Q.A laboratory blood test is 99% effective in detecting a certain disease when it is in fact present. However, the test also yields a false positive result for 0.5% of the healthy person tested (i.e. if a healthy person is tested, then, with probability 0.005, the test will imply he has the disease). If 0.1% of the population actually has the disease, what is the probability that a person has the disease given that his test result is positive?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability (Bayes' Theorem)
Let D = has disease, T+ = positive test.
Given: P(T+∣D)=0.99, P(T+∣Dˉ)=0.005, P(D)=0.001.
Step 1: Find P(T+) using the law of total probability:
P(T+)=P(T+∣D)P(D)+P(T+∣Dˉ)P(Dˉ)=(0.99)(0.001)+(0.005)(0.999)=0.00099+0.004995=0.005985.
Step 2: Apply Bayes' Theorem:
P(D∣T+)=P(T+)P(T+∣D)P(D)=0.0059850.00099.
Step 3: Simplify: …
Using Bayes’ theorem, the probability that a person actually has the disease given a positive test result is approximately 0.165 (or 16.5%). This low value arises because the disease is rare, so even a highly accurate test produces many false positives.
Why Bayes’ theorem is the natural tool
We are asked: Given a positive test, what is the chance the person truly has the disease? This is a classic inverse probability problem. The test’s accuracy is given “forward” (if diseased → positive with 99% chance), but we need the reverse direction. Bayes’ theorem is designed exactly for this: it lets us “flip” conditional probabilities using the base rate (prevalence) of the disease.
The key insight: even a very good test can be misleading when the condition is rare. Most positive results will come from the large number of healthy people, not from the few who are actually sick.
Step-by-step solution
1. Define the events clearly
Let D = event that the person has the disease.
Let T+ = event that the test result is positive.
We are given:
- Prevalence: P(D)=0.001 (0.1% of population)
- Test sensitivity (true positive rate): P(T+∣D)=0.99
- False positive rate: P(T+∣not D)=0.005 (0.5% of healthy people test positive)
2. Write Bayes’ theorem for this situation
P(D∣T+)=P(T+)P(T+∣D)⋅P(D)
The denominator P(T+) is the total probability of a positive test, which comes from two sources: diseased people who test positive, and healthy people who test positive.
3. Compute the total probability of a positive test
P(T+)=P(T+∣D)⋅P(D)+P(T+∣not D)⋅P(not D)
We know P(not D)=1−0.001=0.999.
So:
P(T+)=(0.99)(0.001)+(0.005)(0.999)
=0.00099+0.004995=0.005985
4. Apply Bayes’ theorem
P(D∣T+)=0.0059850.99×0.001=0.0059850.00099
Now simplify: …
Method: Bayes' Theorem with a rare base rate (the false-positive trap)
Use this for medical-test and screening problems: the test's accuracy is given forward (diseased → positive), but you are asked the reverse (positive → diseased), and the condition is rare.
Steps
Step 1: Write the prior (prevalence) and its complement.
P(D) is the base rate of the condition; P(Dˉ)=1−P(D) is the healthy fraction. Because P(D) is tiny, P(Dˉ) is close to 1 — keep both, do not carelessly round it to 1.
Step 2: Record the two likelihoods.
P(E∣D) is the true-positive rate (sensitivity); P(E∣Dˉ) is the false-positive rate.
Step 3: Total probability of a positive result. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Reading "99% effective" as a 99% chance of disease after a positive test.
Why it's wrong: that ignores the base rate — the disease is present in only 0.1% of people. Correct approach: weight by prevalence via Bayes' theorem; the answer is about 0.165, not 0.99.
Mistake 2: Leaving out the false-positive contribution to P(T+).
Why it's wrong: most positives actually come from the huge healthy group. Correct approach: P(T+)=(0.99)(0.001)+(0.005)(0.999)=0.005985. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.At a certain university 4% of male students are over 6 feet tall and 1% of female students are over 6 feet tall. The total student population is divided in the ratio 3 : 2, in favor of female students. If a student is selected at random from amongst all those over 6 feet tall, what is the probability that the student is a female? (A) 1/3 (B) 2/5 (C) 3/11 (D) 3/5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem gives P(female∣>6ft)=0.0220.006=113.
Population split 3:2 in favour of females ⇒ P(F)=53=0.6, P(M)=52=0.4.
Tall fractions: P(T∣F)=0.01, P(T∣M)=0.04.
