Q.Suppose that 6% of the people with blood group O are left handed and 10% of those with other blood groups are left handed. 30% of the people have blood group O. If a left handed person is selected at random, what is the probability that he/she will have blood group O?
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
Concept: Conditional Probability (Bayes' Theorem)
Let O = event that a person has blood group O, and L = event that a person is left-handed.
We are given:
- P(O)=0.30, so P(O′)=0.70
- P(L∣O)=0.06
- P(L∣O′)=0.10
We need P(O∣L).
Step 1: Find P(L) using the law of total probability:
P(L)=P(L∣O)P(O)+P(L∣O′)P(O′)=(0.06)(0.30)+(0.10)(0.70)=0.018+0.07=0.088
Step 2: Apply Bayes' Theorem: …
This is a classic Bayes’ theorem problem. We are given the prevalence of blood group O (30%) and the conditional probabilities of being left-handed given O (6%) and given not-O (10%). The probability that a randomly selected left-handed person has blood group O is approximately 0.2045 or 20.45%.
We start with the idea of conditional probability: we want P(O∣left-handed), the probability that a person has blood group O given that they are left-handed. The direct data we have is the other way around — left-handedness given blood group. Bayes’ theorem is the natural tool to reverse the conditioning.
Let’s define events clearly:
- Let O = event that a person has blood group O.
- Let L = event that a person is left-handed.
We are told:
- P(O)=0.30 (30% of people have blood group O).
- P(L∣O)=0.06 (6% of people with blood group O are left-handed).
- P(L∣Oc)=0.10 (10% of people with other blood groups are left-handed).
We want P(O∣L).
- Find the probability of being left-handed overall, P(L). This is the total probability, which we get by considering both ways a person can be left-handed: either they have blood group O and are left-handed, or they don’t have O and are left-handed.
P(L)=P(L∩O)+P(L∩Oc)
Using the multiplication rule:
P(L∩O)=P(O)⋅P(L∣O)=0.30×0.06=0.018
P(L∩Oc)=P(Oc)⋅P(L∣Oc)=(1−0.30)×0.10=0.70×0.10=0.07
So:
P(L)=0.018+0.07=0.088
That is, 8.8% of the population is left-handed.
- Apply Bayes’ theorem. Bayes’ theorem states:
P(O∣L)=P(L)P(L∣O)⋅P(O)
We already have all three pieces:
P(O∣L)=0.0880.06×0.30=0.0880.018
- Simplify the fraction. …
Method: Bayes' Theorem with a Two-Group Partition
Use this when a population splits into a group and its complement, each with a known rate of some trait, and you want to reverse the conditioning.
Steps
Step 1: Name the partition and the observed trait.
Let O and Oc be the two groups with priors P(O), P(Oc)=1−P(O); let L be the observed trait, with rates P(L∣O) and P(L∣Oc).
Step 2: Get the total probability of the trait. …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Putting only one group in the denominator.
Why it's wrong: P(L) must count left-handers from both blood-group O and non-O; using only P(L∣O)P(O) understates the denominator. Correct approach: use total probability, P(L)=P(L∣O)P(O)+P(L∣Oc)P(Oc)=0.088.
Mistake 2: Reporting P(L∣O) when P(O∣L) is asked. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.70% of the total employees of a factory are men. Among the employees of that factory, 30% of men and 15% of women are technical assistants. If an employee chosen at random is found to be a technical assistant, then the probability that this employee is a man is (A) 239 (B) 173 (C) 1714 (D) 2314
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct Bayes'/total-probability computation using a convenient total of 100 employees. The answer is 1714.
Concept and Intuition
We want P(man∣technical assistant). Since we're given the proportion of men and women, and what fraction of each group are technical assistants, the cleanest approach is to work with actual counts (out of a convenient total like 100) rather than abstract probabilities — it avoids fraction juggling.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Assume 100 employees: Men =70, Women =30.
- Technical assistants among men: 30% of 70=21.
