Q.Explain why Bohr's postulate of non-radiating stationary orbits, though it contradicts classical electromagnetic theory, was necessary to obtain a stable atom, and why the quantisation of angular momentum was needed to fix which orbits are allowed.
You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Why postulate 1 was necessary. Classical electromagnetic theory demands that any accelerating (hence orbiting) charge radiate energy continuously, which would make the electron spiral into the nucleus in about (Exercise 3) -- so SOME departure from classical theory was unavoidable if atoms are to be stable at all. Postulate 1 supplies exactly this departure, by declaring that electrons in certain special orbits simply do not radiate, however long they remain in them.
Why postulate 2 was also necessary. The force-balance condition alone, , is satisfied for EVERY possible radius (for a suitably chosen speed ) -- it does not, by itself, single out any particular orbit as special. Without a second condition, postulate 1 alone would still permit a continuous range of "non-radiating" orbits, which fails to explain why only certain fixed spectral lines are observed (Section 1.6). The angular-momentum quantisation condition, , supplies exactly this missing second …
Unlock everything free for 14 days
- Full step-by-step solutions
- Concept-first explanations
- Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.