three black sides, leaving only the three red sides. Among those three red sides, two belong to the all-red card and only one belongs to the mixed card. So the probability that the other side is black is 1/3.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Label the sides.
Let the cards be:
- Card A: both sides red (sides R1,R2)
- Card B: both sides black (sides B1,B2)
- Card C: one red, one black (sides R3,B3)
-
Count equally likely outcomes.
When we pick a card uniformly at random and then look at a random side, there are 3×2=6 equally likely side-views. Each of the six sides has probability 1/6 of being the one we see.
-
Condition on seeing a red side.
The red sides are: R1,R2 (from card A) and R3 (from card C). That's 3 red sides. So the conditional space has 3 equally likely possibilities. …
-
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.Vishnu has two jars of marbles, Jar A and Jar B. Jar A contains 3 yellow marbles and 2 green marbles. Jar B contains 4 yellow marbles and 3 green marbles. Vishnu flips a fair coin. If it lands heads, he picks two marbles at random without replacement from Jar A. If it lands tails, he picks two marbles at random with replacement from Jar B. Given that Vishnu picked one yellow and one green marble, what is the probability that they came from Jar B? (A) 4121 (B) 8949 (C) 8940 (D) 4120
›Reveal solutionSolution
P(E∣A)=53 (without replacement), P(E∣B)=4924 (with replacement); Bayes gives P(B∣E)=8940 — option (C).
Likelihoods of drawing one yellow and one green (E).
Jar A (3 yellow, 2 green; two draws without replacement):
P(E∣A)=(25)(13)(12)=106=53.
Jar B (4 yellow, 3 green; two draws with replacement):
P(E∣B)=2⋅74⋅73=4924.
Bayes' theorem with P(A)=P(B)=21 (the 21 cancels): …
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.A man speaks truth 2 out of 3 times. He picks one of the natural numbers in the set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} and reports that it is even. The probability that it is actually even is (A) 52 (B) 51 (C) 101 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Bayes' theorem the probability is 53 — option (D).
The set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} has 3 even numbers (2,4,6) and 4 odd numbers, and one number is picked at random.
Let E = "the number is even" and R = "the man reports it as even."
Priors.
P(E)=73,P(Ec)=74.
Likelihoods. He tells the truth with probability 32 and lies with probability 31.
- If the number really is even, a truthful report says "even": P(R∣E)=32.
- If the number is odd, only a lie reports "even": P(R∣Ec)=31.
Bayes' theorem. …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.The probability of solving a problem by three persons A, B and C independently is 21, 41 and 31 respectively. Then the probability of the problem is solved by any two of them is (A) 121 (B) 41 (C) 241 (D) 81
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for the probability that exactly two of the three persons solve it. We compute the sum of probabilities for each pair solving while the third fails, giving 81.
The key idea: "solved by any two of them" means exactly two solve it, not at least two. The third person must fail. Since A, B, and C work independently, we multiply their individual probabilities for each specific outcome and then add the three possible cases.
A common mistake is to include the case where all three solve it. That would be "at least two", not "any two". The phrase "any two" in probability problems almost always means exactly two.
Let’s denote:
- P(A)=21, so P(A fails)=1−21=21
- P(B)=41, so P(B fails)=1−41=43
- P(C)=31, so P(C fails)=1−31=32
We want exactly two successes. There are three mutually exclusive ways this happens:
-
A and B solve, C fails
Probability = P(A)×P(B)×P(C fails)
=21×41×32=242=121
-
A and C solve, B fails
Probability = P(A)×P(C)×P(B fails)
=21×31×43=243=81
-
B and C solve, A fails
Probability = P(B)×P(C)×P(A fails) …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.Two dice are thrown. If it is known that the sum of numbers on the dice was less than 6 the probability of getting a sum as 3 is (A) 181 (B) 185 (C) 51 (D) 52
›Reveal solutionSolution
We use conditional probability: reduce the sample space to only those outcomes where the sum is less than 6, then find the fraction of those that give a sum of exactly 3. The answer is 51.
The key idea here is conditional probability — the probability of one event given that another event has already occurred. When we say "if it is known that the sum was less than 6", we are no longer considering all 36 possible outcomes of throwing two dice. Instead, we restrict ourselves to only those outcomes that satisfy the condition, and then ask: within this smaller set, what fraction gives a sum of 3?
Let’s work it out step by step.
-
List all possible outcomes when two dice are thrown.
Each die shows a number from 1 to 6. The total number of ordered pairs (a,b) is 6×6=36.
