Q.Suppose a girl throws a die. If she gets a 5 or 6, she tosses a coin three times and notes the number of heads. If she gets 1, 2, 3 or 4, she tosses a coin once and notes whether a head or tail is obtained. If she obtained exactly one head, what is the probability that she threw 1, 2, 3 or 4 with the die?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability — we need P(die∈{1,2,3,4}∣exactly one head).
Step 1: Define events.
Let E1 = die shows 5 or 6, E2 = die shows 1,2,3,4.
P(E1)=62=31, P(E2)=64=32.
Step 2: Probability of exactly one head under each case.
- Under E1: 3 coin tosses. Exactly one head: (13)(21)3=83.
- Under E2: 1 coin toss. Exactly one head: 21.
Step 3: Apply Bayes' theorem.
P(E2∣1 head)=P(E1)⋅P(1 head∣E1)+P(E2)⋅P(1 head∣E2)P(E2)⋅P(1 head∣E2) …
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem where the experiment has two stages (die roll → coin tosses). The key is to compute the probability of getting exactly one head under each die outcome, then use Bayes to reverse the conditional. The final answer is 118.
Why Bayes’ theorem?
We are asked: Given that exactly one head was obtained, what is the probability that the die showed 1, 2, 3, or 4?
This is a “reverse” conditional probability — we know the result (one head) and want the probability of a particular cause (die in {1,2,3,4}). Bayes’ theorem is the natural tool for such problems.
Step 1: Define the events clearly
Let E be the event that the die shows 1, 2, 3, or 4.
Let F be the event that the die shows 5 or 6.
Let A be the event that exactly one head is obtained.
We want P(E∣A).
Step 2: Find the prior probabilities
A fair die:
P(E)=64=32
P(F)=62=31
Step 3: Find P(A∣E) — probability of exactly one head given die showed 1–4
If the die shows 1–4, she tosses a coin once.
Possible outcomes: H or T. Exactly one head means the single toss is H.
So P(A∣E)=21.
Step 4: Find P(A∣F) — probability of exactly one head given die showed 5 or 6
If the die shows 5 or 6, she tosses a coin three times.
Number of heads in 3 tosses follows a binomial distribution with n=3, p=21.
Exactly one head:
P(A∣F)=(13)(21)1(21)2=3⋅81=83.
A quick check: the total probability of getting exactly one head in 3 tosses is 83, which is less than 21 — this makes sense because with more tosses, the outcomes spread out.
Step 5: Apply Bayes’ theorem
Bayes’ theorem states:
P(E∣A)=P(A∣E)⋅P(E)+P(A∣F)⋅P(F)P(A∣E)⋅P(E)
Substitute the values:
P(E∣A)=21⋅32+83⋅3121⋅32
Simplify numerator: …
Method: Bayes' theorem for a two-stage ("cause then result") experiment
Use this whenever an experiment happens in two stages — a first random choice decides which second experiment is run — and you observe the final result, then are asked for the probability of a particular first-stage cause.
Steps
Step 1: List the mutually exclusive first-stage "causes" and their prior probabilities.
Partition the first stage into events that cannot overlap and together cover everything (e.g. "die shows 1–4" vs "die shows 5 or 6"), and write down each prior probability.
Step 2: For each cause, find the likelihood of the observed result.
Compute P(result∣cause) separately under each branch — the second-stage experiment is different in each, so these likelihoods differ. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Forgetting the die outcomes split into unequal groups.
Why it's wrong: "1,2,3,4" has prior 64=32 while "5 or 6" has 62=31; treating them as equal wrecks the weighting. Correct approach: use the true priors 32 and 31 in Bayes' theorem.
Mistake 2: Using only one branch in the denominator. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Samhita faces a three-headed dragon. She wins a "Tactical medal" if she manages to defeat exactly one of the three heads. The battle proceeds head-by-head under the following conditions: The probability of defeating the first head is 31. After a win: if she defeats a head, the probability of defeating the next head is 32. After a loss: if she fails to defeat a head, the probability of defeating the next head is 41. What is the probability that Samhita earns the "Tactical medal"? (A) 7223 (B) 365 (C) 7217 (D) 7219
›Reveal solutionSolution
Summing the three disjoint "exactly one win" paths gives 121+181+81=7219 — option (D).
Set up the conditional probabilities. Let Wi mean "defeats head i" and Li mean "fails":
- P(W1)=31, so P(L1)=32.
