Q.A card from a pack of 52 cards is lost. From the remaining cards of the pack, two cards are drawn and are found to be both diamonds. Find the probability of the lost card being a diamond.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability — we update the probability of the lost card being a diamond given the evidence that two diamonds were drawn from the remaining deck.
Step 1: Define events
Let E = lost card is a diamond.
Let A = two cards drawn (from remaining 51) are both diamonds.
Step 2: Find prior probabilities
P(E)=5213=41,
P(Eˉ)=5239=43.
Step 3: Find likelihoods
If E occurs: 12 diamonds remain in 51 cards.
P(A∣E)=(251)(212)=127566.
If Eˉ occurs: 13 diamonds remain in 51 cards.
P(A∣Eˉ)=(251)(213)=127578.
Step 4: Apply Bayes' theorem …
Use conditional probability: the lost card being a diamond is updated by the evidence that two drawn cards (from the remaining 51) are both diamonds. The answer is 5011.
Why conditional probability?
The problem gives us an outcome (two diamonds drawn from the remaining cards) and asks for the probability of a prior event (the lost card being a diamond) given that outcome. This is a classic Bayes' theorem situation — we need to reverse the conditioning.
Think of it this way: before any cards are drawn, the lost card could be any of the 52. After we see two diamonds drawn from the remaining 51, it becomes more likely that the lost card was not a diamond (because if it were, there would be fewer diamonds left to draw). The maths will quantify exactly how much more likely.
Let’s define:
- E = event that the lost card is a diamond.
- F = event that two cards drawn from the remaining 51 are both diamonds.
We want P(E∣F).
Step-by-step solution
1. Find the prior probability P(E).
Before any draw, the lost card is equally likely to be any of the 52 cards. There are 13 diamonds.
P(E)=5213=41
2. Find P(not E) — the lost card is not a diamond.
P(not E)=1−41=43
3. Compute P(F∣E) — probability of drawing two diamonds given the lost card was a diamond.
If the lost card was a diamond, then the remaining 51 cards contain 13−1=12 diamonds.
Number of ways to draw 2 diamonds from these 12: (212).
Total ways to draw any 2 cards from 51: (251).
P(F∣E)=(251)(212)=51×5012×11=2550132=42522
4. Compute P(F∣not E) — probability of two diamonds given the lost card was NOT a diamond.
If the lost card was not a diamond, all 13 diamonds remain in the 51 cards.
P(F∣not E)=(251)(213)=51×5013×12=2550156=42526 …
Method: Bayes' theorem when the "cause" is an earlier unseen event
Use this for problems where something happened first but is unknown (a lost card, an unseen transfer), later evidence is observed, and you must update the probability of the hidden first event.
Steps
Step 1: Make the hidden event the partition.
Let the unknown first event and its complement be the two (or more) mutually exclusive causes, and write their priors — e.g. lost card is a diamond (5213) or is not (5239).
Step 2: Compute the likelihood of the evidence under each cause, using counting.
Under each hypothesis the remaining pool changes, so the probability of the observed draw changes. Use combinations for "both drawn are diamonds": …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Ignoring the case where the lost card is NOT a diamond.
Why it's wrong: the evidence (two diamonds drawn) is more likely when all 13 diamonds remain, so that branch must appear in the denominator. Correct approach: include both P(A∣E) and P(A∣E′) in Bayes' total-probability denominator.
Mistake 2: Using 5213 directly as the answer.
Why it's wrong: that is only the prior; the observed diamonds lower it. Correct approach: update via Bayes to get 5011, which is less than the prior 41. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Suppose we have three cards identical in form except that both sides of the first card are coloured red, both sides of the second are coloured black, and one side of the third card is coloured red and the other side is coloured black. The three cards are mixed and a card is picked randomly. If the upper side of the chosen card is coloured red, what is the probability that the other side is coloured black. (A) 61 (B) 21 (C) 0 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic conditional probability problem (often called the "three cards" or "Bertrand's box" variant). The key is that seeing a red side updates the probability space to only the red sides, and among those, only one belongs to the mixed card. The answer is 1/3.
We are asked: given that the visible side is red, what is the probability that the other side is black? This is not simply "one of the two remaining cards has a black other side" because the cards are not equally likely once we condition on the observation.
Concept and Intuition
The pitfall is to think: "We see red, so the card is either the all-red or the mixed card. That's two possibilities, so the chance is 1/2." But this ignores that the all-red card has two red sides, while the mixed card has only one red side. When we pick a card at random and then look at a random side, each of the six sides is equally likely to be the one we see. Seeing red eliminates the three black sides, leaving only the three red sides. Among those three red sides, two belong to the all-red card and only one belongs to the mixed card. So the probability that the other side is black is 1/3.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Label the sides.
