Skip to content
Question

Q.Assertion (A) : The pentaacetate of glucose does not react with H2N−OHH_2N-OH. Reason (R) : It indicates the presence of free −CHO-CHO group in glucose. (A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A). (C) Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. (D) Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2026MCQ· 1mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Glucose forms a cyclic hemiacetal, so its aldehyde group is locked in a ring and not free. The pentaacetate of glucose has all five –OH groups acetylated, but the ring remains closed — no free –CHO exists to react with hydroxylamine. Hence Assertion is true, Reason is false. The correct option is (C).

Glucose is famously a reducing sugar — it reduces Tollens’ reagent, Fehling’s solution, and so on. That reducing behaviour comes from its aldehyde group. But here’s the twist: in solution, glucose exists almost entirely as a cyclic hemiacetal (a six-membered pyranose ring). The aldehyde group is not free; it’s tied up in the ring as a hemiacetal linkage. The open-chain aldehyde form is present only in trace amounts (about 0.02% at equilibrium). Yet glucose still behaves as a reducing sugar because the ring can open to regenerate the aldehyde under the reaction conditions.

Now, the pentaacetate of glucose is made by acetylating all five –OH groups of glucose. That locks the ring structure completely. The ring cannot open because the anomeric –OH (the one at C1) is now acetylated — there’s no free –OH to participate in ring-opening. So the aldehyde group is permanently trapped in the cyclic form. Hydroxylamine (H2N−OHH_2N-OH) reacts with free carbonyl groups (aldehydes and ketones) to form oximes. Since no free –CHO exists in the pentaacetate, no reaction occurs. That makes Assertion (A) true.

Reason (R) claims that this non-reactivity indicates the presence of a free –CHO group in glucose. That’s backwards. The non-reactivity of the pentaacetate actually shows that the –CHO group is not free in the cyclic form — it’s masked. The free –CHO is present only in the open-chain form, which is a tiny fraction. So Reason (R) is false.

Let’s walk through the logic step by step.

  1. Glucose cyclizes to a hemiacetal.

    The –CHO group at C1 reacts with the –OH at C5 to form a six-membered ring (pyranose). The C1 carbon becomes a chiral centre (the anomeric carbon) and the oxygen of the original –CHO is now part of a C–O–C linkage. No free aldehyde remains in the cyclic form.

  2. Acetylation of glucose gives the pentaacetate.

    All five –OH groups (including the anomeric –OH at C1) are converted to acetate esters. The ring stays intact. The anomeric acetate is not a hemiacetal — it’s a full acetal (specifically a glycosidic bond analogue). Acetals do not equilibrate with the open-chain aldehyde under mild conditions.

  3. Hydroxylamine reacts only with free carbonyls. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.