Skip to content
unlabeled · Q2

Q.Two imaginary situations (caste-based tea service; age/gender bias in TV newsreaders) — do they involve fundamental rights violation?

CBSENCERTSubjectiveImportance★★★★★est
86% · 18/21 Questions
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The caste-based tea-service situation is a clear violation of the Right to Equality, directly tied

to the constitutional abolition of untouchability. The TV-newsreader situation likely also involves

a Fundamental Rights issue -- discrimination on grounds of age or gender in employment -- but would

need to be examined to rule out a genuine, non-discriminatory professional requirement before being

confirmed as a clear violation.

If a person from a Dalit or other caste group is served tea in a separate cup, made to sit apart, or

otherwise treated differently purely because of their caste, this is a direct instance of caste-based

discrimination and untouchability-linked treatment -- exactly what Article 17 (abolition of

untouchability) and Article 15 (prohibition of discrimination on grounds of caste) are meant to

prevent. This would clearly involve a Fundamental Rights violation.

The television-newsreader situation is a genuine Fundamental Rights question too, but requires more

care. If older newsreaders, or newsreaders of one gender, are systematically removed or denied roles

purely because of their age or sex, with no genuine job-related justification, this raises a real

equality concern under Articles 15-16 (though Article 16's public-employment protection applies most

directly to state employment, and private broadcasters raise a slightly different legal question). …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.