By Bayes' theorem: …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-E1 markMCQQ.If A and B are two events such that P(Aˉ)=0.3,P(B)=0.4,P(A∩Bˉ)=0.5, then find the value of P(B/A∪Bˉ) (A) 0.33 (B) 0.7 (C) 0.8 (D) 0.25
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for a conditional probability P(B∣A∪Bˉ). Using the definition of conditional probability and the given probabilities, we compute P(B∩(A∪Bˉ)) and P(A∪Bˉ), then divide. The final value is 0.25, so the correct option is (D).
We are given:
- P(Aˉ)=0.3, so P(A)=1−0.3=0.7.
- P(B)=0.4.
- P(A∩Bˉ)=0.5.
We need P(B∣A∪Bˉ), which is the probability that B occurs given that A or Bˉ (or both) occurs.
Concept and intuition:
Conditional probability P(X∣Y)=P(Y)P(X∩Y). Here X=B and Y=A∪Bˉ. So we need the probability that both B and (A∪Bˉ) happen, divided by the probability that A∪Bˉ happens. The key is to simplify the intersection B∩(A∪Bˉ) using set algebra — it often collapses to something simpler.
-
Simplify the numerator P(B∩(A∪Bˉ))
Using the distributive law:
B∩(A∪Bˉ)=(B∩A)∪(B∩Bˉ)
But B∩Bˉ=∅, so this is just B∩A.
Hence P(B∩(A∪Bˉ))=P(A∩B).
-
Find P(A∩B)
We know P(A)=0.7 and P(A∩Bˉ)=0.5.
Since A=(A∩B)∪(A∩Bˉ) and these are disjoint,
P(A)=P(A∩B)+P(A∩Bˉ)
⇒0.7=P(A∩B)+0.5
⇒P(A∩B)=0.2.
-
Find the denominator P(A∪Bˉ)
Use the inclusion-exclusion principle: …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.Given that A and B are two events such that P(B)=53, P(A/B)=21 and P(A∪B)=54, then P(A)= (A) 103 (B) 21 (C) 51 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
Turn the conditional probability into P(A∩B), then substitute into the addition theorem and solve for P(A).
Step 1 — Extract P(A∩B) from the conditional probability.
By definition,
P(A/B)=P(B)P(A∩B)(P(B)=0).
Rearranging (the multiplication theorem):
P(A∩B)=P(A/B)⋅P(B)=21×53=103.
This is the key move — the conditional probability is not directly usable in the union formula, but P(A∩B) is.
Step 2 — Apply the addition theorem.
P(A∪B)=P(A)+P(B)−P(A∩B).
The intersection is subtracted because the elements common to A and B would otherwise be counted twice.
Step 3 — Substitute the known values.
54=P(A)+53−103.
Step 4 — Solve for P(A). …
- KCET 2025Set A-11 markMCQQ.Meera visits only one of the two temples A and B in her locality. Probability that she visits temple A is 52. If she visits temple A, 31 is the probability that she meets her friend, whereas it is 72 if she visits temple B. Meera met her friend at one of the two temples. The probability that she met her at temple B is (A) 167 (B) 165 (C) 163 (D) 169
›Reveal solutionSolution
The friend has already been met (the effect); we want the probability of the cause (temple B) — that reversal of conditioning is exactly Bayes' theorem.
Step 1 — Name the events.
Let A = "Meera visits temple A", B = "Meera visits temple B", F = "she meets her friend".
She visits only one of the two temples, so A and B are mutually exclusive and exhaustive:
P(A)=52⟹P(B)=1−52=53.
Given: P(F∣A)=31, P(F∣B)=72.
Step 2 — Why Bayes.
We are told the outcome (F happened) and asked for the probability of a cause (B). Bayes' theorem inverts the conditioning:
P(B∣F)=P(A)P(F∣A)+P(B)P(F∣B)P(B)P(F∣B).
The denominator is P(F) by the law of total probability — the friend can be met on either branch.
Step 3 — Compute the two branch probabilities.
P(A∩F)=52×31=152,P(B∩F)=53×72=356.
Step 4 — Total probability of meeting the friend. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.In an entrance test, there are multiple choice questions. There are four possible answers to each question of which only one is correct. The probability that a student knows the answer to a question is 90%. If he gets the correct answer to a question, then the probability that he was guessing is (A) 3736 (B) 91 (C) 371 (D) 4037
›Reveal solutionSolution
We use Bayes’ theorem to reverse the conditional probability: given that the student answered correctly, we want the probability that he was guessing. The answer is 371, so the correct option is (C).
Concept and intuition
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem. We have two ways a student can get a correct answer: either he knows the answer (and thus answers correctly for sure), or he guesses (and has a 1 in 4 chance of being correct). We are told the prior probability that he knows the answer is 90%. The question asks: given that he got it right, what’s the chance he was actually guessing? Bayes’ theorem lets us “flip” the conditional probability, using the known likelihoods.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Define events clearly Let K = “student knows the answer”, and G = “student guesses” (so G is the complement of K). Let C = “student gives the correct answer”. We are given:
P(K)=0.9,P(G)=0.1.