Let the cards be:
- Card A: both sides red (sides R1,R2)
- Card B: both sides black (sides B1,B2)
- Card C: one red, one black (sides R3,B3)
-
Count equally likely outcomes.
When we pick a card uniformly at random and then look at a random side, there are 3×2=6 equally likely side-views. Each of the six sides has probability 1/6 of being the one we see.
-
Condition on seeing a red side.
The red sides are: R1,R2 (from card A) and R3 (from card C). That's 3 red sides. So the conditional space has 3 equally likely possibilities. …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.P and Q are considering to apply for a job. The probability that P applies for the job is 41. The probability that P applies for the job given that Q applies for the job is 21, and the probability that Q applies for the job given that P applies for the job is 31. Then the probability that P does not apply for the job given that Q does not apply for the job is (A) 54 (B) 87 (C) 65 (D) 1211
›Reveal solutionSolution
We are given conditional probabilities and need to find P(P∣Q). Using the definitions of conditional probability and the law of total probability, we compute P(Q) and P(Q), then apply Bayes' theorem to get 54, which corresponds to option (A).
Concept and intuition:
This is a classic problem of working backwards from conditional probabilities to find a joint probability table. We know P(P), P(P∣Q), and P(Q∣P). From these, we can find P(P∩Q) in two ways, which lets us solve for P(Q). Then we can compute the desired conditional probability P(P∣Q) using the complement rule and the definition of conditional probability.
Step-by-step solution:
- Write down what is given. Let P = event that P applies, Q = event that Q applies. We have:
P(P)=41,P(P∣Q)=21,P(Q∣P)=31.
- Use the definition of conditional probability to express P(P∩Q) in two ways. From P(P∣Q)=P(Q)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(P∣Q)⋅P(Q)=21P(Q).
From P(Q∣P)=P(P)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(Q∣P)⋅P(P)=31⋅41=121.
- Equate the two expressions for P(P∩Q) to find P(Q).
21P(Q)=121⇒P(Q)=61.
- Find P(Q) and P(P∩Q).
P(Q)=1−P(Q)=1−61=65.
Also, P(P∩Q)=P(P)−P(P∩Q)=41−121=123−121=122=61.
- Find P(P∩Q). Since P∩Q is the complement of P∪Q, we can use:
P(P∩Q)=1−P(P∪Q).
First, P(P∪Q)=P(P)+P(Q)−P(P∩Q)=41+61−121. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.A die is thrown twice and the sum of numbers appearing is observed to be 8 . What is the conditional probability that the number 5 has appeared atleast once? (A) 365 (B) 52 (C) 181 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
Given the sum is 8, the sample space is the 5 ordered pairs summing to 8; two of them include a 5, giving probability 52.
The ordered outcomes with sum 8 are
(2,6),(3,5),(4,4),(5,3),(6,2)(5 outcomes). …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.Two dice are thrown. If it is known that the sum of numbers on the dice was less than 6 the probability of getting a sum as 3 is (A) 181 (B) 185 (C) 51 (D) 52
›Reveal solutionSolution
We use conditional probability: reduce the sample space to only those outcomes where the sum is less than 6, then find the fraction of those that give a sum of exactly 3. The answer is 51.
The key idea here is conditional probability — the probability of one event given that another event has already occurred. When we say "if it is known that the sum was less than 6", we are no longer considering all 36 possible outcomes of throwing two dice. Instead, we restrict ourselves to only those outcomes that satisfy the condition, and then ask: within this smaller set, what fraction gives a sum of 3?
Let’s work it out step by step.
-
List all possible outcomes when two dice are thrown.
Each die shows a number from 1 to 6. The total number of ordered pairs (a,b) is 6×6=36.
-
Identify the condition: sum less than 6.
The possible sums are 2, 3, 4, and 5 (since sum = 1 is impossible with two dice). Let’s list all ordered pairs that give each sum:
- Sum = 2: (1,1) → 1 outcome
- Sum = 3: (1,2),(2,1) → 2 outcomes
- Sum = 4: (1,3),(2,2),(3,1) → 3 outcomes
- Sum = 5: (1,4),(2,3),(3,2),(4,1) → 4 outcomes
Total outcomes with sum < 6: 1+2+3+4=10.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that (1,2) and (2,1) are different outcomes. Dice are distinct, so order matters. Always count ordered pairs unless the problem explicitly says "identical dice" (which is rare in such problems).
