Q.A man is known to speak truth 3 out of 4 times. He throws a die and reports that it is a six. Find the probability that it is actually a six.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability (Bayes' Theorem)
Let E1 be the event that the die shows a six, and E2 be the event that it does not show a six.
Let A be the event that the man reports a six.
Step 1: Prior probabilities
P(E1)=61, P(E2)=65.
Step 2: Likelihoods (probability of reporting a six given the actual outcome)
If it is a six, he tells truth: P(A∣E1)=43.
If it is not a six, he lies and reports a six: P(A∣E2)=41.
Step 3: Apply Bayes' Theorem …
A Bayes' theorem problem. The probability the die actually shows a six, given the report, is 83.
Let S be the event "the die shows a six" and R the event "the man reports a six".
P(S)=61,P(S′)=65.
He speaks truth 3 of 4 times, so if it is a six he correctly reports six with probability 43, and if it is not a six he (lying) reports six with probability 41:
P(R∣S)=43,P(R∣S′)=41.
By Bayes' theorem, …
Method: Bayes' Theorem (finding the cause from the observed outcome)
Use this "reliability of a witness" pattern: someone reports an outcome and you want the probability the outcome is genuinely what they claim. You know how truthful the reporter is; you want P(event true∣event reported).
Steps
Step 1: Set up the partition of possible causes.
List the mutually exclusive, exhaustive hypotheses (here: the die actually shows a six, or it does not) and write their prior probabilities P(Ei) (these must sum to 1).
Step 2: Write each likelihood.
For each cause, state P(A∣Ei) — the probability of the observed outcome (here: the man reports a six) under that cause.
Step 3: Get the total probability of the outcome (the denominator).
By the law of total probability,
P(A)=∑iP(Ei)P(A∣Ei).
Step 4: Apply Bayes' theorem for the cause you want. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Answering 43 (his truth-telling rate).
Why it's wrong: 43 is P(reports six∣it is a six), whereas the question asks the reverse, P(it is a six∣reports six). Correct approach: apply Bayes' theorem.
Mistake 2: Forgetting the "lie" branch in the denominator. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 on this concept.
- KCET 2019Set A-11 markMCQQ.A man speaks truth 2 out of 3 times. He picks one of the natural numbers in the set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} and reports that it is even. The probability that it is actually even is (A) 52 (B) 51 (C) 101 (D) 53
›Reveal solutionSolution
By Bayes' theorem the probability is 53 — option (D).
The set S={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} has 3 even numbers (2,4,6) and 4 odd numbers, and one number is picked at random.
Let E = "the number is even" and R = "the man reports it as even."
Priors.
P(E)=73,P(Ec)=74.
Likelihoods. He tells the truth with probability 32 and lies with probability 31.
- If the number really is even, a truthful report says "even": P(R∣E)=32.
- If the number is odd, only a lie reports "even": P(R∣Ec)=31.
Bayes' theorem. …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.Two dice are thrown. If it is known that the sum of numbers on the dice was less than 6 the probability of getting a sum as 3 is (A) 181 (B) 185 (C) 51 (D) 52
›Reveal solutionSolution
We use conditional probability: reduce the sample space to only those outcomes where the sum is less than 6, then find the fraction of those that give a sum of exactly 3. The answer is 51.
The key idea here is conditional probability — the probability of one event given that another event has already occurred. When we say "if it is known that the sum was less than 6", we are no longer considering all 36 possible outcomes of throwing two dice. Instead, we restrict ourselves to only those outcomes that satisfy the condition, and then ask: within this smaller set, what fraction gives a sum of 3?
Let’s work it out step by step.
-
List all possible outcomes when two dice are thrown.
Each die shows a number from 1 to 6. The total number of ordered pairs (a,b) is 6×6=36.
-
Identify the condition: sum less than 6.
The possible sums are 2, 3, 4, and 5 (since sum = 1 is impossible with two dice). Let’s list all ordered pairs that give each sum:
- Sum = 2: (1,1) → 1 outcome
- Sum = 3: (1,2),(2,1) → 2 outcomes
- Sum = 4: (1,3),(2,2),(3,1) → 3 outcomes
- Sum = 5: (1,4),(2,3),(3,2),(4,1) → 4 outcomes
Total outcomes with sum < 6: 1+2+3+4=10.
Watch outA common mistake is to forget that (1,2) and (2,1) are different outcomes. Dice are distinct, so order matters. Always count ordered pairs unless the problem explicitly says "identical dice" (which is rare in such problems).