-
Conditional probabilities for answering correctly
- If the student knows the answer, he is certain to be correct: P(C∣K)=1.
- If he guesses, he picks randomly among 4 options, so P(C∣G)=41.
-
Find the total probability of a correct answer
By the law of total probability:
P(C)=P(C∣K)P(K)+P(C∣G)P(G)=(1)(0.9)+(41)(0.1)=0.9+0.025=0.925.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem We want P(G∣C), the probability that he was guessing given that he answered correctly:
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.A man speaks truth 2 out of 3 times. He picks one of the natural numbers in the set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} and reports that it is even. The probability that it is actually even is (A) 52 (B) 51 (C) 101 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Bayes' theorem the probability is 53 — option (D).
The set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} has 3 even numbers (2,4,6) and 4 odd numbers, and one number is picked at random.
Let E = "the number is even" and R = "the man reports it as even."
Priors.
P(E)=73,P(Ec)=74.
Likelihoods. He tells the truth with probability 32 and lies with probability 31.
- If the number really is even, a truthful report says "even": P(R∣E)=32.
- If the number is odd, only a lie reports "even": P(R∣Ec)=31.
Bayes' theorem. …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.A car manufacturing factory has two plants X and Y. Plant X manufactures 70% of cars and plant Y manufactures 30% of cars. 80% of cars at plant X and 90% of cars at plant Y are rated as standard quality. A car is chosen at random and is found to be of standard quality. The probability that it has come from plant X is (A) 7356 (B) 8456 (C) 8356 (D) 7956
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a reverse-probability question (effect → cause), so use Bayes' theorem with the total probability of a standard-quality car in the denominator.
Step 1 — Define the events.
- X: the car came from plant X — P(X)=0.70
- Y: the car came from plant Y — P(Y)=0.30
- S: the car is of standard quality
The conditional (likelihood) data given:
P(S∣X)=0.80,P(S∣Y)=0.90
Note X and Y are mutually exclusive and exhaustive (0.7+0.3=1), which is exactly what Bayes' theorem needs.
Step 2 — Why Bayes and not simple conditioning.
We are told the effect (the chosen car is standard) and asked for the probability of the cause (it came from X). That inversion — P(X∣S) from P(S∣X) — is precisely Bayes' theorem:
P(X∣S)=P(X)P(S∣X)+P(Y)P(S∣Y)P(X)P(S∣X)
Step 3 — Compute the numerator.
P(X)P(S∣X)=0.70×0.80=0.56
Step 4 — Compute the denominator (total probability of a standard car).
P(S)=0.70×0.80+0.30×0.90=0.56+0.27=0.83
Step 5 — Divide. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.P and Q are considering to apply for a job. The probability that P applies for the job is 41. The probability that P applies for the job given that Q applies for the job is 21, and the probability that Q applies for the job given that P applies for the job is 31. Then the probability that P does not apply for the job given that Q does not apply for the job is (A) 54 (B) 87 (C) 65 (D) 1211
›Reveal solutionSolution
We are given conditional probabilities and need to find P(P∣Q). Using the definitions of conditional probability and the law of total probability, we compute P(Q) and P(Q), then apply Bayes' theorem to get 54, which corresponds to option (A).
Concept and intuition:
This is a classic problem of working backwards from conditional probabilities to find a joint probability table. We know P(P), P(P∣Q), and P(Q∣P). From these, we can find P(P∩Q) in two ways, which lets us solve for P(Q). Then we can compute the desired conditional probability P(P∣Q) using the complement rule and the definition of conditional probability.
Step-by-step solution:
- Write down what is given. Let P = event that P applies, Q = event that Q applies. We have:
P(P)=41,P(P∣Q)=21,P(Q∣P)=31.
- Use the definition of conditional probability to express P(P∩Q) in two ways. From P(P∣Q)=P(Q)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(P∣Q)⋅P(Q)=21P(Q).
From P(Q∣P)=P(P)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(Q∣P)⋅P(P)=31⋅41=121.
- Equate the two expressions for P(P∩Q) to find P(Q).
21P(Q)=121⇒P(Q)=61.
- Find P(Q) and P(P∩Q).
P(Q)=1−P(Q)=1−61=65.
Also, P(P∩Q)=P(P)−P(P∩Q)=41−121=123−121=122=61.
- Find P(P∩Q). Since P∩Q is the complement of P∪Q, we can use:
P(P∩Q)=1−P(P∪Q).