-
Identify the condition: sum less than 6.
The possible sums are 2, 3, 4, and 5 (since sum = 1 is impossible with two dice). Let’s list all ordered pairs that give each sum:
- Sum = 2: (1,1) → 1 outcome
- Sum = 3: (1,2),(2,1) → 2 outcomes
- Sum = 4: (1,3),(2,2),(3,1) → 3 outcomes
- Sum = 5: (1,4),(2,3),(3,2),(4,1) → 4 outcomes
Total outcomes with sum < 6: 1+2+3+4=10.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that (1,2) and (2,1) are different outcomes. Dice are distinct, so order matters. Always count ordered pairs unless the problem explicitly says "identical dice" (which is rare in such problems).
-
Identify the event of interest: sum = 3. …
-
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.Events E1 and E2 form a partition of the sample space S. A is any event such that P(E1)=P(E2)=21, P(E2/A)=21 and P(A/E2)=32, then P(E1/A) is (A) 21 (B) 32 (C) 1 (D) 41
›Reveal solutionSolution
A partition's posterior probabilities must add to 1, so P(E1∣A)=1−P(E2∣A)=1−21=21.
Step 1 — What "partition of the sample space" means.
E1 and E2 form a partition of S if they are mutually exclusive (E1∩E2=∅) and exhaustive (E1∪E2=S), with non-zero probabilities. So exactly one of them must occur.
Step 2 — Conditioning preserves the partition.
Conditioning on an event A (with P(A)>0) just renormalises probabilities inside A; it does not destroy the partition. Formally,
A=(A∩E1)∪(A∩E2),(A∩E1)∩(A∩E2)=∅
Dividing by P(A):
P(A)P(A∩E1)+P(A)P(A∩E2)=P(A)P(A)=1
which is precisely
P(E1∣A)+P(E2∣A)=1
The posterior probabilities of a partition must still sum to 1 — a fact worth remembering, since it turns many Bayes questions into a one-line subtraction.
Step 3 — Substitute the given value.
P(E1∣A)=1−P(E2∣A)=1−21=21 …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Three bags contain a number of red and white balls are as follows. Bag I: 3 red balls Bag II: 2 red balls and 1 white ball Bag III: 3 White balls The probability that bag i will be chosen and a ball is selected from it is 6i,i=1,2,3. If a white ball is selected, what is the probablity that it came from Bag III (A) 119 (B) 112 (C) 0 (D) 111
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem: we are given prior probabilities for choosing each bag and the conditional probabilities of drawing a white ball from each bag; after observing a white ball, we want the posterior probability that it came from Bag III. The answer is 119.
We start by noting that the problem gives us three bags with different compositions, and a rule for choosing a bag: the probability of picking bag i is 6i. Then, from that bag, we pick a ball uniformly at random. We are told that a white ball was selected, and we need the probability that it came from Bag III. This is a textbook case for Bayes’ theorem, which lets us “reverse” conditional probabilities: we know P(white∣bag i), and we want P(bag i∣white).
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Define events and write down given probabilities. Let Bi be the event that bag i is chosen (i=1,2,3). We are told:
P(B1)=61,P(B2)=62,P(B3)=63.
Let W be the event that a white ball is drawn.
From the bag compositions:
- Bag I: 3 red, 0 white → P(W∣B1)=0.
- Bag II: 2 red, 1 white → P(W∣B2)=31.
- Bag III: 0 red, 3 white → P(W∣B3)=1.
- Compute the total probability of drawing a white ball. By the law of total probability:
P(W)=P(B1)P(W∣B1)+P(B2)P(W∣B2)+P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Substitute:
P(W)=61⋅0+62⋅31+63⋅1=0+182+63=91+21.
Get a common denominator (18):
P(W)=182+189=1811.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem to find P(B3∣W). Bayes’ theorem says:
P(B3∣W)=P(W)P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Plug in the numbers:
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.An urn contains 5 red and 5 black coloured balls. A ball is picked at random, its colour noted and then is put back into the urn. Now, additional two balls of the same colour are put into the urn and then a ball is drawn at random. What is the probability that the ball now chosen is red. (A) 7/24 (B) 1/2 (C) 5/8 (D) 2/3
›Reveal solutionSolution
By symmetry the second-draw red probability averages to 21.
Start: 5 red, 5 black (10 total). First ball is drawn, replaced, then 2 more of the same colour are added, so the urn always has 12 balls before the second draw.
- First ball red (P=105=21): urn now 7R, 5B ⇒ P(red)=127. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.