-
Identify the event of interest: sum = 3. …
-
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-M1 markMCQQ.Three fair dice are thrown. What is the probability of getting a total of 15 given that they exhibit three different numbers that are in arithmetic progression? (A) 81 (B) 61 (C) 41 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for the conditional probability that three dice sum to 15, given that the three numbers shown are distinct and form an arithmetic progression. By listing all such triples and counting those summing to 15, the probability is found to be 1/2.
Concept and intuition
We need P(sum=15∣distinct AP). The condition restricts the outcomes to only those triples (a,b,c) with a<b<c (since dice are fair, order matters but we can treat ordered rolls; however the condition “three different numbers” and “arithmetic progression” is symmetric). The key is to enumerate all possible ordered triples of distinct numbers from {1,2,3,4,5,6} that are in arithmetic progression, then count how many of those sum to 15. Because the dice are fair, each ordered triple is equally likely, so the conditional probability is just the ratio of favorable ordered triples to total ordered triples satisfying the condition.
Step-by-step reasoning
- Characterize arithmetic progressions of three distinct numbers from 1 to 6. Three numbers x,y,z (with x<y<z) are in AP iff 2y=x+z. Since they are distinct and from 1 to 6, the possible triples (unordered) are:
(1,2,3), (1,3,5), (2,3,4), (2,4,6), (3,4,5), (4,5,6).
Check: For (1,2,3): 2⋅2=1+3; (1,3,5): 2⋅3=1+5; etc. That’s all.
-
Count ordered triples satisfying the condition.
For each unordered triple, the three numbers are distinct, so they can appear in any order on the three dice. That gives 3!=6 permutations per triple.
Total ordered triples satisfying the condition = 6×6=36.
-
Identify which of these triples sum to 15.
Compute sums of the unordered triples:
(1,2,3)(1,3,5)(2,3,4)(2,4,6)(3,4,5)(4,5,6)→6,→9,→9,→12,→12,→15. …
- COMEDK 2021Set 2021-B1 markMCQQ.At a certain university 4% of male students are over 6 feet tall and 1% of female students are over 6 feet tall. The total student population is divided in the ratio 3 : 2, in favor of female students. If a student is selected at random from amongst all those over 6 feet tall, what is the probability that the student is a female? (A) 1/3 (B) 2/5 (C) 3/11 (D) 3/5
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem gives P(female∣>6ft)=0.0220.006=113.
Population split 3:2 in favour of females ⇒ P(F)=53=0.6, P(M)=52=0.4.
Tall fractions: P(T∣F)=0.01, P(T∣M)=0.04.
By Bayes' theorem: …
- COMEDK 2026Set 2026-M1 markMCQQ.Samhita faces a three-headed dragon. She wins a "Tactical medal" if she manages to defeat exactly one of the three heads. The battle proceeds head-by-head under the following conditions: The probability of defeating the first head is 31. After a win: if she defeats a head, the probability of defeating the next head is 32. After a loss: if she fails to defeat a head, the probability of defeating the next head is 41. What is the probability that Samhita earns the "Tactical medal"? (A) 7223 (B) 365 (C) 7217 (D) 7219
›Reveal solutionSolution
Summing the three disjoint "exactly one win" paths gives 121+181+81=7219 — option (D).
Set up the conditional probabilities. Let Wi mean "defeats head i" and Li mean "fails":
- P(W1)=31, so P(L1)=32.
- After a win: next-head win probability =32, so next-head loss probability =31.
- After a loss: next-head win probability =41, so next-head loss probability =43.
Earning the medal means exactly one of the three heads is defeated. The three disjoint sequences are W1L2L3, L1W2L3, and L1L2W3.
Path 1 — W1L2L3 (win, then loss after a win, then loss after a loss):
P=31⋅31⋅43=363=121
Path 2 — L1W2L3 (loss, then win after a loss, then loss after a win): …
- KCET 2020Set A-11 markMCQQ.The probability of solving a problem by three persons A, B and C independently is 21, 41 and 31 respectively. Then the probability of the problem is solved by any two of them is (A) 121 (B) 41 (C) 241 (D) 81
›Reveal solutionSolution
The problem asks for the probability that exactly two of the three persons solve it. We compute the sum of probabilities for each pair solving while the third fails, giving 81.
The key idea: "solved by any two of them" means exactly two solve it, not at least two. The third person must fail. Since A, B, and C work independently, we multiply their individual probabilities for each specific outcome and then add the three possible cases.