First, P(P∪Q)=P(P)+P(Q)−P(P∩Q)=41+61−121. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.
[!FORMULA] If P(B)=53P(A/B)=21 and P(A∪B)=54 then P(A∪B)′+P(A′∪B)=
(A) 54 (B) 21 (C) 1 (D) 51›Reveal solutionSolution
Step 5: sum = 1/5 + 4/5 = 1.
Concept: conditional probability, addition theorem, complements, De Morgan.
Given P(B) = 3/5, P(A|B) = 1/2, P(A U B) = 4/5.
Step 1: P(A ^ B) = P(A|B) P(B) = (1/2)(3/5) = 3/10.
Step 2: from P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ^ B),
P(A) = 4/5 - 3/5 + 3/10 = 1/5 + 3/10 = 1/2.
Step 3: P((A U B)') = 1 - P(A U B) = 1 - 4/5 = 1/5. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Three bags contain a number of red and white balls are as follows. Bag I: 3 red balls Bag II: 2 red balls and 1 white ball Bag III: 3 White balls The probability that bag i will be chosen and a ball is selected from it is 6i,i=1,2,3. If a white ball is selected, what is the probablity that it came from Bag III (A) 119 (B) 112 (C) 0 (D) 111
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem: we are given prior probabilities for choosing each bag and the conditional probabilities of drawing a white ball from each bag; after observing a white ball, we want the posterior probability that it came from Bag III. The answer is 119.
We start by noting that the problem gives us three bags with different compositions, and a rule for choosing a bag: the probability of picking bag i is 6i. Then, from that bag, we pick a ball uniformly at random. We are told that a white ball was selected, and we need the probability that it came from Bag III. This is a textbook case for Bayes’ theorem, which lets us “reverse” conditional probabilities: we know P(white∣bag i), and we want P(bag i∣white).
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Define events and write down given probabilities. Let Bi be the event that bag i is chosen (i=1,2,3). We are told:
P(B1)=61,P(B2)=62,P(B3)=63.
Let W be the event that a white ball is drawn.
From the bag compositions:
- Bag I: 3 red, 0 white → P(W∣B1)=0.
- Bag II: 2 red, 1 white → P(W∣B2)=31.
- Bag III: 0 red, 3 white → P(W∣B3)=1.
- Compute the total probability of drawing a white ball. By the law of total probability:
P(W)=P(B1)P(W∣B1)+P(B2)P(W∣B2)+P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Substitute:
P(W)=61⋅0+62⋅31+63⋅1=0+182+63=91+21.
Get a common denominator (18):
P(W)=182+189=1811.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem to find P(B3∣W). Bayes’ theorem says:
P(B3∣W)=P(W)P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Plug in the numbers:
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.If for two events A and B,P(A−B)=51 and P(A)=53 then P(B/A)= (A) 32 (B) 21 (C) 53 (D) 52
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key is to interpret P(A−B) as P(A∩Bc) and use the definition of conditional probability. The result is P(B/A)=32, so option (A) is correct.
We are asked for P(B/A), the probability of B given A. The definition is
P(B/A)=P(A)P(A∩B).
We know P(A)=53, so we need P(A∩B). The given P(A−B)=51 is the key: A−B means “A and not B,” i.e., A∩Bc.
- Relate P(A−B) to P(A∩B) Since A is the union of the disjoint parts “A and B” and “A and not B,” we have
P(A)=P(A∩B)+P(A∩Bc).
Here P(A∩Bc)=P(A−B)=51 and P(A)=53.
- Solve for P(A∩B)
53=P(A∩B)+51⇒P(A∩B)=53−51=52.
- Apply the conditional probability formula P(B/A)=P(A)P(A∩B)=3/52/5=32. …
- COMEDK 2021Set 20211 markMCQQ.A student answers a multiple choice question with 5 alternatives, of which exactly one is correct. The probability that he knows the correct answer is p,0<p<1. If he knows the answer, he answers it correctly; if he does not know the answer, he guesses it, and the probability that he guesses correctly is 51. Given that he has answered the question correctly, the probability that he knew the correct answer is (A) 4p+33p (B) 3p+25p (C) 4p+15p (D) 3p+14p
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Bayes: P(K | correct) = P(K) P(correct | K) / P(correct) = p / [ (4p + 1)/5 ] = 5p/(4p + 1).
Concept: Bayes' theorem. (The stem is truncated, but this is the standard question: given that he answered correctly, find the probability that he actually knew the answer.)
Let K = he knows the answer, P(K) = p, so P(not K) = 1 - p.
If he knows it, he is certainly correct: P(correct | K) = 1.
If he does not know it, he guesses among 5 alternatives: P(correct | not K) = 1/5. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.