- Technical assistants among women: 15% of 30=4.5.
- Total technical assistants =21+4.5=25.5.
- P(man∣TA)=25.521=255210=5142=1714. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.In a class consisting of 40 boys and 30 girls, 30% of the boys and 40% of the girls are good at Mathematics. If a student selected at random from that class is found to be a girl, then the probability that she is not good at Mathematics is (A) 53 (B) 52 (C) 103 (D) 107
›Reveal solutionSolution
Conditioning on "the student is a girl" restricts the sample space to the 30 girls only; the answer is 53.
Concept and Intuition
This is conditional probability with a twist: the condition ("selected student is a girl") is given as a fact, not something to be computed via Bayes' theorem. Once we know the student is a girl, the boys' statistics become irrelevant — we simply work within the group of girls.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Total girls =30.
- Girls good at Mathematics =40% of 30=12.
- Girls not good at Mathematics =30−12=18.
- Since we are told the selected student is a girl, the relevant sample space is just these 30 girls.
- P(not good at maths∣girl)=3018=53. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-12-FN1 markMCQQ.In a college, the heights of 4% of male and 1% of female students are more than 1.8 meters. If 60% of the total students are female and a student selected at random has height more than 1.8 meters, then the probability that this student is a female, is (A) 118 (B) 116 (C) 115 (D) 113
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct application of Bayes' theorem: given the height is above 1.8m, find the probability the student is female.
Concept and Intuition
This is the classic "reverse conditional probability" setup — we know P(tall∣gender) for each gender and the gender proportions, and want P(gender∣tall). Bayes' theorem converts one direction of conditioning into the other by weighting each gender's tall-probability by its population share and normalizing.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let M = male, F = female, H = height >1.8m. Given: P(F)=0.6, P(M)=0.4, P(H∣M)=0.04, P(H∣F)=0.01.
- Total probability of height >1.8m: P(H)=P(M)P(H∣M)+P(F)P(H∣F)=0.4(0.04)+0.6(0.01)=0.016+0.006=0.022. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-07-FN1 markMCQQ.In a toy factory, the machines A, B and C are used to manufacture 30%, 40% and 30% of the output, respectively. The probabilities of toys made by machines A, B, and C to be defective are respectively 2%, 3% and 1%. A toy is taken from the factory and is found to be defective. The probability that it was manufactured by the machine B is (A) 4/5 (B) 2/9 (C) 3/4 (D) 4/7
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Bayes' theorem for finding the probability of a specific cause given an observed
effect (a defective toy); the answer is 4/7.
Concept and Intuition
When an outcome (a defective toy) could have come from several sources, each with its own prior
probability and its own conditional probability of producing that outcome, Bayes' theorem lets us
"invert" the conditioning: given that the outcome occurred, what's the probability it came from a
particular source? The key is to first find the total probability of the outcome by summing over
all sources (the law of total probability), then take the one source's contribution as a fraction of
that total.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior probabilities: P(A)=0.3, P(B)=0.4, P(C)=0.3.
- Conditional defect rates: P(D∣A)=0.02, P(D∣B)=0.03, P(D∣C)=0.01.
- Total probability of a defective toy (law of total probability):
P(D)=P(A)P(D∣A)+P(B)P(D∣B)+P(C)P(D∣C)=0.3(0.02)+0.4(0.03)+0.3(0.01)
=0.006+0.012+0.003=0.021.
- By Bayes' theorem: …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-19-FN1 markMCQQ.A shopkeeper buys a particular type of electric bulbs from three manufacturers M1,M2 and M3. He buys 25% of his requirement from M1, 45% from M2 and 30% from M3. Based on past experience he found that 2% of type M3 bulbs are defective, where as only 1% of type M1 and type M2 are defective. If a bulb chosen by him at random is defective, then the probability that it was of type M3 is (A) 135 (B) 136 (C) 137 (D) 138
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct application of Bayes' theorem with the law of total probability for the defective-bulb probability. Answer: (B).
