Q.A letter is known to have come either from TATA NAGAR or from CALCUTTA. On the envelope, just two consecutive letters TA are visible. What is the probability that the letter came from TATA NAGAR.
🔒You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.
🔒 Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →Concept understanding — Conditional Probability
Conditional Probability
Roll a die and ask "what is the chance of an even number?" — that is 3/6. But suppose someone tells you the result is greater than 3. Now you are no longer looking at all six faces, only at {4,5,6}, and two of those (4 and 6) are even, so the probability becomes 2/3. That change — from the probability of A to the probability of A given that B has already occurred — is conditional probability.
The Idea: Shrink the Sample Space
Conditioning on B throws away every outcome where B is false and treats B as the new "whole world." You measure A only against what is still possible.
Think of filtering a table of data: unconditional probability uses every row; conditional probability keeps only the rows where the condition is true.
The Definition
For events A and B with P(B)>0,
P(A∣B)=P(B)P(A∩B).
We divide by P(B) to rescale so that B itself has probability 1; the surviving part of A is the overlap A∩B. Checking the die: P(A∩B)=P({4,6})=62 and P(B)=63, so P(A∣B)=3/62/6=32, matching the intuition.
Rearranging gives the multiplication rule P(A∩B)=P(A∣B)P(B), which is usually the easier way to compute a joint probability when a problem says "given that."
Two Cautions
- P(A∣B) and P(B∣A) are generally not equal; swapping them is the classic mistake. They are linked by Bayes' theorem, P(A∣B)=P(B)P(B∣A)P(A). …
The key idea is conditional probability: we compare the frequency of the visible clue "TA" in each city's name.
Step 1 – Count total occurrences of "TA" as consecutive letters
- In TATA NAGAR: the consecutive pairs are TA, AT, TA, (space), NA, AG, GA, AR. "TA" appears twice (positions 1-2 and 3-4).
- In CALCUTTA: the consecutive pairs are CA, AL, LC, CU, UT, TT, TA. "TA" appears once (positions 6-7).
Step 2 – Apply conditional probability
Let T = event that "TA" is visible, C = event letter is from TATA NAGAR.
We want P(C∣T). Assuming both cities equally likely a priori: …
Counting how often the pair "TA" occurs among all consecutive letter-pairs of each name and applying Bayes' theorem gives P(TATA NAGAR∣TA)=117.
Let E1 = "from TATA NAGAR" and E2 = "from CALCUTTA," with equal priors P(E1)=P(E2)=21. Let A = "the two visible consecutive letters are TA." The chance of seeing TA in a name equals (number of TA pairs) / (number of consecutive pairs).
1. TATA NAGAR (letters TATANAGAR, 9 letters ⇒8 consecutive pairs):
TA, AT, TA, AN, NA, AG, GA, AR.
"TA" occurs twice, so P(A∣E1)=82=41.
2. CALCUTTA (letters CALCUTTA, 8 letters ⇒7 consecutive pairs):
CA, AL, LC, CU, UT, TT, TA.
"TA" occurs once, so P(A∣E2)=71.
3. Bayes' theorem. …
Method: Bayes' theorem with counting-based likelihoods
Use this for "which source is more likely given an observed clue" problems where the likelihood of the clue must be obtained by counting how it can appear in each source.
Steps
Step 1: Assign priors
With no reason to prefer either source, take equal priors, e.g. P(source1)=P(source2)=21.
Step 2: Get each likelihood by counting
The chance of seeing the clue in a given name is …
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Counting single letters instead of the pair
Why it's wrong: the clue is the consecutive pair "TA", so counting how many T's or A's appear is irrelevant. Correct approach: scan adjacent letter-pairs and count matches of the whole pair.
Mistake 2: Miscounting the number of consecutive pairs
Why it's wrong: a 9-letter name has 8 adjacent pairs and an 8-letter name has 7; using the letter count instead skews every likelihood. Correct approach: use (length −1) pairs per name. …
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 on this concept.
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.70% of the total employees of a factory are men. Among the employees of that factory, 30% of men and 15% of women are technical assistants. If an employee chosen at random is found to be a technical assistant, then the probability that this employee is a man is (A) 239 (B) 173 (C) 1714 (D) 2314
›Reveal solutionSolution
A direct Bayes'/total-probability computation using a convenient total of 100 employees. The answer is 1714.
Concept and Intuition
We want P(man∣technical assistant). Since we're given the proportion of men and women, and what fraction of each group are technical assistants, the cleanest approach is to work with actual counts (out of a convenient total like 100) rather than abstract probabilities — it avoids fraction juggling.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Assume 100 employees: Men =70, Women =30.
- Technical assistants among men: 30% of 70=21.