A common mistake is to include the case where all three solve it. That would be "at least two", not "any two". The phrase "any two" in probability problems almost always means exactly two.
Let’s denote:
- P(A)=21, so P(A fails)=1−21=21
- P(B)=41, so P(B fails)=1−41=43
- P(C)=31, so P(C fails)=1−31=32
We want exactly two successes. There are three mutually exclusive ways this happens:
-
A and B solve, C fails
Probability = P(A)×P(B)×P(C fails)
=21×41×32=242=121
-
A and C solve, B fails
Probability = P(A)×P(C)×P(B fails)
=21×31×43=243=81
-
B and C solve, A fails
Probability = P(B)×P(C)×P(A fails) …
- COMEDK 2023Set 2023-E1 markMCQQ.A die is thrown twice and the sum of numbers appearing is observed to be 8 . What is the conditional probability that the number 5 has appeared atleast once? (A) 365 (B) 52 (C) 181 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
Given the sum is 8, the sample space is the 5 ordered pairs summing to 8; two of them include a 5, giving probability 52.
The ordered outcomes with sum 8 are
(2,6),(3,5),(4,4),(5,3),(6,2)(5 outcomes). …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-A1 markMCQQ.P and Q are considering to apply for a job. The probability that P applies for the job is 41. The probability that P applies for the job given that Q applies for the job is 21, and the probability that Q applies for the job given that P applies for the job is 31. Then the probability that P does not apply for the job given that Q does not apply for the job is (A) 54 (B) 87 (C) 65 (D) 1211
›Reveal solutionSolution
We are given conditional probabilities and need to find P(P∣Q). Using the definitions of conditional probability and the law of total probability, we compute P(Q) and P(Q), then apply Bayes' theorem to get 54, which corresponds to option (A).
Concept and intuition:
This is a classic problem of working backwards from conditional probabilities to find a joint probability table. We know P(P), P(P∣Q), and P(Q∣P). From these, we can find P(P∩Q) in two ways, which lets us solve for P(Q). Then we can compute the desired conditional probability P(P∣Q) using the complement rule and the definition of conditional probability.
Step-by-step solution:
- Write down what is given. Let P = event that P applies, Q = event that Q applies. We have:
P(P)=41,P(P∣Q)=21,P(Q∣P)=31.
- Use the definition of conditional probability to express P(P∩Q) in two ways. From P(P∣Q)=P(Q)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(P∣Q)⋅P(Q)=21P(Q).
From P(Q∣P)=P(P)P(P∩Q), we get
P(P∩Q)=P(Q∣P)⋅P(P)=31⋅41=121.
- Equate the two expressions for P(P∩Q) to find P(Q).
21P(Q)=121⇒P(Q)=61.
- Find P(Q) and P(P∩Q).
P(Q)=1−P(Q)=1−61=65.
Also, P(P∩Q)=P(P)−P(P∩Q)=41−121=123−121=122=61.
- Find P(P∩Q). Since P∩Q is the complement of P∪Q, we can use:
P(P∩Q)=1−P(P∪Q).
First, P(P∪Q)=P(P)+P(Q)−P(P∩Q)=41+61−121. …
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.Suppose we have three cards identical in form except that both sides of the first card are coloured red, both sides of the second are coloured black, and one side of the third card is coloured red and the other side is coloured black. The three cards are mixed and a card is picked randomly. If the upper side of the chosen card is coloured red, what is the probability that the other side is coloured black. (A) 61 (B) 21 (C) 0 (D) 31
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic conditional probability problem (often called the "three cards" or "Bertrand's box" variant). The key is that seeing a red side updates the probability space to only the red sides, and among those, only one belongs to the mixed card. The answer is 1/3.
We are asked: given that the visible side is red, what is the probability that the other side is black? This is not simply "one of the two remaining cards has a black other side" because the cards are not equally likely once we condition on the observation.
Concept and Intuition
The pitfall is to think: "We see red, so the card is either the all-red or the mixed card. That's two possibilities, so the chance is 1/2." But this ignores that the all-red card has two red sides, while the mixed card has only one red side. When we pick a card at random and then look at a random side, each of the six sides is equally likely to be the one we see. Seeing red eliminates the three black sides, leaving only the three red sides. Among those three red sides, two belong to the all-red card and only one belongs to the mixed card. So the probability that the other side is black is 1/3.
Step-by-step reasoning
-
Label the sides.
Let the cards be:
- Card A: both sides red (sides R1,R2)
- Card B: both sides black (sides B1,B2)
- Card C: one red, one black (sides R3,B3)
-
Count equally likely outcomes.