- After a win: next-head win probability =32, so next-head loss probability =31.
- After a loss: next-head win probability =41, so next-head loss probability =43.
Earning the medal means exactly one of the three heads is defeated. The three disjoint sequences are W1L2L3, L1W2L3, and L1L2W3.
Path 1 — W1L2L3 (win, then loss after a win, then loss after a loss):
P=31⋅31⋅43=363=121
Path 2 — L1W2L3 (loss, then win after a loss, then loss after a win): …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.A coin is tossed until a head appears or until the coin has been tossed three times. Given that 'head' does not appear on the first toss, what is the probability that the coin is tossed thrice? (A) 21 (B) 83 (C) 81 (D) 41
›Reveal solutionSolution
Given the first toss is a tail, the coin is tossed a third time only if the second toss is also a tail — probability 21.
The coin stops the moment a head appears, or after three tosses. We are told the first toss is a tail (no head on toss 1).
Now the second toss decides:
- Head on toss 2 ⇒ stop after 2 tosses.
- Tail on toss 2 ⇒ a third toss is made. …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.Two dice are thrown. If it is known that the sum of numbers on the dice was less than 6 the probability of getting a sum as 3 is (A) 181 (B) 185 (C) 51 (D) 52
›Reveal solutionSolution
We use conditional probability: reduce the sample space to only those outcomes where the sum is less than 6, then find the fraction of those that give a sum of exactly 3. The answer is 51.
The key idea here is conditional probability — the probability of one event given that another event has already occurred. When we say "if it is known that the sum was less than 6", we are no longer considering all 36 possible outcomes of throwing two dice. Instead, we restrict ourselves to only those outcomes that satisfy the condition, and then ask: within this smaller set, what fraction gives a sum of 3?
Let’s work it out step by step.
-
List all possible outcomes when two dice are thrown.
Each die shows a number from 1 to 6. The total number of ordered pairs (a,b) is 6×6=36.
-
Identify the condition: sum less than 6.
The possible sums are 2, 3, 4, and 5 (since sum = 1 is impossible with two dice). Let’s list all ordered pairs that give each sum:
- Sum = 2: (1,1) → 1 outcome
- Sum = 3: (1,2),(2,1) → 2 outcomes
- Sum = 4: (1,3),(2,2),(3,1) → 3 outcomes
- Sum = 5: (1,4),(2,3),(3,2),(4,1) → 4 outcomes
Total outcomes with sum < 6: 1+2+3+4=10.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that (1,2) and (2,1) are different outcomes. Dice are distinct, so order matters. Always count ordered pairs unless the problem explicitly says "identical dice" (which is rare in such problems).
-
Identify the event of interest: sum = 3. …
-
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.A die is thrown twice and the sum of numbers appearing is observed to be 8 . What is the conditional probability that the number 5 has appeared atleast once? (A) 365 (B) 52 (C) 181 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
Given the sum is 8, the sample space is the 5 ordered pairs summing to 8; two of them include a 5, giving probability 52.
The ordered outcomes with sum 8 are
(2,6),(3,5),(4,4),(5,3),(6,2)(5 outcomes). …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-A1 markMCQQ.Vishnu has two jars of marbles, Jar A and Jar B. Jar A contains 3 yellow marbles and 2 green marbles. Jar B contains 4 yellow marbles and 3 green marbles. Vishnu flips a fair coin. If it lands heads, he picks two marbles at random without replacement from Jar A. If it lands tails, he picks two marbles at random with replacement from Jar B. Given that Vishnu picked one yellow and one green marble, what is the probability that they came from Jar B? (A) 4121 (B) 8949 (C) 8940 (D) 4120
›Reveal solutionSolution
P(E∣A)=53 (without replacement), P(E∣B)=4924 (with replacement); Bayes gives P(B∣E)=8940 — option (C).
Likelihoods of drawing one yellow and one green (E).
Jar A (3 yellow, 2 green; two draws without replacement):
P(E∣A)=(25)(13)(12)=106=53.
Jar B (4 yellow, 3 green; two draws with replacement):
P(E∣B)=2⋅74⋅73=4924.