-
Identify the event of interest: sum = 3. …
-
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.A pot contains 5 red and 2 green balls. A ball is drawn at random from this pot. If a drawn ball is green, then a red ball is added to the pot. If a drawn ball is red, then a green ball is added to the pot, while the original ball drawn is not replaced in the pot. Now a second ball is drawn at random from the pot, what is the probability that the second ball drawn is a red ball? (A) 4912 (B) 4932 (C) 73 (D) 4927
›Reveal solutionSolution
Condition on the first draw: P(2nd red)=72⋅76+75⋅74=4932.
Start: 5 red, 2 green, total 7. The first ball is not replaced, and a ball of the other colour is added.
Case 1 — first ball is green. P=72.
Remove that green (5R,1G), then add a red ⇒6R,1G (total 7).
P(2nd red∣green first)=76
Case 2 — first ball is red. P=75.
Remove that red (4R,2G), then add a green ⇒4R,3G (total 7). …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.Vishnu has two jars of marbles, Jar A and Jar B. Jar A contains 3 yellow marbles and 2 green marbles. Jar B contains 4 yellow marbles and 3 green marbles. Vishnu flips a fair coin. If it lands heads, he picks two marbles at random without replacement from Jar A. If it lands tails, he picks two marbles at random with replacement from Jar B. Given that Vishnu picked one yellow and one green marble, what is the probability that they came from Jar B? (A) 4121 (B) 8949 (C) 8940 (D) 4120
›Reveal solutionSolution
P(E∣A)=53 (without replacement), P(E∣B)=4924 (with replacement); Bayes gives P(B∣E)=8940 — option (C).
Likelihoods of drawing one yellow and one green (E).
Jar A (3 yellow, 2 green; two draws without replacement):
P(E∣A)=(25)(13)(12)=106=53.
Jar B (4 yellow, 3 green; two draws with replacement):
P(E∣B)=2⋅74⋅73=4924.
Bayes' theorem with P(A)=P(B)=21 (the 21 cancels): …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-M1 markMCQQ.An urn contains 2 white and 2 black balls. A ball is drawn at random. If it is white it is not replaced into the urn. Otherwise it is replaced along with another ball of the same colour. The process is repeated. The probability that the third ball drawn is black is (A) 3017 (B) 6037 (C) 6031 (D) 3023
›Reveal solutionSolution
Conditioning on the first two draws (white -> not replaced; black -> replaced plus one extra black) and using total probability gives P(3rd black)=3023 — option (D).
Rules. Start with 2 white, 2 black (total 4). Drawing white removes it (whites −1, total −1). Drawing black puts it back and adds one more black (blacks +1, total +1).
First two draws and the composition just before the 3rd draw
- WW: 42⋅31=61; urn becomes W0, B2 (total 2) ⇒P(black)=1.
- WB: 42⋅32=31; urn becomes W1, B3 (total 4) ⇒P(black)=43.
- BW: 42⋅52=51; urn becomes W1, B3 (total 4) ⇒P(black)=43.
- BB: 42⋅53=103; urn becomes W2, B4 (total 6) ⇒P(black)=32. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.A bag contains (n+1) coins. It is known that one of these coins has a head on both sides, whereas the other coins are fair. One of these coins is selected at random and tossed. If the probability that the toss results in heads is 127, then the value of n is : (A) 5 (B) 3 (C) 2 (D) 4
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to treat the coin selection as a two‑case partition (two‑headed coin vs. fair coins) and apply the law of total probability. Solving the resulting equation gives n=5, so the correct option is (A).
Concept and intuition
We have a mixed bag: one trick coin that always lands heads, and n fair coins that land heads with probability 21. When we pick a coin at random and toss it, the overall chance of heads is a weighted average of the two cases. The weight for the trick coin is n+11 (since there are n+1 coins total), and for any fair coin it’s n+1n. The problem gives that overall probability as 127, so we set up an equation and solve for n.
Step‑by‑step solution
- Define the events Let T be the event that the two‑headed coin is selected, and F the event that a fair coin is selected. Since selection is random,
P(T)=n+11,P(F)=n+1n.
- Conditional probabilities for heads If the trick coin is chosen, heads is certain:
P(heads∣T)=1.
If a fair coin is chosen, the chance of heads is 21:
P(heads∣F)=21.
- Apply the law of total probability The overall probability of heads is
P(heads)=P(T)⋅P(heads∣T)+P(F)⋅P(heads∣F).