- Technical assistants among women: 15% of 30=4.5.
- Total technical assistants =21+4.5=25.5.
- P(man∣TA)=25.521=255210=5142=1714. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-25-FN1 markMCQQ.One ticket is selected at random from 50 tickets numbered 00,01,02,…49. The probability that sum of the digits is 10, given that product of the digits is 9 is (A) 109 (B) 41 (C) 21 (D) 252
›Reveal solutionSolution
Only two tickets (19 and 33) have digit-product 9, and only one of them (19) also has digit-sum 10, giving conditional probability 1/2.
Concept and Intuition
Conditional probability P(sum=10∣product=9) restricts attention entirely to the tickets satisfying the "given" condition (product =9), then asks what fraction of those also satisfy the target condition (sum =10).
Step-by-Step Solution
- List all two-digit combinations (d1,d2) with d1∈{0,1,2,3,4} (tens digit, since tickets run 00–49) and d2∈{0,…,9} (units digit) whose product is 9:
- d1=1,d2=9: ticket 19.
- d1=3,d2=3: ticket 33.
- No other integer pairs with d1≤4 give product 9.
- So the "product = 9" event has exactly 2 tickets: {19,33}.
- Check digit sums: 19→1+9=10 ✓; 33→3+3=6 ✗.
- Only 1 out of these 2 tickets also has digit-sum 10. …
- List all two-digit combinations (d1,d2) with d1∈{0,1,2,3,4} (tens digit, since tickets run 00–49) and d2∈{0,…,9} (units digit) whose product is 9:
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-AN1 markMCQQ.A box contains n coins, m of which are fair and the rest are biased. When a biased coin is tossed, the probability of getting a head is twice as likely as tail. A coin is drawn from the box at random and is tossed twice. It is found that first time it shows head and the second time it shows tail. Then the probability that the coin drawn is fair is (A) 8n+m7m (B) 8n+m9m (C) 8m+n7m (D) 8m+n9m
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a Bayes'-theorem problem; computing the likelihoods for fair vs. biased coins and combining with the prior m/n gives 8n+m9m.
Concept and Intuition
Bayes' theorem updates our belief about which "type" of coin was drawn, given the observed outcome (head then tail), by weighing each type's prior probability by how likely it was to produce that exact outcome.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Fair coin: P(H)=P(T)=21, so P(HT∣fair)=21⋅21=41.
- Biased coin: head is twice as likely as tail, so P(H)=32,P(T)=31; P(HT∣biased)=32⋅31=92.
- Priors: P(fair)=nm, P(biased)=nn−m. …
- AP EAPCET 2026Set eng-2026-05-15-AN1 markMCQQ.If it is known that a woman has two children and she has at least one girl child, the probability that the woman has both girl children is (A) 41 (B) 31 (C) 32 (D) 21
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a classic conditional-probability trap: conditioning on "at least one girl" (not "the elder/first child is a girl") leaves 3 equally likely outcomes, of which 1 is both-girls, giving 31.
Concept and Intuition
With two children, birth order matters for counting equally likely outcomes: BB,BG,GB,GG, each with probability 1/4. The event "at least one girl" is a set of outcomes, not a statement about a specific (e.g. first) child, so it correctly removes only BB and keeps three outcomes, not two. This distinguishes it from the simpler (and different) question "given the elder child is a girl," which would leave only {GB,GG} and give probability 1/2.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Sample space (ordered by birth, say elder-younger): {BB,BG,GB,GG}, each with probability 41.
- Event E = "at least one girl" = {BG,GB,GG}, so P(E)=43. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-21-FN1 markMCQQ.A person is known to speak the truth in 3 out of 4 occasions. If he throws a die and reports that it is six, then the probability that it is actually six is (A) 83 (B) 72 (C) 91 (D) 54
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem problem: combine the prior P(six)=1/6 with the witness's reliability 3/4 to get the posterior probability it's actually six, given he reports six. The answer is 3/8.
Concept and Intuition
Before he speaks, the die has P(six)=1/6. His report is evidence, but he isn't perfectly reliable (truthful 3/4 of the time). Bayes' theorem updates the prior probability using how likely the report "six" is under each of the two possibilities (six actually occurred vs. it didn't).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let E1 = the die actually shows six, E2 = it doesn't. P(E1)=61, P(E2)=65.
- Let A = he reports "six". If E1 occurred, he reports six truthfully with probability 43: P(A∣E1)=43.
- If E2 occurred, he reports "six" only if he lies, with probability 41: P(A∣E2)=41.
- By Bayes' theorem:
P(E1∣A)=P(A∣E1)P(E1)+P(A∣E2)P(E2)P(A∣E1)P(E1).
- Numerator: 43⋅61=243=81.