Bayes' theorem with P(A)=P(B)=21 (the 21 cancels): …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.Three fair dice are thrown. What is the probability of getting a total of 15 given that they exhibit three different numbers that are in arithmetic progression? (A) 81 (B) 61 (C) 41 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for the conditional probability that three dice sum to 15, given that the three numbers shown are distinct and form an arithmetic progression. By listing all such triples and counting those summing to 15, the probability is found to be 1/2.
Concept and intuition
We need P(sum=15∣distinct AP). The condition restricts the outcomes to only those triples (a,b,c) with a<b<c (since dice are fair, order matters but we can treat ordered rolls; however the condition “three different numbers” and “arithmetic progression” is symmetric). The key is to enumerate all possible ordered triples of distinct numbers from {1,2,3,4,5,6} that are in arithmetic progression, then count how many of those sum to 15. Because the dice are fair, each ordered triple is equally likely, so the conditional probability is just the ratio of favorable ordered triples to total ordered triples satisfying the condition.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Characterize arithmetic progressions of three distinct numbers from 1 to 6. Three numbers x,y,z (with x<y<z) are in AP iff 2y=x+z. Since they are distinct and from 1 to 6, the possible triples (unordered) are:
(1,2,3), (1,3,5), (2,3,4), (2,4,6), (3,4,5), (4,5,6).
Check: For (1,2,3): 2⋅2=1+3; (1,3,5): 2⋅3=1+5; etc. That’s all.
-
Count ordered triples satisfying the condition.
For each unordered triple, the three numbers are distinct, so they can appear in any order on the three dice. That gives 3!=6 permutations per triple.
Total ordered triples satisfying the condition = 6×6=36.
-
Identify which of these triples sum to 15.
Compute sums of the unordered triples:
(1,2,3)(1,3,5)(2,3,4)(2,4,6)(3,4,5)(4,5,6)→6,→9,→9,→12,→12,→15. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Suppose we have three cards identical in form except that both sides of the first card are coloured red, both sides of the second are coloured black, and one side of the third card is coloured red and the other side is coloured black. The three cards are mixed and a card is picked randomly. If the upper side of the chosen card is coloured red, what is the probability that the other side is coloured black. (A) 61 (B) 21 (C) 0 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic conditional probability problem (often called the "three cards" or "Bertrand's box" variant). The key is that seeing a red side updates the probability space to only the red sides, and among those, only one belongs to the mixed card. The answer is 1/3.
We are asked: given that the visible side is red, what is the probability that the other side is black? This is not simply "one of the two remaining cards has a black other side" because the cards are not equally likely once we condition on the observation.
Concept and Intuition
The pitfall is to think: "We see red, so the card is either the all-red or the mixed card. That's two possibilities, so the chance is 1/2." But this ignores that the all-red card has two red sides, while the mixed card has only one red side. When we pick a card at random and then look at a random side, each of the six sides is equally likely to be the one we see. Seeing red eliminates the three black sides, leaving only the three red sides. Among those three red sides, two belong to the all-red card and only one belongs to the mixed card. So the probability that the other side is black is 1/3.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Label the sides.
Let the cards be:
- Card A: both sides red (sides R1,R2)
- Card B: both sides black (sides B1,B2)
- Card C: one red, one black (sides R3,B3)
-
Count equally likely outcomes.
When we pick a card uniformly at random and then look at a random side, there are 3×2=6 equally likely side-views. Each of the six sides has probability 1/6 of being the one we see.
-
Condition on seeing a red side.
The red sides are: R1,R2 (from card A) and R3 (from card C). That's 3 red sides. So the conditional space has 3 equally likely possibilities. …
-
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Advika chooses one of three scarves every morning: Red, Blue, or Green. The probability she chooses Red is 20%. The probability she chooses Blue is twice the probability of choosing Red. On the remaining days she wears a Green scarf. Once a scarf is chosen, she decides whether to wear a Hat (H) and Sunglasses (S). These choices are independent of each other but depend on the scarf colour: Scarf colour Red Blue Green P(H)0.50.40.1P(S)0.80.50.5 Advika is spotted outdoors wearing both a Hat and Sunglasses. What is the probability that she is wearing the Red scarf? (A) 31313 (B) 218 (C) 94 (D) 138
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem on scarf colour given that both a hat and sunglasses are worn. Priors P(R)=0.2, P(B)=0.4, P(G)=0.4; likelihoods P(H∩S∣colour)=P(H)P(S). The posterior P(R∣H∩S)=94 — option (C).