Concept and Intuition
This is a classic "reverse conditional probability" problem: we know how likely a defect is given the source, and want the reverse — the probability the source was M3 given a defect was observed. Bayes' theorem converts one into the other via the law of total probability.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Given: P(M1)=0.25, P(M2)=0.45, P(M3)=0.30; P(D∣M1)=0.01, P(D∣M2)=0.01, P(D∣M3)=0.02.
- Total probability of a defective bulb: P(D)=P(M1)P(D∣M1)+P(M2)P(D∣M2)+P(M3)P(D∣M3) =0.25(0.01)+0.45(0.01)+0.30(0.02)=0.0025+0.0045+0.006=0.013. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-20-FN1 markMCQQ.A, B, C are mutually exclusive and exhaustive events of a random experiment and E is an event that occurs in conjunction with one of the events A, B, C. The conditional Probabilities of E given the happening of A, B, C are respectively 0.6, 0.3 and 0.1. If P(A)=0.30 and P(B)=0.50, then P(C∣E)= (A) 352 (B) 3515 (C) 3518 (D) 3517
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a direct Bayes' theorem application over three mutually exclusive, exhaustive causes; P(C∣E)=2/35.
Concept and Intuition
When an event E can occur alongside any of several mutually exclusive, exhaustive causes A,B,C, Bayes' theorem lets us find the probability of a particular cause given that E has occurred, by weighing each cause's prior probability by how likely E is under it, then normalizing.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Since A,B,C are mutually exclusive and exhaustive, P(C)=1−P(A)−P(B)=1−0.30−0.50=0.20.
- Total probability of E: P(E)=P(E∣A)P(A)+P(E∣B)P(B)+P(E∣C)P(C) =0.6(0.30)+0.3(0.50)+0.1(0.20)=0.18+0.15+0.02=0.35 …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.An item is tested on a device for its defectiveness. The probability that such an item is defective is 0.3. The device gives accurate result in 8 out of 10 such tests. If the device reports that an item tested is not defective, then the probability that it is actually defective is (A) 152 (B) 293 (C) 313 (D) 514
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct Bayes'-theorem inversion problem; the item is actually defective with probability 313 given a "not defective" report — option (C).
Concept and Intuition
The device's report can be wrong. To find the true state given an observed (possibly wrong) report, we must weigh both ways the report could have arisen: a genuinely non-defective item correctly reported as such, or a genuinely defective item incorrectly reported as non-defective. Bayes' theorem combines these.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let D: item defective, P(D)=0.3; D′: item not defective, P(D′)=0.7.
- Device accuracy =0.8, so it errs with probability 0.2.
- "Reports not defective" while the item is defective means the device made an error: P(report ND∣D)=0.2.
- "Reports not defective" while the item is not defective means the device was accurate: P(report ND∣D′)=0.8. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-24-FN1 markMCQQ.In a school there are 3 sections A, B and C. Section A contains 20 girls and 30 boys, section B contains 40 girls and 20 boys and section C contains 10 girls and 30 boys. The probabilities of selecting the section A, B and C are 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 respectively. If a student selected at random from the school is a girl, then the probability that she belongs to section A is (A) 200121 (B) 12116 (C) 8114 (D) 8116
›Reveal solutionSolution
A three-section Bayes'-theorem problem; the answer is 8116, option (D).
Concept and Intuition
Given a randomly selected student is a girl, we want to reverse-condition on which section she came from. This requires the total probability of "selecting a girl" (summed over all three sections weighted by section-selection probability), then applying Bayes' theorem to isolate section A's contribution.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Conditional probabilities of picking a girl within each section: P(girl∣A)=5020=52; P(girl∣B)=6040=32; P(girl∣C)=4010=41.
- Section-selection probabilities: P(A)=51, P(B)=103, P(C)=21.