Substituting the values:
P(heads)=n+11⋅1+n+1n⋅21.
- Simplify the expression
P(heads)=n+11+2(n+1)n=2(n+1)2+n.
- Set equal to the given probability The problem states this equals 127:
- KCET 2025Set A-11 markMCQQ.Meera visits only one of the two temples A and B in her locality. Probability that she visits temple A is 52. If she visits temple A, 31 is the probability that she meets her friend, whereas it is 72 if she visits temple B. Meera met her friend at one of the two temples. The probability that she met her at temple B is (A) 167 (B) 165 (C) 163 (D) 169
›Reveal solutionSolution
The friend has already been met (the effect); we want the probability of the cause (temple B) — that reversal of conditioning is exactly Bayes' theorem.
Step 1 — Name the events.
Let A = "Meera visits temple A", B = "Meera visits temple B", F = "she meets her friend".
She visits only one of the two temples, so A and B are mutually exclusive and exhaustive:
P(A)=52⟹P(B)=1−52=53.
Given: P(F∣A)=31, P(F∣B)=72.
Step 2 — Why Bayes.
We are told the outcome (F happened) and asked for the probability of a cause (B). Bayes' theorem inverts the conditioning:
P(B∣F)=P(A)P(F∣A)+P(B)P(F∣B)P(B)P(F∣B).
The denominator is P(F) by the law of total probability — the friend can be met on either branch.
Step 3 — Compute the two branch probabilities.
P(A∩F)=52×31=152,P(B∩F)=53×72=356.
Step 4 — Total probability of meeting the friend. …
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.An urn contains 5 red and 5 black coloured balls. A ball is picked at random, its colour noted and then is put back into the urn. Now, additional two balls of the same colour are put into the urn and then a ball is drawn at random. What is the probability that the ball now chosen is red. (A) 7/24 (B) 1/2 (C) 5/8 (D) 2/3
›Reveal solutionSolution
By symmetry the second-draw red probability averages to 21.
Start: 5 red, 5 black (10 total). First ball is drawn, replaced, then 2 more of the same colour are added, so the urn always has 12 balls before the second draw.
- First ball red (P=105=21): urn now 7R, 5B ⇒ P(red)=127. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Bag A contains 3 white and 2 red balls. Bag B contains only 1 white ball. A fair coin is tossed. If head appears then 1 ball is drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. However if tail appears then 2 balls are drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. Now one ball is drawn at random from bag B. Given that the drawn ball from B is white, the probability that head appeared on the coin is (A) 3023 (B) 2312 (C) 2311 (D) 3019
›Reveal solutionSolution
Computing P(white drawn∣H)=54 and P(white∣T)=1511, Bayes' theorem gives P(H∣white)=2312.
Head (transfer 1 ball from A(3W,2R) to B(1W), then draw from B's 2 balls):
P(white)=53(1)+52(21)=53+51=54.
Tail (transfer 2 balls from A to B(1W), then draw from B's 3 balls):
P(WW)=103⇒P(white)=1,P(WR)=106⇒32,P(RR)=101⇒31. …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.A car manufacturing factory has two plants X and Y. Plant X manufactures 70% of cars and plant Y manufactures 30% of cars. 80% of cars at plant X and 90% of cars at plant Y are rated as standard quality. A car is chosen at random and is found to be of standard quality. The probability that it has come from plant X is (A) 7356 (B) 8456 (C) 8356 (D) 7956
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a reverse-probability question (effect → cause), so use Bayes' theorem with the total probability of a standard-quality car in the denominator.
Step 1 — Define the events.
- X: the car came from plant X — P(X)=0.70
- Y: the car came from plant Y — P(Y)=0.30
- S: the car is of standard quality
The conditional (likelihood) data given:
P(S∣X)=0.80,P(S∣Y)=0.90
Note X and Y are mutually exclusive and exhaustive (0.7+0.3=1), which is exactly what Bayes' theorem needs.
Step 2 — Why Bayes and not simple conditioning.
We are told the effect (the chosen car is standard) and asked for the probability of the cause (it came from X). That inversion — P(X∣S) from P(S∣X) — is precisely Bayes' theorem:
P(X∣S)=P(X)P(S∣X)+P(Y)P(S∣Y)P(X)P(S∣X)
Step 3 — Compute the numerator.
P(X)P(S∣X)=0.70×0.80=0.56
Step 4 — Compute the denominator (total probability of a standard car).
P(S)=0.70×0.80+0.30×0.90=0.56+0.27=0.83
Step 5 — Divide. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.