When we pick a card uniformly at random and then look at a random side, there are 3×2=6 equally likely side-views. Each of the six sides has probability 1/6 of being the one we see.
-
Condition on seeing a red side.
The red sides are: R1,R2 (from card A) and R3 (from card C). That's 3 red sides. So the conditional space has 3 equally likely possibilities. …
-
- COMEDK 2024Set 2024-E1 markMCQQ.A coin is tossed until a head appears or until the coin has been tossed three times. Given that 'head' does not appear on the first toss, what is the probability that the coin is tossed thrice? (A) 21 (B) 83 (C) 81 (D) 41
›Reveal solutionSolution
Given the first toss is a tail, the coin is tossed a third time only if the second toss is also a tail — probability 21.
The coin stops the moment a head appears, or after three tosses. We are told the first toss is a tail (no head on toss 1).
Now the second toss decides:
- Head on toss 2 ⇒ stop after 2 tosses.
- Tail on toss 2 ⇒ a third toss is made. …
- KCET 2021Set A-11 markMCQQ.A car manufacturing factory has two plants X and Y. Plant X manufactures 70% of cars and plant Y manufactures 30% of cars. 80% of cars at plant X and 90% of cars at plant Y are rated as standard quality. A car is chosen at random and is found to be of standard quality. The probability that it has come from plant X is (A) 7356 (B) 8456 (C) 8356 (D) 7956
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a reverse-probability question (effect → cause), so use Bayes' theorem with the total probability of a standard-quality car in the denominator.
Step 1 — Define the events.
- X: the car came from plant X — P(X)=0.70
- Y: the car came from plant Y — P(Y)=0.30
- S: the car is of standard quality
The conditional (likelihood) data given:
P(S∣X)=0.80,P(S∣Y)=0.90
Note X and Y are mutually exclusive and exhaustive (0.7+0.3=1), which is exactly what Bayes' theorem needs.
Step 2 — Why Bayes and not simple conditioning.
We are told the effect (the chosen car is standard) and asked for the probability of the cause (it came from X). That inversion — P(X∣S) from P(S∣X) — is precisely Bayes' theorem:
P(X∣S)=P(X)P(S∣X)+P(Y)P(S∣Y)P(X)P(S∣X)
Step 3 — Compute the numerator.
P(X)P(S∣X)=0.70×0.80=0.56
Step 4 — Compute the denominator (total probability of a standard car).
P(S)=0.70×0.80+0.30×0.90=0.56+0.27=0.83
Step 5 — Divide. …
- COMEDK 2025Set 2025-A1 markMCQQ.Three bags contain a number of red and white balls are as follows. Bag I: 3 red balls Bag II: 2 red balls and 1 white ball Bag III: 3 White balls The probability that bag i will be chosen and a ball is selected from it is 6i,i=1,2,3. If a white ball is selected, what is the probablity that it came from Bag III (A) 119 (B) 112 (C) 0 (D) 111
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem: we are given prior probabilities for choosing each bag and the conditional probabilities of drawing a white ball from each bag; after observing a white ball, we want the posterior probability that it came from Bag III. The answer is 119.
We start by noting that the problem gives us three bags with different compositions, and a rule for choosing a bag: the probability of picking bag i is 6i. Then, from that bag, we pick a ball uniformly at random. We are told that a white ball was selected, and we need the probability that it came from Bag III. This is a textbook case for Bayes’ theorem, which lets us “reverse” conditional probabilities: we know P(white∣bag i), and we want P(bag i∣white).
Let’s work through it step by step.
- Define events and write down given probabilities. Let Bi be the event that bag i is chosen (i=1,2,3). We are told:
P(B1)=61,P(B2)=62,P(B3)=63.
Let W be the event that a white ball is drawn.
From the bag compositions:
- Bag I: 3 red, 0 white → P(W∣B1)=0.
- Bag II: 2 red, 1 white → P(W∣B2)=31.
- Bag III: 0 red, 3 white → P(W∣B3)=1.
- Compute the total probability of drawing a white ball. By the law of total probability:
P(W)=P(B1)P(W∣B1)+P(B2)P(W∣B2)+P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Substitute:
P(W)=61⋅0+62⋅31+63⋅1=0+182+63=91+21.
Get a common denominator (18):
P(W)=182+189=1811.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem to find P(B3∣W). Bayes’ theorem says:
P(B3∣W)=P(W)P(B3)P(W∣B3).
Plug in the numbers:
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.