- Joint terms: P(A)P(girl∣A)=51⋅52=252; P(B)P(girl∣B)=103⋅32=51; P(C)P(girl∣C)=21⋅41=81. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.The probability that a person goes to college by car is 51; by bus 52 and by train is 53 respectively. The probabilities that he reaches the college late if he takes car, bus, train are 72,74 and 71 respectively. If he reaches the college in time, the probability that he travelled by car is (A) 296 (B) 2924 (C) 295 (D) 2923
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem: weight each mode's "on-time" probability by its usage probability, then take the car-share of the total.
Concept and Intuition
This is a direct application of Bayes' theorem / total probability: to find P(cause∣effect), build the denominator as the weighted sum over every possible cause of reaching the observed effect (here, arriving on time), then take the numerator's share of it.
Step-by-Step Solution
- On-time probabilities per mode: car 1−72=75; bus 1−74=73; train 1−71=76.
- Total on-time probability: P(ontime)=51⋅75+52⋅73+53⋅76=355+356+3518=3529.
- Joint probability of taking the car AND being on time: 51⋅75=355. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-23-AN1 markMCQQ.A bag contains 5 balls of unknown colours. There are equal chances that out of these five balls, there may be 0 or 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 red balls. A ball is taken out from the bag at random and is found to be red. The probability that it is the only red ball in the bag is (A) 51 (B) 61 (C) 151 (D) 301
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a Bayes'-theorem problem over the six equally likely compositions of red balls; the posterior probability that exactly one ball is red, given a red ball was drawn, is 1/15.
Concept and Intuition
Bayes' theorem updates the prior (uniform belief over how many red balls there are) using the evidence (a red ball was drawn) — compositions with more red balls make drawing red more likely, so they get more posterior weight, but we want specifically the R=1 case.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior: P(R=r)=61 for r=0,1,2,3,4,5.
- Likelihood of drawing red given R=r red balls among 5: P(red∣R=r)=5r.
- Total probability of drawing red: P(red)=∑r=0561⋅5r=301(0+1+2+3+4+5)=3015=21. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-23-FN1 markMCQQ.It is given that in a random experiment events A and B are such that P(A)=41, P(A∣B)=21 and P(B∣A)=32 then P(B)= (A) 31 (B) 32 (C) 21 (D) 61
›Reveal solutionSolution
Using P(B∣A) to find P(A∩B), then dividing by P(A∣B), gives P(B)=31.
Concept and Intuition
The conditional probability definitions P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B) and P(B∣A)=P(A)P(A∩B) share the common quantity P(A∩B) — computing it from one equation lets us solve the other for the unknown probability.
Step-by-Step Solution
- From P(B∣A)=P(A)P(A∩B)=32, and P(A)=41: P(A∩B)=32×41=61.
- From P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B)=21: P(B)=P(A∣B)P(A∩B)=1/21/6=31.
Common Mistakes …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.In a test a student either guesses or copies or knows the answer to answer a multiple choice question with four choices. The probability that he makes a guess is 1/3 and the probability that he copies the answer is 1/6. The probability that his answer is correct, given that he copied it is 1/8. The probability that he knew the answer to the question, given that he answered it correctly is (A) 2429 (B) 2922 (C) 2924 (D) 2923
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem problem with three mutually exclusive causes (guess/copy/know) for a correct answer. Answer: 24/29.
Concept and Intuition
This is a textbook application of Bayes' theorem: we're given the prior probabilities of three exhaustive, mutually exclusive ways of answering (guessing, copying, knowing) along with the conditional probability of being correct under each, and asked to reverse the conditioning — find the probability the student knew the answer, GIVEN that they got it right.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The three ways of answering are exhaustive: P(know)=1−P(guess)−P(copy)=1−31−61=1−21=21.
- Conditional correctness probabilities: P(C∣guess)=41 (one of four choices), P(C∣copy)=81 (given), P(C∣know)=1.
- Total probability of being correct: P(C)=31⋅41+61⋅81+21⋅1=121+481+21. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.