- Denominator's second term: 41⋅65=245.
- Sum =243+245=248=31. …
- AP EAPCET 2024Set eng-2024-05-18-FN1 markMCQQ.The probability that a person goes to college by car is 51; by bus 52 and by train is 53 respectively. The probabilities that he reaches the college late if he takes car, bus, train are 72,74 and 71 respectively. If he reaches the college in time, the probability that he travelled by car is (A) 296 (B) 2924 (C) 295 (D) 2923
›Reveal solutionSolution
Bayes' theorem: weight each mode's "on-time" probability by its usage probability, then take the car-share of the total.
Concept and Intuition
This is a direct application of Bayes' theorem / total probability: to find P(cause∣effect), build the denominator as the weighted sum over every possible cause of reaching the observed effect (here, arriving on time), then take the numerator's share of it.
Step-by-Step Solution
- On-time probabilities per mode: car 1−72=75; bus 1−74=73; train 1−71=76.
- Total on-time probability: P(ontime)=51⋅75+52⋅73+53⋅76=355+356+3518=3529.
- Joint probability of taking the car AND being on time: 51⋅75=355. …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-22-AN1 markMCQQ.There are three families F1,F2,F3. F1 has 2 boys and 1 girl; F2 has 1 boy and 2 girls; F3 has 1 boy and 1 girl. A family is randomly chosen and a child is chosen from that family randomly. If it is known that the child thus selected is a girl, then the probability that she is from F2 is (A) 94 (B) 92 (C) 73 (D) 75
›Reveal solutionSolution
Applying Bayes' theorem across the three equally-likely families gives P(F2∣girl)=94.
Concept and Intuition
This is a textbook application of Bayes' theorem: we're given the reverse conditional probabilities (family → probability of picking a girl) and asked for the forward one (girl picked → probability she's from a specific family).
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior: P(F1)=P(F2)=P(F3)=31.
- P(girl∣F1)=31 (1 girl out of 3 children), P(girl∣F2)=32, P(girl∣F3)=21.
- Total probability: P(girl)=31⋅31+31⋅32+31⋅21=31(31+32+21)=31⋅62+4+3=31⋅69=21
- P(F2∩girl)=31⋅32=92. …
- AP EAPCET 2022Set eng-2022-07-07-FN1 markMCQQ.In a toy factory, the machines A, B and C are used to manufacture 30%, 40% and 30% of the output, respectively. The probabilities of toys made by machines A, B, and C to be defective are respectively 2%, 3% and 1%. A toy is taken from the factory and is found to be defective. The probability that it was manufactured by the machine B is (A) 4/5 (B) 2/9 (C) 3/4 (D) 4/7
›Reveal solutionSolution
This tests Bayes' theorem for finding the probability of a specific cause given an observed
effect (a defective toy); the answer is 4/7.
Concept and Intuition
When an outcome (a defective toy) could have come from several sources, each with its own prior
probability and its own conditional probability of producing that outcome, Bayes' theorem lets us
"invert" the conditioning: given that the outcome occurred, what's the probability it came from a
particular source? The key is to first find the total probability of the outcome by summing over
all sources (the law of total probability), then take the one source's contribution as a fraction of
that total.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Prior probabilities: P(A)=0.3, P(B)=0.4, P(C)=0.3.
- Conditional defect rates: P(D∣A)=0.02, P(D∣B)=0.03, P(D∣C)=0.01.
- Total probability of a defective toy (law of total probability):
P(D)=P(A)P(D∣A)+P(B)P(D∣B)+P(C)P(D∣C)=0.3(0.02)+0.4(0.03)+0.3(0.01)
=0.006+0.012+0.003=0.021.
- By Bayes' theorem: …
- AP EAPCET 2025Set eng-2025-05-26-AN1 markMCQQ.A family consists of 8 persons. If 4 persons are chosen at random and they are found to be 2 men and 2 women, then the probability that there are equal number of men and women in that family is (A) 51 (B) 73 (C) 52 (D) 72
›Reveal solutionSolution
This is a Bayes'-theorem problem: given the observed sample (2 men, 2 women out of 4 drawn), find the posterior probability that the family itself is evenly split (4 men, 4 women), by weighting each possible family composition's likelihood of producing that sample.
Concept and Intuition
Before drawing, we don't know how many of the 8 family members are men — call it k (k can range from 0 to 8, but only k=2,3,4,5,6 can possibly yield a sample of 2 men and 2 women out of 4 drawn, since we need at least 2 men and at least 2 women in the family). Treating each feasible value of k as equally likely a priori, Bayes' theorem says: P(k=4∣observed 2M,2W)=∑kP(observed∣k)P(observed∣k=4), since the priors cancel when they're equal.