Concept. Hat and sunglasses are independent given the scarf, so P(H∩S∣colour)=P(H∣colour)⋅P(S∣colour). Bayes' theorem then reverses the conditioning to give the probability of the scarf colour from the observed accessories.
Step 1 — Priors.
P(R)=20%=0.2,P(B)=2P(R)=0.4,P(G)=1−0.2−0.4=0.4.
Step 2 — Likelihood of wearing both accessories for each colour.
P(H∩S∣R)=0.5×0.8=0.40,
P(H∩S∣B)=0.4×0.5=0.20,
P(H∩S∣G)=0.1×0.5=0.05. …
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.A man speaks truth 2 out of 3 times. He picks one of the natural numbers in the set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} and reports that it is even. The probability that it is actually even is (A) 52 (B) 51 (C) 101 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Bayes' theorem the probability is 53 — option (D).
The set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} has 3 even numbers (2,4,6) and 4 odd numbers, and one number is picked at random.
Let E = "the number is even" and R = "the man reports it as even."
Priors.
P(E)=73,P(Ec)=74.
Likelihoods. He tells the truth with probability 32 and lies with probability 31.
- If the number really is even, a truthful report says "even": P(R∣E)=32.
- If the number is odd, only a lie reports "even": P(R∣Ec)=31.
Bayes' theorem. …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.Bag A contains 3 white and 2 red balls. Bag B contains only 1 white ball. A fair coin is tossed. If head appears then 1 ball is drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. However if tail appears then 2 balls are drawn at random from bag A and put into bag B. Now one ball is drawn at random from bag B. Given that the drawn ball from B is white, the probability that head appeared on the coin is (A) 3023 (B) 2312 (C) 2311 (D) 3019
›Reveal solutionSolution
Computing P(white drawn∣H)=54 and P(white∣T)=1511, Bayes' theorem gives P(H∣white)=2312.
Head (transfer 1 ball from A(3W,2R) to B(1W), then draw from B's 2 balls):
P(white)=53(1)+52(21)=53+51=54.
Tail (transfer 2 balls from A to B(1W), then draw from B's 3 balls):
P(WW)=103⇒P(white)=1,P(WR)=106⇒32,P(RR)=101⇒31. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.A bag contains (n+1) coins. It is known that one of these coins has a head on both sides, whereas the other coins are fair. One of these coins is selected at random and tossed. If the probability that the toss results in heads is 127, then the value of n is : (A) 5 (B) 3 (C) 2 (D) 4
›Reveal solutionSolution
The key idea is to treat the coin selection as a two‑case partition (two‑headed coin vs. fair coins) and apply the law of total probability. Solving the resulting equation gives n=5, so the correct option is (A).
Concept and intuition
We have a mixed bag: one trick coin that always lands heads, and n fair coins that land heads with probability 21. When we pick a coin at random and toss it, the overall chance of heads is a weighted average of the two cases. The weight for the trick coin is n+11 (since there are n+1 coins total), and for any fair coin it’s n+1n. The problem gives that overall probability as 127, so we set up an equation and solve for n.
Step‑by‑step solution
- Define the events Let T be the event that the two‑headed coin is selected, and F the event that a fair coin is selected. Since selection is random,
P(T)=n+11,P(F)=n+1n.
- Conditional probabilities for heads If the trick coin is chosen, heads is certain:
P(heads∣T)=1.
If a fair coin is chosen, the chance of heads is 21:
P(heads∣F)=21.
- Apply the law of total probability The overall probability of heads is
P(heads)=P(T)⋅P(heads∣T)+P(F)⋅P(heads∣F).
Substituting the values:
P(heads)=n+11⋅1+n+1n⋅21.
- Simplify the expression
P(heads)=n+11+2(n+1)n=2(n+1)2+n.
- Set equal to the given probability The problem states this equals 127:
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.At a certain university 4% of male students are over 6 feet tall and 1% of female students are over 6 feet tall. The total student population is divided in the ratio 3 : 2, in favor of female students. If a student is selected at random from amongst all those over 6 feet tall, what is the probability that the student is a female? (A) 1/3 (B) 2/5 (C) 3/11 (D) 3/5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem gives P(female∣>6ft)=0.0220.006=113.
Population split 3:2 in favour of females ⇒ P(F)=53=0.6, P(M)=52=0.4.
Tall fractions: P(T∣F)=0.01, P(T∣M)=0.04.
By Bayes' theorem: …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.