Step-by-Step Solution
- For a family with k men and 8−k women, the probability of drawing exactly 2 men and 2 women in a sample of 4 (hypergeometric) is proportional to (2k)(28−k) (the (48) denominator is common to all k and cancels in the ratio).
- Only k=2,3,4,5,6 give a nonzero value (need k≥2 and 8−k≥2).
- Compute L(k)=(2k)(28−k) for each:
- k=2: (22)(26)=1×15=15
- k=3: (23)(25)=3×10=30
- k=4: (24)(24)=6×6=36
- k=5: (25)(23)=10×3=30
- k=6: (26)(22)=15×1=15
- Sum of likelihoods =15+30+36+30+15=126. …
- AP EAPCET 2023Set eng-2023-05-17-AN1 markMCQQ.In a test a student either guesses or copies or knows the answer to answer a multiple choice question with four choices. The probability that he makes a guess is 1/3 and the probability that he copies the answer is 1/6. The probability that his answer is correct, given that he copied it is 1/8. The probability that he knew the answer to the question, given that he answered it correctly is (A) 2429 (B) 2922 (C) 2924 (D) 2923
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem problem with three mutually exclusive causes (guess/copy/know) for a correct answer. Answer: 24/29.
Concept and Intuition
This is a textbook application of Bayes' theorem: we're given the prior probabilities of three exhaustive, mutually exclusive ways of answering (guessing, copying, knowing) along with the conditional probability of being correct under each, and asked to reverse the conditioning — find the probability the student knew the answer, GIVEN that they got it right.
Step-by-Step Solution
- The three ways of answering are exhaustive: P(know)=1−P(guess)−P(copy)=1−31−61=1−21=21.
- Conditional correctness probabilities: P(C∣guess)=41 (one of four choices), P(C∣copy)=81 (given), P(C∣know)=1.
- Total probability of being correct: P(C)=31⋅41+61⋅81+21⋅1=121+481+21. …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-23-AN1 markMCQQ.2 aero planes I and II bond a target in succession. The probabilities of I and II scoring a hit correctly is 0.3 and 0.2 respectively. The second plane will bomb only if first misses the target. The probability that the target is hit by the 2nd plane is (A) 0.06 (B) 0.14 (C) 0.32 (D) 0.7
›Reveal solutionSolution
The 2nd plane gets a chance only after the 1st fails, so P=0.7×0.2=0.14. Answer: (B).
Concept and Intuition
This is a sequential (conditional) experiment: the second trial happens only when the first fails. The event 'the target is hit by the 2nd plane' is therefore a compound event —
{I misses}∩{II hits}
and because the two planes' performances are independent, the probability of the intersection is the product of the probabilities.
A useful picture is a probability tree:
┌── I hits (0.3) ────────────────► target hit by plane I (0.3) Start ───┤ └── I misses (0.7) ─┬── II hits (0.2) ──► hit by plane II (0.7 × 0.2 = 0.14) └── II misses (0.8) ► target not hit (0.7 × 0.8 = 0.56)The three leaves sum to 0.3+0.14+0.56=1 ✓ — a good check that the model is complete.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Let H1 = plane I hits, with P(H1)=0.3, so P(H1)=1−0.3=0.7.
- Let H2 = plane II hits (given it bombs), with P(H2)=0.2.
- Plane II bombs only if plane I missed. Hence
P(target hit by 2nd plane)=P(H1∩H2)=P(H1)P(H2)
- Substitute: =0.7×0.2=0.14 …
- AP EAPCET 2021Set eng-2021-08-24-AN1 markMCQQ.A man is known to speak truth 7 out of 10 times. After throwing a die with 100 faces marked 1,2,3,…,100 on its faces, the man reports that he got a prime number on the die. What is the probability that it is actually a prime? (A) 165 (B) 167 (C) 1611 (D) 1610
›Reveal solutionSolution
A classic Bayes'-theorem "truth-telling" problem: combining the base rate of primes among 1–100 with the man's truthfulness gives P(actually prime∣reports prime)=167.
Concept and Intuition
Even though the man is more likely to tell the truth than lie, the base rate of the event matters. Since primes are a minority (25 out of 100), a "prime" report is diluted by false reports from the much larger non-prime set.
Step-by-Step Solution
- Number of primes from 1 to 100 is 25 (2, 3, 5, ..., 97), so P(prime)=10025=41, and P(not prime)=43.
- He speaks truth with probability 107: P(reports prime∣prime)=107, and (lying) P(reports prime∣not prime)=103. …
🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days
- ✓Full step-by-step solutions
- ✓Concept-first explanations
- ✓Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
- ✓PYQ mapping + timed mock tests
Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.